hypothesis on solar energy

Research Projects
Publications
Future Energy Systems Center
Studies and reports
Seed Fund Program

Research Focus Areas

Carbon management
Electric power
Energy storage
Low-carbon fuels
Transportation
Undergraduate education
Graduate & postdoctoral
Online education
Education research
Current members
Energy Futures
In the media
Affiliations

The Future of Solar Energy

Read the report.

Executive summary (PDF) Full report (PDF)

The Future of Solar Energy considers only the two widely recognized classes of technologies for converting solar energy into electricity — photovoltaics (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP), sometimes called solar thermal) — in their current and plausible future forms. Because energy supply facilities typically last several decades, technologies in these classes will dominate solar-powered generation between now and 2050, and we do not attempt to look beyond that date. In contrast to some earlier Future of studies, we also present no forecasts — for two reasons. First, expanding the solar industry dramatically from its relatively tiny current scale may produce changes we do not pretend to be able to foresee today. Second, we recognize that future solar deployment will depend heavily on uncertain future market conditions and public policies — including but not limited to policies aimed at mitigating global climate change.

As in other studies in this series, our primary aim is to inform decision-makers in the developed world, particularly the United States. We concentrate on the use of grid-connected solar-powered generators to replace conventional sources of electricity. For the more than one billion people in the developing world who lack access to a reliable electric grid, the cost of small-scale PV generation is often outweighed by the very high value of access to electricity for lighting and charging mobile telephone and radio batteries. In addition, in some developing nations it may be economic to use solar generation to reduce reliance on imported oil, particularly if that oil must be moved by truck to remote generator sites. A companion working paper discusses both these valuable roles for solar energy in the developing world.

Research Areas

Related publications.

Shaping photovoltaic array output to align with changing wholesale electricity price profiles

Spatial and temporal variation in the value of solar power across United States electricity markets

Solar heating for residential and industrial processes

Related News

MIT Energy Initiative Director Robert Armstrong shares perspectives on past successes and ongoing and future energy projects at the Institute.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
Published: 03 June 2024

Evaluating community solar as a measure to promote equitable clean energy access

Eric O’Shaughnessy ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-0184 1 ,
Galen Barbose ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-2309 1 ,
Sudha Kannan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-8776 2 &
Jenny Sumner 2

Nature Energy volume 9 , pages 955–963 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1914 Accesses

3 Citations

27 Altmetric

Metrics details

Energy access
Social policy

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 June 2024

This article has been updated

Rooftop and community solar are alternative product classes for residential solar in the United States. Community solar, where multiple households buy solar from shared systems, could make solar more accessible by reducing initial costs and removing adoption barriers for renters and multifamily building occupants. Here we test whether community solar has expanded solar access in the United States. On the basis of a sample of 11 states, we find that community solar adopters are about 6.1 times more likely to live in multifamily buildings than rooftop solar adopters, 4.4 times more likely to rent and earn 23% less annual income. We do not find that community solar expands access in terms of race. These differences are driven, roughly evenly, by inherent differences between the two solar products and by policies to promote low-income community solar adoption. The results suggest that alternative solar products can expand solar access and that policy could augment such benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

111,21 € per year

only 9,27 € per issue

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink
Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Modeling the potential effects of rooftop solar on household energy burden in the United States

Increasing solar entitlement and decreasing energy vulnerability in a low-income community by adopting the Prosuming Project

Climate change will impact the value and optimal adoption of residential rooftop solar

Data availability.

This work was performed using proprietary, household-level data that cannot be shared. However, elements of the rooftop solar data are publicly available from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory at https://emp.lbl.gov/projects/solar-demographics-trends-and-analysis . Aggregated data are available in via Github at https://github.com/eoshaugh2/community_solar_access . The LIFT Solar Toolkit used in the imputed carve outs analysis ( Methods ) is publicly available at https://lift.groundswell.org/solar-projects/ .

Code availability

Code used in this analysis is available via Github at https://github.com/eoshaugh2/community_solar_access .

Change history

28 june 2024.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01586-8

Davis, M. et al. US Solar Market Insight: 2022 Year in Review (Wood Mackenzie, 2023).

Sunter, D., Castellanos, S. & Kammen, D. Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity. Nat. Sustain. 2 , 71–76 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Lukanov, B. & Krieger, E. Distributed solar and environmental justice: exploring the demographic and socio-economic trends of residential PV adoption in California. Energy Policy 134 , 110935 (2019).

Darghouth, N., O’Shaughnessy, E., Forrester, S. & Barbose, G. Characterizing local rooftop solar adoption inequity in the US. Environ. Res. Lett. 17 , 034028 (2022).

Forrester, S., Barbose, G., O’Shaughnessy, E., Darghouth, N. & Crespo Montañés, C. Residential Solar-Adopter Income and Demographic Trends: 2023 Update (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2023).

Carley, S. & Konisky, D. M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5 , 569–577 (2020).

Heeter, J., Sekar, A., Fekete, E., Shah, M. & Cook, J. J. Affordable and Accessible Solar for All: Barriers, Solutions, and On-Site Adoption Potential (NREL, 2021).

Attanasio, O. P. & Pistaferri, L. Consumption inequality. J. Econ. Perspect. 30 , 3–28 (2016).

Welton, S. & Eisen, J. Clean energy justice: charting an emerging agenda. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 43 , 307–371 (2019).

Google Scholar

Bidwell, D. & Sovacool, B. Uneasy tensions in energy justice and systems transformation. Nat. Energy 8 , 317–320 (2023).

Zhou, S., Gao, X., Wellstead, A. M. & Min Kim, D. Operationalizing social equity in public policy design: a comparative analysis of solar equity policies in the United States. Policy Stud. J. 51 , 741–772 (2023).

Drury, E. et al. The transformation of southern California’s residential photovoltaics market through third-party ownership. Energy Policy 42 , 681–690 (2012).

O’Shaughnessy, E., Barbose, G., Wiser, R., Forrester, S. & Darghouth, N. The impact of policies and business models on income equity in rooftop solar adoption. Nat. Energy 6 , 84–91 (2021).

Malhotra, R. Increasing access to solar for low-income households in multifamily affordable housing. In Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society National Conference (eds Ghosh, A. K. & Rixham, C.) 87–93. (Springer, 2022).

Goyette, K. L. Community solar policy and the low- and moderate-income customer. Nat. Res. Environ. 36 , 13–16 (2021).

Funkhouser, E., Blackburn, G., Magee, C. & Rai, V. Business model innovations for deploying distributed generation: the emerging landscape of community solar in the U.S. Energy Res. Social Sci. 10 , 90–101 (2015).

Hausman, N. How Community Solar can Benefit Low- and Moderate-Income Customers (World Resources Institute, 2022).

Heeter, J., Bird, L., O’Shaughnessy, E. & Koebrich, S. Design and Implementation of Community Solar Programs for Low- and Moderate-Income Customers (NREL, 2018).

Abbott, S., Tyson, M., Popkin, M. & Farthing, A. Community Solar+: How the Next Generation of Community Solar can Unlock New Value Streams and Help Communities Pursue Holistic Decarbonization (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2022).

Michaud, G. Perspectives on community solar policy adoption across the United States. Renew. Energy Focus 33 , 1–15 (2020).

Brown, M., Soni, A., Lapsa, M. V., Southworth, K. & Cox, M. High energy burden and low-income energy affordability: conclusions from a literature review. Progr. Energy 2 , 042003 (2020).

Haynes, B. Community Solar: Expanding Access and Safeguarding Low-Income Families (National Consumer Law Center, 2024).

Shared Renewables Policy Catalog (Interstate Renewable Energy Council, 2020).

Equitable Access to Community Solar: Program Design and Subscription Considerations (NREL, 2021).

Xu, K., Sumner, J., Dalecki, E. & Burton, R. Expanding Solar Access: State Community Solar Landscape (NREL, 2023).

Borenstein, S. & Davis, L. The distributional effects of U.S. clean energy tax credits. Tax Policy Econ. 30 , 191–234 (2016).

Chwastyk, D., Leader, J., Cramer, J. & Rolph, M. Community Solar Program Design Models (Smart Electric Power Alliance, 2018).

Gallucci, M. Energy equity: bringing solar power to low-income communities. YaleEnvironment360 https://e360.yale.edu/features/energy-equity-bringing-solar-power-to-low-income-communities (2019).

Lydersen, K. Bringing community solar to low-income customers is harder than it looks. Canary Media https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/solar/bringing-community-solar-to-low-income-customers-is-harder-than-it-looks (2023).

Connelly, C. U.S. Community Solar Market Outlook: 2023 (Wood Mackenzie, 2023).

O’Shaughnessy, E., Barbose, G., Wiser, R. & Forrester, S. Income-targeted marketing as a supply-side barrier to low-income solar adoption. iScience 24 , 103137 (2021).

Ramasamy, V. et al. U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System and Energy Storage Cost Benchmarks, with Minimum Sustainable Price Analysis: Q1 2023 (NREL, 2023).

Chan, G. et al. Sharing the Sun Community Solar Project data (December 2022). NREL Data Catalog. NREL https://data.nrel.gov/submissions/220 (2023).

Connelly, C. Demystifying LMI Incentives for Community Solar Projects (Wood Mackenzie, 2023).

DeLiema, M. & Witt, P. Profiling consumers who reported mass marketing scams: demographic characterizations and emotional sentiments associated with victimization. Secur. J. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-023-00401-5 (2023).

Khanna, K. et al. wru: who are you? Bayesian prediction of racial category using surname, first name, middle name, and geolocation. R package version 1.0.1. CRAN https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wru (2022).

Imai, K., Olivella, S. & Rosenman, E. T. R. Addressing census data problems in race imputation via fully Bayesian improved surname geocoding and name supplements. Sci. Adv. 8 , eadc9824 (2022).

O’Shaughnessy, E. Rooftop solar incentives remain effective for low- and moderate-income adoption. Energy Policy 163 , 112881 (2022).

Statewide distributed solar projects: beginning 2000. NYSERDA https://data.ny.gov/Energy-Environment/Statewide-Distributed-Solar-Projects-Beginning-200/wgsj-jt5f/about_data (2024).

LIFT Solar: solar projects. Groundswell https://lift.groundswell.org/ (2023).

Xu, K., Sumner, J., Burton, R. & Dalecki, E. State policies and programs for community solar. NREL Data Catalog. NREL https://data.nrel.gov/submissions/215 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office award number 38444 and contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231 (E.O. and G.B.). This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for DOE under contract number DE-AC36-08GO28308 (S.K. and J.S.). Funding was provided by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the US Government. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

Eric O’Shaughnessy & Galen Barbose

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

Sudha Kannan & Jenny Sumner

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.O. wrote the paper and led the analysis; G.B. conceived of the study, supported the analysis and co-led data acquisition; and S.K. and J.S. led data acquisition and supported the analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric O’Shaughnessy .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Energy thanks Michael Garvey, Christine Lasco Crago and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Supplementary Tables 1–10 and Figs. 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

O’Shaughnessy, E., Barbose, G., Kannan, S. et al. Evaluating community solar as a measure to promote equitable clean energy access. Nat Energy 9 , 955–963 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01546-2

Download citation

Received : 02 November 2023

Accepted : 02 May 2024

Published : 03 June 2024

Issue Date : August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01546-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies