psychology research essay

61 intriguing psychology research topics to explore

Last updated

11 January 2024

Reviewed by

Brittany Ferri, PhD, OTR/L

Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead

Psychology is an incredibly diverse, critical, and ever-changing area of study in the medical and health industries. Because of this, it’s a common area of study for students and healthcare professionals.

We’re walking you through picking the perfect topic for your upcoming paper or study. Keep reading for plenty of example topics to pique your interest and curiosity.

• How to choose a psychology research topic

Exploring a psychology-based topic for your research project? You need to pick a specific area of interest to collect compelling data. 

Use these tips to help you narrow down which psychology topics to research:

Focus on a particular area of psychology

The most effective psychological research focuses on a smaller, niche concept or disorder within the scope of a study. 

Psychology is a broad and fascinating area of science, including everything from diagnosed mental health disorders to sports performance mindset assessments. 

This gives you plenty of different avenues to explore. Having a hard time choosing? Check out our list of 61 ideas further down in this article to get started.

Read the latest clinical studies

Once you’ve picked a more niche topic to explore, you need to do your due diligence and explore other research projects on the same topic. 

This practice will help you learn more about your chosen topic, ask more specific questions, and avoid covering existing projects. 

For the best results, we recommend creating a research folder of associated published papers to reference throughout your project. This makes it much easier to cite direct references and find inspiration down the line.

Find a topic you enjoy and ask questions

Once you’ve spent time researching and collecting references for your study, you finally get to explore. 

Whether this research project is for work, school, or just for fun, having a passion for your research will make the project much more enjoyable. (Trust us, there will be times when that is the only thing that keeps you going.) 

Now you’ve decided on the topic, ask more nuanced questions you might want to explore. 

If you can, pick the direction that interests you the most to make the research process much more enjoyable.

• 61 psychology topics to research in 2024

Need some extra help starting your psychology research project on the right foot? Explore our list of 61 cutting-edge, in-demand psychology research topics to use as a starting point for your research journey.

• Psychology research topics for university students

As a university student, it can be hard to pick a research topic that fits the scope of your classes and is still compelling and unique. 

Here are a few exciting topics we recommend exploring for your next assigned research project:

Mental health in post-secondary students

Seeking post-secondary education is a stressful and overwhelming experience for most students, making this topic a great choice to explore for your in-class research paper. 

Examples of post-secondary mental health research topics include:

Student mental health status during exam season

Mental health disorder prevalence based on study major

The impact of chronic school stress on overall quality of life

The impacts of cyberbullying

Cyberbullying can occur at all ages, starting as early as elementary school and carrying through into professional workplaces. 

Examples of cyberbullying-based research topics you can study include:

The impact of cyberbullying on self-esteem

Common reasons people engage in cyberbullying 

Cyberbullying themes and commonly used terms

Cyberbullying habits in children vs. adults

The long-term effects of cyberbullying

• Clinical psychology research topics

If you’re looking to take a more clinical approach to your next project, here are a few topics that involve direct patient assessment for you to consider:

Chronic pain and mental health

Living with chronic pain dramatically impacts every aspect of a person’s life, including their mental and emotional health. 

Here are a few examples of in-demand pain-related psychology research topics:

The connection between diabetic neuropathy and depression

Neurological pain and its connection to mental health disorders

Efficacy of meditation and mindfulness for pain management

The long-term effects of insomnia

Insomnia is where you have difficulty falling or staying asleep. It’s a common health concern that impacts millions of people worldwide. 

This is an excellent topic because insomnia can have a variety of causes, offering many research possibilities. 

Here are a few compelling psychology research topics about insomnia you could investigate:

The prevalence of insomnia based on age, gender, and ethnicity

Insomnia and its impact on workplace productivity

The connection between insomnia and mental health disorders

Efficacy and use of melatonin supplements for insomnia

The risks and benefits of prescription insomnia medications

Lifestyle options for managing insomnia symptoms

The efficacy of mental health treatment options

Management and treatment of mental health conditions is an ever-changing area of study. If you can witness or participate in mental health therapies, this can make a great research project. 

Examples of mental health treatment-related psychology research topics include:

The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with severe anxiety

The benefits and drawbacks of group vs. individual therapy sessions

Music therapy for mental health disorders

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for patients with depression 

• Controversial psychology research paper topics

If you are looking to explore a more cutting-edge or modern psychology topic, you can delve into a variety of controversial and topical options:

The impact of social media and digital platforms

Ever since access to internet forums and video games became more commonplace, there’s been growing concern about the impact these digital platforms have on mental health. 

Examples of social media and video game-related psychology research topics include:

The effect of edited images on self-confidence

How social media platforms impact social behavior

Video games and their impact on teenage anger and violence

Digital communication and the rapid spread of misinformation

The development of digital friendships

Psychotropic medications for mental health

In recent years, the interest in using psychoactive medications to treat and manage health conditions has increased despite their inherently controversial nature. 

Examples of psychotropic medication-related research topics include:

The risks and benefits of using psilocybin mushrooms for managing anxiety

The impact of marijuana on early-onset psychosis

Childhood marijuana use and related prevalence of mental health conditions

Ketamine and its use for complex PTSD (C-PTSD) symptom management

The effect of long-term psychedelic use and mental health conditions

• Mental health disorder research topics

As one of the most popular subsections of psychology, studying mental health disorders and how they impact quality of life is an essential and impactful area of research. 

While studies in these areas are common, there’s always room for additional exploration, including the following hot-button topics:

Anxiety and depression disorders

Anxiety and depression are well-known and heavily researched mental health disorders. 

Despite this, we still don’t know many things about these conditions, making them great candidates for psychology research projects:

Social anxiety and its connection to chronic loneliness

C-PTSD symptoms and causes

The development of phobias

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) behaviors and symptoms

Depression triggers and causes

Self-care tools and resources for depression

The prevalence of anxiety and depression in particular age groups or geographic areas

Bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a complex and multi-faceted area of psychology research. 

Use your research skills to learn more about this condition and its impact by choosing any of the following topics:

Early signs of bipolar disorder

The incidence of bipolar disorder in young adults

The efficacy of existing bipolar treatment options

Bipolar medication side effects

Cognitive behavioral therapy for people with bipolar 

Schizoaffective disorder

Schizoaffective disorder is often stigmatized, and less common mental health disorders are a hotbed for new and exciting research. 

Here are a few examples of interesting research topics related to this mental health disorder:

The prevalence of schizoaffective disorder by certain age groups or geographic locations

Risk factors for developing schizoaffective disorder

The prevalence and content of auditory and visual hallucinations

Alternative therapies for schizoaffective disorder

• Societal and systematic psychology research topics

Modern society’s impact is deeply enmeshed in our mental and emotional health on a personal and community level. 

Here are a few examples of societal and systemic psychology research topics to explore in more detail:

Access to mental health services

While mental health awareness has risen over the past few decades, access to quality mental health treatment and resources is still not equitable. 

This can significantly impact the severity of a person’s mental health symptoms, which can result in worse health outcomes if left untreated. 

Explore this crucial issue and provide information about the need for improved mental health resource access by studying any of the following topics:

Rural vs. urban access to mental health resources

Access to crisis lines by location

Wait times for emergency mental health services

Inequities in mental health access based on income and location

Insurance coverage for mental health services

Systemic racism and mental health

Societal systems and the prevalence of systemic racism heavily impact every aspect of a person’s overall health.

Researching these topics draws attention to existing problems and contributes valuable insights into ways to improve access to care moving forward.

Examples of systemic racism-related psychology research topics include: 

Access to mental health resources based on race

The prevalence of BIPOC mental health therapists in a chosen area

The impact of systemic racism on mental health and self-worth

Racism training for mental health workers

The prevalence of mental health disorders in discriminated groups

LGBTQIA+ mental health concerns

Research about LGBTQIA+ people and their mental health needs is a unique area of study to explore for your next research project. It’s a commonly overlooked and underserved community.

Examples of LGBTQIA+ psychology research topics to consider include:

Mental health supports for queer teens and children

The impact of queer safe spaces on mental health

The prevalence of mental health disorders in the LGBTQIA+ community

The benefits of queer mentorship and found family

Substance misuse in LQBTQIA+ youth and adults

• Collect data and identify trends with Dovetail

Psychology research is an exciting and competitive study area, making it the perfect choice for projects or papers.

Take the headache out of analyzing your data and instantly access the insights you need to complete your next psychology research project by teaming up with Dovetail today.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 22 August 2024

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

How to Write a Psychology Essay

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Before you write your essay, it’s important to analyse the task and understand exactly what the essay question is asking. Your lecturer may give you some advice – pay attention to this as it will help you plan your answer.

Next conduct preliminary reading based on your lecture notes. At this stage, it’s not crucial to have a robust understanding of key theories or studies, but you should at least have a general “gist” of the literature.

After reading, plan a response to the task. This plan could be in the form of a mind map, a summary table, or by writing a core statement (which encompasses the entire argument of your essay in just a few sentences).

After writing your plan, conduct supplementary reading, refine your plan, and make it more detailed.

It is tempting to skip these preliminary steps and write the first draft while reading at the same time. However, reading and planning will make the essay writing process easier, quicker, and ensure a higher quality essay is produced.

Components of a Good Essay

Now, let us look at what constitutes a good essay in psychology. There are a number of important features.

• Global Structure – structure the material to allow for a logical sequence of ideas. Each paragraph / statement should follow sensibly from its predecessor. The essay should “flow”. The introduction, main body and conclusion should all be linked.
• Each paragraph should comprise a main theme, which is illustrated and developed through a number of points (supported by evidence).
• Knowledge and Understanding – recognize, recall, and show understanding of a range of scientific material that accurately reflects the main theoretical perspectives.
• Critical Evaluation – arguments should be supported by appropriate evidence and/or theory from the literature. Evidence of independent thinking, insight, and evaluation of the evidence.
• Quality of Written Communication – writing clearly and succinctly with appropriate use of paragraphs, spelling, and grammar. All sources are referenced accurately and in line with APA guidelines.

In the main body of the essay, every paragraph should demonstrate both knowledge and critical evaluation.

There should also be an appropriate balance between these two essay components. Try to aim for about a 60/40 split if possible.

Most students make the mistake of writing too much knowledge and not enough evaluation (which is the difficult bit).

It is best to structure your essay according to key themes. Themes are illustrated and developed through a number of points (supported by evidence).

Choose relevant points only, ones that most reveal the theme or help to make a convincing and interesting argument.

Knowledge and Understanding

Remember that an essay is simply a discussion / argument on paper. Don’t make the mistake of writing all the information you know regarding a particular topic.

You need to be concise, and clearly articulate your argument. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences.

Each paragraph should have a purpose / theme, and make a number of points – which need to be support by high quality evidence. Be clear why each point is is relevant to the argument. It would be useful at the beginning of each paragraph if you explicitly outlined the theme being discussed (.e.g. cognitive development, social development etc.).

Try not to overuse quotations in your essays. It is more appropriate to use original content to demonstrate your understanding.

Psychology is a science so you must support your ideas with evidence (not your own personal opinion). If you are discussing a theory or research study make sure you cite the source of the information.

Note this is not the author of a textbook you have read – but the original source / author(s) of the theory or research study.

For example:

Bowlby (1951) claimed that mothering is almost useless if delayed until after two and a half to three years and, for most children, if delayed till after 12 months, i.e. there is a critical period.

Maslow (1943) stated that people are motivated to achieve certain needs. When one need is fulfilled a person seeks to fullfil the next one, and so on.

As a general rule, make sure there is at least one citation (i.e. name of psychologist and date of publication) in each paragraph.

Remember to answer the essay question. Underline the keywords in the essay title. Don’t make the mistake of simply writing everything you know of a particular topic, be selective. Each paragraph in your essay should contribute to answering the essay question.

Critical Evaluation

In simple terms, this means outlining the strengths and limitations of a theory or research study.

There are many ways you can critically evaluate:

Methodological evaluation of research

Is the study valid / reliable ? Is the sample biased, or can we generalize the findings to other populations? What are the strengths and limitations of the method used and data obtained?

Be careful to ensure that any methodological criticisms are justified and not trite.

Rather than hunting for weaknesses in every study; only highlight limitations that make you doubt the conclusions that the authors have drawn – e.g., where an alternative explanation might be equally likely because something hasn’t been adequately controlled.

Compare or contrast different theories

Outline how the theories are similar and how they differ. This could be two (or more) theories of personality / memory / child development etc. Also try to communicate the value of the theory / study.

Debates or perspectives

Refer to debates such as nature or nurture, reductionism vs. holism, or the perspectives in psychology . For example, would they agree or disagree with a theory or the findings of the study?

What are the ethical issues of the research?

Does a study involve ethical issues such as deception, privacy, psychological or physical harm?

Gender bias

If research is biased towards men or women it does not provide a clear view of the behavior that has been studied. A dominantly male perspective is known as an androcentric bias.

Cultural bias

Is the theory / study ethnocentric? Psychology is predominantly a white, Euro-American enterprise. In some texts, over 90% of studies have US participants, who are predominantly white and middle class.

Does the theory or study being discussed judge other cultures by Western standards?

Animal Research

This raises the issue of whether it’s morally and/or scientifically right to use animals. The main criterion is that benefits must outweigh costs. But benefits are almost always to humans and costs to animals.

Animal research also raises the issue of extrapolation. Can we generalize from studies on animals to humans as their anatomy & physiology is different from humans?

The PEC System

It is very important to elaborate on your evaluation. Don’t just write a shopping list of brief (one or two sentence) evaluation points.

Instead, make sure you expand on your points, remember, quality of evaluation is most important than quantity.

When you are writing an evaluation paragraph, use the PEC system.

• Make your P oint.
• E xplain how and why the point is relevant.
• Discuss the C onsequences / implications of the theory or study. Are they positive or negative?

For Example

• Point: It is argued that psychoanalytic therapy is only of benefit to an articulate, intelligent, affluent minority.
• Explain: Because psychoanalytic therapy involves talking and gaining insight, and is costly and time-consuming, it is argued that it is only of benefit to an articulate, intelligent, affluent minority. Evidence suggests psychoanalytic therapy works best if the client is motivated and has a positive attitude.
• Consequences: A depressed client’s apathy, flat emotional state, and lack of motivation limit the appropriateness of psychoanalytic therapy for depression.

Furthermore, the levels of dependency of depressed clients mean that transference is more likely to develop.

Using Research Studies in your Essays

Research studies can either be knowledge or evaluation.

• If you refer to the procedures and findings of a study, this shows knowledge and understanding.
• If you comment on what the studies shows, and what it supports and challenges about the theory in question, this shows evaluation.

Writing an Introduction

It is often best to write your introduction when you have finished the main body of the essay, so that you have a good understanding of the topic area.

If there is a word count for your essay try to devote 10% of this to your introduction.

Ideally, the introduction should;

Identify the subject of the essay and define the key terms. Highlight the major issues which “lie behind” the question. Let the reader know how you will focus your essay by identifying the main themes to be discussed. “Signpost” the essay’s key argument, (and, if possible, how this argument is structured).

Introductions are very important as first impressions count and they can create a h alo effect in the mind of the lecturer grading your essay. If you start off well then you are more likely to be forgiven for the odd mistake later one.

Writing a Conclusion

So many students either forget to write a conclusion or fail to give it the attention it deserves.

If there is a word count for your essay try to devote 10% of this to your conclusion.

Ideally the conclusion should summarize the key themes / arguments of your essay. State the take home message – don’t sit on the fence, instead weigh up the evidence presented in the essay and make a decision which side of the argument has more support.

Also, you might like to suggest what future research may need to be conducted and why (read the discussion section of journal articles for this).

Don”t include new information / arguments (only information discussed in the main body of the essay).

If you are unsure of what to write read the essay question and answer it in one paragraph.

Points that unite or embrace several themes can be used to great effect as part of your conclusion.

The Importance of Flow

Obviously, what you write is important, but how you communicate your ideas / arguments has a significant influence on your overall grade. Most students may have similar information / content in their essays, but the better students communicate this information concisely and articulately.

When you have finished the first draft of your essay you must check if it “flows”. This is an important feature of quality of communication (along with spelling and grammar).

This means that the paragraphs follow a logical order (like the chapters in a novel). Have a global structure with themes arranged in a way that allows for a logical sequence of ideas. You might want to rearrange (cut and paste) paragraphs to a different position in your essay if they don”t appear to fit in with the essay structure.

To improve the flow of your essay make sure the last sentence of one paragraph links to first sentence of the next paragraph. This will help the essay flow and make it easier to read.

Finally, only repeat citations when it is unclear which study / theory you are discussing. Repeating citations unnecessarily disrupts the flow of an essay.

Referencing

The reference section is the list of all the sources cited in the essay (in alphabetical order). It is not a bibliography (a list of the books you used).

In simple terms every time you cite/refer to a name (and date) of a psychologist you need to reference the original source of the information.

If you have been using textbooks this is easy as the references are usually at the back of the book and you can just copy them down. If you have been using websites, then you may have a problem as they might not provide a reference section for you to copy.

References need to be set out APA style :

Author, A. A. (year). Title of work . Location: Publisher.

Journal Articles

Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (year). Article title. Journal Title, volume number (issue number), page numbers

A simple way to write your reference section is use Google scholar . Just type the name and date of the psychologist in the search box and click on the “cite” link.

Next, copy and paste the APA reference into the reference section of your essay.

Once again, remember that references need to be in alphabetical order according to surname.

How to Write a Great Psychology Essay

Categories Psychology Education

Writing a great psychology essay takes skill. You need good research skills to provide an adequate empirical background. You also need to put your analytical skills to work to evaluate the research and then build a coherent argument. If you are not used to writing psychology essays, it can be a little challenging at first (especially if you are also learning how to use APA format).

Remember, the skill of writing an exceptional psychology essay lies not only in presenting information, but also in synthesizing and explaining it effectively. If you need to write a psychology essay for a class, here are some tips to help you get started.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

• Craft a strong thesis statement highlighting the main points of your psychology essay.
• Incorporate research studies to support arguments and critically evaluate their validity and reliability.
• Structure the essay with a clear introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a compelling conclusion.
• Include critical analysis by evaluating research methodologies, strengths, weaknesses, and ethical considerations.

What to Include in an APA Format Essay

To craft a great psychology essay, it’s important to make sure you follow the right format. While your instructor may have specific instructions, the typical format for an essay includes the following sections:

• The title page
• The abstract
• The introduction
• The main body
• The reference section

Mastering the key components of a psychology essay is vital for crafting a compelling and academically sound piece of writing. To start, a good introduction sets the stage for your essay, providing a clear overview of what will be discussed.

Moving on to the main body, each paragraph should focus on a main theme, supported by evidence from research studies published in peer-reviewed journals. It’s pivotal to critically evaluate these studies, considering their validity, reliability, and limitations to strengthen your arguments.

Incorporating research studies not only adds credibility to your essay but also demonstrates a deep understanding of theoretical perspectives in psychology.

The Structure of a Psychology Essay

Each section of a psychology essay should also follow a specific format:

The Title Page

The title page is the first impression of your essay, and it should be formatted according to APA guidelines. It typically includes:

• The title of your essay : Make sure it’s concise, descriptive, and gives the reader an idea of its content.
• Your name : Place your full name below the title.
• Institutional affiliation : This usually refers to your university or college.
• Course number and name : Include the course for which the essay is being written.
• Instructor’s name : Write the name of your instructor.
• Due date : Indicate the date when the essay is due.

The Abstract

The abstract is a brief summary of your essay, typically around 150-250 words. It should provide a snapshot of the main points and findings. Key elements include:

• Research topic : Briefly describe what your essay is about.
• Research questions : Outline the main questions your essay addresses.
• Methodology : Summarize the methods used to gather information or conduct research.
• Results : Highlight the key findings.
• Conclusion : Provide a concise conclusion or the implications of your findings.

The Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for your essay, providing context and outlining the main points. It should include:

• Hook : Start with an interesting fact, quote, or anecdote to grab the reader’s attention.
• Background information : Provide necessary context or background information on your topic.
• Thesis statement : Clearly state the main argument or purpose of your essay.
• Overview of structure : Briefly outline the structure of your essay to give the reader a roadmap.

The Main Body

The main body is the core of your essay, where you present your arguments, evidence, and analysis. It should be well-organized and divided into sections with subheadings if necessary. Each section should include:

• Topic sentences : Start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea.
• Evidence : Provide evidence to support your arguments, such as data, quotes, or studies.
• Analysis : Analyze the evidence and explain how it supports your thesis.
• Transitions : Use transitions to ensure a smooth flow between paragraphs and sections.

The Reference Section

The reference section is crucial for giving credit to the sources you used and for allowing readers to locate the sources themselves. It should follow APA format and include:

• Alphabetical order : List all sources alphabetically by the author’s last name.
• Proper citation format : Follow APA guidelines for formatting each type of source (books, articles, websites, etc.).
• Hanging indent : Ensure that each reference entry has a hanging indent.

By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your psychology essay is well-structured, informative, and adheres to APA format.

Using Research in Your Psychology Essay

To strengthen the arguments in your psychology essay, it’s essential to incorporate relevant research studies that provide credibility and depth to your analysis. Utilizing research studies not only enhances the validity of your points but also demonstrates a deeper understanding of the topic at hand.

When integrating research into your essay, remember to include citations for each study referenced to give proper credit and allow readers to explore the sources further.

It is also important to evaluate the research studies you include to assess their validity, reliability, and any ethical considerations involved. This helps you determine the trustworthiness of the findings and whether they align with your argument.

Be sure to discuss any ethical concerns, such as participant deception or potential harm, and showcase a thoughtful approach to utilizing research in your essay.

Analyzing the Research Critically

When writing a psychology essay, using high-quality research sources and analyzing them critically is crucial. This not only strengthens your arguments but also ensures the credibility and reliability of your work. Here are some guidelines to help you critically analyze sources and use them appropriately:

Evaluating the Credibility of Sources

• Authorship : Check the credentials of the author. Are they an expert in the field? Do they have relevant qualifications or affiliations with reputable institutions?
• Publication Source : Determine where the research was published. Peer-reviewed journals, academic books, and respected organizations are considered reliable sources.
• Date of Publication : Ensure the research is current and up-to-date. In psychology, recent studies are often more relevant as they reflect the latest findings and theories.
• Citations and References : Look at how often the source is cited by other scholars. A frequently cited source is generally more credible.

Assessing the Quality of the Research

• Research Design and Methodology : Evaluate the research design. Is it appropriate for the study’s aims? Consider the sample size, controls, and methods used.
• Data Analysis : Check how the data was analyzed. Are the statistical methods sound and appropriate? Were the results interpreted correctly?
• Bias and Limitations : Identify any potential biases or limitations in the study. Authors should acknowledge these in their discussion.

Synthesizing Information from Multiple Sources

• Comparing Findings : Compare findings from different sources to identify patterns, trends, or discrepancies. This can help you understand the broader context and the range of perspectives on your topic.
• Integrating Evidence : Integrate evidence from various sources to build a comprehensive argument. Use multiple pieces of evidence to support each point or counterpoint in your essay.

Citing Sources Appropriately

• In-Text Citations : Follow APA guidelines for in-text citations. Include the author’s last name and the year of publication (e.g., Smith, 2020).
• Direct Quotes and Paraphrasing : When directly quoting, use quotation marks and provide a page number. For paraphrasing, ensure you rephrase the original text significantly and still provide an in-text citation.
• Reference List : Include a complete reference list at the end of your essay, formatted according to APA guidelines.

Using Sources to Support Your Argument

• Relevance : Ensure each source directly relates to your thesis or the specific point you are discussing. Irrelevant information can distract from your argument.
• Strength of Evidence : Use the strongest and most persuasive evidence available. Prioritize high-quality, peer-reviewed studies over less reliable sources.
• Balance : Present a balanced view by including evidence that supports and opposes your thesis. Acknowledging counterarguments demonstrates thorough research and critical thinking.

By critically analyzing research sources and using them appropriately, you can enhance the quality and credibility of your psychology essay. This approach ensures that your arguments are well-supported, your analysis is thorough, and your work adheres to academic standards.

Putting the Finishing Touches on Your Psychology Essay

Once you have a basic grasp of the topic and have written a rough draft of your psychology essay, the next step is to polish it up and ensure it is ready to turn in. To perfect your essay structure, consider the following:

• Make sure your topic is well-defined: Make sure your essay topic is specific and focused to provide a clear direction for your writing.
• Check that you are highlighting a main point in each paragraph: Commence each paragraph with a topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea you’ll discuss.
• Revise and refine your first draft: Take the time to review and refine your initial draft, guaranteeing that each section flows logically into the next and that your arguments are well-supported. ( Tip: Ask a friend of classmate to read through it to catch any typos or errors you might have missed. )
• Check your APA format : Use the APA publication manual to double-check that all your sources are cited and referenced correctly.

Creating an amazing psychology essay requires a compelling introduction, evidence-based arguments, a strong thesis statement, critical analysis, and a well-structured essay.

By incorporating research from peer-reviewed journals, evaluating studies for validity and reliability, and considering differing viewpoints and ethical considerations, you can craft a powerful and insightful piece that showcases your understanding of the topic.

With attention to detail and logical flow, your psychology essay will captivate and inform your readers effectively.

Writing Your Psychology Research Paper

Available formats, also available from.

• Table of contents
• Contributor bios
• Reviews and awards
• Book details

This primer explains how to write clear, compelling, well-organized research papers.

From picking a promising topic, to finding and digesting the pertinent literature, to developing a thesis, to outlining and presenting ideas, to editing for clarity and concision — each step is broken down and illustrated with examples.

In addition, a bonus chapter discusses how to combat procrastination. You will learn that the best writing is done in chunks over long periods of time and that writing is a skill that improves with practice.

By following the advice in this book, you can not only get through dreaded writing assignments, but also become a more proficient writer.

This book is part of APA's Concise Guides to Conducting Behavioral, Health, and Social Science Research series. Aimed at undergraduate students in research methods courses or others with a lab or research project, each book describes a key stage in the research process. Collectively, these books provide a solid grounding in research from start to finish.

Series Foreword

Acknowledgments

Introduction

I. Preparing to Write

• Developing an Idea
• Finding Background Information and Literature

II. Writing

• Organizing Your Ideas and Creating a Thesis
• Structuring and Drafting Your Paper
• Revising Your Paper
• Managing Citations

III. Staying on Task

• Dealing With Procrastination

About the Author

About the Series Editors

Scott A. Baldwin, PhD, received his doctorate in clinical psychology from the University of Memphis in 2006. He completed his predoctoral clinical internship at the University of Wisconsin–Madison Department of Psychiatry.

He's an associate professor of psychology at Brigham Young University and a licensed psychologist in Utah.

Dr. Baldwin's research focuses on research design, statistical, and measurement issues in psychotherapy and health research. He has published more than 50 articles and has focused his recent efforts on demonstrating the use of advanced statistical methods in psychological research. He teaches courses on statistics, measurement, research design, and psychotherapy.

When not doing data analysis or writing, he likes to spend time with his family, swim, bike, run, and play classic video games.

A useful addition to the array of volumes on improving student writing. The strength of this brief book is that it encourages students to develop the mind-set necessary for competent writing. Rather than focusing on technical aspects of writing, the author emphasizes the crucial preparatory work that writers need to complete before they can establish the messages they want to convey. – Choice

Baldwin's talent as a teacher of writing shines through in Writing Your Psychology Research Paper . This crisp, practical book should be the first stop for students new to writing about the science of psychology. —Paul J. Silvia, PhD University of North Carolina at Greensboro

From research-based class papers to manuscripts for professional journals — this easy-to-read book provides a clear guide for any student (undergraduate or graduate) who wants to improve the quality of his or her writing and save time in the writing process. —Joshua K. Swift, PhD Idaho State University, Pocatello

You may also like

The Complete Researcher

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Sweepstakes
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write an Introduction for a Psychology Paper

• Writing Tips

If you are writing a psychology paper, it is essential to kick things off with a strong introduction. The introduction to a psychology research paper helps your readers understand why the topic is important and what they need to know before they delve deeper.

Your goal in this section is to introduce the topic to the reader, provide an overview of previous research on the topic, and identify your own hypothesis .

At a Glance

Writing a great introduction can be a great foundation for the rest of your psychology paper. To create a strong intro:

• Research your topic
• Outline your paper
• Introduce your topic
• Summarize the previous research
• Present your hypothesis or main argument

Before You Write an Introduction

There are some important steps you need to take before you even begin writing your introduction. To know what to write, you need to collect important background information and create a detailed plan.

Research Your Topic

Search a journal database, PsychInfo or ERIC, to find articles on your subject. Once you have located an article, look at the reference section to locate other studies cited in the article. As you take notes from these articles, be sure to write down where you found the information.

A simple note detailing the author's name, journal, and date of publication can help you keep track of sources and avoid plagiarism.

Create a Detailed Outline

This is often one of the most boring and onerous steps, so students tend to skip outlining and go straight to writing. Creating an outline might seem tedious, but it can be an enormous time-saver down the road and will make the writing process much easier.

Start by looking over the notes you made during the research process and consider how you want to present all of your ideas and research.

Introduce the Topic

Once you are ready to write your introduction, your first task is to provide a brief description of the research question. What is the experiment or study attempting to demonstrate? What phenomena are you studying? Provide a brief history of your topic and explain how it relates to your current research.

As you are introducing your topic, consider what makes it important. Why should it matter to your reader? The goal of your introduction is not only to let your reader know what your paper is about, but also to justify why it is important for them to learn more.

If your paper tackles a controversial subject and is focused on resolving the issue, it is important to summarize both sides of the controversy in a fair and impartial way. Consider how your paper fits in with the relevant research on the topic.

The introduction of a research paper is designed to grab interest. It should present a compelling look at the research that already exists and explain to readers what questions your own paper will address.

Summarize Previous Research

The second task of your introduction is to provide a well-rounded summary of previous research that is relevant to your topic. So, before you begin to write this summary, it is important to research your topic thoroughly.

Finding appropriate sources amid thousands of journal articles can be a daunting task, but there are several steps you can take to simplify your research. If you have completed the initial steps of researching and keeping detailed notes, writing your introduction will be much easier.

It is essential to give the reader a good overview of the historical context of the issue you are writing about, but do not feel like you must provide an exhaustive review of the subject. Focus on hitting the main points, and try to include the most relevant studies.

You might describe previous research findings and then explain how the current study differs or expands upon earlier research.

Provide Your Hypothesis

Once you have summarized the previous research, explain areas where the research is lacking or potentially flawed. What is missing from previous studies on your topic? What research questions have yet to be answered? Your hypothesis should lead to these questions.

At the end of your introduction, offer your hypothesis and describe what you expected to find in your experiment or study.

The introduction should be relatively brief. You want to give your readers an overview of a topic, explain why you are addressing it, and provide your arguments.

Tips for Writing Your Psychology Paper Intro

• Use 3x5 inch note cards to write down notes and sources.
• Look in professional psychology journals for examples of introductions.
• Remember to cite your sources.
• Maintain a working bibliography with all of the sources you might use in your final paper. This will make it much easier to prepare your reference section later on.
• Use a copy of the APA style manual to ensure that your introduction and references are in proper APA format .

What This Means For You

Before you delve into the main body of your paper, you need to give your readers some background and present your main argument in the introduction of you paper. You can do this by first explaining what your topic is about, summarizing past research, and then providing your thesis.

Armağan A. How to write an introduction section of a scientific article ?  Turk J Urol . 2013;39(Suppl 1):8-9. doi:10.5152/tud.2013.046

Fried T, Foltz C, Lendner M, Vaccaro AR. How to write an effective introduction .  Clin Spine Surg . 2019;32(3):111-112. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000714

Jawaid SA, Jawaid M. How to write introduction and discussion .  Saudi J Anaesth . 2019;13(Suppl 1):S18-S19. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_584_18

American Psychological Association. Information Recommended for Inclusion in Manuscripts That Report New Data Collections Regardless of Research Design . Published 2020.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

What this handout is about

This handout discusses some of the common writing assignments in psychology courses, and it presents strategies for completing them. The handout also provides general tips for writing psychology papers and for reducing bias in your writing.

What is psychology?

Psychology, one of the behavioral sciences, is the scientific study of observable behaviors, like sleeping, and abstract mental processes, such as dreaming. Psychologists study, explain, and predict behaviors. Because of the complexity of human behaviors, researchers use a variety of methods and approaches.  They ask questions about behaviors and answer them using systematic methods. For example, to understand why female students tend to perform better in school than their male classmates, psychologists have examined whether parents, teachers, schools, and society behave in ways that support the educational outcomes of female students to a greater extent than those of males.

Writing in psychology

Writing in psychology is similar to other forms of scientific writing in that organization, clarity, and concision are important.  The Psychology Department at UNC has a strong research emphasis, so many of your assignments will focus on synthesizing and critically evaluating research, connecting your course material with current research literature, and designing and carrying out your own studies.

Common assignments

Reaction papers.

These assignments ask you to react to a scholarly journal article.  Instructors use reaction papers to teach students to critically evaluate research and to synthesize current research with course material.  Reaction papers typically include a brief summary of the article, including prior research, hypotheses, research method, main results, and conclusions. The next step is your critical reaction. You might critique the study, identify unresolved issues, suggest future research, or reflect on the study’s implications.  Some instructors may want you to connect the material you are learning in class with the article’s theories, methodology, and findings. Remember, reaction papers require more than a simple summary of what you have read.

To successfully complete this assignment, you should carefully read the article. Go beyond highlighting important facts and interesting findings. Ask yourself questions as you read: What are the researchers’ assumptions? How does the article contribute to the field? Are the findings generalizable, and to whom?  Are the conclusions valid and based on the results?  It is important to pay attention to the graphs and tables because they can help you better assess the researchers’ claims.

Your instructor may give you a list of articles to choose from, or you may need to find your own.  The American Psychological Association (APA) PsycINFO database is the most comprehensive collection of psychology research; it is an excellent resource for finding journal articles.  You can access PsycINFO from the E-research tab on the Library’s webpage.   Here are the most common types of articles you will find:

• Empirical studies test hypotheses by gathering and analyzing data. Empirical articles are organized into distinct sections based on stages in the research process: introduction, method, results, and discussion.
• Literature reviews synthesize previously published material on a topic.  The authors define or clarify the problem, summarize research findings, identify gaps/inconsistencies in the research, and make suggestions for future work. Meta-analyses, in which the authors use quantitative procedures to combine the results of multiple studies, fall into this category.
• Theoretical articles trace the development of a specific theory to expand or refine it, or they present a new theory.  Theoretical articles and literature reviews are organized similarly, but empirical information is included in theoretical articles only when it is used to support the theoretical issue.

You may also find methodological articles, case studies, brief reports, and commentary on previously published material. Check with your instructor to determine which articles are appropriate.

Research papers

This assignment involves using published research to provide an overview of and argument about a topic.  Simply summarizing the information you read is not enough. Instead, carefully synthesize the information to support your argument. Only discuss the parts of the studies that are relevant to your argument or topic.  Headings and subheadings can help guide readers through a long research paper. Our handout on literature reviews may help you organize your research literature.

Choose a topic that is appropriate to the length of the assignment and for which you can find adequate sources. For example, “self-esteem” might be too broad for a 10- page paper, but it may be difficult to find enough articles on “the effects of private school education on female African American children’s self-esteem.” A paper in which you focus on the more general topic of “the effects of school transitions on adolescents’ self-esteem,” however, might work well for the assignment.

Designing your own study/research proposal

You may have the opportunity to design and conduct your own research study or write about the design for one in the form of a research proposal. A good approach is to model your paper on articles you’ve read for class. Here is a general overview of the information that should be included in each section of a research study or proposal:

• Introduction: The introduction conveys a clear understanding of what will be done and why. Present the problem, address its significance, and describe your research strategy. Also discuss the theories that guide the research, previous research that has been conducted, and how your study builds on this literature. Set forth the hypotheses and objectives of the study.
• Methods:   This section describes the procedures used to answer your research questions and provides an overview of the analyses that you conducted. For a research proposal, address the procedures that will be used to collect and analyze your data. Do not use the passive voice in this section. For example, it is better to say, “We randomly assigned patients to a treatment group and monitored their progress,” instead of “Patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and their progress was monitored.” It is acceptable to use “I” or “we,” instead of the third person, when describing your procedures. See the section on reducing bias in language for more tips on writing this section and for discussing the study’s participants.
• Results: This section presents the findings that answer your research questions. Include all data, even if they do not support your hypotheses.  If you are presenting statistical results, your instructor will probably expect you to follow the style recommendations of the American Psychological Association. You can also consult our handout on figures and charts . Note that research proposals will not include a results section, but your instructor might expect you to hypothesize about expected results.
• Discussion: Use this section to address the limitations of your study as well as the practical and/or theoretical implications of the results. You should contextualize and support your conclusions by noting how your results compare to the work of others. You can also discuss questions that emerged and call for future research. A research proposal will not include a discussion section.  But you can include a short section that addresses the proposed study’s contribution to the literature on the topic.

Other writing assignments

For some assignments, you may be asked to engage personally with the course material. For example, you might provide personal examples to evaluate a theory in a reflection paper.  It is appropriate to share personal experiences for this assignment, but be mindful of your audience and provide only relevant and appropriate details.

Writing tips for psychology papers

Psychology is a behavioral science, and writing in psychology is similar to writing in the hard sciences.  See our handout on writing in the sciences .  The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association provides an extensive discussion on how to write for the discipline.  The Manual also gives the rules for psychology’s citation style, called APA. The Library’s citation tutorial will also introduce you to the APA style.

Suggestions for achieving precision and clarity in your writing

• Jargon: Technical vocabulary that is not essential to understanding your ideas can confuse readers. Similarly, refrain from using euphemistic phrases instead of clearer terms.  Use “handicapped” instead of “handi-capable,” and “poverty” instead of “monetarily felt scarcity,” for example.
• Anthropomorphism: Anthropomorphism occurs when human characteristics are attributed to animals or inanimate entities.  Anthropomorphism can make your writing awkward.  Some examples include: “The experiment attempted to demonstrate…,” and “The tables compare…”  Reword such sentences so that a person performs the action: “The experimenter attempted to demonstrate…”  The verbs “show” or “indicate” can also be used: “The tables show…”
• Verb tenses: Select verb tenses carefully. Use the past tense when expressing actions or conditions that occurred at a specific time in the past, when discussing other people’s work, and when reporting results.  Use the present perfect tense to express past actions or conditions that did not occur at a specific time, or to describe an action beginning in the past and continuing in the present.
• Pronoun agreement: Be consistent within and across sentences with pronouns that refer to a noun introduced earlier (antecedent). A common error is a construction such as “Each child responded to questions about their favorite toys.” The sentence should have either a plural subject (children) or a singular pronoun (his or her). Vague pronouns, such as “this” or “that,” without a clear antecedent can confuse readers: “This shows that girls are more likely than boys …” could be rewritten as “These results show that girls are more likely than boys…”
• Avoid figurative language and superlatives: Scientific writing should be as concise and specific as possible.  Emotional language and superlatives, such as “very,” “highly,” “astonishingly,” “extremely,” “quite,” and even “exactly,” are imprecise or unnecessary. A line that is “exactly 100 centimeters” is, simply, 100 centimeters.
• Avoid colloquial expressions and informal language: Use “children” rather than “kids;” “many” rather than “a lot;” “acquire” rather than “get;” “prepare for” rather than “get ready;” etc.

Reducing bias in language

Your writing should show respect for research participants and readers, so it is important to choose language that is clear, accurate, and unbiased.  The APA sets forth guidelines for reducing bias in language: acknowledge participation, describe individuals at the appropriate level of specificity, and be sensitive to labels. Here are some specific examples of how to reduce bias in your language:

• Acknowledge participation: Use the active voice to acknowledge the subjects’ participation. It is preferable to say, “The students completed the surveys,” instead of “The experimenters administered surveys to the students.”  This is especially important when writing about participants in the methods section of a research study.
• Gender: It is inaccurate to use the term “men” when referring to groups composed of multiple genders. See our handout on gender-inclusive language for tips on writing appropriately about gender.
• Race/ethnicity: Be specific, consistent, and sensitive with terms for racial and ethnic groups. If the study participants are Chinese Americans, for instance, don’t refer to them as Asian Americans. Some ethnic designations are outdated or have negative connotations. Use terms that the individuals or groups prefer.
• Clinical terms: Broad clinical terms can be unclear. For example, if you mention “at risk” in your paper, be sure to specify the risk—“at risk for school failure.”  The same principle applies to psychological disorders. For instance, “borderline personality disorder” is more precise than “borderline.”
• Labels: Do not equate people with their physical or mental conditions or categorize people broadly as objects. For example, adjectival forms like “older adults” are preferable to labels such as “the elderly” or “the schizophrenics.” Another option is to mention the person first, followed by a descriptive phrase— “people diagnosed with schizophrenia.”  Be careful using the label “normal,” as it may imply that others are abnormal.
• Other ways to reduce bias: Consistently presenting information about the socially dominant group first can promote bias. Make sure that you don’t always begin with men followed by other genders when writing about gender, or whites followed by minorities when discussing race and ethnicity. Mention differences only when they are relevant and necessary to understanding the study. For example, it may not be important to indicate the sexual orientation of participants in a study about a drug treatment program’s effectiveness. Sexual orientation may be important to mention, however, when studying bullying among high school students.

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

American Psychological Association. n.d. “Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style®.” APA Style. Accessed June 24, 2019. https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/index .

American Psychological Association. 2010. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association . 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Landrum, Eric. 2008. Undergraduate Writing in Psychology: Learning to Tell the Scientific Story . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing in Psychology Overview

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

Psychology is based on the study of human behaviors. As a social science, experimental psychology uses empirical inquiry to help understand human behavior. According to Thrass and Sanford (2000), psychology writing has three elements: describing, explaining, and understanding concepts from a standpoint of empirical investigation.

Discipline-specific writing, such as writing done in psychology, can be similar to other types of writing you have done in the use of the writing process, writing techniques, and in locating and integrating sources. However, the field of psychology also has its own rules and expectations for writing; not everything that you have learned in about writing in the past works for the field of psychology.

Writing in psychology includes the following principles:

• Using plain language : Psychology writing is formal scientific writing that is plain and straightforward. Literary devices such as metaphors, alliteration, or anecdotes are not appropriate for writing in psychology.
• Conciseness and clarity of language : The field of psychology stresses clear, concise prose. You should be able to make connections between empirical evidence, theories, and conclusions. See our OWL handout on conciseness for more information.
• Evidence-based reasoning: Psychology bases its arguments on empirical evidence. Personal examples, narratives, or opinions are not appropriate for psychology.
• Use of APA format: Psychologists use the American Psychological Association (APA) format for publications. While most student writing follows this format, some instructors may provide you with specific formatting requirements that differ from APA format .

Types of writing

Most major writing assignments in psychology courses consists of one of the following two types.

Experimental reports: Experimental reports detail the results of experimental research projects and are most often written in experimental psychology (lab) courses. Experimental reports are write-ups of your results after you have conducted research with participants. This handout provides a description of how to write an experimental report .

Critical analyses or reviews of research : Often called "term papers," a critical analysis of research narrowly examines and draws conclusions from existing literature on a topic of interest. These are frequently written in upper-division survey courses. Our research paper handouts provide a detailed overview of how to write these types of research papers.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals

Psychology articles from across Nature Portfolio

Psychology is a scientific discipline that focuses on understanding mental functions and the behaviour of individuals and groups.

Related Subjects

• Human behaviour

Latest Research and Reviews

The mediating effect of maturity on anxiety and the motives for postponing parenthood

• Małgorzata Szcześniak
• Adam Falewicz
• Katarzyna Grodecka

Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: an on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types

Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults’ technology acceptance: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023

• Xianru Shang
• Chengliang Wang

Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning

• Xiaolei Fan
• Lingchao Meng

A measurement model of pedestrian tolerance time under signal-controlled conditions

• Nanhao Wang

Transcriptional patterns of amygdala functional connectivity in first-episode, drug-naïve major depressive disorder

News and Comment

Could video games be good for your health?

A large causal analysis based on a natural experiment suggests that gaming improves psychological well-being, but these benefits tapered off after more than 3 hours of gaming per day.

• Karen O’Leary

Own your narrative

Having a personal website or claiming online author profiles can increase a researcher’s visibility and reach.

Federal funding shapes knowledge in clinical science

Advances in clinical science often rely on federal funding, but an overly prescriptive funding agenda might limit the societal benefits of clinical research. Greater diversity in funding schemes is needed to ensure the highest clinical impact.

• Bunmi O. Olatunji
• Alexandra M. Adamis

Behavioural science can improve parenting interventions

• Marilyn N. Ahun
• Simon L. Bacon

Exploring children’s despair in the face of climate change

Interventions targeting children’s eco-anxiety have focused on fostering hope, however this is disconnected from children’s need to explore and express despair regarding the climate crisis. Adults can help by acknowledging and discussing these emotions with children.

• Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise
• David Lefrançois
• Catherine M. Herba

From the lab to a career in education research

Nature Reviews Psychology is interviewing individuals with doctoral degrees in psychology who pursued non-academic careers. We spoke with Dominic Gibson about his journey from a post-doctoral fellow to a senior researcher.

• Teresa Schubert

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

REVIEW article

Hot topics and frontier evolution of growth-mindset research: a bibliometric analysis using citespace.

• 1 Chinese Education Modernization Research Institute of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
• 2 Jinghengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

By virtue of CiteSpace, this study aims to evaluate and pinpoint the status, hot areas, and frontiers of growth-mindset research. Co-authorship analysis, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence analysis, cluster analysis, and content analysis are conducted, based on 543 articles selected from the Social Sciences Citation Index database. Researchers from Australia and countries/territories in North America, East Asia, and Western Europe have maintained relatively closer cooperation with each other. Carol S. Dweck, Jeni L. Burnette, David S. Yeager, and Mary Murphy have high publication volumes and close connections with each other. Angela Duckworth has acted as a bridge among many researchers. Highly co-cited literature has mainly focused on the impacts of mindset and intervention measures. In the past two decades, the literature on mindset research has plunged into numerous hot topics in terms of implicit theory, intelligence, motivation, beliefs, achievements, academic performance, students, transitions, and psychological intervention. Based on burst detection, the field of growth-mindset research shows the following trends: (1) future research must pay more attention to fidelity in intervention studies, conduct rigorous manipulation tests at the statistical level, and improve causal relationship models between growth mindset and other variables and (2) use a multidisciplinary perspective to provide a deeper explanation of the formation mechanism of the growth mindset. Finally, (3) the function mechanisms of the growth mindset in different cultural backgrounds should be strengthened.

1 Introduction

Being faced with the same problem, different individuals often have different attitudes and responses. One of the reasons for this underlies in the fact that people possess different mindsets. The study of mindset can matter-of-factly help us understand the world and thus transform it better ( Reber, 1967 ). The origin of research on mindset could be traced back to the 1960s, with the boom in cognitive psychology and cognitive learning theory. This very theory, regarding the human as the subject of the learning process, posits that their behavior is the result of the interaction with environment. With this theoretical tide, Reber blazes a trail on implicit learning, and, soon after, Carol Dweck profounds the “implicit theories,” which is renamed after “mindset,” a belief or perspective down to the human traits ( Dweck et al., 1995 ). The mindset theories, however, derive from the motivation theory, attribution and achievement motivation theory in particular ( Dweck and Leggett, 1988 ).

The growth mindset, one of the two major types that Dweck first defined, is particularly tied to the implicit theories of intelligence . Those “theories,” according to Dweck, “were potentially falsifiable ideas about what intelligence is and how it might work,” and consists in the parallel of entity and incremental theories , while they are translated into “more user-friendly terms”— fixed mindset and growth mindset ( Dweck and Yeager, 2019 ). The individuals with the former one are of the belief that their abilities are fixed into an “entity,” and thus they are failure-afraid and eager to flaunt their abilities, if were not gain them effortlessly. However, the individuals with growth mindset deem the “growth of abilities,” that is, their intelligence is expandable, malleable, and controllable and can be improved continually through effort, learning, and training. Moreover, they view the failures and setbacks more positively, and thus mostly achieve more in academic, professional fields or otherwise ( Dweck, 2006 ). Not tough to conclude that, the study on growth mindset is an exploration of the personal factors in terms of emotion, will and interest, though they are easily overlooked, that work on the problem-solving per se . Therefore, to gain a panorama of the research status and envision the developing trends of growth mindset , this paper will take a systemic analysis on the literature of growth mindset collected from internationally important knowledge databases by means of bibliometrics and content analysis.

2 Data source and processing

To ensure the credibility and persuasiveness of the collected data, we selected literature for analysis from the Social Sciences Citation Index database on the “Web of Science” (WoS; Clarivate Analytics, London, UK). In conducting the CiteSpace bibliometric analyses, Web of Science, as the foremost comprehensive academic database globally, is renowned for its high-quality data records, detailed citation information, and rigorous screening criteria. We choose WoS to guarantee the elevated scholarly standard and dependability of the literature it encompasses, as this is essential for precisely establishing citation networks and pinpointing research frontiers and hotspots. Moreover, CiteSpace is particularly suitable for processing data from well-structured databases like WoS. It can effectively extract and analyze metadata like authors, institutions, keywords, and citation links, and subsequently produce visually intuitive analysis findings. Considering the purpose of the study and the functional suitability of CiteSpace, WoS became our preferred data source. The specific search strategy deployed in the SSCI database on the WoS was as follows: the topic search term was set as “growth mindset” with the search formula TS = (growth mindset), resulting in 1578 articles. Further refinement was done by selecting specific research areas, such as education, psychology, and social sciences, while excluding conference papers, editorials, book chapters. This yielded a total of 571 articles. To improve the accuracy and precision of the data, manual screening was conducted, resulting in a final selection of 543 articles. Changing the topic search term to “implicit theory,” the database yielded a limited number of articles, most of which were published a long time ago. It is worth noting that the majority of articles on implicit theories do not focus on intelligence or cognition. The implicit theories of intelligence are frequently utilized alongside development mentality, rather than separately, as precursor theories to growth mindset . Hence, the 543 articles acquired from the search phrase “growth mindset” are still utilized for subsequent research. Using the scientific literature measurement method and leveraging CiteSpace 6.2.R4 (Chaomei Chen, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA), an analysis was conducted on the current research status of the growth mindset. After removing duplicates, the total number of relevant articles was 543. The selected time span was from 2008 to 2022, with a time slice of 1 year. This analysis generated multiple types of visual representations, including a research hotspot visualization, a co-citation network visualization, and an emerging node visualization, to explore the current state and development trends of growth mindset research.

3 Numbers of publications

Using the Strategic Consulting Intelligence Support System from the China Knowledge Center for Engineering Sciences and Technology, the exported 543 foreign language articles were subjected to analysis. Figure 1 shows the yearly distribution of publications on “growth mindset” from 2008 to 2020. The research on “growth mindset” in fields such as education and psychology began in 2008. Initially, there was relatively low attention given to this field, and research remained in a nascent stage, with annual publication volumes of less than 10 papers before 2015. However, starting from 2015, there was a noticeable increase in publication volume, and publication counts continued to grow rapidly over the following 6 years, reaching a peak in 2021 with 120 articles. In 2022, there was a slight decrease in the annual publication volume, but the overall publication count remained stable at 96 articles. Overall, research on the growth mindset started early, experienced a flourishing period in the past 6 or 7 years, and has garnered sustained attention and interest.

Figure 1 . The number of “growth mindset” publications indexed in the WoS per year (2008–2022).

4.1 Core research forces

4.1.1 key researchers and core author group.

Using CiteSpace 6.2.R4, an analysis of authors and their inter-relationships among the selected literature was conducted. The specific steps involved selecting “Author” as the analysis node in the software’s parameter panel, choosing the top 50 authors based on their appearance frequency, and using the default “Cosine” calculation method for uncovering the connections. After adjusting the colors and dragging the nodes for clarity, an original visualization was developed and is shown in Figure 2 .

Figure 2 . Core authors and their inter-relationships in the study of the growth mindset.

The publications of core authors reflect the breadth and depth of research in the field. According to Price’s law, which determines the distribution of core authors, the relevant mathematical formula is as follows: M = 0.74√P max , where M represents the minimum publications of core authors during the statistical period and P max represents the maximum publications of core authors during the statistical period. Based on our analysis, the P max value for research on the growth mindset is 14 articles, so M was rounded to three articles. Therefore, authors with more than three publications are considered core author candidates. A total of 103 candidates were identified. These 103 authors have a combined publication count of 431, which exceeds half of the total publication count (543). This indicates the formation of a core author group in this field. As shown in Figure 2 , the node size, node color, node connections, and line width represent the quantity of publications, the publication time, collaborative relationships, and the strength of relationships between authors, respectively. It can be observed that authors such as Carol S. Dweck, Jeni L. Burnette, David S. Yeager, and Mary Murphy have high publication volumes and close connections with each other.

Examining the node details of the aforementioned authors, it can be seen that Carol S. Dweck is the most productive author, with two first-authored and 12 co-authored articles indexed in the WoS Core Collection. Dweck is closely connected with high-productivity authors like Burnette and Yeager. According to our findings, Dweck has long been interested in the field of socio-cognitive development, particularly the relationship between students’ beliefs, motivation, and academic achievement. As early as 1993, she began collaborating with scholars Hong and Chiu from the Chinese University of Hong Kong to conduct research on implicit theories of intelligence, publishing several studies on cognitive influences based on this theory over the next 5 years ( Dweck et al., 1993 ). These authors identify two different tendencies in cognitive processes: entity theory and incremental theory. Individuals with an entity theory tend to believe that personality is fixed, while those with an incremental theory believe that personality is malleable. This judgment continues to influence the problem-solving strategies adopted thereafter. Dweck believes that the likelihood of students’ academic success is influenced not only by their actual abilities but also by the goals and beliefs they hold in achievement situations. These beliefs and goals that influence individual behavior are not isolated but can be integrated into a meaning system, with the mindset integrating these variables to form this system ( Dweck and Yeager, 2019 ). These studies have provided a solid theoretical foundation for her concept of the growth mindset. Based on our findings, Dweck could be considered a foundational and pioneering figure in research on the growth mindset.

By calculating the authors’ betweenness centrality, it is found that Duckworth has the highest betweenness centrality score of 0.01, playing a bridging role among many researchers and existing adjacent to several central nodes. By examining Duckworth’s articles indexed in the WoS Core Collection, it is observed that she has collaborated with core authors such as Yeager and Dweck in various areas, including interventions related to the growth mindset, assessment of non-cognitive skills (such as the growth mindset), and self-control. Duckworth has extensively studied grit, which is also a non-cognitive skill related to mindset, with the aim of predicting how it influences students’ academic and career achievements. She believes that the most effective way to cultivate grit is through the growth mindset ( Duckworth, 2013 ).

4.1.2 Countries (regions) and institutions of publications

Using CiteSpace 6.2.R4, a further examination of the source countries and institutions of the selected literature is conducted to understand the overall situation. The resulting knowledge network is shown in Figure 3 . In terms of the overall distribution, the literature collected in this study comes from 49 countries and regions. However, the top five countries (regions) in terms of publications account for a cumulative total of 478 articles, which is 88% of the total. North American countries are the main knowledge hubs, with the United States presenting as the central axis node radiating to the surrounding areas. East Asian countries, represented by China, Japan, and South Korea, form a secondary axis along with Western Europe and Australia. There are close cross-regional collaboration relationships among countries and institutions, and a collaborative network has basically formed.

Figure 3 . Distribution of authors by country (region) in the study of the growth mindset.

The country with the highest number of relevant publications is the United States. American scholars were the first to focus on and contribute to research on the growth mindset. Currently, 301 articles from the United States are indexed in the WoS Core Collection, accounting for a high proportion of 55%. Similarly, analyzing the distribution of institutions in the literature reveals that the majority of institutions are concentrated in certain universities in the United States. Stanford University, the University of Texas at Austin, Michigan State University, the University of Virginia, the University of Southern California, and Indiana University are particularly prominent as centers focused on researching the growth mindset (as shown in Figure 4 ).

Figure 4 . Institutional distribution of authors in the study of the growth mindset.

China ranks second among all countries with a publication volume of 65 articles, but there is still a significant gap in publication counts compared to the United States. Growth mindset research in China was initially conducted by the University of Hong Kong, and, so far, 16 related articles have been indexed in the WoS Core Collection. The main research institutions in this area include the University of Hong Kong, the University of Macau, and Peking University. The University of Hong Kong has continued its tradition of researching the growth mindset due to its early collaboration with Stanford University on implicit theories. Notable scholars in this field include Chi Yue Chiu and Ying Yi Hong. The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia follow China closely with publication volumes of 49, 34, and 29 articles, respectively. Major research institutions include the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, the University of Alberta in Canada, and the University of New South Wales in Australia, respectively.

4.2 Analysis of knowledge base based on spatiotemporal dimensions

4.2.1 spatial dimension.

The top 24 authors with a publication volume of at least five articles were analyzed (refer to Table 1 ). Looking at the countries and research institutions to which these core authors belong, 13 scholars are from American universities, four are from Australian universities, three are from Canadian universities, and the remaining authors come from Finland ( n  = 2), Poland ( n  = 1), and China ( n  = 1). It can be observed that, except for the Chinese authors, the rest of the authors are from occidental countries.

Table 1 . Major authors in growth mindset research.

Combining information from Table 1 with the details of the core author group in the field of growth mindset research, along with their countries/regions, institutions, and research directions, we can analyze the foundation of the knowledge network constituting the growth mindset paradigm.

First, the research landscape presented by the knowledge map aligns closely with the institutions of the core authors in Table 1 . Current research on the growth mindset is primarily centered around these core authors and carried out within their affiliated institutions. Authors from the same institution or country/region often have interconnected research interests. For example, core authors from the United States have primarily focused on adolescents, examining the development of their academic achievements and psychological well-being. Core authors from Australia have consistently directed their attention toward the field of teacher education, aiming to explore the impact of the growth mindset on teacher professional development and classroom instruction. Additionally, they have also emphasized the influence of the growth mindset on the domain of mathematics, including the relationship between academic achievement, engagement, and growth goals. Canadian scholars have demonstrated a strong interest in cross-cultural comparisons of the growth mindset and the mechanisms by which the growth mindset promotes language learning, particularly second language acquisition.

Secondly, there are close connections among the core author group, with frequent exchanges between academic institutions, and the existing collaborative networks tend to be biased towards core cities and major universities worldwide. Apart from collaborations within the same institution, there are also cross-institutional collaborations; for instance, Dweck and Yeager from Stanford University collaborated to explore the promotion of psychological resilience by the growth mindset ( Yeager and Dweck, 2012 ), design intervention models reconstructing the growth mindset ( Yeager et al., 2016a , b ), and conduct large-scale online interventions to improve the educational trajectories of adolescents ( Yeager et al., 2019 ). Porter from Pennsylvania State University concurrently lectures at Duckworth’s Grit Lab, collaborating on research related to fostering perseverance in adolescents through the growth mindset. The disciplinary backgrounds and research conditions of publishing institutions determine the quality and quantity of their affiliated literature. The research landscape mentioned above consists of renowned universities in various regions, which are located in economically developed areas and can provide excellent resources to support research.

In summary, the foundation of the knowledge network constituting the growth mindset paradigm is characterized by close alignment between the research landscape and the core authors’ affiliated institutions. The core authors often have interconnected research interests within the same institution or country/region while also maintaining strong connections and collaborations across institutions. These research institutions are well-known universities located in economically developed regions, which can provide favorable support and resources for research in the field of growth mindset research.

Furthermore, at the current stage, research efforts in different regions are primarily focused on intervention studies related to the growth mindset. Growth mindset interventions are typically considered as light touch interventions ( Kim et al., 2022 ) and are common interventions that address both educational and mental health needs ( Mosanya, 2021 ). However, investigators from different countries are approaching research from different angles, such as developing interventions based on neuroscience research, using computer games for intervention therapy, and developing single-session online intervention models, among others. Looking at the development process of mindset research, we can see that each stage has its own characteristics.

In the first stage of research, the focus was mainly on demonstrating the positive impact of the growth mindset on individual intelligence and academic development, such as its promotional and predictive effects on seeking challenges, positive outcomes, and psychological resilience. Additionally, mindset also influences the formation of social judgments and biases in interpersonal interactions. In the second stage, which is the current stage, research on mindset has entered the era of field experiments and replication science. Its characteristic is the use of large samples and longitudinal designs to examine changes in mindset processes ( Dweck and Yeager, 2019 ). Unlike in previous laboratory experiments, the current challenges posed by field experiments and the difficulties in developing intervention measures have become common concerns among scholars worldwide.

Lastly, in the context of accelerating globalization, research on the growth mindset should not be limited to a single country or region. Researchers have started to adopt a comparative perspective to examine the development of a growth mindset and focus on the similarities and differences in the growth mindset across different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the participation of researchers from different socio-cultural backgrounds has allowed research team expansion; broadened the research perspective; and even led to the establishment of closely connected and productive scholar networks like the Student Experience Research Network (SERN), which conducts research on the growth mindset and stereotype threats. SERN scholars come from 24 different institutions and cover various stages of development from early childhood to adulthood. Although the network operations have reached a conclusion in 2023, this interdisciplinary growth mindset approach to research continues to exert an influence on future research, and the network’s resources remain accessible.

4.2.2 Time dimension

The knowledge foundation can reflect the essence of cutting-edge research in a field, with highly cited literature best representing the knowledge foundation of that research area. By conducting co-citation analysis of the collected literature’s references, as shown in Figure 5 , it was revealed that the size and color depth of the nodes are positively correlated with their citation frequency.

Figure 5 . Distribution of highly co-cited literature in the study of the growth mindset.

By filtering out highly co-cited literature with a citation frequency of at least 30 citations, we identified 10 highly co-cited papers ( Table 2 ). Among the authors involved in these papers, Yeager has published three papers. The citations of these papers mainly occurred from 2016 to 2019, with a concentration in 2016. However, there have been no highly cited papers in the past 2 years. The network graph exhibits a clustering distribution pattern characterized by “multi-core” and “periphery” nodes. There are strong cores formed by highly co-cited papers closely connected to each other as well as multiple peripheral clusters radiating from single weak core nodes. When combining this information with the results of the analysis of the core research forces mentioned earlier, we could discern that the prominent nodes in the co-citation network align well with the core author group presented in the previous discussion.

Table 2 . Highly cited literature on growth mindset research (frequency ≥ 30).

Tracing the development of highly co-cited literature based on publication years provides insights into the research trajectory of a field. The attention to mindset began shifting from exploring the mechanisms of mindset to focusing on intervention measures and replication in the 2010s. The interventions based on a growth mindset showed promising prospects for improving students’ academic achievements in face-to-face interactions. However, the limitations of these “experiential interventions” in terms of time and cost have hindered their potential for widespread implementation and replication. Experimental data alone could no longer meet the current demands of large-scale educational improvement nor enhance educational equity, thus requiring a shift toward large-scale replication in intervention research ( Paunesku et al., 2015 ). Over the past decade, researchers have made efforts to develop concise and practical online intervention programs, yielding substantial data. However, the data also suggest that there are positive and negative poles in the impact of online interventions on different groups of students, such as struggling students versus high-achieving students. Moreover, in real educational settings, the inability to strictly control and estimate the influence of covariates makes it challenging to ensure that interventions have the intended impact on participants rather than other mediator variables ( Sisk et al., 2018 ). Easily implementable interventions may not necessarily be easy to develop or widely disseminate. Yeager improved intervention measures using design thinking principles, incorporating qualitative surveys to gather information on preferred intervention methods among the target population, such as storytelling using examples of famous individuals, peer role models, diversified writing exercises, and reducing information overload during the intervention. Randomized A/B testing was conducted on participants, followed by self-report evaluations. Meanwhile, the “saying-is-believing” approach helped participants internalize the growth mindset ( Yeager et al., 2016a , b ).

Interventions are not limited to classroom environments; they are also crucial during important transitional periods in individuals’ lives, such as school choice. Students often feel confused and uncertain during such transitions. Academic struggles often begin for students during early adolescence and can persist. Analyses revealed that changes in various aspects of the school environment, as perceived by students, particularly alterations in teacher support, could to some extent forecast changes in levels of student academic, personal, and interpersonal functioning ( Barber and Olsen, 2004 ). Furthermore, a longitudinal study has confirmed that students who fall behind in middle school are at a higher risk of dropping out of high school ( Bowers, 2010 ). Preparatory interventions based on a growth mindset can support students in developing higher strain levels in the future, enabling them to better adapt to changing environments. However, research suggests that the combined use of interventions targeting academic achievement and a growth mindset does not always yield greater effectiveness compared to their individual use, highlighting the importance of the delivery method for promoting growth mindsets ( Yeager et al., 2016a , b ).

Intervention measures are rapidly evolving in ways that are more easily accepted by groups. At the same time, intervention research, while penetrating deeper into schools, is also shifting its focus to the broader mechanisms influencing the growth mindset within society and families. Researchers, considering causal relationships derived from previous raw data, are employing quantitative research methods like meta-analysis to re-examine these relationships in larger sample sizes, aiming to explore the interplay of multiple factors. Socioeconomic conditions, as a structural factor, have been found to influence mindset mechanisms. Individuals with a stronger growth mindset can effectively mitigate the detrimental effects of low socioeconomic conditions on future achievement, and the positive effects of a growth mindset hold true across different socioeconomic strata ( Claro et al., 2016 ). In addition to socioeconomic conditions, there is a growing body of evidence shows that teachers can create classroom cultures that are consistent (or inconsistent) with growth mindset. This can affect students’ perceptions of or reactions to the context ( Muenks et al., 2020 ; LaCosse et al., 2021 ). A research based on a hypothesis proposes that the effects of individuals’ newly adopted beliefs depend on environmental affordances. The impact of these interventions may be amplified in settings where the pertinent beliefs and their associated behaviors are more malleable. Conversely, it is also plausible that a conducive environment could result in diminished estimated effects of growth mindset interventions. Building on this study, researchers have developed the Mindset × Context framework to understand this heterogeneity phenomenon that the different intervention effects for people in different contexts. This framework can interpret emerging evidence and guide the next generation of research on belief-supporting interventions, complementing established belief-changing interventions. The cues or features of the context permit or encourage individuals to internalize and act on their new mindsets. Concurrently, the results of previous large-scale, multi-site randomized trials (e.g., Yeager et al., 2019 ; Rege et al., 2021 ) indicate that there is a positive interaction between student interventions and contextual support. This implies that these interventions are more effective in more supportive environments. The full Mindset × Context framework integrates this positive interaction into a broader model that demonstrates how the effects of direct-to-student interventions could be modified by individual and contextual factors ( Hecht et al., 2021 ). A large-scale, randomized controlled trial demonstrates that growth mindset interventions are more effective when delivered by teachers ( Porter et al., 2022 ).

Furthermore, the family environment and parental parenting style also influence the development of children’s growth mindset. Non–mindset-related beliefs naturally permeate and influence children’s mindset formation. The influence of adults, such as parents and teachers, on children’s mindset formation often goes beyond their own mindset. Instead, their other beliefs, such as beliefs about failure and how they motivate children, manifest in visible attention and behaviors, shaping children’s beliefs in return. Children can accurately perceive parents’ beliefs about failure, which in turn predicts their beliefs about intelligence ( Haimovitz and Dweck, 2016 , 2017 ). This finding opens up directions for future research, focusing on the bidirectional influence between parents and children and the reciprocal interactions with other environmental factors. This aligns with Dweck and Yeager’s prediction regarding the research shift—namely, a greater focus on the mindset environment in which individuals are situated.

4.3 Analysis and evolution trends of research hotspots in growth mindset studies

By tracing the knowledge base of growth mindset research based on the temporal and spatial dimensions, the analysis of keyword co-occurrence and clustering in CiteSpace 6.2.R4 allows us to explore the interconnectedness of keywords in selected articles and infer the research foci in the related field.

4.3.1 Analysis of research hotspots based on keywords

Keywords reflect the themes and central ideas of an article, summarizing its content. By using the “keyword co-occurrence” function in CiteSpace 6.2.R4, we analyzed the interconnectedness of keywords in the selected articles to identify research hotspots and their evolution trends. After visualizing the original network map, further modifications of specific parameters in the control panel are made, resulting in the exported Figure 6 .

Figure 6 . Literature keyword co-occurrence in the study of the growth mindset.

Building upon the “keyword co-occurrence” analysis the “keyword clustering analysis” was performed yielding 21 clusters. The 10 largest clusters are selected and their silhouette profiles are presented in Figure 7 . The Q-value (modularity Q) was 0.7436 and the S-value (weighted mean silhouette S) was 0.8812. Based on these values we concluded that the network structure was significant the clustering results were good and the credibility was high. The size of each silhouette represents the scale of the cluster with larger sizes indicating more related keywords within the cluster and a greater level of attention to that topic.

Figure 7 . Literature keyword clusters in the study of the growth mindset.

In Figure 7 , we can observe that there is a partial overlap of cluster #0 with clusters #2 and #5. These clusters contain large and densely distributed keyword nodes, indicating the presence of numerous high-frequency keywords related to the theme of “mindset.” The topics covered include implicit theories, stereotypes, research subjects related to mindset, and studies on mindset interventions. Cluster #3 is related to “self-concept,” while cluster #4 is associated with “student motivation.” These clusters include keywords related to internal psychological aspects, such as “goal-setting” and “academic beliefs,” as well as keywords related to external factors, such as “Chinese parenting” and “psychological control.” Clusters #6 and #7 are relatively independent and primarily focus on interpersonal relationships. Alongside keywords like “management” and “leadership,” topics related to sexual relationships, such as “sexual satisfaction” and “erotica/pornography,” are also included. Clusters #8 and #9 also have some overlap. Cluster #8 revolves around the keyword “stress” and explores the relationship between mindset formation and individual cognition and behavioral experiences, including keywords like “fixed mindset” and “stress-related growth.” Cluster #9 approaches mindset formation from a neuroscientific perspective, focusing on brain electrophysiological signals related to error processing, such as “error positivity” and “error-related negativity,” to investigate the generation and impact of mindset.

Additionally, keywords related to research methods and processes, such as “meta-analysis,” “structural equation modeling,” and “reliability of measures,” are dispersed across various clusters, reflecting the emphasis on quantitative methods in growth mindset research. To provide a clearer presentation and analysis of the data, a “summary table” of the keyword data was exported, and Table 3 was obtained after consolidating singular and plural synonyms. This table summarizes the high-frequency keywords in the field of growth mindset research and, combined with the presented clusters, identifies four research hotspot directions.

Table 3 . High-frequency keywords in the study of growth mindset (2008–2022).

The theoretical origins of the growth mindset can be traced back to the concept of implicit theory, which is reflected in the highest co-occurring keyword “implicit theory.” Dweck proposed two theoretical frameworks of ability based on individuals’ different understandings of intelligence; these are the entity theory, which views intelligence as fixed, and the incremental theory, which sees intelligence as malleable. From these frameworks, the fixed and growth mindset concepts were developed ( Dweck and Yeager, 2019 ). The scientific validation of the growth mindset theory extends beyond the psychological level to include physiological aspects. Myers et al. approached the topic from a neuroscience perspective; using functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques, they conducted a study on 20 children with an average age of 11.2 years and identified a correlation between brain regions involved in error monitoring, such as the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and the influence of the growth mindset ( Myers et al., 2016 ). Current research utilizing brain activity measurement techniques such as electroencephalography is gradually uncovering the neuroscientific basis of the growth mindset. By reviewing the theoretical lineage of mindset research, we can see that the dominance of behaviorism in psychology gradually declined from the 1960s, leading to the cognitive revolution. Studies on learned helplessness in animals revealed the mechanisms by which experiences form beliefs and how beliefs influence motivation ( Weiner and Kukla, 1970 ). Dweck and Yeager combined animal learning theory with the emerging theory of individual attribution, exploring whether individuals would interpret uncontrollable and unpredictable events differently and how these interpretations shape their behavior ( Dweck and Yeager, 2019 ). Subsequent research confirmed this hypothesis, suggesting that children’s attributions for failure can predict their helplessness or mastery-oriented responses to setbacks ( Dweck and Reppucci, 1973 ). Through a series of experiments, researchers raised the question of why, among students with relatively equal abilities, some are more concerned with proving their abilities, while others are more focused on improving their abilities. To address this question, the field of mindset research emerged.

5 Discussion

5.1 exploration of factors influencing the growth mindset.

With the flourishing development of online teaching and learning, which differs from traditional face-to-face formats, students now require higher levels of self-regulation skills for autonomous learning planning. Consequently, more research has focused on factors influencing the growth mindset from the individual’s intrinsic perspective, such as self-efficacy and self-regulation. Jeni Burnette and colleagues approached the topic from the theory of self-control, highlighting the direct relationship between an individual’s implicit theory of intelligence and self-regulatory processes like goal-setting and monitoring ( Burnette et al., 2013 ). The external environment is also an important influencing factor, with investigators exploring how individuals use environmental cues to construct their mindset. When studying the impact of mindset formation, researchers often examine the effects of different environmental factors within educational contexts. These factors are evaluated based on individual academic achievements, such as course grades, standardized test scores, and GPA or participation and completion rates for advanced courses and challenging tasks ( Yeager et al., 2019 ). Some scholars have shifted their focus to the overall individual growth process and pay more attention to psychological well-being. Lawrence Rescorla from Stanford University addressed the issue of adolescent drug and alcohol addiction, highlighting the irreversible effects on neurotransmitters and the continuous need for medical intervention. Based on these findings, Burnette and other researchers have attempted to change participants’ fixed mindset beliefs regarding the incurability of addiction by inducing growth mindset messages. However, the results showed minimal effects of the growth mindset on cessation treatment ( Burnette et al., 2019 ).

Currently, more research simultaneously focuses on both of the aforementioned aspects of influence. One study based on data from the Programme for International Student Assessment examined the scores of students from different socioeconomic backgrounds in reading, mathematics, and science as well as their satisfaction with life and happiness indices. The goal was to determine the role of the growth mindset in bridging the gap between disadvantaged and high-achieving students. This study found that, on average in PISA, students who reported having a growth mindset scored higher in reading, mathematics, and science, displayed lower levels of fear of failure, and are more likely to consider their life satisfactory. Growth mindset is associated with a larger score gain for girls (+3 points), and disadvantaged (+12 points) and immigrant students (+9 points) when compared to boys, and advantaged and non-immigrant students ( Gouëdard, 2021 ).

5.2 Diverse research subjects in the study of the growth mindset

As indicated by the previous information, research on mindset has primarily focused on surveying students, particularly those in higher education or the transitional phase of middle and high school during adolescence. Many studies targeting the transitional period in basic education confirm that adolescence is a critical period for students facing numerous academic and social challenges. Students may encounter various difficulties, such as a reduced sense of belonging due to changes in the school environment, declining academic performance due to increased difficulty, and increased participation in challenging courses. The flexible changes in the educational trajectory during secondary school often lead to neglect in identifying and effectively addressing these problems. Research indicates that, over time, the issues that manifest in early secondary school will compound into significant differences in human capital in adulthood ( Yeager et al., 2019 ). Shifting to higher education, newly enrolled university students also receive considerable research attention. The transition in environment that occurs when entering college signifies that more complex challenges lie ahead. Moreover, increasing age does not necessarily mean enhanced stress resistance or a better ability to cope with challenges among college students. Judd specifically examined the significance of the growth mindset for learners in higher education environments. He believes that the impact of the growth mindset includes resilience, perseverance, persistence, social and teamwork skills, and giving and receiving peer support. These are essential general abilities for the comprehensive development that college students strive to acquire ( Judd, 2017 ). Almost every empirical study has conducted gender comparisons, yet no significant gender differences have been observed in the mindset held by individuals.

5.3 Expansion of application areas and research methods in the study of the growth mindset

Intervention research is a key focus in the application of the growth mindset, having been extensively applied to academic achievements, social qualities, and psychological health interventions. Studies on growth mindset interventions span from primary education to higher education, covering multiple disciplines and fields such as language, mathematics, and entrepreneurship. A “pure” growth mindset does not exist; in other words, each individual is a mixture of fixed and growth mindsets, and this mixture evolves continuously with experience ( Dweck, 2000 ). Adolescence is an important period for personality formation and the prevalence of psychological issues. It is also a golden period for interventions. Therefore, the majority of intervention measures are targeted at the adolescent stage. Burnette et al. conducted comparative experiments on different intervention models in an entrepreneurship introductory course and found that the growth mindset promotes entrepreneurial self-efficacy and simultaneously enhances academic and career interests among adolescents ( Burnette et al., 2020 ). Even brief face-to-face interventions can change some traits related to adolescence and society; reduce aggressive behavior; and address the widespread issues of campus violence, racial discrimination, and fixed mindset stereotypes ( Yeager et al., 2013 ). In terms of the development and implementation framework of intervention measures, Ku and Stager selected and examined 20 empirical studies on the effectiveness of growth mindset interventions; specifically, they extracted self-regulation, self-efficacy, and self-worth as three sub-abilities of the growth mindset and developed a more feasible intervention framework for higher education practitioners based on these concepts ( Ku and Stager, 2022 ). Some investigators have pointed out that, when focusing on primary school, research in this area is often limited in scale and tends to confuse overall school process evaluations with targeted intervention measures ( Savvides and Bond, 2021 ). Although growth mindset interventions are widely applied in classroom practices, this emerging field still requires more rigorous implementation procedures and outcome research.

5.4 Prediction of evolutionary trends based on emergent nodes

The concept of burst detection refers to a sharp increase in the citation frequency of a specific paper within a short period. This indicates that scholars have paid close attention to the content of that research field, reflecting the changes and dynamics of the research topics in the relevant field. By selecting “burst detection” on the control panel, the generated co-citation knowledge graph displays 25 high-bursting papers published from 2008 to 2022. In this analysis, we selected 11 papers with burst intensities of greater than 6 for further examination ( Table 4 ).

Table 4 . Articles with the strongest citation bursts (intensity ≥6).

Based on the analysis of the emergent node literature and the research directions of the main researchers in this field, as well as the four research hotspots identified earlier, we can make some predictions about the future evolution of research. For example, it is expected that the research procedures in the study of the growth mindset will be improved, including the measurement of data, data-collection methods, and statistical processes. The existing mature scales include Dweck’s Growth Mindset Scale developed in 2000, which has good reliability, validity, and cultural adaptability. As researchers delve deeper into the concept, more and more scholars are attempting to assess the level of growth mindset in research subjects from multiple attribute perspectives, such as beliefs about intelligence, effort, and setbacks. At the same time, many research errors and heterogeneity are related to the data-collection process. Future research needs to pay more attention to fidelity in intervention studies, conduct rigorous manipulation tests at the statistical level, and improve causal relationship models between the growth mindset and other variables.

Second, the applied attributes of the growth mindset will continue to be strengthened in contemporary research. After overcoming the limitations of small sample sizes in intervention studies, contemporary researchers are gradually conducting larger-scale assessments and interventions using remote online operations and big data computations. Large-scale testing often entails a large amount of data collection, and current studies often conduct interventions on a monthly or semester basis. While short-term measurements have shown promising significant effects, research data with longer timespans show that the effects of growth mindset interventions are comparable to traditional interventions, with low effect sizes. Some scholars have pointed out the existence of “publication bias” in the field, where the effect sizes of published studies are much larger than those of unpublished studies, or there is “ p -value manipulation,” where research data are selectively reported ( Paunesku et al., 2015 ). Small effects, null effects, or effects in non-predicted directions are often discarded by researchers, while influential conclusions are often based on a few inconspicuous heterogeneous samples. Future research may need to focus more on heterogeneous samples that emerge and investigate the reasons for heterogeneity and low effect sizes. In addition to procedural adjustments in quantitative research, qualitative research often involves self-reporting by participants to investigate their mindset, such as self-reporting in teacher classroom instruction. There may be response biases, such as social expectation errors, that can subjectively influence the results ( Park et al., 2016 ). Therefore, simultaneously examining self-reporting and specific practices can greatly improve the objectivity of the research. Future research should pay more attention to details and subtle differences, such as handling heterogeneous samples, controlling research variables, reducing research subjectivity, and better integrating quantitative and qualitative methods to improve research procedures.

Furthermore, the exploration of the mechanisms underlying the formation of the growth mindset will deepen. Apart from the influence of physiological mechanisms, such as the neuroscientific basis of growth-mindset formation, there are complex and variable social environmental factors of interest. Park et al.’s research indicates that teacher performance–oriented teaching practices have a significant impact on the formation of students’ fixed mindsets. The data show a negative correlation between teacher performance–oriented teaching practices and students’ math scores over one academic year, although this finding is not significant at the statistical level. However, when the research period was extended to two academic years and measured continuously, the data became significant. This suggests that external influences on an individual’s growth mindset can accumulate over time. Going further back, it can be confirmed that belief differences in mindset and human attribute plasticity have already been identified in early elementary school children, but they are not domain-specific ( Park et al., 2016 ). Research on the conditions for mindset formation also paves the way for exploring the function mechanisms in subsequent studies, with the goal of better leveraging the positive effects of the growth mindset.

Similarly, previous studies on the impact mechanisms of parenting styles on children’s mindset formation corroborate Park’s conclusion that the thinking environment in which children grow up in strongly influences the formation of their mindset. Yeager et al.’s research found that prior achievement levels and peer norms in the middle school transition period can influence mindset transitions. High-achieving students often receive more and higher-quality resources and are less likely to change, and positive peer norms facilitate the formation of the growth mindset in specific domains (e.g., reading; Yeager et al., 2019 ). The emphasis on the growth environment of children’s thinking also prompts researchers to pay more attention to the interactive effects between multiple mechanisms, such as simultaneously examining the interactive effects of parenting styles and school classroom environments. In addition to tracking measurements in real-life contexts, related laboratory studies can be conducted to explore causal relationships more accurately. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have infused interdisciplinary perspectives, strengthening the foundation of explanatory mechanisms for the growth mindset.

Lastly, research on the function mechanisms of the growth mindset will become more precise. As the growth mindset is applied in a wider range of disciplines and fields, the issue of how to more accurately control complex variables to maximize the function of the growth mindset has become a common concern. Studies have shown that the growth mindset has a greater impact among students with a lower socioeconomic status and provides more help to them ( Claro et al., 2016 ). In contrast, among high-achieving students, the scope of improvement is smaller and the impact of the growth mindset is weaker ( Yeager et al., 2019 ). Moreover, scholars have focused on the involvement of minority groups in STEM classrooms and pointed out a negative correlation between teachers’ fixed mindset and minority students’ participation ( Canning et al., 2019 ). These findings urge us to investigate the integration of mindset in different thinking environments, and relevant questions include the following: how can we best convey a growth mindset to different individuals? How does the organization of the thinking environment determine whether students accept and apply new thinking or help embed the growth mindset into the culture of schools and organizations? Finally, how should we address the potential adverse effects of mindset? We still know very little about the best answers to these questions. Romero et al. demonstrated the predictive role of mindset for students’ academic performance by measuring the scores of middle school students and the enrollment rate in AP math courses. They confirmed the predictive role of affective theory for students’ emotional functioning by tracking measurements of depression and well-being among middle school students. However, upon examining the interaction effects of these two mechanisms, it was found that the results were not significant ( Romero et al., 2014 ). Similar to the generation mechanisms of mindset, the function mechanisms of mindset also involve the possibility of different theories and environmental interactions.

In addition, existing research on school learning and transitional periods has, to varying degrees, demonstrated the positive function of the growth mindset for different populations. Some scholars have pointed out that the influence of a growth mindset only manifests in adversity or challenging situations, such as the transition from middle school to high school, which is a period marked by frequent adolescent issues ( Blackwell et al., 2007 ). So, for other life-development stages or different time and space contexts during schooling, can the function of the growth mindset be manifested in relatively smooth life stages? To what extent can the growth mindset maximize its function in challenging environments with different characteristics? Whether its specificity can be highlighted deserves more attention. In a field survey with a wider scope and larger sample size, the association between a growth mindset and academic achievement was much weaker compared to the presentation of laboratory data ( Bahník and Vranka, 2017 ), showing significant differences from the meta-analytical results of previous scholars such as Burnette. Although this does not imply that mindset does not have a positive effect on achieving goals, this study can be seen as a heterogeneous source. This also prompts us to reflect on whether the effectiveness of a growth mindset in predicting achievements in various fields is limited to specific research scenarios or small-scale samples. As research deepens and expands, investigators will face more complex environments and interaction mechanisms, and the exploration of mindset may be endless. The future direction of research efforts is to overcome these limitations in order to better explain the differences between existing and past research results.

5.5 Limitations

Firstly, in the initial phase of the study, a single Web of Science database was employed for the analysis of the literature. While other databases, including Scopus and Google Scholar, are also rich in literature, given the limited resources and time available, we prioritised focusing on WoS to achieve the best balance of research depth and efficiency. We acknowledge that this choice may bring certain limitations, especially that it may not cover all relevant literature. At the same time, the possibility of positive results bias cannot be ruled out.

Secondly, CiteSpace is a relatively straightforward visualisation tool. In future research, the combination of additional tools such as VOSviewer could facilitate a more in-depth and comprehensive analysis within this field. Furthermore, the utilisation of tools such as the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) could assist in the control of bias.

6 Conclusion

Based on 543 articles selected from the Social Sciences Citation Index database, this study used CiteSpace 6.2.R4 to evaluate and pinpoint the status, hot areas, and frontiers of growth-mindset. Researchers from Australia and countries/territories in North America, East Asia, and Western Europe have maintained relatively tighter cooperation with each other. Carol S. Dweck, Jeni L. Burnette, David S. Yeager, and Mary Murphy have high publication volumes and close connections with each other. Angela Duckworth has acted as a bridge among many researchers. Highly co-cited literature has mainly focused on the impacts of mindset and intervention measures. In the past two decades, the literature on mindset research has plunged into numerous hot topics in terms of implicit theory, intelligence, motivation, beliefs, achievements, academic performance, students, transitions, and psychological intervention. Based on burst detection, the field of growth-mindset research shows the following trends: (1) future research must pay more attention to fidelity in intervention studies, conduct rigorous manipulation tests at the statistical level, and improve causal relationship models between growth mindset and other variables and (2) use a multidisciplinary perspective to provide a deeper explanation of the formation mechanism of the growth mindset. Finally, (3) the function mechanisms of the growth mindset in different cultural backgrounds should be strengthened.

Author contributions

JX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WX: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project, grant number 19YJA880069.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Bahník, Š., and Vranka, M. A. (2017). Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants. Personal. Individ. Differ. 117, 139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.046

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barber, B. K., and Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. J. Adolesc. Res. 19, 3–30. doi: 10.1177/0743558403258113

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., and Carol, S. D. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bowers, A. J. (2010). Grades and graduation: a longitudinal risk perspective to identify student dropouts. J. Educ. Res. 103, 191–207. doi: 10.1080/00220670903382970

Burnette, J. L., Forsyth, R. B., Desmarais, S. L., and Hoyt, C. L. (2019). Mindsets of addiction: implications for treatment intentions. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 38, 367–394. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2019.38.5.367

Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., and Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychol. Bull. 139, 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531

Burnette, J. L., Pollack, J. M., Forsyth, R. B., Hoyt, C. L., Babij, A. D., Thomas, F. N., et al. (2020). A growth mindset intervention: enhancing students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and career development. Entrep. Theor. Pract. 44, 878–908. doi: 10.1177/1042258719864293

Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., and Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Sci. Adv. 5:eaau4734. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

Claro, S., Paunesku, D., and Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8664–8668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608207113

Duckworth, A. L. (2013). “Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance.” TED Talk, April, Video, 5 min., 59 sec. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/angela_lee_duckworth_grit_the_power_of_passion_and_perseverance?subtitle=en

Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self theories: their role in motivation, personality and development . Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success . New York, NY: Random House.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., and Hong, Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a word from two perspectives. Psychol. Inq. 6, 267–285. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y., and Chiu, C. (1993). Implicit theories individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 19, 644–656. doi: 10.1177/0146167293195015

Dweck, C. S., and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Dweck, C. S., and Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 25, 109–116. doi: 10.1037/h0034248

Dweck, C. S., and Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: a view from two eras. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 481–496. doi: 10.1177/1745691618804166

Gouëdard, P. (2021). ‘Can a growth mindset help disadvantaged students close the gap?’, PISA in focus, 112 . Paris: OECD Publishing.

Haimovitz, K., and Dweck, C. S. (2016). Parents’ views of failure predict children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets. Psychol. Sci. 27, 859–869. doi: 10.1177/0956797616639727

Haimovitz, K., and Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: new research and a new proposal. Child Dev. 88, 1849–1859. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12955

Hecht, C. A., Yeager, D. S., Dweck, C. S., and Murphy, M. C. (2021). Beliefs, affordances, and adolescent development: lessons from a decade of growth mindset interventions. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 61, 169–197. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2021.04.004

Judd, F. (2017). “Growth mindset and adult learners in higher education.” in Global conference on education and research (GLOCER 2017) . pp. 1–13.

Ku, Y. R., and Stager, C. (2022). Rethinking the multidimensionality of growth mindset amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and framework proposal. Front. Psychol. 13:572220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.572220

LaCosse, J., Murphy, M. C., Garcia, J. A., and Zirkel, S. (2021). The role of STEM professors’ mindset beliefs on students’ anticipated psychological experiences and course interest. J. Educ. Psychol. 113, 949–971. doi: 10.1037/edu0000620

Mosanya, M. (2021). Buffering academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic related social isolation: grit and growth mindset as protective factors against the impact of loneliness. Int. J. Appl. Posit. Psychol. 6, 159–174. doi: 10.1007/s41042-020-00043-7

Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., et al. (2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. J. Exp. Psychol. 149, 2119–2144. doi: 10.1037/xge0000763

Myers, C. A., Wang, C., Black, J. M., Bugescu, N., and Hoeft, F. (2016). The matter of motivation: striatal resting-state connectivity is dissociable between grit and growth mindset. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 1521–1527. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw065

Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., and Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 300–313. doi: 10.1037/edu0000064

Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., and Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychol. Sci. 26, 784–793. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571017

Porter, T., Catalán Molina, D., Cimpian, A., Roberts, S., Fredericks, A., Blackwell, L. S., et al. (2022). Growth-mindset intervention delivered by teachers boosts achievement in early adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 33, 1086–1096. doi: 10.1177/09567976211061109

Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 6, 855–863. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X

Rege, M., Hanselman, P., Solli, I. F., Dweck, C. S., Ludvigsen, S., Bettinger, E., et al. (2021). How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries. Am. Psychol. 76, 755–767. doi: 10.1037/amp0000647

Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., and Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: the role of implicit theories. Emotion 14, 227–234. doi: 10.1037/a0035490

Savvides, H., and Bond, C. (2021). How does growth mindset inform interventions in primary schools? A systematic literature review. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 37, 134–149. doi: 10.1080/02667363.2021.1879025

Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., and Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychol. Sci. 29, 549–571. doi: 10.1177/0956797617739704

Weiner, B., and Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 15, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/h0029211

Yeager, D. S., and Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educ. Psychol. 47, 302–314. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., et al. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature 573, 364–369. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., et al. (2016a). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: the case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 374–391. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098

Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., and Dweck, C. S. (2013). An implicit theories of personality intervention reduces adolescent aggression in response to victimization and exclusion. Child Dev. 84, 970–988. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12003

Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., et al. (2016b). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E3341–E3348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524360113

Kim, S., Yun, J., Schneider, B., Broda, M., Klager, C., and Chen, I. C. (2022). The effects of growth mindset on college persistence and completion. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 195, 219–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.002

Keywords: growth mindset, bibliometric analysis, CiteSpace, implicit theory, intervention

Citation: Xu J and Xu W (2024) Hot topics and frontier evolution of growth-mindset research: a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. Front. Psychol . 15:1349820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349820

Received: 05 December 2023; Accepted: 09 August 2024; Published: 30 August 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Xu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wenqiong Xu, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.