Weekend batch
Avijeet is a Senior Research Analyst at Simplilearn. Passionate about Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning, Avijeet is also interested in politics, cricket, and football.
Free eBook: Top Programming Languages For A Data Scientist
Normality Test in Minitab: Minitab with Statistics
Machine Learning Career Guide: A Playbook to Becoming a Machine Learning Engineer
Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips
Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz
Falsifiability of a hypothesis.
Hypotheses examples.
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.
Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."
A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.
In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:
The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.
Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen.
In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.
Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.
In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment do not support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.
In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."
In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."
So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:
Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.
To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:
In the scientific method , falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.
Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that if something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.
One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.
A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.
Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.
For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.
These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.
One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.
Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.
Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.
To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.
The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:
A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the dependent variable if you change the independent variable .
The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."
Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.
Descriptive research such as case studies , naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.
Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a correlational study can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.
Experimental methods are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).
Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually cause another to change.
The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.
Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses . R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607
Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:]. Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z
Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004
Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ? PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies . Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Hypothesis Testing - Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Lisa Sullivan, PhD
Professor of Biostatistics
Boston University School of Public Health
This module will continue the discussion of hypothesis testing, where a specific statement or hypothesis is generated about a population parameter, and sample statistics are used to assess the likelihood that the hypothesis is true. The hypothesis is based on available information and the investigator's belief about the population parameters. The specific test considered here is called analysis of variance (ANOVA) and is a test of hypothesis that is appropriate to compare means of a continuous variable in two or more independent comparison groups. For example, in some clinical trials there are more than two comparison groups. In a clinical trial to evaluate a new medication for asthma, investigators might compare an experimental medication to a placebo and to a standard treatment (i.e., a medication currently being used). In an observational study such as the Framingham Heart Study, it might be of interest to compare mean blood pressure or mean cholesterol levels in persons who are underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese.
The technique to test for a difference in more than two independent means is an extension of the two independent samples procedure discussed previously which applies when there are exactly two independent comparison groups. The ANOVA technique applies when there are two or more than two independent groups. The ANOVA procedure is used to compare the means of the comparison groups and is conducted using the same five step approach used in the scenarios discussed in previous sections. Because there are more than two groups, however, the computation of the test statistic is more involved. The test statistic must take into account the sample sizes, sample means and sample standard deviations in each of the comparison groups.
If one is examining the means observed among, say three groups, it might be tempting to perform three separate group to group comparisons, but this approach is incorrect because each of these comparisons fails to take into account the total data, and it increases the likelihood of incorrectly concluding that there are statistically significate differences, since each comparison adds to the probability of a type I error. Analysis of variance avoids these problemss by asking a more global question, i.e., whether there are significant differences among the groups, without addressing differences between any two groups in particular (although there are additional tests that can do this if the analysis of variance indicates that there are differences among the groups).
The fundamental strategy of ANOVA is to systematically examine variability within groups being compared and also examine variability among the groups being compared.
After completing this module, the student will be able to:
Consider an example with four independent groups and a continuous outcome measure. The independent groups might be defined by a particular characteristic of the participants such as BMI (e.g., underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese) or by the investigator (e.g., randomizing participants to one of four competing treatments, call them A, B, C and D). Suppose that the outcome is systolic blood pressure, and we wish to test whether there is a statistically significant difference in mean systolic blood pressures among the four groups. The sample data are organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
| n | n | n | n |
|
|
|
|
|
| s | s | s | s |
The hypotheses of interest in an ANOVA are as follows:
where k = the number of independent comparison groups.
In this example, the hypotheses are:
The null hypothesis in ANOVA is always that there is no difference in means. The research or alternative hypothesis is always that the means are not all equal and is usually written in words rather than in mathematical symbols. The research hypothesis captures any difference in means and includes, for example, the situation where all four means are unequal, where one is different from the other three, where two are different, and so on. The alternative hypothesis, as shown above, capture all possible situations other than equality of all means specified in the null hypothesis.
The test statistic for testing H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 = ... = μ k is:
and the critical value is found in a table of probability values for the F distribution with (degrees of freedom) df 1 = k-1, df 2 =N-k. The table can be found in "Other Resources" on the left side of the pages.
NOTE: The test statistic F assumes equal variability in the k populations (i.e., the population variances are equal, or s 1 2 = s 2 2 = ... = s k 2 ). This means that the outcome is equally variable in each of the comparison populations. This assumption is the same as that assumed for appropriate use of the test statistic to test equality of two independent means. It is possible to assess the likelihood that the assumption of equal variances is true and the test can be conducted in most statistical computing packages. If the variability in the k comparison groups is not similar, then alternative techniques must be used.
The F statistic is computed by taking the ratio of what is called the "between treatment" variability to the "residual or error" variability. This is where the name of the procedure originates. In analysis of variance we are testing for a difference in means (H 0 : means are all equal versus H 1 : means are not all equal) by evaluating variability in the data. The numerator captures between treatment variability (i.e., differences among the sample means) and the denominator contains an estimate of the variability in the outcome. The test statistic is a measure that allows us to assess whether the differences among the sample means (numerator) are more than would be expected by chance if the null hypothesis is true. Recall in the two independent sample test, the test statistic was computed by taking the ratio of the difference in sample means (numerator) to the variability in the outcome (estimated by Sp).
The decision rule for the F test in ANOVA is set up in a similar way to decision rules we established for t tests. The decision rule again depends on the level of significance and the degrees of freedom. The F statistic has two degrees of freedom. These are denoted df 1 and df 2 , and called the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom, respectively. The degrees of freedom are defined as follows:
df 1 = k-1 and df 2 =N-k,
where k is the number of comparison groups and N is the total number of observations in the analysis. If the null hypothesis is true, the between treatment variation (numerator) will not exceed the residual or error variation (denominator) and the F statistic will small. If the null hypothesis is false, then the F statistic will be large. The rejection region for the F test is always in the upper (right-hand) tail of the distribution as shown below.
Rejection Region for F Test with a =0.05, df 1 =3 and df 2 =36 (k=4, N=40)
For the scenario depicted here, the decision rule is: Reject H 0 if F > 2.87.
We will next illustrate the ANOVA procedure using the five step approach. Because the computation of the test statistic is involved, the computations are often organized in an ANOVA table. The ANOVA table breaks down the components of variation in the data into variation between treatments and error or residual variation. Statistical computing packages also produce ANOVA tables as part of their standard output for ANOVA, and the ANOVA table is set up as follows:
Source of Variation | Sums of Squares (SS) | Degrees of Freedom (df) | Mean Squares (MS) | F |
---|---|---|---|---|
Between Treatments |
| k-1 |
|
|
Error (or Residual) |
| N-k |
| |
Total |
| N-1 |
where
The ANOVA table above is organized as follows.
and is computed by summing the squared differences between each treatment (or group) mean and the overall mean. The squared differences are weighted by the sample sizes per group (n j ). The error sums of squares is:
and is computed by summing the squared differences between each observation and its group mean (i.e., the squared differences between each observation in group 1 and the group 1 mean, the squared differences between each observation in group 2 and the group 2 mean, and so on). The double summation ( SS ) indicates summation of the squared differences within each treatment and then summation of these totals across treatments to produce a single value. (This will be illustrated in the following examples). The total sums of squares is:
and is computed by summing the squared differences between each observation and the overall sample mean. In an ANOVA, data are organized by comparison or treatment groups. If all of the data were pooled into a single sample, SST would reflect the numerator of the sample variance computed on the pooled or total sample. SST does not figure into the F statistic directly. However, SST = SSB + SSE, thus if two sums of squares are known, the third can be computed from the other two.
A clinical trial is run to compare weight loss programs and participants are randomly assigned to one of the comparison programs and are counseled on the details of the assigned program. Participants follow the assigned program for 8 weeks. The outcome of interest is weight loss, defined as the difference in weight measured at the start of the study (baseline) and weight measured at the end of the study (8 weeks), measured in pounds.
Three popular weight loss programs are considered. The first is a low calorie diet. The second is a low fat diet and the third is a low carbohydrate diet. For comparison purposes, a fourth group is considered as a control group. Participants in the fourth group are told that they are participating in a study of healthy behaviors with weight loss only one component of interest. The control group is included here to assess the placebo effect (i.e., weight loss due to simply participating in the study). A total of twenty patients agree to participate in the study and are randomly assigned to one of the four diet groups. Weights are measured at baseline and patients are counseled on the proper implementation of the assigned diet (with the exception of the control group). After 8 weeks, each patient's weight is again measured and the difference in weights is computed by subtracting the 8 week weight from the baseline weight. Positive differences indicate weight losses and negative differences indicate weight gains. For interpretation purposes, we refer to the differences in weights as weight losses and the observed weight losses are shown below.
Low Calorie | Low Fat | Low Carbohydrate | Control |
---|---|---|---|
8 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
9 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
6 | 3 | 4 | -1 |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Is there a statistically significant difference in the mean weight loss among the four diets? We will run the ANOVA using the five-step approach.
H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 = μ 3 = μ 4 H 1 : Means are not all equal α=0.05
The test statistic is the F statistic for ANOVA, F=MSB/MSE.
The appropriate critical value can be found in a table of probabilities for the F distribution(see "Other Resources"). In order to determine the critical value of F we need degrees of freedom, df 1 =k-1 and df 2 =N-k. In this example, df 1 =k-1=4-1=3 and df 2 =N-k=20-4=16. The critical value is 3.24 and the decision rule is as follows: Reject H 0 if F > 3.24.
To organize our computations we complete the ANOVA table. In order to compute the sums of squares we must first compute the sample means for each group and the overall mean based on the total sample.
| Low Calorie | Low Fat | Low Carbohydrate | Control |
---|---|---|---|---|
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Group mean | 6.6 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 1.2 |
We can now compute
So, in this case:
Next we compute,
SSE requires computing the squared differences between each observation and its group mean. We will compute SSE in parts. For the participants in the low calorie diet:
| 6.6 |
|
---|---|---|
8 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
9 | 2.4 | 5.8 |
6 | -0.6 | 0.4 |
7 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
3 | -3.6 | 13.0 |
Totals | 0 | 21.4 |
For the participants in the low fat diet:
| 3.0 |
|
---|---|---|
2 | -1.0 | 1.0 |
4 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
5 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
1 | -2.0 | 4.0 |
Totals | 0 | 10.0 |
For the participants in the low carbohydrate diet:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
3 | -0.4 | 0.2 |
5 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
4 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
2 | -1.4 | 2.0 |
3 | -0.4 | 0.2 |
Totals | 0 | 5.4 |
For the participants in the control group:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
2 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
2 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
-1 | -2.2 | 4.8 |
0 | -1.2 | 1.4 |
3 | 1.8 | 3.2 |
Totals | 0 | 10.6 |
We can now construct the ANOVA table .
Source of Variation | Sums of Squares (SS) | Degrees of Freedom (df) | Means Squares (MS) | F |
---|---|---|---|---|
Between Treatmenst | 75.8 | 4-1=3 | 75.8/3=25.3 | 25.3/3.0=8.43 |
Error (or Residual) | 47.4 | 20-4=16 | 47.4/16=3.0 | |
Total | 123.2 | 20-1=19 |
We reject H 0 because 8.43 > 3.24. We have statistically significant evidence at α=0.05 to show that there is a difference in mean weight loss among the four diets.
ANOVA is a test that provides a global assessment of a statistical difference in more than two independent means. In this example, we find that there is a statistically significant difference in mean weight loss among the four diets considered. In addition to reporting the results of the statistical test of hypothesis (i.e., that there is a statistically significant difference in mean weight losses at α=0.05), investigators should also report the observed sample means to facilitate interpretation of the results. In this example, participants in the low calorie diet lost an average of 6.6 pounds over 8 weeks, as compared to 3.0 and 3.4 pounds in the low fat and low carbohydrate groups, respectively. Participants in the control group lost an average of 1.2 pounds which could be called the placebo effect because these participants were not participating in an active arm of the trial specifically targeted for weight loss. Are the observed weight losses clinically meaningful?
Calcium is an essential mineral that regulates the heart, is important for blood clotting and for building healthy bones. The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends a daily calcium intake of 1000-1200 mg/day for adult men and women. While calcium is contained in some foods, most adults do not get enough calcium in their diets and take supplements. Unfortunately some of the supplements have side effects such as gastric distress, making them difficult for some patients to take on a regular basis.
A study is designed to test whether there is a difference in mean daily calcium intake in adults with normal bone density, adults with osteopenia (a low bone density which may lead to osteoporosis) and adults with osteoporosis. Adults 60 years of age with normal bone density, osteopenia and osteoporosis are selected at random from hospital records and invited to participate in the study. Each participant's daily calcium intake is measured based on reported food intake and supplements. The data are shown below.
|
|
|
---|---|---|
1200 | 1000 | 890 |
1000 | 1100 | 650 |
980 | 700 | 1100 |
900 | 800 | 900 |
750 | 500 | 400 |
800 | 700 | 350 |
Is there a statistically significant difference in mean calcium intake in patients with normal bone density as compared to patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis? We will run the ANOVA using the five-step approach.
H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 = μ 3 H 1 : Means are not all equal α=0.05
In order to determine the critical value of F we need degrees of freedom, df 1 =k-1 and df 2 =N-k. In this example, df 1 =k-1=3-1=2 and df 2 =N-k=18-3=15. The critical value is 3.68 and the decision rule is as follows: Reject H 0 if F > 3.68.
To organize our computations we will complete the ANOVA table. In order to compute the sums of squares we must first compute the sample means for each group and the overall mean.
Normal Bone Density |
|
|
---|---|---|
n =6 | n =6 | n =6 |
|
|
|
If we pool all N=18 observations, the overall mean is 817.8.
We can now compute:
Substituting:
SSE requires computing the squared differences between each observation and its group mean. We will compute SSE in parts. For the participants with normal bone density:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
1200 | 261.6667 | 68,486.9 |
1000 | 61.6667 | 3,806.9 |
980 | 41.6667 | 1,738.9 |
900 | -38.3333 | 1,466.9 |
750 | -188.333 | 35,456.9 |
800 | -138.333 | 19,126.9 |
Total | 0 | 130,083.3 |
For participants with osteopenia:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
1000 | 200 | 40,000 |
1100 | 300 | 90,000 |
700 | -100 | 10,000 |
800 | 0 | 0 |
500 | -300 | 90,000 |
700 | -100 | 10,000 |
Total | 0 | 240,000 |
For participants with osteoporosis:
|
|
|
---|---|---|
890 | 175 | 30,625 |
650 | -65 | 4,225 |
1100 | 385 | 148,225 |
900 | 185 | 34,225 |
400 | -315 | 99,225 |
350 | -365 | 133,225 |
Total | 0 | 449,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Between Treatments | 152,477.7 | 2 | 76,238.6 | 1.395 |
Error or Residual | 819,833.3 | 15 | 54,655.5 | |
Total | 972,311.0 | 17 |
We do not reject H 0 because 1.395 < 3.68. We do not have statistically significant evidence at a =0.05 to show that there is a difference in mean calcium intake in patients with normal bone density as compared to osteopenia and osterporosis. Are the differences in mean calcium intake clinically meaningful? If so, what might account for the lack of statistical significance?
The video below by Mike Marin demonstrates how to perform analysis of variance in R. It also covers some other statistical issues, but the initial part of the video will be useful to you.
The ANOVA tests described above are called one-factor ANOVAs. There is one treatment or grouping factor with k > 2 levels and we wish to compare the means across the different categories of this factor. The factor might represent different diets, different classifications of risk for disease (e.g., osteoporosis), different medical treatments, different age groups, or different racial/ethnic groups. There are situations where it may be of interest to compare means of a continuous outcome across two or more factors. For example, suppose a clinical trial is designed to compare five different treatments for joint pain in patients with osteoarthritis. Investigators might also hypothesize that there are differences in the outcome by sex. This is an example of a two-factor ANOVA where the factors are treatment (with 5 levels) and sex (with 2 levels). In the two-factor ANOVA, investigators can assess whether there are differences in means due to the treatment, by sex or whether there is a difference in outcomes by the combination or interaction of treatment and sex. Higher order ANOVAs are conducted in the same way as one-factor ANOVAs presented here and the computations are again organized in ANOVA tables with more rows to distinguish the different sources of variation (e.g., between treatments, between men and women). The following example illustrates the approach.
Consider the clinical trial outlined above in which three competing treatments for joint pain are compared in terms of their mean time to pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis. Because investigators hypothesize that there may be a difference in time to pain relief in men versus women, they randomly assign 15 participating men to one of the three competing treatments and randomly assign 15 participating women to one of the three competing treatments (i.e., stratified randomization). Participating men and women do not know to which treatment they are assigned. They are instructed to take the assigned medication when they experience joint pain and to record the time, in minutes, until the pain subsides. The data (times to pain relief) are shown below and are organized by the assigned treatment and sex of the participant.
Table of Time to Pain Relief by Treatment and Sex
|
|
|
---|---|---|
| 12 | 21 |
15 | 19 | |
16 | 18 | |
17 | 24 | |
14 | 25 | |
| 14 | 21 |
17 | 20 | |
19 | 23 | |
20 | 27 | |
17 | 25 | |
| 25 | 37 |
27 | 34 | |
29 | 36 | |
24 | 26 | |
22 | 29 |
The analysis in two-factor ANOVA is similar to that illustrated above for one-factor ANOVA. The computations are again organized in an ANOVA table, but the total variation is partitioned into that due to the main effect of treatment, the main effect of sex and the interaction effect. The results of the analysis are shown below (and were generated with a statistical computing package - here we focus on interpretation).
ANOVA Table for Two-Factor ANOVA
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 967.0 | 5 | 193.4 | 20.7 | 0.0001 |
Treatment | 651.5 | 2 | 325.7 | 34.8 | 0.0001 |
Sex | 313.6 | 1 | 313.6 | 33.5 | 0.0001 |
Treatment * Sex | 1.9 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9054 |
Error or Residual | 224.4 | 24 | 9.4 | ||
Total | 1191.4 | 29 |
There are 4 statistical tests in the ANOVA table above. The first test is an overall test to assess whether there is a difference among the 6 cell means (cells are defined by treatment and sex). The F statistic is 20.7 and is highly statistically significant with p=0.0001. When the overall test is significant, focus then turns to the factors that may be driving the significance (in this example, treatment, sex or the interaction between the two). The next three statistical tests assess the significance of the main effect of treatment, the main effect of sex and the interaction effect. In this example, there is a highly significant main effect of treatment (p=0.0001) and a highly significant main effect of sex (p=0.0001). The interaction between the two does not reach statistical significance (p=0.91). The table below contains the mean times to pain relief in each of the treatments for men and women (Note that each sample mean is computed on the 5 observations measured under that experimental condition).
Mean Time to Pain Relief by Treatment and Gender
|
|
|
---|---|---|
A | 14.8 | 21.4 |
B | 17.4 | 23.2 |
C | 25.4 | 32.4 |
Treatment A appears to be the most efficacious treatment for both men and women. The mean times to relief are lower in Treatment A for both men and women and highest in Treatment C for both men and women. Across all treatments, women report longer times to pain relief (See below).
Notice that there is the same pattern of time to pain relief across treatments in both men and women (treatment effect). There is also a sex effect - specifically, time to pain relief is longer in women in every treatment.
Suppose that the same clinical trial is replicated in a second clinical site and the following data are observed.
Table - Time to Pain Relief by Treatment and Sex - Clinical Site 2
|
|
|
---|---|---|
| 22 | 21 |
25 | 19 | |
26 | 18 | |
27 | 24 | |
24 | 25 | |
| 14 | 21 |
17 | 20 | |
19 | 23 | |
20 | 27 | |
17 | 25 | |
| 15 | 37 |
17 | 34 | |
19 | 36 | |
14 | 26 | |
12 | 29 |
The ANOVA table for the data measured in clinical site 2 is shown below.
Table - Summary of Two-Factor ANOVA - Clinical Site 2
Source of Variation | Sums of Squares (SS) | Degrees of freedom (df) | Mean Squares (MS) | F | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 907.0 | 5 | 181.4 | 19.4 | 0.0001 |
Treatment | 71.5 | 2 | 35.7 | 3.8 | 0.0362 |
Sex | 313.6 | 1 | 313.6 | 33.5 | 0.0001 |
Treatment * Sex | 521.9 | 2 | 260.9 | 27.9 | 0.0001 |
Error or Residual | 224.4 | 24 | 9.4 | ||
Total | 1131.4 | 29 |
Notice that the overall test is significant (F=19.4, p=0.0001), there is a significant treatment effect, sex effect and a highly significant interaction effect. The table below contains the mean times to relief in each of the treatments for men and women.
Table - Mean Time to Pain Relief by Treatment and Gender - Clinical Site 2
|
|
|
---|---|---|
| 24.8 | 21.4 |
| 17.4 | 23.2 |
| 15.4 | 32.4 |
Notice that now the differences in mean time to pain relief among the treatments depend on sex. Among men, the mean time to pain relief is highest in Treatment A and lowest in Treatment C. Among women, the reverse is true. This is an interaction effect (see below).
Notice above that the treatment effect varies depending on sex. Thus, we cannot summarize an overall treatment effect (in men, treatment C is best, in women, treatment A is best).
When interaction effects are present, some investigators do not examine main effects (i.e., do not test for treatment effect because the effect of treatment depends on sex). This issue is complex and is discussed in more detail in a later module.
The bottom line.
Hypothesis testing, sometimes called significance testing, is an act in statistics whereby an analyst tests an assumption regarding a population parameter. The methodology employed by the analyst depends on the nature of the data used and the reason for the analysis.
Hypothesis testing is used to assess the plausibility of a hypothesis by using sample data. Such data may come from a larger population or a data-generating process. The word "population" will be used for both of these cases in the following descriptions.
In hypothesis testing, an analyst tests a statistical sample, intending to provide evidence on the plausibility of the null hypothesis. Statistical analysts measure and examine a random sample of the population being analyzed. All analysts use a random population sample to test two different hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.
The null hypothesis is usually a hypothesis of equality between population parameters; e.g., a null hypothesis may state that the population mean return is equal to zero. The alternative hypothesis is effectively the opposite of a null hypothesis. Thus, they are mutually exclusive , and only one can be true. However, one of the two hypotheses will always be true.
The null hypothesis is a statement about a population parameter, such as the population mean, that is assumed to be true.
If an individual wants to test that a penny has exactly a 50% chance of landing on heads, the null hypothesis would be that 50% is correct, and the alternative hypothesis would be that 50% is not correct. Mathematically, the null hypothesis is represented as Ho: P = 0.5. The alternative hypothesis is shown as "Ha" and is identical to the null hypothesis, except with the equal sign struck-through, meaning that it does not equal 50%.
A random sample of 100 coin flips is taken, and the null hypothesis is tested. If it is found that the 100 coin flips were distributed as 40 heads and 60 tails, the analyst would assume that a penny does not have a 50% chance of landing on heads and would reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.
If there were 48 heads and 52 tails, then it is plausible that the coin could be fair and still produce such a result. In cases such as this where the null hypothesis is "accepted," the analyst states that the difference between the expected results (50 heads and 50 tails) and the observed results (48 heads and 52 tails) is "explainable by chance alone."
Some statisticians attribute the first hypothesis tests to satirical writer John Arbuthnot in 1710, who studied male and female births in England after observing that in nearly every year, male births exceeded female births by a slight proportion. Arbuthnot calculated that the probability of this happening by chance was small, and therefore it was due to “divine providence.”
Hypothesis testing helps assess the accuracy of new ideas or theories by testing them against data. This allows researchers to determine whether the evidence supports their hypothesis, helping to avoid false claims and conclusions. Hypothesis testing also provides a framework for decision-making based on data rather than personal opinions or biases. By relying on statistical analysis, hypothesis testing helps to reduce the effects of chance and confounding variables, providing a robust framework for making informed conclusions.
Hypothesis testing relies exclusively on data and doesn’t provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject being studied. Additionally, the accuracy of the results depends on the quality of the available data and the statistical methods used. Inaccurate data or inappropriate hypothesis formulation may lead to incorrect conclusions or failed tests. Hypothesis testing can also lead to errors, such as analysts either accepting or rejecting a null hypothesis when they shouldn’t have. These errors may result in false conclusions or missed opportunities to identify significant patterns or relationships in the data.
Hypothesis testing refers to a statistical process that helps researchers determine the reliability of a study. By using a well-formulated hypothesis and set of statistical tests, individuals or businesses can make inferences about the population that they are studying and draw conclusions based on the data presented. All hypothesis testing methods have the same four-step process, which includes stating the hypotheses, formulating an analysis plan, analyzing the sample data, and analyzing the result.
Sage. " Introduction to Hypothesis Testing ," Page 4.
Elder Research. " Who Invented the Null Hypothesis? "
Formplus. " Hypothesis Testing: Definition, Uses, Limitations and Examples ."
Hypothesis testing involves formulating assumptions about population parameters based on sample statistics and rigorously evaluating these assumptions against empirical evidence. This article sheds light on the significance of hypothesis testing and the critical steps involved in the process.
A hypothesis is an assumption or idea, specifically a statistical claim about an unknown population parameter. For example, a judge assumes a person is innocent and verifies this by reviewing evidence and hearing testimony before reaching a verdict.
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method that is used to make a statistical decision using experimental data. Hypothesis testing is basically an assumption that we make about a population parameter. It evaluates two mutually exclusive statements about a population to determine which statement is best supported by the sample data.
To test the validity of the claim or assumption about the population parameter:
Example: You say an average height in the class is 30 or a boy is taller than a girl. All of these is an assumption that we are assuming, and we need some statistical way to prove these. We need some mathematical conclusion whatever we are assuming is true.
Hypothesis testing is an important procedure in statistics. Hypothesis testing evaluates two mutually exclusive population statements to determine which statement is most supported by sample data. When we say that the findings are statistically significant, thanks to hypothesis testing.
One tailed test focuses on one direction, either greater than or less than a specified value. We use a one-tailed test when there is a clear directional expectation based on prior knowledge or theory. The critical region is located on only one side of the distribution curve. If the sample falls into this critical region, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
There are two types of one-tailed test:
A two-tailed test considers both directions, greater than and less than a specified value.We use a two-tailed test when there is no specific directional expectation, and want to detect any significant difference.
Example: H 0 : [Tex]\mu = [/Tex] 50 and H 1 : [Tex]\mu \neq 50 [/Tex]
To delve deeper into differences into both types of test: Refer to link
In hypothesis testing, Type I and Type II errors are two possible errors that researchers can make when drawing conclusions about a population based on a sample of data. These errors are associated with the decisions made regarding the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis is True | Null Hypothesis is False | |
---|---|---|
Null Hypothesis is True (Accept) | Correct Decision | Type II Error (False Negative) |
Alternative Hypothesis is True (Reject) | Type I Error (False Positive) | Correct Decision |
Step 1: define null and alternative hypothesis.
State the null hypothesis ( [Tex]H_0 [/Tex] ), representing no effect, and the alternative hypothesis ( [Tex]H_1 [/Tex] ), suggesting an effect or difference.
We first identify the problem about which we want to make an assumption keeping in mind that our assumption should be contradictory to one another, assuming Normally distributed data.
Select a significance level ( [Tex]\alpha [/Tex] ), typically 0.05, to determine the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. It provides validity to our hypothesis test, ensuring that we have sufficient data to back up our claims. Usually, we determine our significance level beforehand of the test. The p-value is the criterion used to calculate our significance value.
Gather relevant data through observation or experimentation. Analyze the data using appropriate statistical methods to obtain a test statistic.
The data for the tests are evaluated in this step we look for various scores based on the characteristics of data. The choice of the test statistic depends on the type of hypothesis test being conducted.
There are various hypothesis tests, each appropriate for various goal to calculate our test. This could be a Z-test , Chi-square , T-test , and so on.
We have a smaller dataset, So, T-test is more appropriate to test our hypothesis.
T-statistic is a measure of the difference between the means of two groups relative to the variability within each group. It is calculated as the difference between the sample means divided by the standard error of the difference. It is also known as the t-value or t-score.
In this stage, we decide where we should accept the null hypothesis or reject the null hypothesis. There are two ways to decide where we should accept or reject the null hypothesis.
Comparing the test statistic and tabulated critical value we have,
Note: Critical values are predetermined threshold values that are used to make a decision in hypothesis testing. To determine critical values for hypothesis testing, we typically refer to a statistical distribution table , such as the normal distribution or t-distribution tables based on.
We can also come to an conclusion using the p-value,
Note : The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one observed in the sample, assuming the null hypothesis is true. To determine p-value for hypothesis testing, we typically refer to a statistical distribution table , such as the normal distribution or t-distribution tables based on.
At last, we can conclude our experiment using method A or B.
To validate our hypothesis about a population parameter we use statistical functions . We use the z-score, p-value, and level of significance(alpha) to make evidence for our hypothesis for normally distributed data .
When population means and standard deviations are known.
[Tex]z = \frac{\bar{x} – \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/Tex]
T test is used when n<30,
t-statistic calculation is given by:
[Tex]t=\frac{x̄-μ}{s/\sqrt{n}} [/Tex]
Chi-Square Test for Independence categorical Data (Non-normally distributed) using:
[Tex]\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_{ij} – E_{ij})^2}{E_{ij}}[/Tex]
Let’s examine hypothesis testing using two real life situations,
Imagine a pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug that they believe can effectively lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Before bringing the drug to market, they need to conduct a study to assess its impact on blood pressure.
Let’s consider the Significance level at 0.05, indicating rejection of the null hypothesis.
If the evidence suggests less than a 5% chance of observing the results due to random variation.
Using paired T-test analyze the data to obtain a test statistic and a p-value.
The test statistic (e.g., T-statistic) is calculated based on the differences between blood pressure measurements before and after treatment.
t = m/(s/√n)
then, m= -3.9, s= 1.8 and n= 10
we, calculate the , T-statistic = -9 based on the formula for paired t test
The calculated t-statistic is -9 and degrees of freedom df = 9, you can find the p-value using statistical software or a t-distribution table.
thus, p-value = 8.538051223166285e-06
Step 5: Result
Conclusion: Since the p-value (8.538051223166285e-06) is less than the significance level (0.05), the researchers reject the null hypothesis. There is statistically significant evidence that the average blood pressure before and after treatment with the new drug is different.
Let’s create hypothesis testing with python, where we are testing whether a new drug affects blood pressure. For this example, we will use a paired T-test. We’ll use the scipy.stats library for the T-test.
Scipy is a mathematical library in Python that is mostly used for mathematical equations and computations.
We will implement our first real life problem via python,
import numpy as np from scipy import stats # Data before_treatment = np . array ([ 120 , 122 , 118 , 130 , 125 , 128 , 115 , 121 , 123 , 119 ]) after_treatment = np . array ([ 115 , 120 , 112 , 128 , 122 , 125 , 110 , 117 , 119 , 114 ]) # Step 1: Null and Alternate Hypotheses # Null Hypothesis: The new drug has no effect on blood pressure. # Alternate Hypothesis: The new drug has an effect on blood pressure. null_hypothesis = "The new drug has no effect on blood pressure." alternate_hypothesis = "The new drug has an effect on blood pressure." # Step 2: Significance Level alpha = 0.05 # Step 3: Paired T-test t_statistic , p_value = stats . ttest_rel ( after_treatment , before_treatment ) # Step 4: Calculate T-statistic manually m = np . mean ( after_treatment - before_treatment ) s = np . std ( after_treatment - before_treatment , ddof = 1 ) # using ddof=1 for sample standard deviation n = len ( before_treatment ) t_statistic_manual = m / ( s / np . sqrt ( n )) # Step 5: Decision if p_value <= alpha : decision = "Reject" else : decision = "Fail to reject" # Conclusion if decision == "Reject" : conclusion = "There is statistically significant evidence that the average blood pressure before and after treatment with the new drug is different." else : conclusion = "There is insufficient evidence to claim a significant difference in average blood pressure before and after treatment with the new drug." # Display results print ( "T-statistic (from scipy):" , t_statistic ) print ( "P-value (from scipy):" , p_value ) print ( "T-statistic (calculated manually):" , t_statistic_manual ) print ( f "Decision: { decision } the null hypothesis at alpha= { alpha } ." ) print ( "Conclusion:" , conclusion )
T-statistic (from scipy): -9.0 P-value (from scipy): 8.538051223166285e-06 T-statistic (calculated manually): -9.0 Decision: Reject the null hypothesis at alpha=0.05. Conclusion: There is statistically significant evidence that the average blood pressure before and after treatment with the new drug is different.
In the above example, given the T-statistic of approximately -9 and an extremely small p-value, the results indicate a strong case to reject the null hypothesis at a significance level of 0.05.
Data: A sample of 25 individuals is taken, and their cholesterol levels are measured.
Cholesterol Levels (mg/dL): 205, 198, 210, 190, 215, 205, 200, 192, 198, 205, 198, 202, 208, 200, 205, 198, 205, 210, 192, 205, 198, 205, 210, 192, 205.
Populations Mean = 200
Population Standard Deviation (σ): 5 mg/dL(given for this problem)
As the direction of deviation is not given , we assume a two-tailed test, and based on a normal distribution table, the critical values for a significance level of 0.05 (two-tailed) can be calculated through the z-table and are approximately -1.96 and 1.96.
The test statistic is calculated by using the z formula Z = [Tex](203.8 – 200) / (5 \div \sqrt{25}) [/Tex] and we get accordingly , Z =2.039999999999992.
Step 4: Result
Since the absolute value of the test statistic (2.04) is greater than the critical value (1.96), we reject the null hypothesis. And conclude that, there is statistically significant evidence that the average cholesterol level in the population is different from 200 mg/dL
import scipy.stats as stats import math import numpy as np # Given data sample_data = np . array ( [ 205 , 198 , 210 , 190 , 215 , 205 , 200 , 192 , 198 , 205 , 198 , 202 , 208 , 200 , 205 , 198 , 205 , 210 , 192 , 205 , 198 , 205 , 210 , 192 , 205 ]) population_std_dev = 5 population_mean = 200 sample_size = len ( sample_data ) # Step 1: Define the Hypotheses # Null Hypothesis (H0): The average cholesterol level in a population is 200 mg/dL. # Alternate Hypothesis (H1): The average cholesterol level in a population is different from 200 mg/dL. # Step 2: Define the Significance Level alpha = 0.05 # Two-tailed test # Critical values for a significance level of 0.05 (two-tailed) critical_value_left = stats . norm . ppf ( alpha / 2 ) critical_value_right = - critical_value_left # Step 3: Compute the test statistic sample_mean = sample_data . mean () z_score = ( sample_mean - population_mean ) / \ ( population_std_dev / math . sqrt ( sample_size )) # Step 4: Result # Check if the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical values if abs ( z_score ) > max ( abs ( critical_value_left ), abs ( critical_value_right )): print ( "Reject the null hypothesis." ) print ( "There is statistically significant evidence that the average cholesterol level in the population is different from 200 mg/dL." ) else : print ( "Fail to reject the null hypothesis." ) print ( "There is not enough evidence to conclude that the average cholesterol level in the population is different from 200 mg/dL." )
Reject the null hypothesis. There is statistically significant evidence that the average cholesterol level in the population is different from 200 mg/dL.
Hypothesis testing stands as a cornerstone in statistical analysis, enabling data scientists to navigate uncertainties and draw credible inferences from sample data. By systematically defining null and alternative hypotheses, choosing significance levels, and leveraging statistical tests, researchers can assess the validity of their assumptions. The article also elucidates the critical distinction between Type I and Type II errors, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced decision-making process inherent in hypothesis testing. The real-life example of testing a new drug’s effect on blood pressure using a paired T-test showcases the practical application of these principles, underscoring the importance of statistical rigor in data-driven decision-making.
1. what are the 3 types of hypothesis test.
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed. Right-tailed tests assess if a parameter is greater, left-tailed if lesser. Two-tailed tests check for non-directional differences, greater or lesser.
Null Hypothesis ( [Tex]H_o [/Tex] ): No effect or difference exists. Alternative Hypothesis ( [Tex]H_1 [/Tex] ): An effect or difference exists. Significance Level ( [Tex]\alpha [/Tex] ): Risk of rejecting null hypothesis when it’s true (Type I error). Test Statistic: Numerical value representing observed evidence against null hypothesis.
Statistical method to evaluate the performance and validity of machine learning models. Tests specific hypotheses about model behavior, like whether features influence predictions or if a model generalizes well to unseen data.
Pytest purposes general testing framework for Python code while Hypothesis is a Property-based testing framework for Python, focusing on generating test cases based on specified properties of the code.
Similar reads.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Nature Astronomy ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
Various landforms suggest the past presence of liquid water on the surface of Mars. The putative coastal landforms, outflow channels and the hemisphere-wide Vastitas Borealis Formation sediments indicate that the northern lowlands may have housed an ancient ocean. Challenges to this hypothesis are from topography analysis, mineral formation environment and climate modelling. Determining whether there was a northern ocean on Mars is crucial for understanding its climate history, geological processes and potential for ancient life, and for guiding future explorations. Recently, China’s Zhurong rover has identified marine sedimentary structures and multiple subsurface sedimentary layers. The unique in situ perspective of the Zhurong rover, along with previous orbital observations, provides strong support for an episodic northern ocean during the early Hesperian and early Amazonian (about 3.6–2.5 billion years ago). The ground truth from future sample-return missions, such as China’s Tianwen-3 or the Mars sample-return programmes by NASA, ESA and other agencies, will be required for a more unambiguous confirmation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
111,21 € per year
only 9,27 € per issue
Buy this article
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The Tianwen-1 data used in this work are processed and produced by Ground Research and Application System (GRAS) of China’s Lunar and Planetary Exploration Program, provided by China National Space Administration ( http://moon.bao.ac.cn ). The HiRISE data are available in the NASA Planetary Data System ( pds.jpl.nasa.gov ). The CTX global mosaic is accessible at http://murray-lab.caltech.edu/CTX/ . The MOLA data are available at https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/map/mars_mgs_mola_dem_463m .
Hartmann, W. K. & Neukum, G. Cratering chronology and the evolution of Mars. Space Sci. Rev. 96 , 165–194 (2001).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B., Kasting, J. F., Richardson, S. M. & Poliakoff, K. The case for a wet, warm climate on early Mars. Icarus 71 , 203–224 (1987).
Squyres, S. W. & Kasting, J. F. Early Mars: how warm and how wet?. Science 265 , 744–749 (1994).
Fassett, C. I. & Head, J. W. The timing of Martian valley network activity: constraints from buffered crater counting. Icarus 195 , 61–89 (2008).
Hynek, B. M., Beach, M. & Hoke, M. R. T. Updated global map of Martian valley networks and implications for climate and hydrologic processes. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 115 , 2009JE003548 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Duran, S. & Coulthard, T. J. The Kasei Valles, Mars: a unified record of episodic channel flows and ancient ocean levels. Sci. Rep. 10 , 18571 (2020).
Warner, N., Gupta, S., Muller, J.-P., Kim, J.-R. & Lin, S.-Y. A refined chronology of catastrophic outflow events in Ares Vallis, Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 288 , 58–69 (2009).
Bahia, R. S., Covey-Crump, S., Jones, M. A. & Mitchell, N. Discordance analysis on a high-resolution valley network map of Mars: assessing the effects of scale on the conformity of valley orientation and surface slope direction. Icarus 383 , 115041 (2022).
Carr, M. H. Formation of Martian flood features by release of water from confined aquifers. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 84 , 2995–3007 (1979).
Craddock, R. A. & Howard, A. D. The case for rainfall on a warm, wet early Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 107 , 21-1–21-36 (2002).
Fairén, A. G. et al. Episodic flood inundations of the northern plains of Mars. Icarus 165 , 53–67 (2003).
Carr, M. H. & Head, J. W. Oceans on Mars: an assessment of the observational evidence and possible fate. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 108 , 2002JE001963 (2003).
Clifford, S., & Parker, T. J. The evolution of the Martian hydrosphere: implications for the fate of a primordial ocean and the current state of the northern plains. Icarus 154 , 40–79 (2001).
Dickeson, Z. I. & Davis, J. M. Martian oceans. Astron. Geophys. 61 , 3.11–3.17 (2020).
Palumbo, A. M. & Head, J. W. Oceans on Mars: the possibility of a Noachian groundwater-fed ocean in a sub-freezing Martian climate. Icarus 331 , 209–225 (2019).
Parker, T. J., Stephen Saunders, R. & Schneeberger, D. M. Transitional morphology in West Deuteronilus Mensae, Mars: implications for modification of the lowland/upland boundary. Icarus 82 , 111–145 (1989).
Parker, T. J., Gorsline, D. S., Saunders, R. S., Pieri, D. C. & Schneeberger, D. M. Coastal geomorphology of the Martian northern plains. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 98 , 11061–11078 (1993).
Citron, R. I., Manga, M. & Hemingway, D. J. Timing of oceans on Mars from shoreline deformation. Nature 555 , 643–646 (2018).
Head, J. et al. Two oceans on Mars? History, problems and prospects. In 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstr. 2083 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2018).
Ivanov, M. A., Erkeling, G., Hiesinger, H., Bernhardt, H. & Reiss, D. Topography of the Deuteronilus contact on Mars: evidence for an ancient water/mud ocean and long-wavelength topographic readjustments. Planet. Space Sci. 144 , 49–70 (2017).
Parker, T. J., Grant, J. A. & Franklin, B. J. Lakes on Mars Ch. 9 (Elsevier, 2010).
Costard, F. et al. Modeling tsunami propagation and the emplacement of thumbprint terrain in an early Mars ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122 , 633–649 (2017).
Rodriguez, J. A. P. et al. Tsunami waves extensively resurfaced the shorelines of an early Martian ocean. Sci. Rep. 6 , 25106 (2016).
Di Achille, G. & Hynek, B. M. Ancient ocean on Mars supported by global distribution of deltas and valleys. Nat. Geosci. 3 , 459–463 (2010).
Duran, S., Coulthard, T. J. & Baynes, E. R. C. Knickpoints in Martian channels indicate past ocean levels. Sci. Rep. 9 , 15153 (2019).
Webb, V. E. Putative shorelines in northern Arabia Terra, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 109 , 2003JE002205 (2004).
Sholes, S. F., Dickeson, Z. I., Montgomery, D. R. & Catling, D. C. Where are Mars’ hypothesized ocean shorelines? Large lateral and topographic offsets between different versions of paleoshoreline maps. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126 , e2020JE006486 (2021).
Salvatore, M. R. & Christensen, P. R. On the origin of the Vastitas Borealis Formation in Chryse and Acidalia planitiae, Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 119 , 2437–2456 (2014).
Malin, M. C. & Edgett, K. S. Oceans or seas in the Martian northern lowlands: high resolution imaging tests of proposed coastlines. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 , 3049–3052 (1999).
Di Pietro, I., Séjourné, A., Costard, F., Ciążela, M. & Rodriguez, J. A. P. Evidence of mud volcanism due to the rapid compaction of Martian tsunami deposits in southeastern Acidalia Planitia, Mars. Icarus 354 , 114096 (2021).
Rodriguez, J. A. P. et al. Evidence of an oceanic impact and megatsunami sedimentation in Chryse Planitia, Mars. Sci. Rep. 12 , 19589 (2022).
Tanaka, K. L., Skinner, J. A. & Hare, T. M. Geologic Map of the Northern Plains of Mars: Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2888 (USGS, 2005).
Costard, F. et al. The Lomonosov Crater impact event: a possible mega‐tsunami source on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124 , 1840–1851 (2019).
Iijima, Y., Goto, K., Minoura, K., Komatsu, G. & Imamura, F. Hydrodynamics of impact-induced tsunami over the Martian ocean. Planet. Space Sci. 95 , 33–44 (2014).
Dohm, J. M., Fink, W., Williams, J.-P., Mahaney, W. C. & Ferris, J. C. Chicxulub-like Gale impact into an ocean/land interface on Mars: an explanation for the formation of Mount Sharp. Icarus 390 , 115306 (2023).
Turbet, M. & Forget, F. The paradoxes of the Late Hesperian Mars ocean. Sci. Rep. 9 , 5717 (2019).
Leverington, D. W. A volcanic origin for the outflow channels of Mars: key evidence and major implications. Geomorphology 132 , 51–75 (2011).
Mouginot, J., Pommerol, A., Beck, P., Kofman, W. & Clifford, S. M. Dielectric map of the Martian northern hemisphere and the nature of plain filling materials. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 , 2011GL050286 (2012).
Salvatore, M. R. & Christensen, P. R. Evidence for widespread aqueous sedimentation in the northern plains of Mars. Geology 42 , 423–426 (2014).
Huang, H. et al. The analysis of cones within the Tianwen-1 landing area. Remote Sens. 14 , 2590 (2022).
Oehler, D. Z. & Allen, C. C. Evidence for pervasive mud volcanism in Acidalia Planitia, Mars. Icarus 208 , 636–657 (2010).
Skinner, J. A. & Tanaka, K. L. Evidence for and implications of sedimentary diapirism and mud volcanism in the southern Utopia highland–lowland boundary plain, Mars. Icarus 186 , 41–59 (2007).
Wang, L., Zhao, J., Huang, J. & Xiao, L. An explosive mud volcano origin for the pitted cones in southern Utopia Planitia, Mars. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66 , 2045–2056 (2023).
Cuřín, V., Brož, P., Hauber, E. & Markonis, Y. Mud flows in southwestern Utopia Planitia, Mars. Icarus 389 , 115266 (2023).
Hiesinger, H. & Head, J. W. Characteristics and origin of polygonal terrain in southern Utopia Planitia, Mars: results from Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter and Mars Orbiter Camera data. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 105 , 11999–12022 (2000).
Buczkowski, D. L., Seelos, K. D. & Cooke, M. L. Giant polygons and circular graben in western Utopia basin, Mars: exploring possible formation mechanisms. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117 , 2011JE003934 (2012).
Ivanov, M. A., Hiesinger, H., Erkeling, G. & Reiss, D. Mud volcanism and morphology of impact craters in Utopia Planitia on Mars: evidence for the ancient ocean. Icarus 228 , 121–140 (2014).
Ghent, R. R., Anderson, S. W. & Pithawala, T. M. The formation of small cones in Isidis Planitia, Mars through mobilization of pyroclastic surge deposits. Icarus 217 , 169–183 (2012).
Wilson, S. A., Morgan, A. M., Howard, A. D. & Grant, J. A. The global distribution of craters with alluvial fans and deltas on Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 , e2020GL091653 (2021).
DiBiase, R. A., Limaye, A. B., Scheingross, J. S., Fischer, W. W. & Lamb, M. P. Deltaic deposits at Aeolis Dorsa: sedimentary evidence for a standing body of water on the northern plains of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118 , 1285–1302 (2013).
Fawdon, P. et al. The Hypanis Valles Delta: the last highstand of a sea on early Mars? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 500 , 225–241 (2018).
Cardenas, B. T. & Lamb, M. P. Paleogeographic reconstructions of an ocean margin on mars based on deltaic sedimentology at Aeolis Dorsa. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 127 , e2022JE007390 (2022).
Rivera‐Hernández, F. & Palucis, M. C. Do deltas along the crustal dichotomy boundary of Mars in the Gale Crater region record a northern ocean? Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 , 8689–8699 (2019).
De Toffoli, B., Plesa, A.-C., Hauber, E. & Breuer, D. Delta deposits on Mars: a global perspective. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 , e2021GL094271 (2021).
Head, J. W. et al. Possible ancient oceans on Mars: evidence from Mars orbiter laser altimeter data. Science 286 , 2134–2137 (1999).
Perron, J. T., Mitrovica, J. X., Manga, M., Matsuyama, I. & Richards, M. A. Evidence for an ancient Martian ocean in the topography of deformed shorelines. Nature 447 , 840–843 (2007).
Baum, M., Sholes, S. & Hwang, A. Impact craters and the observability of ancient Martian shorelines. Icarus 387 , 115178 (2022).
Sholes, S. F. & Rivera-Hernández, F. Constraints on the uncertainty, timing, and magnitude of potential Mars oceans from topographic deformation models. Icarus 378 , 114934 (2022).
Kreslavsky, M. A. & Head, J. W. Fate of outflow channel effluents in the northern lowlands of Mars: the Vastitas Borealis Formation as a sublimation residue from frozen ponded bodies of water. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 107 , 4-1–4-25 (2002).
Leone, G. The absence of an ocean and the fate of water all over the Martian history. Earth Space Sci. 7 , e2019EA001031 (2020).
Seybold, H. J., Kite, E. & Kirchner, J. W. Branching geometry of valley networks on Mars and Earth and its implications for early Martian climate. Sci. Adv. 4 , eaar6692 (2018).
Shi, Y., Zhao, J., Xiao, L., Yang, Y. & Wang, J. An arid-semiarid climate during the Noachian–Hesperian transition in the Huygens region, Mars: evidence from morphological studies of valley networks. Icarus 373 , 114789 (2022).
Ehlmann, B. L. et al. Subsurface water and clay mineral formation during the early history of Mars. Nature 479 , 53–60 (2011).
Elwood Madden, M. E., Bodnar, R. J. & Rimstidt, J. D. Jarosite as an indicator of water-limited chemical weathering on Mars. Nature 431 , 821–823 (2004).
Bandfield, J. L. Global mineral distributions on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 107 , 9-1–9-20 (2002).
Bibring, J.-P. et al. Global mineralogical and aqueous mars history derived from OMEGA/Mars express data. Science 312 , 400–404 (2006).
Hamilton, V. E. & Christensen, P. R. Evidence for extensive, olivine-rich bedrock on Mars. Geology 33 , 433–436 (2005).
Wordsworth, R. D. The climate of early Mars. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44 , 381–408 (2016).
Ramirez, R. M. & Craddock, R. A. The geological and climatological case for a warmer and wetter early Mars. Nat. Geosci. 11 , 230–237 (2018).
Halevy, I. & Head Iii, J. W. Episodic warming of early Mars by punctuated volcanism. Nat. Geosci. 7 , 865–868 (2014).
Wordsworth, R. et al. Global modelling of the early Martian climate under a denser CO 2 atmosphere: water cycle and ice evolution. Icarus 222 , 1–19 (2013).
Forget, F. et al. 3D modelling of the early Martian climate under a denser CO 2 atmosphere: temperatures and CO 2 ice clouds. Icarus 222 , 81–99 (2013).
Fairén, A. G. A cold and wet Mars. Icarus 208 , 165–175 (2010).
Schmidt, F. et al. Circumpolar ocean stability on Mars 3 Gy ago. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 , e2112930118 (2022).
Irwin, R. P., Howard, A. D., Craddock, R. A. & Moore, J. M. An intense terminal epoch of widespread fluvial activity on early Mars: 2. Increased runoff and paleolake development. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 110 , 2005JE002460 (2005).
Palumbo, A. M. & Head, J. W. Early Mars climate history: characterizing a ‘warm and wet’ Martian climate with a 3‐D global climate model and testing geological predictions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 , 10249–10258 (2018).
Wordsworth, R. D., Kerber, L., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Forget, F. & Head, J. W. Comparison of ‘warm and wet’ and ‘cold and icy’ scenarios for early Mars in a 3‐D climate model. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 120 , 1201–1219 (2015).
Kamada, A., Kuroda, T., Kasaba, Y., Terada, N. & Nakagawa, H. Global climate and river transport simulations of early Mars around the Noachian and Hesperian boundary. Icarus 368 , 114618 (2021).
Christensen, P. R., Bandfield, J. L., Smith, M. D., Hamilton, V. E. & Clark, R. N. Identification of a basaltic component on the Martian surface from Thermal Emission Spectrometer data. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 105 , 9609–9621 (2000).
Edwards, C. S. & Ehlmann, B. L. Carbon sequestration on Mars. Geology 43 , 863–866 (2015).
Fairén, A. G., Fernández-Remolar, D., Dohm, J. M., Baker, V. R. & Amils, R. Inhibition of carbonate synthesis in acidic oceans on early Mars. Nature 431 , 423–426 (2004).
Jakosky, B. M., Pepin, R. O., Johnson, R. E. & Fox, J. L. Mars atmospheric loss and isotopic fractionation by solar-wind-induced sputtering and photochemical escape. Icarus 111 , 271–288 (1994).
Head, J. W., Kreslavsky, M. A. & Pratt, S. Northern lowlands of Mars: evidence for widespread volcanic flooding and tectonic deformation in the Hesperian Period. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 107 , 3-1–3-29 (2002).
Zhao, J. et al. Geological characteristics and targets of high scientific interest in the Zhurong landing region on Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 , e2021GL094903 (2021).
Liu, J. et al. Geomorphic contexts and science focus of the Zhurong landing site on Mars. Nat. Astron. 6 , 65–71 (2021).
Xiao, L. et al. Evidence for marine sedimentary rocks in Utopia Planitia: Zhurong rover observations. Natl Sci. Rev. 10 , nwad137 (2023).
Yang, J.-F. et al. Design and ground verification for multispectral camera on the Mars Tianwen-1 rover. Space Sci. Rev. 218 , 19 (2022).
Li, C. et al. Layered subsurface in Utopia Basin of Mars revealed by Zhurong rover radar. Nature 610 , 308–312 (2022).
Zhou, B. et al. The Mars rover subsurface penetrating radar onboard China’s Mars 2020 mission. Earth Planet. Phys. 4 , 345–354 (2020).
Hobiger, M. et al. The shallow structure of Mars at the InSight landing site from inversion of ambient vibrations. Nat. Commun. 12 , 6756 (2021).
Ruff, S. W. & Christensen, P. R. Bright and dark regions on Mars: particle size and mineralogical characteristics based on Thermal Emission Spectrometer data. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 107 , 2-1–2-22 (2002).
Mazzini, A. & Etiope, G. Mud volcanism: an updated review. Earth Sci. Rev. 168 , 81–112 (2017).
Oehler, D. Z. & Allen, C. C. Giant polygons and mounds in the lowlands of Mars: signatures of an ancient ocean? Astrobiology 12 , 601–615 (2012).
Carr, M. H. The Surface of Mars Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
Tanaka, K. L. et al. Geologic Map of Mars: Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3292 (USGS, 2014).
Carr, M. H. & Head, J. W. Geologic history of Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294 , 185–203 (2010).
Hauber, E. et al. Asynchronous formation of Hesperian and Amazonian‐aged deltas on Mars and implications for climate. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118 , 1529–1544 (2013).
Liu, J. et al. A 76-m per pixel global color image dataset and map of Mars by Tianwen-1. Sci. Bull . 69 , 2183–2186 (2024).
Download references
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42273041). We thank L. Xiao and J. Zhao for the discussion on an Martian ancient northern ocean.
Authors and affiliations.
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Planetary Science Institute, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
Le Wang & Jun Huang
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
J.H. designed this research. J.H. and L.W. discussed and analysed the results and their implications. L.W. prepared the figures and wrote the manuscript with edits from J.H.
Correspondence to Jun Huang .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information.
Nature Astronomy thanks Rickbir Bahia and Frédéric Schmidt for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Wang, L., Huang, J. Hypothesis of an ancient northern ocean on Mars and insights from the Zhurong rover. Nat Astron (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02343-3
Download citation
Received : 16 April 2023
Accepted : 17 July 2024
Published : 27 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02343-3
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories. ... Hypothesis testing example In your analysis of the difference in average height between men and women, you find that the p-value ...
5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways. To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable. If a first-year student starts attending more lectures, then their exam scores will improve.
It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis. 7.
Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments and the collection and analysis of data. It is an essential element of the scientific method, as it allows researchers to make predictions about the outcome of their experiments and to test those predictions to determine their accuracy. Types of Hypothesis
Hypothesis testing is a crucial procedure to perform when you want to make inferences about a population using a random sample. These inferences include estimating population properties such as the mean, differences between means, proportions, and the relationships between variables. This post provides an overview of statistical hypothesis testing.
A hypothesis test consists of five steps: 1. State the hypotheses. State the null and alternative hypotheses. These two hypotheses need to be mutually exclusive, so if one is true then the other must be false. 2. Determine a significance level to use for the hypothesis. Decide on a significance level.
3. Simple hypothesis. A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, "Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking. 4.
Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways. To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable. If a first-year student starts attending more lectures, then their exam scores will improve.
Explore the intricacies of hypothesis testing, a cornerstone of statistical analysis. Dive into methods, interpretations, and applications for making data-driven decisions. In this Blog post we will learn: What is Hypothesis Testing? Steps in Hypothesis Testing 2.1. Set up Hypotheses: Null and Alternative 2.2. Choose a Significance Level (α) 2.3.
Photo from StepUp Analytics. Hypothesis testing is a method of statistical inference that considers the null hypothesis H₀ vs. the alternative hypothesis Ha, where we are typically looking to assess evidence against H₀. Such a test is used to compare data sets against one another, or compare a data set against some external standard. The former being a two sample test (independent or ...
1. Introduction to Hypothesis Testing - Definition and significance in research and data analysis. - Brief historical background. 2. Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing - Null and Alternative…
Hypothesis analysis is a widely known concept and is used extensively by researchers, statisticians and quantitative analysts. It allows them to follow a set of formal steps to perform calculated ...
A statistical hypothesis test may return a value called p or the p-value. This is a quantity that we can use to interpret or quantify the result of the test and either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This is done by comparing the p-value to a threshold value chosen beforehand called the significance level.
4. Photo by Anna Nekrashevich from Pexels. Hypothesis testing is a common statistical tool used in research and data science to support the certainty of findings. The aim of testing is to answer how probable an apparent effect is detected by chance given a random data sample. This article provides a detailed explanation of the key concepts in ...
Introduction to Hypotheses Tests. Hypothesis testing is a statistical tool used to make decisions based on data. It involves making assumptions about a population parameter and testing its validity using a population sample. Hypothesis tests help us draw conclusions and make informed decisions in various fields like business, research, and science.
In other words, a hypothesis test at the 0.05 level will virtually always fail to reject the null hypothesis if the 95% confidence interval contains the predicted value. A hypothesis test at the 0.05 level will nearly certainly reject the null hypothesis if the 95% confidence interval does not include the hypothesized parameter.
Null hypothesis: This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables. Alternative hypothesis: This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis. Statistical hypothesis: This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
4 Alternative hypothesis. An alternative hypothesis, abbreviated as H 1 or H A, is used in conjunction with a null hypothesis. It states the opposite of the null hypothesis, so that one and only one must be true. Examples: Plants grow better with bottled water than tap water. Professional psychics win the lottery more than other people. 5 ...
It is the total probability of achieving a value so rare and even rarer. It is the area under the normal curve beyond the P-Value mark. This P-Value is calculated using the Z score we just found. Each Z-score has a corresponding P-Value. This can be found using any statistical software like R or even from the Z-Table.
The hypothesis is based on available information and the investigator's belief about the population parameters. The specific test considered here is called analysis of variance (ANOVA) and is a test of hypothesis that is appropriate to compare means of a continuous variable in two or more independent comparison groups.
A statistical hypothesis test is a method of statistical inference used to decide whether the data sufficiently supports a particular hypothesis. A statistical hypothesis test typically involves a calculation of a test statistic. Then a decision is made, either by comparing the test statistic to a critical value or equivalently by evaluating a ...
Hypothesis testing is an act in statistics whereby an analyst tests an assumption regarding a population parameter. The methodology employed by the analyst depends on the nature of the data used ...
Hypothesis testing stands as a cornerstone in statistical analysis, enabling data scientists to navigate uncertainties and draw credible inferences from sample data. By systematically defining null and alternative hypotheses, choosing significance levels, and leveraging statistical tests, researchers can assess the validity of their assumptions.
Challenges to this hypothesis are from topography analysis, mineral formation environment and climate modelling. ... The analysis of cones within the Tianwen-1 landing area. Remote Sens. 14, 2590 ...
Trochleoplasty is a valid surgical procedure for the treatment of patellar instability in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia. It is usually combined with reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and, when indicated, other bony procedures, such as tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) and rotational osteotomies of the tibia or femur. 38,39 Even if the outcomes are good with a ...