Video Links
ASC T-Chart Tutorial
ASC Venn Diagram Tutorial
Step 1: Determine Your Research Topic
Searching 101 Workshop
Searching 102 Workshop
ASC Review of Literature Matrix
Step 2: Use graphic organizers to identify and analyze similarities and differences.
T-Chart Graphic Organizer
Venn Diagram
Step 3: Produce a compare/contrast or comparative analysis with these strategies.
Let your curiosity lead the way:
Apply Today
Guide for Comparative Literature Ph.D. dissertation, defense, and electronic submission.
The Student is responsible for punctually completing and providing all of the necessary materials(^) for submission to the OGS, and for formatting the dissertation in accordance with its guidelines.
The Dissertation Director is responsible for assisting The Student in assembling the full five member Dissertation Defense Committee for the defense, for assisting in arranging a defense date and location, as well as submitting all required signed paperwork and forms(^) to the The Coordinator for submission to the OGS via Portal(*), including the Dissertation Defense Committee and Examination Approval forms .
The OGS provides a comprehensive Doctoral Dissertation Guide for all Ph.D. candidates.
Open researcher and contributor id (orcid), title, scope, and procedure (tsp) ph.d..
Completed by The Student, Submitted by The Coordinator
By the time of completion of the Comprehensive Exams, students should have formulated a dissertation topic and selected a Dissertation Director, as well as two additional readers. The Student submits a Title, Scope and Procedure Ph.D. form^ (TSP) for approval; this form requires the signatures of the Dissertation Director and two additional readers (collectively known as the Research Advisory Committee or RAC), as well as the Program Director. The RAC normally consists of three tenured or tenur-track Washington University faculty members.
The TSP form includes and initial outline or model to research the dissertation topic, which must be comparative. TSP form outlines the preliminary dissertation title, a brief abstract, and methodology.
The Academic and Administrative Coordinator must receive the completed and signed TSP form to submit to the Office of Graduate Studies on behalf of the student. The TSP form must be completed and submitted to the OGS before beginning the fifth year of full-time enrollment in the Office of Graduate Studies. The TSP may change in the course of research: contact the Academic and Administrative Coordinator with requirements for an amended form if this occurs.
Completed by The Student
The Student must file an Intent to Graduate (ITG) form for the semester in which they intend to graduate. Deadlines for filing the Intent to Graduate form for each semester are listed on the Office of Graduate Studies’s online calendar. Complete this form by logging onto WebSTAC and clicking on “Intent to Graduate” from the menu . Take note of the diploma pick-up and mailing dates that are included in the form because the diploma will be mailed to the address entered.
If the graduation semester changes, a new form must be filed for the term the Student intends to graduate.
Ph.D. students are encouraged to establish an Open Researcher and contributor ID (ORCiD) , a free, personal digital identifier. Many scholars will want to establish their ORCiD profile and maintain it throughout their careers. For more information, visit https://libguides.wustl.edu/orcid.
The Student should work with the Dissertation Director to establish an effective and efficient calendar for submission of work, allowing time for revisions. Once the Dissertation Director has approved a chapter, the student should submit it to the other two readers. The Student is expected to respect the suggestions for revision from all three of their readers for each chapter as they go along. This process ensures that the dissertation is sound from their different perspectives before the Student submits the completed dissertation to the larger Dissertation Committee for the "defense."
Completed by The Student and The Dissertation Director, submitted by The Coordinator to OGS
The Defense Committee consists of at least five members, who normally meet two independent criteria:
All Dissertation Committees must be approved by the Dean of the Graduate School or by their designee, regardless of whether they meet the normal criteria. Approval requires completion of the Dissertation Defense Committee form^ . The Coordinator must receive the completed and DGS signed Dissertation Defense Committeee form to submit to OGS on behalf of The Student via Portal.
This form and Defense Committee must be approved by the Graduate School before the scheduling of the dissertation defense can occur; this MUST be completed and approved at least 3 weeks ahead of your desired defense date.
Completed by The Student, submitted by The Coordinator to OGS
Once the Defense Committee is approved via an email from the OGS, The Coordinator can help The Student in securing a time and location for the defense. After approval of the Defense Committee and at least 15 days before the defense, The Coordinator will submit a Defense Notification* to the OGS via Portal stating the time, date, and location of the defense, as well as attach an updated CV of The Student^. The Student is required to provide the Coordinator with the Dissertation Defense Information (date and location of defense, title of dissertation) and a copy of the Student CV in a .pdf format for submission.
Once the Dissertation Director has approved the content and the style of the entire dissertation, The Student must distribute copies of the full document to all members of the Defense Committee, including external readers, in preparation for the oral defense. The Student should allow a minimum of three (3) weeks for the Defense Committee members to read the thesis. The Student is responsible for giving copies of the dissertation to the Defense Committee. According to the OGS, the Defense Committee members may request rescheduling of the defense if the dissertation is not made available at least 1 week in advance.
While certain critiques and suggestions from the larger Defense Committee during the defense are to be expected, indeed encouraged, The Dissertation Director, by signaling approval of The Student's submission of the dissertation to the Defense Committee, is indicating the support of the Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members, i.e., that they stand by the work and are prepared to support its content and form at the defense.
OGS provides a Dissertation and Thesis Template for all Ph.D. candidates.
Completed by The Student and The Defense Committee,
From Graduate School Information on Defense of the Dissertation :
"Attendance by a minimum of four members of the Dissertation Defense Committee, including the committee chair and an outside member, is required for the defense to take place. This provision is designed to permit your defense to proceed in case of a situation that unexpectedly prevents one of the five members from attending. Do not plan in advance to have only four members in attendance; if one of those four cannot attend, your defense must be rescheduled. Note that the absence of all outside members or of the committee chair would necessitate rescheduling the defense.
"Members of the Dissertation Defense Committee normally attend in person, but one of the five (or, in case of an emergency, one of the four) members may attend virtually instead.
“Faculty and graduate students who are interested in the subject of the dissertation are normally welcome to attend all or part of the defense but may ask questions only at the discretion of the committee members. Though there is some variation among degree programs, the defense ordinarily focuses on the dissertation itself and its relation to the student’s field of expertise.”
Signed by The Defense Committee, delivered to The Coordinator by The Dissertation Director, submitted by The Coordinator to OGS
The Dissertation Director is responsible for gathering signatures of the committee on the Examination Approval Form ^*. The Coordinator will then submit it on behalf of The Student via Portal.
Visit the OGS calendar for the Dissertation/Thesis Final Submission deadline. The following items must be completed by this deadline or Graduation and degree dates will need to be delayed. It is encouraged to submit the dissertation before the deadline in the event fomatting changes are needed.
Consult the Comparative Literature subject librarian regarding copyright permissions for any copyrighted work included in the dissertation.
Students are encouraged to complete their Survey of Earned Doctorates prior to the dissertation deadline. Do this as soon as possible so that OGS has a record of its arrival in time for graduation requirements to be met. OGS will be notified automatically once the survey is complete.
The electronic submission of the dissertation will not be processed or approved until this email arrives to OGS.
After successful defense of the dissertation and completion of any committee requested changes, OGS requires that The Student create an online account at ProQuest ( http://www.etdadmin.com/wustl ) to submit the final approved text. ProQuest is this country’s most widely used commercial archiving service for dissertations and theses.
Visit the OGS calendar for the Dissertation/Thesis Final Submission deadline. The following items must be completed by this deadline or Graduation and degree dates will need to be delayed. It is encouraged to submit the dissertation before the deadlin in the event fomatting changes are needed.
The Student must have completed all items below before the electronic submission of the dissertation to ProQuest.
| Filed Intent to Graduate for the semester planned to complete degree? |
Does the title page indicate the correct administrative unit? | |
Is the committee alphabetized by last name, after chair/co-chair? | |
Is The Title in Upper and Lower Case, as in This Quest? | |
Does the title page indicate the month and year in which the degree is being conferred? | |
If including an abstract page, does it use the required heading found in the Dissertation & Thesis Template? | |
Is the front matter numbered correctly, starting with ii? | |
Does the page numbering on the Table of Contents correspond to the correct page location? | |
Does the Table of Contents include a bibliography/references/works cited? | |
Completed the Survey of Earned Doctorates? | |
Completed the Post-Graduation Job Survey? | |
Has the OGS received the Examination Approval Form? | |
Any requisite copyright permission letters? |
The OGS is notified when you submit your dissertation to ProQuest. When reviewing submission, they ensure that the Examination Approval Form and Survey of Earned Doctorates have been completed and check the submitted PDF to ensure that all formatting requirements have been followed. The amount of time needed to review the manuscript, and the number and nature of any changes that may be required to make, are generally determined by how carefully the work has been prepared. Do not wait until the deadline day to submit the dissertation! Work must be formatted correctly and approved by the OGS in order for graduation. Once the OGS review is complete, they will send you an email through ProQuest saying one of the following:
After the dissertation has been approved by the OGS, The Student should forward The Coordinator the OGS dissertation approval email for ordering of bound copies from Thesis On Demand.
The Student may need to present proof of completion of degree to a prospective employer before receiving a diploma. In that case, only after notification that submission has been approved, The Student may request a Degree Certification on the Graduate School website , on the Forms page.
Once the dissertation has been approved, The Student should contact The Dissertation Director for confirmation of the Hooding Ceremony for Commencement. Traditionally, The Dissertation Director will be present to present The Student with the Ph.D. hood during the Ph.D. Hooding Ceremony.
Registration for the Commencement ceremony is required and is separate from the ITG and ordering of regalia. Please register by the deadline online via the Wash U Commencement site .
Please note that the deadline and process for ordering regalia will be announced on the Wash U Commencement regalia site and is taken care of by the Wash U Bookstore and NOT the Comparative Literature program.
Questions from students may be addressed to the current Comparative Literature Academic and Administrative Coordinator (aka Graduate Program Assistant, or GPA) or the Comparative Literature program at: [email protected] .
Home > USC Columbia > Arts and Sciences > Comparative Literature > Comparative Literature Theses and Dissertations
Theses/dissertations from 2023 2023.
Constructing Selfhood Through Fantasy: Mirror Women and Dreamscape Conversations in Olga Grushin’s Forty Rooms , Grace Marie Alger
Eugene O’Neill Returns: Theatrical Modernization and O’Neill Adaptations in 1980s China , Shuying Chen
The Supernatural in Migration: A Reflection on Senegalese Literature and Film , Rokhaya Aballa Dieng
Breaking Down the Human: Disintegration in Nineteenth-Century Fiction , Benjamin Mark Driscol
Archetypes Revisited: Investigating the Power of Universals in Soviet and Hollywood Cinema , Iana Guselnikova
Planting Rhizomes: Roots and Rhizomes in Maryse Condé’s Traversée de la Mangrove and Calixthe Beyala’s Le Petit Prince de Belleville , Rume Kpadamrophe
Violence, Rebellion, and Compromise in Chinese Campus Cinema ----- The Comparison of Cry Me a Sad River and Better Days , Chunyu Liu
Tracing Modern and Contemporary Sino-French Literary and Intellectual Relations: China, France, and Their Shifting Peripheries , Paul Timothy McElhinny
Truth And Knowledge In A Literary Text And Beyond: Lydia Chukovskaya’s Sofia Petrovna At The Intersections Between Selves, Culture, And Paratext , Angelina Rubina
From Roland to Gawain, or the Origin of Personified Knights , Clyde Tilson
Afro-Diasporic Literatures of the United States and Brazil: Imaginaries, Counter-Narratives, and Black Feminism in the Americas , David E. S. Beek
The Pursuit of Good Food: The Alimentary Chronotope in Madame Bovary , Lauren Flinner
Form and Voice: Representing Contemporary Women’s Subaltern Experience in and Beyond China , Tingting Hu
Geography of a “Foreign” China: British Intellectuals’ Encounter With Chinese Spaces, 1920-1945 , Yuzhu Sun
Truth and Identity in Dostoevsky’s Raskolnikov and Prince Myshkin , Gwendolyn Walker
Postcolonial Narrative and The Dialogic Imaginatio n: An Analysis of Early Francophone West African Fiction and Cinema , Seydina Mouhamed Diouf
The Rising of the Avant-Garde Movement In the 1980s People’s Republic of China: A Cultural Practice of the New Enlightenment , Jingsheng Zhang
L’ Entre- Monde : The Cinema of Alain Gomis , Guillaume Coly
Digesting Gender: Gendered Foodways in Modern Chinese Literature, 1890s–1940s , Zhuo Feng
The Deconstruction of Patriarchal War Narratives in Svetlana Alexievich’s The Unwomanly Face of War , Liubov Kartashova
Pushing the Limits of Black Atlantic and Hispanic Transatlantic Studies Through the Exploration of Three U.S. Afro-Latio Memoirs , Julia Luján
Taiwanese Postcolonial Identities and Environmentalism in Wu Ming-Yi’s the Stolen Bicycle , Chihchi Sunny Tsai
Games and Play of Dream of the Red Chamber , Jiayao Wang
Convertirse en Inmortal, 成仙 ChéngxiāN, Becoming Xian: Memory and Subjectivity in Cristina Rivera Garza’s Verde Shanghai , Katherine Paulette Elizabeth Crouch
Between Holy Russia and a Monkey: Darwin's Russian Literary and Philosophical Critics , Brendan G. Mooney
Emerging Populations: An Analysis of Twenty-First Century Caribbean Short Stories , Jeremy Patterson
Time, Space and Nonexistence in Joseph Brodsky's Poetry , Daria Smirnova
Through the Spaceship’s Window: A Bio-political Reading of 20th Century Latin American and Anglo-Saxon Science Fiction , Juan David Cruz
The Representations of Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Arab Women’s Literature: Elements of Subversion and Resignification. , Rima Sadek
Insects As Metaphors For Post-Civil War Reconstruction Of The Civic Body In Augustan Age Rome , Olivia Semler
Flannery O’Connor’s Art And The French Renouveau Catholique: A Comparative Exploration Of Contextual Resources For The Author’s Theological Aesthetics Of Sin and Grace , Stephen Allen Baarendse
The Quixotic Picaresque: Tricksters, Modernity, and Otherness in the Transatlantic Novel, or the Intertextual Rhizome of Lazarillo, Don Quijote, Huck Finn, and The Reivers , David Elijah Sinsabaugh Beek
Piglia and Russia: Russian Influences in Ricardo Piglia’s Nombre Falso , Carol E. Fruit Diouf
Beyond Life And Death Images Of Exceptional Women And Chinese Modernity , Wei Hu
Archival Resistance: A Comparative Reading of Ulysses and One Hundred Years of Solitude , Maria-Josee Mendez
Narrating the (Im)Migrant Experience: 21st Century African Fiction in the Age of Globalization , Bernard Ayo Oniwe
Narrating Pain and Freedom: Place and Identity in Modern Syrian Poetry (1970s-1990s) , Manar Shabouk
The Development of ‘Meaning’ in Literary Theory: A Comparative Critical Study , Mahmoud Mohamed Ali Ahmad Elkordy
Familial Betrayal And Trauma In Select Plays Of Shakespeare, Racine, And The Corneilles , Lynn Kramer
Evil Men Have No Songs: The Terrorist and Literatuer Boris Savinkov, 1879-1925 , Irina Vasilyeva Meier
Resurrectio Mortuorum: Plato’s Use of Ἀνάγκη in the Dialogues , Joshua B. Gehling
Two Million "Butterflies" Searching for Home: Identity and Images of Korean Chinese in Ho Yon-Sun's Yanbian Narratives , Xiang Jin
The Trialectics Of Transnational Migrant Women’s Literature In The Writing Of Edwidge Danticat And Julia Alvarez , Jennifer Lynn Karash-Eastman
Unacknowledged Victims: Love between Women in the Narrative of the Holocaust. An Analysis of Memoirs, Novels, Film and Public Memorials , Isabel Meusen
Making the Irrational Rational: Nietzsche and the Problem of Knowledge in Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita , Brendan Mooney
Invective Drag: Talking Dirty in Catullus, Cicero, Horace, and Ovid , Casey Catherine Moore
Destination Hong Kong: Negotiating Locality in Hong Kong Novels 1945-1966 , Xianmin Shen
H.P. Lovecraft & The French Connection: Translation, Pulps and Literary History , Todd David Spaulding
Female Representations in Contemporary Postmodern War Novels of Spain and the United States: Women as Tools of Modern Catharsis in the Works of Javier Cercas and Tim O'Brien , Joseph P. Weil
Poetic Appropriations in Vergil’s Aeneid: A Study in Three Themes Comprising Aeneas’ Character Development , Edgar Gordyn
Ekphrasis and Skepticism in Three Works of Shakespeare , Robert P. Irons
The Role of the Trickster Figure and Four Afro-Caribbean Meta-Tropes In the Realization of Agency by Three Slave Protagonists , David Sebastian Cross
Putting Place Back Into Displacement: Reevaluating Diaspora In the Contemporary Literature of Migration , Christiane Brigitte Steckenbiller
Using Singular Value Decomposition in Classics: Seeking Correlations in Horace, Juvenal and Persius against the Fragments of Lucilius , Thomas Whidden
Decolonizing Transnational Subaltern Women: The Case of Kurasoleñas and New York Dominicanas , Florencia Cornet
Representation of Women In 19Th Century Popular Art and Literature: Forget Me Not and La Revista Moderna , Juan David Cruz
53x+m³=Ø? (Sex+Me=No Result?): Tropes of Asexuality in Literature and Film , Jana -. Fedtke
Argentina in The African Diaspora: Afro-Argentine And African American Cultural Production, Race, And Nation Building in the 19th Century , Julia Lujan
Male Subjectivity and Twenty-First Century German Cinema: Gender, National Idenity, and the Problem of Normalization , Richard Sell
Blue Poets: Brilliant Poetry , Evangelin Grace Chapman-Wall
Sickness of the Spirit: A Comparative Study of Lu Xun and James Joyce , Liang Meng
Dryden and the Solution to Domination: Bonds of Love In the Conquest of Granada , Lydia FitzSimons Robins
The Family As the New Collectivity of Belonging In the Fiction of Bharati Mukherjee and Jhumpa Lahiri , Sarbani Bose
Lyric Transcendence: the Sacred and the Real In Classical and Early-Modern Lyric. , Larry Grant Hamby
Abd al-Rahman Al-Kawakibi's Tabai` al-Istibdad wa Masari` al-Isti`bad (The Characteristics of Despotism and The Demises of Enslavement): A Translation and Introduction , Mohamad Subhi Hindi
Re-Visions: Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy In German and Italian Film and Literature , Kristina Stefanic Brown
Plato In Modern China: A Study of Contemporary Chinese Platonists , Leihua Weng
Making Victims: History, Memory, and Literature In Japan's Post-War Social Imaginary , Kimberly Wickham
The Mirrored Body: Doubling and Replacement of the Feminine and androgynous Body In Hadia Said'S Artist and Haruki Murakami'S Sputnik Sweetheart , Fatmah Alsalamean
Making Monsters: The Monstrous-Feminine In Horace and Catullus , Casey Catherine Moore
Not Quite American, Not Quite European: Performing "Other" Claims to Exceptionality In Francoist Spain and the Jim Crow South , Brittany Powell
Developing Latin American Feminist Theory: Strategies of Resistance In the Novels of Luisa Valenzuela and Sandra Cisneros , Jennifer Lyn Slobodian
Advanced Search
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on August 6, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.
Comparing and contrasting is an important skill in academic writing . It involves taking two or more subjects and analyzing the differences and similarities between them.
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
When should i compare and contrast, making effective comparisons, comparing and contrasting as a brainstorming tool, structuring your comparisons, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about comparing and contrasting.
Many assignments will invite you to make comparisons quite explicitly, as in these prompts.
Some other prompts may not directly ask you to compare and contrast, but present you with a topic where comparing and contrasting could be a good approach.
One way to approach this essay might be to contrast the situation before the Great Depression with the situation during it, to highlight how large a difference it made.
Comparing and contrasting is also used in all kinds of academic contexts where it’s not explicitly prompted. For example, a literature review involves comparing and contrasting different studies on your topic, and an argumentative essay may involve weighing up the pros and cons of different arguments.
As the name suggests, comparing and contrasting is about identifying both similarities and differences. You might focus on contrasting quite different subjects or comparing subjects with a lot in common—but there must be some grounds for comparison in the first place.
For example, you might contrast French society before and after the French Revolution; you’d likely find many differences, but there would be a valid basis for comparison. However, if you contrasted pre-revolutionary France with Han-dynasty China, your reader might wonder why you chose to compare these two societies.
This is why it’s important to clarify the point of your comparisons by writing a focused thesis statement . Every element of an essay should serve your central argument in some way. Consider what you’re trying to accomplish with any comparisons you make, and be sure to make this clear to the reader.
Comparing and contrasting can be a useful tool to help organize your thoughts before you begin writing any type of academic text. You might use it to compare different theories and approaches you’ve encountered in your preliminary research, for example.
Let’s say your research involves the competing psychological approaches of behaviorism and cognitive psychology. You might make a table to summarize the key differences between them.
Behaviorism | Cognitive psychology |
---|---|
Dominant from the 1920s to the 1950s | Rose to prominence in the 1960s |
Mental processes cannot be empirically studied | Mental processes as focus of study |
Focuses on how thinking is affected by conditioning and environment | Focuses on the cognitive processes themselves |
Or say you’re writing about the major global conflicts of the twentieth century. You might visualize the key similarities and differences in a Venn diagram.
These visualizations wouldn’t make it into your actual writing, so they don’t have to be very formal in terms of phrasing or presentation. The point of comparing and contrasting at this stage is to help you organize and shape your ideas to aid you in structuring your arguments.
When comparing and contrasting in an essay, there are two main ways to structure your comparisons: the alternating method and the block method.
In the alternating method, you structure your text according to what aspect you’re comparing. You cover both your subjects side by side in terms of a specific point of comparison. Your text is structured like this:
Mouse over the example paragraph below to see how this approach works.
One challenge teachers face is identifying and assisting students who are struggling without disrupting the rest of the class. In a traditional classroom environment, the teacher can easily identify when a student is struggling based on their demeanor in class or simply by regularly checking on students during exercises. They can then offer assistance quietly during the exercise or discuss it further after class. Meanwhile, in a Zoom-based class, the lack of physical presence makes it more difficult to pay attention to individual students’ responses and notice frustrations, and there is less flexibility to speak with students privately to offer assistance. In this case, therefore, the traditional classroom environment holds the advantage, although it appears likely that aiding students in a virtual classroom environment will become easier as the technology, and teachers’ familiarity with it, improves.
In the block method, you cover each of the overall subjects you’re comparing in a block. You say everything you have to say about your first subject, then discuss your second subject, making comparisons and contrasts back to the things you’ve already said about the first. Your text is structured like this:
The most commonly cited advantage of distance learning is the flexibility and accessibility it offers. Rather than being required to travel to a specific location every week (and to live near enough to feasibly do so), students can participate from anywhere with an internet connection. This allows not only for a wider geographical spread of students but for the possibility of studying while travelling. However, distance learning presents its own accessibility challenges; not all students have a stable internet connection and a computer or other device with which to participate in online classes, and less technologically literate students and teachers may struggle with the technical aspects of class participation. Furthermore, discomfort and distractions can hinder an individual student’s ability to engage with the class from home, creating divergent learning experiences for different students. Distance learning, then, seems to improve accessibility in some ways while representing a step backwards in others.
Note that these two methods can be combined; these two example paragraphs could both be part of the same essay, but it’s wise to use an essay outline to plan out which approach you’re taking in each paragraph.
If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
College essays
(AI) Tools
Some essay prompts include the keywords “compare” and/or “contrast.” In these cases, an essay structured around comparing and contrasting is the appropriate response.
Comparing and contrasting is also a useful approach in all kinds of academic writing : You might compare different studies in a literature review , weigh up different arguments in an argumentative essay , or consider different theoretical approaches in a theoretical framework .
Your subjects might be very different or quite similar, but it’s important that there be meaningful grounds for comparison . You can probably describe many differences between a cat and a bicycle, but there isn’t really any connection between them to justify the comparison.
You’ll have to write a thesis statement explaining the central point you want to make in your essay , so be sure to know in advance what connects your subjects and makes them worth comparing.
Comparisons in essays are generally structured in one of two ways:
It’s also possible to combine both methods, for example by writing a full paragraph on each of your topics and then a final paragraph contrasting the two according to a specific metric.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 30, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/compare-and-contrast/
Other students also liked, how to write an expository essay, how to write an argumentative essay | examples & tips, academic paragraph structure | step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
A step-by-step guide to writing a comparative analysis.
Click Here to Download Now.
How to write a comparative analysis.
Writing a comparative review in a research paper is not as difficult as many people might tend to think. With some tips, it is possible to write an outstanding comparative review. There are steps that must be utilized to attain this result. They are as detailed in this article.
Within the literary, academic, and journalistic world, analysis allows exposing ideas and arguments in front of a context, making it an important material for discussion within the professional work.
Within this genre, we can find a comparative analysis. For some authors, the comparative essay is defined as the text where two opposing positions are proposed or where two theses are verified. Through this comparison, the author intends to make the reader reflect on a specific topic. It consists of giving a written opinion about two positions, which are compared between them to conclude. Do you know how to write a comparative essay? In this article, we will explain step by step how to do it.
So, let’s see the guidelines that you must follow to achieve a good comparative analysis .
The structure.
In general, the approach is developed in the first paragraph or at the beginning of the work. Its objective is to propose the author’s position regarding a specific subject. Generally, this approach specifies the objective to be achieved. You must be clear about what topic you are going to deal with, what you want to explain, and what the perspectives will be to use in your comparative analysis, and you must also define who you write for.
As it is a comparative text, it begins with a general observation that can serve as a context for both approaches, then begins by establishing the arguments in each of the two cases. Do not forget to compare both objects of study according to each argument or idea to develop.
Let it be the reader himself who finds or defines his position in this essay and choose one of the two alternatives.
In this entry, there are two possibilities of approach: one deductive and the other inductive. The deductive method raises the issue, and you use your analysis of the variables leading, guiding the reader to draw their conclusions or fix a position on the issue. While the inductive method starts with argument, developing each of the variables until reaching the topic’s approach or problem. The two ways of approaching the subject are viable. Choose the one that is easiest for you to work with.
At the end of this section, your audience should:
Generally, in the body of the essay, the author presents all the arguments that support his thesis, which gives him a reflective and justifying body of the author’s initial statement. Depending on the length of the work, which can range from two to 15 pages, each paragraph or before a title corresponds to an argument’s development.
After speaking on the subject, the author must close the essay, must conclude, must show the findings of his work, and/or show the conclusions he reached. You must write a final closing paragraph, as a conclusion, in which you expose a confrontation between the two positions. Try to create a fight between them so that the reader gets involved. The conclusion should give a brief and general summary of the most important similarities and differences. It should end with a personal statement, an opinion, and the “what then?” – what is important about the two things being compared.
Readers should be left feeling that all the different threads of this essay have been put together coherently, that they have learned something – and they must be sure that this is the end – that they do not look around for pages missing. And finally, your assessment must explain what position you stand in solidarity and why you prefer it to the other.
Paragraph 1: Messi’s preferred position / Ronaldo’s preferred position.
Paragraph 2: Messi’s play style / Ronaldo’s play style.
Paragraph 3: Messi aerial game / Ronaldo aerial game.
Paragraph 1: Messi teamwork .
Paragraph 2: Ronaldo’s teamwork.
Paragraph 3: Messi stopped the ball.
Paragraph 4: Ronaldo’s stopped the ball.
Paragraph 5: Messi’s achievements.
Paragraph 6: Ronaldo’s achievements.
Even if the exercise sounds simple, there are a few rules that should be followed to help your audience as best as possible make the best decision.
The first question is, “Why are you doing a comparison analysis”? To highlight your view or ideas over another, or simply to compare two (or more) solutions that do not belong to you? It is imperative that you clearly state your position to your reader, so does your credibility.
Be honest and state, for example:
In addition to the above, you must be consistent with the exposition of your ideas.
Even if you include your personal ideology in your comparison, stay as objective as possible. Your readers will not appreciate it when you point out all the disadvantages of one idea while you display the advantages of the other. Your comparison will turn into advertising. You have to raise weak points and strong points on both sides.
These analyses are always subjective, so you have to clarify which position convinces you the most.
The research paper is intended for your readers, which means that you must take their expectations into account when writing your review. Put aside your desire to sell your desired idea, and take your readers’ perspective:
Again, it is about being objective in all your statements.
Do You Have New or Fresh Topic? Send Us Your Topic
For your readers to want to read your comparative analysis, it is important to structure your comments. The idea is to make it easy for your readers to navigate your paper and get them to find the information that interests them quickly.
You’ve tried to be as objective as possible throughout your comparison, and now is the time to let go like we have mentioned many times in this post. In your conclusion, you can go directly to your readers and give your opinion. With a few tips, you can also encourage them to go towards one or the other idea.
Note: If time is not an issue, the best way to review the essay is to leave it for one day. Go for a walk, eat something, have fun, and forget. Then it’s time to go back to the text, find problems, and fix them. This must be done separately, that is, first find all the problems you can without correcting them. Although the idea of doing it at the same time is tempting, it is smarter to do it separately. It is effective and fast.
Be concise or accurate in your analysis and dissertation of the topic.
Sometimes the authors believe that the more elaborate the language and the more extensive the writing, the better the writers or essayists. On the contrary, a good essay refers to the exact analysis of a topic, where the reader can dynamically advance the work and understand the author’s position.
Use only the arguments necessary for the explanation of the topic, do not talk too much. You run the risk of redundant or repetitive, which makes the text-heavy both when reading it and understanding it.
Just as we recommend that you do not redound in your texts, we also encourage you to write with short sentences. They give dynamism to the text. Communication is direct. The reader advances in the text and understands much more.
Supporting your approach with reflections or quotes from authors makes your essay more important. Above all, use those arguments that justify or give strength to your position regarding one thesis or the other.
Since comparative analysis can tend to be a subjective work, you must let it “sit” for a day or a few hours and read it again. This exercise will allow you to make corrections. Modify those aspects that are not clear enough for you. And you can improve it, in a few words. Once you do this exercise, just like this, you can submit it.
INSTRUCTIONS AFTER PAYMENT
» Send the above details to our email; [email protected] or to our support phone number; (+234) 0813 2546 417 . As soon as details are sent and payment is confirmed, your project will be delivered to you within minutes.
Differential gender perception of sexual abuse among adolescents in secondary schools, emotional intelligence and adolescents’ behaviour problems, impact of broken home on academic performance and psychosocial adjustment of secondary school students, leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
Part of the book series: Classroom Companion: Business ((CCB))
3787 Accesses
Comparative research is essential for making right decisions in business. Decisions are always associated with the comparison and analysis of choices. Each choice, typically, presents multiple features for comparison and analysis depending on the goals, purpose, scope, priorities, resources, capabilities, constraints, available information, and many other factors and conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Authors and affiliations.
Lincoln University - California, Oakland, CA, USA
Sergey K. Aityan
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Sergey K. Aityan .
Reprints and permissions
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Aityan, S.K. (2022). Comparative Analysis. In: Business Research Methodology. Classroom Companion: Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76857-7_18
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76857-7_18
Published : 01 January 2022
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-76856-0
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-76857-7
eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
You are here, recent dissertations in comparative literature.
Dissertations in Comparative Literature have taken on vast number of topics and ranged across various languages, literatures, historical periods and theoretical perspectives. The department seeks to help each student craft a unique project and find the resources across the university to support and enrich her chosen field of study. The excellence of student dissertations has been recognized by several prizes, both within Yale and by the American Comparative Literature Association.
Student Name | Dissertation Title | Year | Advisors |
---|---|---|---|
Beretta, Francesca | The Motionscape of Greek Tragedy: Greek Drama Through the Prism of Movement | 2024 | Marta Figlerowicz Pauline LeVen |
Lahiri, Ray | The Violence of the Form: Violence and the Political in Greek and Latin Historical Narrative | 2024 | Moira Fradinger Christina Kraus |
Lee-Lenfield, Spencer | This Beauty Born of Parting: Literary Translation Between Korean and English via the Korean Diaspora, 1920–Present | 2024 | Marta Figlerowicz |
Pabon, Maru | Agitated Layers of Air: Third-Worldism and the “Voice of the People” Across Palestine, Cuba and Algeria | 2024 | Robyn Creswell |
Stern, Lindsay | Personhood: Literary Visions of a Legal Fiction | 2023 | Jesus Velasco Rudiger Campe |
Todorovic, Nebojsa | Tragedies of Disintegration: Balkanizing Greco-Roman Antiquity | 2023 | Emily Greenwood Milne Moira Fradinger |
Abazon, Lital | Speaking Sovereignty: The Plight of Multilingual Literature in Independent Israel, Morocco, and Algeria | 2023 | Hannan Hever Jill Jarvis |
Huang, Honglan | Reading as Performance: Theatrical Books From Tristram Shandy to Artists’ Books for Children | 2023 | Katie Trumpener |
Peng, Hsin-Yuan | Cinematic Meteorology: Aesthetics and Epistemology of Weather Images | 2023 | Aaron Gerow John Peters |
Sidorenko, Ksenia | Modernity’s Others: Marginality, Mass Culture, and the Early Comic Strip in the US | 2023 | Katie Trumpener Marta Figlerowicz |
Hamilton, Ted | Imagining a Crisis: Human-Environmental Relations in North and South American Law and Literature | 2022 | Michael Warner Moira Fradinger |
Lee, Xavier | Nonhistory: Slavery and the Black Historical Imagination | 2022 | Marta Figlerowicz |
Suther, Jensen | Spirit Disfigured: The Persistence of Freedom in the Modernist Novel | 2022 | Martin Hagglund |
Baena, Victoria | The Novel’s Lost Illusions: Time, Knowledge, and Narrative in the Provinces, 1800-1933 | 2021 | Katie Trumpener Maurice Samuels |
Brunazzo, Alessandro | Conjuring People: Pasolini’s Specters and the Global South | 2021 | Millicent Marcus Dudley Andrew |
Gubbins, Vanessa | The Poem and Social Form: Making a People Out of a Poem in Peru and Germany | 2021 | Moira Fradinger Paul North |
Hirschfeld-Kroen, Leana | Rise of the Modern Mediatrix: The Feminization of Media and Mediating Labor, 1865-1945 | 2021 | Katie Trumpener Charles Musser |
Velez Valencia, Camila | Craft and Storytelling: Romance and Reality in Joseph Conrad and Gabriel García Márquez | 2021 | Moira Fradinger David Bromwich |
Sheidaee, Iraj | In Between Dār Al-Islām and the ‘Lands of the Christians’: Three Christian Arabic Travel Narratives From the Early Modern/Ottoman Period (Mid-17th-Early18th Centuries) | 2021 | Creswell, Robyn |
Tolstoy, Andrey | Where Do We Go When We Go Off-the-Grid? | 2021 | Francesco Casetti Charles Musser |
Fox, Catherine | Christophe’s Ghost: The Making and Unmaking of Tragedy in Post-Revolutionary Haiti | 2020 | Marta Figlerowicz Emily Greenwood |
Piňos, Václav | Haeckel’s Feral Embryo: Animality and Personal Formation in Western Origin Myths from Milton to Golding | 2020 | Rüdiger Campe Marta Figlerowicz |
Yovel, Noemi | Confession and the German and American Novel: Intimate Talk, Violence and Last Confession | 2019 | Rüdiger Campe Katie Trumpener |
Mathew, Shaj | Wandering Comparisons: Global Genealogies of Flânerie and Modernity | 2019 | Marta Figlerowicz Amy Hungerford |
Tartici, Ayten | Adagios of Form | 2019 | Amy Hungerford Carol Jacobs Ruth Yeazell |
Kivrak, Pelin | Imperfect Cosmopolitans: Representations of Responsibility and Hospitality in Contemporary Middle Eastern Literatures, Film, and Art | 2019 | Katerina Clark Martin Hägglund |
Shpolberg, Masha | Labor in Late Socialism: the Cinema of Polish Workers’ Unrest 1968-1981 | 2019 | Katie Trumpener Charles Musser |
Powers, Julia | Brazil’s Mystical Realists: Hilda Hilst, João Guimarães Rosa and Clarice Lispector in the 1960s | 2018 | David Quint K. David Jackson |
Eklund, Craig | The Imagination in Proust, Joyce, and Beckett | 2018 | Martin Hägglund |
Forsberg, Soren | An Alien Point of View: Singular Experience and Literary Form | 2018 | Amy Hungerford; Katie Trumpener |
Weigel, Moira | Animals, Media, and Modernity: Prehistories of the Posthuman | 2017 | Dudley Andrew; Katie Trumpener |
Carper, David | Imagines historiarum: Renaissance Epic and the Development of Historical Thought | 2017 | David Quint |
Fairfax, Daniel | Politics, Aesthetics, Ontology: The Theoretical Legacy of Cahiers du cinema (1968-1973) | 2017 | Dudley Andrew |
Li, Yukai | Being late and being mistaken in the Homeric tradition | 2017 | Egbert Bakker; Moira Fradinger |
Nalencz, Leonard | The Lives of Astyanax: Romance and Recovery in Ariosto, Spenser, and Milton | 2017 | David Quint |
Chreiteh, Alexandra | Fantastice Cohabitations: Magical Realism in Arabic and Hebrew and the Politics of Aesthetics | 2016 | Robyn Creswell |
Harper, Elizabeth | The Lost Children of Tragedy from Euripides to Racine | 2016 | David Quint |
Piazza, Sarah | Performing the Novel and Reading the Romantic Song: Popular Music and Metafiction in Tres tristes tigres, Sirena Selena vestida de pena, La importancia de llamarse Daniel Santos, Le cahier de romances, and Cien botellas en una pared | 2016 | David Quint; Anibal González Pérez |
Sinsky, Carolyn | The Muse of Influence: Reading Russian Fiction in Britain, 1793 -1941 | 2016 | Katie Trumpener |
Sperling, Joshua | Realism, Modernism and Commitment in the Work of John Berger: 1952-76 | 2016 | Dudley Andrew |
Younger, Neil | D’apres le Roman: Cross-Channel Theatrical Adaptations from Richardson to Scott | 2016 | Thomas Kavanaugh; Katie Trumpener |
Bardi, Ariel | Cleansing, Constructing, and Curating the State: India/Pakistan ‘47 and Israel/Palestine ‘48 | 2015 | Hannan Hever |
Kelbert, Eugenia | Acquiring a Second Language Literature: Patterns in Translingual Writing from Modernism to the Moderns | 2015 | Vladimir Alexandrov; Haun Saussy |
Pfeifer, Annie | To the Collector Belong the Spoils: The Transformation of Modernist Practices of Collecting | 2015 | Rüdiger Campe;Katie Trumpener |
Roszak, Suzanne | Triangular Diaspora and Social Resistance in the New American Literature | 2015 | Wai Chee Dimock; Katie Trumpener |
Dahlberg, Leif | “Spacing Law and Politics: The constitution and representation of judicial places and juridicial spaces in law, literature and political philosophy in the works from Greek antiquity to the present” | 2014 | Carol Jacobs; Haun Saussy |
Weisberg, Margaret | “Inventing the Desert and the Jungle: Creating identity through landscape in African and European culture” | 2014 | Christopher Miller; Katie Trumpener |
Wiedenfeld, Grant | “Elastic Esthetics: A Comparative Media Approach to Modernist Literature and Cinema” | 2014 | Haun Saussy; Francesco Casetti |
Avrekh, Mikhail | “Romantic Geographic and the (Re)invention of the Provinces in the Realist Novel” | 2013 | Katerina Clark Maurice Samuels |
Klemann, Heather | “Developing Fictions: Childhood, Children’s Books, and the Novel” | 2013 | Jill Campbell; Katie Trumpener |
Mcmanus, Ann-Marie | “Unfinished Awakenings: Afterlives of the Nahda and Postcolonialism in Arabic Literature 1894–2008” | 2013 | Haun Saussy; Edwige Talbayev |
Wolff, Spencer | “The Darker Sides of Dignity: Freedom of Speech in the Wake of Authoritarian Collapse” | 2013 | Haun Saussy |
Bloch, Elina | “ ‘Unconfessed Confessions’: Strategies of (Not) Telling in Nineteenth-Century Narratives” | 2012 | Margaret Homans; Katie Trumpener |
Devecka, Martin | “Athens, Rome, Tenochtitlan: A Historical Sociology of Ruins” | 2012 | Emily Greenwood |
Gal, Noam | “Fictional Inhumanities: Wartime Animals and Personification” | 2012 | Carol Jacobs; Katie Trumpener |
Jackson, Jeanne-Marie | “Close to Home: Forms of Isolation in the Postcolonial Province” | 2012 | Katerina Clark; Justin Neuman |
Odnopozova, Dina | “Russian-Argentine Literary Exchanges” | 2012 | Katerina Clark; Moira Fradinger |
Stevic, Aleksandar | “Falling Short: Failure, Passivity, and the Crisis of Self-Fashioning in the European Novel, 1830–1927” | 2012 | Katie Trumpener; Maurice Samuels |
Student Name | Dissertation Title | Year | Advisors |
---|---|---|---|
Cramer, Michael | “Blackboard Cinema: Learning from the Pedagogical Art Film” | 2011 | Dudley Andrew; John MacKay |
Djagalov, Rossen | “The People’s Republic of Letters: Twoards a Media History of Twentieth-Century Socialist Internationalism” | 2011 | Katerina Clark; Michael Denning |
Esposito, Stefan | “The Pathological Revolution: Romanticism and Metaphors of Disease” | 2011 | Paul Fry; Carol Jacobs |
Feldman, Daniel | “Unrepeatable: Fiction After Atrocity” | 2011 | Katie Trumpener Benjamin Harshav |
Jeong, Seung-hoon | “Cinematic Interfaces: Retheorizing Apparatus, Image, Subjectivity” | 2011 | Thomas Elsaesser; Dudley Andrew |
Lienau, Annette | “Comparative Literature in the Spirit of Bandung: Script Change, Language Choice, and Ideology in African and Asian Literatures (Senegal & Indonesia)” | 2011 | Christopher Miller |
Coker, William | “Romantic Exteriority: The Construction of Literature in Rousseau, Jean Paul, and P.B. Shelley” | 2010 | Cyrus Hamlin; Paul Fry |
Fan, Victor | “Football Meets Opium: A Topological Study of Political Violence, Sovereignty, and Cinema Archaeology Between ‘England’ and ‘China’ ” | 2010 | Haun Saussy; Dudley Andrew |
Johnson, Rebecca | “A History of the Novel in Translation: Cosmopolitan Tales in English and Arabic, 1729–1859” | 2010 | Katie Trumpener |
Parfitt, Alexandra | “Immoral Lessons: Education and Novel in Nineteenth-Century France” | 2010 | Peter Brooks; Maurice Samuels |
Xie, Wei | “Female Cross-Dressing in Chinese Opera and Cinema” | 2010 | Dudley Andrew |
Flynn, Catherine | “Street Things: Transformations of Experience in the Modern City” | 2009 | Carol Jacobs; Katie Trumpener |
Lovejoy, Alice | “The Army and the Avant-Garde: Art Cinema in the Czechoslovak Military, 1951–1971” | 2009 | Katie Trumpener |
Rhoads, Bonita | “Frontiers of Privacy: The Domestic Enterprise of Modern Fiction” | 2009 | Peter Brooks |
Rubini, Rocco | “Renaissance Humanism and Postmodernity: A Rhetorical History” | 2009 | David Quint; Giuseppe Mazzotta |
Chaudhuri, Pramit | “Themoacy: Ethical Criticism and the Struggle for Authority in Epic and Tragedy” | 2008 | Susanna Braund; David Quint |
Lisi, Leonardo | “Aesthetics of Dependency: Early Modernism and the Struggle against Idealism in Kierkegaard Ibsen, and Henry James” | 2008 | Paul Fry; Pericles Lewis |
Weiner, Allison | “Refusals of Mastery: Ethical Encounters in Henry James and Maurice Blanchot” | 2008 | Wai Chee Dimock; Carol Jacobs |
Hafiz, Hiba | “The Novel and the Ancien Régime: Britain, France, and the Rise of the Novel in the Seventeenth Century” | 2007 | Peter Brooks; Katie Trumpener |
Illibruck, Helmut | “Figurations of Nostalgia: From the Pre-Enlightenment to Romanticism and Beyond” | 2007 | Paul Fry |
Kern, Anne Marie | “The Sacred Made Material: Instances of Game and Play in Interwar Europe” | 2007 | Dudley Andrew |
Boes, Tobias | “The Syncopated Self: Crises of Historical Experience in the Modernist ” | 2006 | Carol Jacobs; Pericles Lewis |
Boyer, Patricio | “Empire and American Visions of the Humane” | 2006 | Rolena Adorno; Roberto Gonález Echevarría |
Chang, Eugene | “Disaster and Hope: A Study of Walter Benjamin and Maurice Blanchot” | 2006 | Shoshana Felman |
Mannheimer, Katherine | “ ‘The Scope in Ev’ry Page’: Eighteenth-Century Satire as a Mode of Vision” | 2006 | Jill Campbell; Katie Trumpener |
Solovieva, Olga | “A Discourse Apart: The Body of Christ and the Practice of Cultural Subversion” | 2006 | Haun Saussy |
van den Berg, Christopher | “The Social Aesthetics of Tacitus’ ” | 2006 | Susanna Braund; David Quint |
Anderson, Jerome B. | “New World Romance and Authorship” | 2005 | Vera Kutzinski; Roberto Gonález Echevarría |
Enjuto Rangel, Cecilia | “Cities in Ruins in Modern Poetry” | 2005 | Roberto Gonález Echevarría |
Kliger, Ilya | “Truth, Time and the Novel: Verdiction in Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Balzac” | 2005 | Peter Brooks; Michael Holquist |
Kolb, Martina | “Journeys of Desire: Liguria as Literary Landscape in Eugenio Montale, Ezra Pound, and Gottfried Benn” | 2005 | Harold Bloom; Peter Brooks |
Matz, Aaron | “Satire in the Age of Realism, 1860–1910” | 2005 | Peter Brooks; Ruth Bernard Yeazell |
Student Name | Dissertation Title | Year | Advisors |
---|---|---|---|
Barrenechea, Antonio | “Telluric Monstrosity in the Americas: The Encyclopedic Taxonomies of Fuentes, Melville, and Pynchon” | 2004 | Roberto Gonález Echevarría; Vera Kutzinski |
Buchenau, Stefanie | “The Art of Invention and the Invention of Art. Logic, Rhetoric, and Aesthetics in the Early German Enlightenment” | 2004 | A. Wood; G. Raulet |
Friedman, Daniel | “Pedagogies of Resistance” | 2004 | Shoshana Felman |
Raff, Sarah | “Erotics of Instruction: Jane Austen and the Generalizing Novel” | 2004 | Peter Brooks |
Steiner, Lina | “The Poetics of Maturity: Autonomy and Aesthetic Education in Byron, Pushkin, and Stendhal” | 2004 | Peter Brooks; Michael Holquist |
Chesney, Duncan | “Signs of Aristocracy in : Proust and the Salon from Mme de Remouillet to Mme de Guermantes” | 2003 | Peter Brooks; Pericles Lewis |
Farbman, Herschel | “Dreaming, Writing, and Restlessness in Freud, Blanchot, Beckett, and Joyce” | 2003 | Paul Fry |
Fradinger, Moira | “Radical Evil: Literary Visions of Political Origins in Sophocles, Sade and Vargas Llosa” | 2003 | Roberto Gonález Echevarría; Shoshana Felman |
Gsoels-Lorensen, Jutta | “Epitaphic Remembrance: Representing a Catastrophic Past in Second Generation Texts” | 2003 | Vilashini Cooppan; Benjamin Harshav |
Horsman, Yasco | “Theatres of Justice: Judging, Staging, and Working Through in Arendt, Brecht and Delbo” | 2003 | Shoshana Felman |
Katsaros, Laure | “A Kaleidoscope in the Midst of the Crowds: Poetry and the City in Walt Whitman’s and Charles Baudelaire’s ” | 2003 | Shoshana Felman |
Reichman, Ravit | “Taking Care: Injury and Responsibility in Literature and Law” | 2003 | Peter Brooks; Shoshana Felman |
Sun, Emily | “Literature and Impersonality: Keats, Flaubert, and the Crisis of the Author” | 2003 | Shoshana Felman; Paul Fry |
Katsaros, George | “Tragedy, Catharsis, and Reason: An Essay on the Idea of the Tragic” | 2002 | Shoshana Felman |
Mirabile, Michael | “From Inscription to Performance: The Rhetoric of Self-Enclosure in the Modern Novel” | 2002 | Peter Brooks |
Alphandary, Idit | “The Subject of Autonomy and Fellowship in: Guy de Maupassant, D.W. Winnicott and Joseph Conrad” | 2001 | Peter Brooks |
Bateman, Chimène | “Addresses of Desire: Literary Innivation and the Female Destinataire in Medieval and Renaissance Literature” | 2001 | Edwin Duval David Quint |
Butler, Henry E. | “Writing and Vampires in the Works of Lautréamont, Bram Stoker, Daniel Paul Schreber, and Fritz Lang” | 2001 | Michael Holquist; David Quint |
Duerfahrd, Lance | “The Work of Poverty: the Minimum in Samuel Beckett and Alain Resnais” | 2001 | Shoshana Felman; Susan Blood |
Hunt, Philippe | “Spectres du réel: Déliminations du Réalism Magique” | 2001 | Paolo Valesio |
Liu, Haoming | “Transformation of Childhood Experience: Rainer Maria Rilke and Fei Ming” | 2001 | Cyrus Hamlin |
Peretz, Eyal | “Literature and the Enigma of Power: A Reading of Moby-Dick” | 2001 | Shoshana Felman |
Pickford, Henry | “The Sense of Semblance: Modern German and Russian Literature after Adorno” | 2001 | Karsten Harries; Winfried Menninghaus; William M. Todd III |
von Zastrow, Claus | “The Ground of Our Beseeching: The Guiding Sense of Place in German and English Elegiac Poetry” | 2001 | Paul Fry; Cyrus Hamlin; Winfried Menninghaus |
Wilson, Emily | “Why Do I Overlive? Greek, Latin and English Tragic Survival” | 2001 | Victor Bers; David Quint |
Lintz, Edward M. | “A Curie for Poetry? Nuclear Disintegration and Gertrude Stein’s Modernist Reception” | 2000 | Michael Holquist; Tyrus Miller |
Anderson, Matthew D. | “Modernity and the Example of Poetry: Readings in Baudelaire, Verlaine and Ashbery” | 1999 | Geoffrey Hartman |
Bernstein, Jonathan | “Parataxis in Heraclitus, Höderlin, Mayakovsky” | 1999 | Benjamin Harshav; Winfried Menninghaus |
Pollard, Tanya L. | “Dangerous Remedies: Poison and Theatre in the English Renaissance” | 1999 | David Quint |
Freeland, Natalka | “Trash fiction: The Victorian Novel and the Rise of Disposable Culture” | 1998 | Peter Brooks; Ruth Bernard Yeazell |
Hood, Carra | “Reading the News: Activism, Authority, Audience” | 1998 | Hazel Carby |
MacKay, John | “Placing the Lyric: An Essay on Poetry and Community | 1998 | Geoffrey Hartman; Tomas Venclova |
Schuller, Mortiz | “ ‘Watching the Self’: The Mirror of Self-Knowledge in Ancient Literature” | 1998 | Heinrich von Staden; Gordon Williams |
Stark, Jared | “Beyond Words: Suicide and Modern Narrative” | 1998 | Cathy Caruth; Geoffrey Hartman |
Last updated
18 April 2023
Reviewed by
Jean Kaluza
Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead
Comparative analysis is a valuable tool for acquiring deep insights into your organization’s processes, products, and services so you can continuously improve them.
Similarly, if you want to streamline, price appropriately, and ultimately be a market leader, you’ll likely need to draw on comparative analyses quite often.
When faced with multiple options or solutions to a given problem, a thorough comparative analysis can help you compare and contrast your options and make a clear, informed decision.
If you want to get up to speed on conducting a comparative analysis or need a refresher, here’s your guide.
Dovetail streamlines comparative analysis to help you uncover and share actionable insights
A comparative analysis is a side-by-side comparison that systematically compares two or more things to pinpoint their similarities and differences. The focus of the investigation might be conceptual—a particular problem, idea, or theory—or perhaps something more tangible, like two different data sets.
For instance, you could use comparative analysis to investigate how your product features measure up to the competition.
After a successful comparative analysis, you should be able to identify strengths and weaknesses and clearly understand which product is more effective.
You could also use comparative analysis to examine different methods of producing that product and determine which way is most efficient and profitable.
The potential applications for using comparative analysis in everyday business are almost unlimited. That said, a comparative analysis is most commonly used to examine
Emerging trends and opportunities (new technologies, marketing)
Competitor strategies
Financial health
Effects of trends on a target audience
Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.
Comparative analysis can help narrow your focus so your business pursues the most meaningful opportunities rather than attempting dozens of improvements simultaneously.
A comparative approach also helps frame up data to illuminate interrelationships. For example, comparative research might reveal nuanced relationships or critical contexts behind specific processes or dependencies that wouldn’t be well-understood without the research.
For instance, if your business compares the cost of producing several existing products relative to which ones have historically sold well, that should provide helpful information once you’re ready to look at developing new products or features.
Comparative analysis is generally divided into three subtypes, using quantitative or qualitative data and then extending the findings to a larger group. These include
Pattern analysis —identifying patterns or recurrences of trends and behavior across large data sets.
Data filtering —analyzing large data sets to extract an underlying subset of information. It may involve rearranging, excluding, and apportioning comparative data to fit different criteria.
Decision tree —flowcharting to visually map and assess potential outcomes, costs, and consequences.
In contrast, competitive analysis is a type of comparative analysis in which you deeply research one or more of your industry competitors. In this case, you’re using qualitative research to explore what the competition is up to across one or more dimensions.
For example
Service delivery —metrics like the Net Promoter Scores indicate customer satisfaction levels.
Market position — the share of the market that the competition has captured.
Brand reputation —how well-known or recognized your competitors are within their target market.
Thorough, independent research is a significant asset when doing comparative analysis. It provides evidence to support your findings and may present a perspective or angle not considered previously.
To get the maximum benefit from comparative research, make it a regular practice, and establish a cadence you can realistically stick to. Some business areas you could plan to analyze regularly include:
Profitability
Competition
In addition to simply comparing and contrasting, explore how different variables might affect your outcomes.
For example, a controllable variable would be offering a seasonal feature like a shopping bot to assist in holiday shopping or raising or lowering the selling price of a product.
Uncontrollable variables include weather, changing regulations, the current political climate, or global pandemics.
Most people enter into comparative research with a particular idea or hypothesis already in mind to validate. For instance, you might try to prove the worthwhileness of launching a new service. So, you may be disappointed if your analysis results don’t support your plan.
However, in any comparative analysis, try to maintain an unbiased approach by spending equal time debating the merits and drawbacks of any decision. Ultimately, this will be a practical, more long-term sustainable approach for your business than focusing only on the evidence that favors pursuing your argument or strategy.
To put together a coherent, insightful analysis that goes beyond a list of pros and cons or similarities and differences, try organizing the information into these five components:
1. Frame of reference
Here is where you provide context. First, what driving idea or problem is your research anchored in? Then, for added substance, cite existing research or insights from a subject matter expert, such as a thought leader in marketing, startup growth, or investment
2. Grounds for comparison Why have you chosen to examine the two things you’re analyzing instead of focusing on two entirely different things? What are you hoping to accomplish?
3. Thesis What argument or choice are you advocating for? What will be the before and after effects of going with either decision? What do you anticipate happening with and without this approach?
For example, “If we release an AI feature for our shopping cart, we will have an edge over the rest of the market before the holiday season.” The finished comparative analysis will weigh all the pros and cons of choosing to build the new expensive AI feature including variables like how “intelligent” it will be, what it “pushes” customers to use, how much it takes off the plates of customer service etc.
Ultimately, you will gauge whether building an AI feature is the right plan for your e-commerce shop.
4. Organize the scheme Typically, there are two ways to organize a comparative analysis report. First, you can discuss everything about comparison point “A” and then go into everything about aspect “B.” Or, you alternate back and forth between points “A” and “B,” sometimes referred to as point-by-point analysis.
Using the AI feature as an example again, you could cover all the pros and cons of building the AI feature, then discuss the benefits and drawbacks of building and maintaining the feature. Or you could compare and contrast each aspect of the AI feature, one at a time. For example, a side-by-side comparison of the AI feature to shopping without it, then proceeding to another point of differentiation.
5. Connect the dots Tie it all together in a way that either confirms or disproves your hypothesis.
For instance, “Building the AI bot would allow our customer service team to save 12% on returns in Q3 while offering optimizations and savings in future strategies. However, it would also increase the product development budget by 43% in both Q1 and Q2. Our budget for product development won’t increase again until series 3 of funding is reached, so despite its potential, we will hold off building the bot until funding is secured and more opportunities and benefits can be proved effective.”
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 22 August 2024
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 August 2024
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 30 April 2024
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.
Get started for free
Appinio Research · 30.10.2023 · 36min read
Have you ever faced a complex decision, wondering how to make the best choice among multiple options? In a world filled with data and possibilities, the art of comparative analysis holds the key to unlocking clarity amidst the chaos.
In this guide, we'll demystify the power of comparative analysis, revealing its practical applications, methodologies, and best practices. Whether you're a business leader, researcher, or simply someone seeking to make more informed decisions, join us as we explore the intricacies of comparative analysis and equip you with the tools to chart your course with confidence.
Comparative analysis is a systematic approach used to evaluate and compare two or more entities, variables, or options to identify similarities, differences, and patterns. It involves assessing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with each entity or option to make informed decisions.
The primary purpose of comparative analysis is to provide a structured framework for decision-making by:
In summary, comparative analysis is a valuable tool that empowers decision-makers across various domains to make informed, data-driven choices, manage risks, allocate resources effectively, and drive continuous improvement. Its structured approach enhances decision quality and transparency, contributing to the success and competitiveness of organizations and research endeavors.
1. define objectives and scope.
Before you begin your comparative analysis, clearly defining your objectives and the scope of your analysis is essential. This step lays the foundation for the entire process. Here's how to approach it:
The quality of your comparative analysis heavily depends on the data and information you gather. Here's how to approach this crucial step:
Choosing the right criteria for comparison is critical to a successful comparative analysis. Here's how to go about it:
Once you have your objectives, data, and criteria in place, it's time to establish a clear framework for your comparative analysis. This framework will guide your process and ensure consistency. Here's how to do it:
With your objectives, data, criteria, and framework established, you're ready to move on to the next phase of comparative analysis: data collection and organization.
Data collection and organization are critical steps in the comparative analysis process. We'll explore how to gather and structure the data you need for a successful analysis.
Primary data sources involve gathering original data directly from the source. This approach offers unique advantages, allowing you to tailor your data collection to your specific research needs.
Some popular primary data sources include:
When using primary data sources, consider factors like sample size , survey design, and data collection methods to ensure the reliability and validity of your data.
Secondary data sources involve using existing data collected by others. These sources can provide a wealth of information and save time and resources compared to primary data collection.
Here are common types of secondary data sources:
When using secondary data sources, critically assess the credibility, relevance, and timeliness of the data. Ensure that it aligns with your research objectives.
Data quality is paramount in comparative analysis. Poor-quality data can lead to inaccurate conclusions and flawed decision-making. Here's how to ensure data validation and reliability:
Structuring your data for comparison is a critical step in the analysis process. Organized data makes it easier to draw insights and make informed decisions. Here's how to structure data effectively:
By paying careful attention to data collection, validation, and organization, you'll set the stage for a robust and insightful comparative analysis. Next, we'll explore various methodologies you can employ in your analysis, ranging from qualitative approaches to quantitative methods and examples.
When it comes to comparative analysis, various methodologies are available, each suited to different research goals and data types. In this section, we'll explore five prominent methodologies in detail.
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a methodology often used when dealing with complex, non-linear relationships among variables. It seeks to identify patterns and configurations among factors that lead to specific outcomes.
QCA is particularly useful in fields such as sociology, political science, and organizational studies, where understanding complex interactions is essential.
Quantitative Comparative Analysis involves the use of numerical data and statistical techniques to compare and analyze variables. It's suitable for situations where data is quantitative, and relationships can be expressed numerically.
Quantitative comparative analysis is commonly applied in economics, social sciences, and market research to draw empirical conclusions from numerical data.
Case studies involve in-depth examinations of specific instances or cases to gain insights into real-world scenarios. Comparative case studies allow researchers to compare and contrast multiple cases to identify patterns, differences, and lessons.
Case studies are prevalent in fields like psychology, business, and sociology, where deep insights into specific situations are valuable.
SWOT Analysis is a strategic tool used to assess the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats associated with a particular entity or situation. While it's commonly used in business, it can be adapted for various comparative analyses.
SWOT Analysis is versatile and can be applied in business, healthcare, education, and any context where a structured assessment of factors is needed.
Benchmarking involves comparing an entity's performance, processes, or practices to those of industry leaders or best-in-class organizations. It's a powerful tool for continuous improvement and competitive analysis.
Benchmarking is widely used in business, manufacturing, healthcare, and customer service to drive excellence and competitiveness.
Each of these methodologies brings a unique perspective to comparative analysis, allowing you to choose the one that best aligns with your research objectives and the nature of your data. The choice between qualitative and quantitative methods, or a combination of both, depends on the complexity of the analysis and the questions you seek to answer.
Once you've prepared your data and chosen an appropriate methodology, it's time to dive into the process of conducting a comparative analysis. We will guide you through the essential steps to extract meaningful insights from your data.
Identifying key variables and metrics is the first crucial step in conducting a comparative analysis. These are the factors or indicators you'll use to assess and compare your options.
Data visualization techniques play a vital role in making complex information more accessible and understandable. Effective data visualization allows you to convey insights and patterns to stakeholders. Consider the following approaches:
Effective data visualization not only enhances understanding but also aids in decision-making by providing clear insights at a glance.
A well-structured comparative framework provides a systematic approach to your analysis. It ensures consistency and enables you to make meaningful comparisons. Here's how to create one:
A well-structured comparative framework simplifies the analysis process, making it easier to draw meaningful conclusions and make informed decisions.
Evaluating and scoring criteria is a critical step in comparative analysis, as it quantifies the performance of each option against the chosen criteria.
Not all criteria are equally important in a comparative analysis. Weighting criteria allows you to reflect their relative significance in the final decision-making process.
By weighting criteria, you ensure that the most critical factors have a more significant influence on the final evaluation, aligning the analysis more closely with your objectives and priorities.
With these steps in place, you're well-prepared to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis. The next phase involves interpreting your findings, drawing conclusions, and making informed decisions based on the insights you've gained.
Interpreting the results of your comparative analysis is a crucial phase that transforms data into actionable insights. We'll delve into various aspects of interpretation and how to make sense of your findings.
Comparative analysis is a versatile methodology that finds application in various fields and scenarios. Let's explore some of the most common and impactful applications.
Comparative analysis is widely employed in business to inform strategic decisions and drive success. Key applications include:
In the healthcare and medical research fields, comparative analysis is instrumental in understanding diseases, treatment options, and healthcare systems.
Comparative analysis is a fundamental tool in social sciences and policy analysis, aiding in understanding complex societal issues.
Comparative analysis plays a pivotal role in understanding environmental issues and promoting sustainability.
Comparative analysis is crucial in the fast-paced world of technology and innovation.
These diverse applications of comparative analysis highlight its flexibility and importance in decision-making across various domains. Whether in business, healthcare, social sciences, environmental studies, or technology, comparative analysis empowers researchers and decision-makers to make informed choices and drive positive outcomes.
Successful comparative analysis relies on following best practices and avoiding common pitfalls. Implementing these practices enhances the effectiveness and reliability of your analysis.
By adhering to these best practices, you'll not only improve the rigor of your comparative analysis but also ensure that your findings are reliable, actionable, and aligned with your objectives.
To illustrate the practical application and benefits of comparative analysis, let's explore several real-world examples across different domains. These examples showcase how organizations and researchers leverage comparative analysis to make informed decisions, solve complex problems, and drive improvements:
Objective: A retail chain aims to assess its price competitiveness against competitors in the same market.
Methodology:
Outcome: The analysis reveals that the retail chain's prices are consistently lower in certain product categories but higher in others. This insight informs pricing strategies, allowing the retailer to adjust prices to remain competitive in the market.
Objective: Researchers aim to compare the effectiveness of two different treatment methods for a specific medical condition.
Outcome: The comparative analysis reveals that one treatment method is statistically more effective than the other in relieving symptoms and has fewer side effects. This information guides medical professionals in recommending the more effective treatment to patients.
Objective: An environmental organization seeks to compare carbon emissions from various transportation modes in a metropolitan area.
Outcome: The comparative analysis reveals that public transportation generates significantly lower carbon emissions per passenger mile compared to individual car travel. This information supports advocacy for increased public transit usage to reduce carbon footprint.
Objective: A software development team needs to choose the most suitable development tool for an upcoming project.
Outcome: The comparative analysis highlights that Tool A excels in essential features critical to the project, such as version control integration and debugging capabilities. The development team selects Tool A as the preferred choice for the project.
Objective: A school district aims to improve student performance by comparing the effectiveness of traditional classroom teaching with online learning.
Outcome: The comparative analysis reveals that online learning leads to similar knowledge gains as traditional classroom teaching. However, students report higher satisfaction and flexibility with the online approach. The school district considers incorporating online elements into its curriculum.
These examples illustrate the diverse applications of comparative analysis across industries and research domains. Whether optimizing pricing strategies in retail, evaluating treatment effectiveness in healthcare, assessing environmental impacts, choosing the right software tool, or improving educational methods, comparative analysis empowers decision-makers with valuable insights for informed choices and positive outcomes.
Comparative analysis is your compass in the world of decision-making. It helps you see the bigger picture, spot opportunities, and navigate challenges. By defining your objectives, gathering data, applying methodologies, and following best practices, you can harness the power of Comparative Analysis to make informed choices and drive positive outcomes.
Remember, Comparative analysis is not just a tool; it's a mindset that empowers you to transform data into insights and uncertainty into clarity. So, whether you're steering a business, conducting research, or facing life's choices, embrace Comparative Analysis as your trusted guide on the journey to better decisions. With it, you can chart your course, make impactful choices, and set sail toward success.
Are you ready to revolutionize your approach to market research and comparative analysis? Appinio , a real-time market research platform, empowers you to harness the power of real-time consumer insights for swift, data-driven decisions. Here's why you should choose Appinio:
Get free access to the platform!
Join the loop 💌
Be the first to hear about new updates, product news, and data insights. We'll send it all straight to your inbox.
Get the latest market research news straight to your inbox! 💌
27.08.2024 | 34min read
What is Brand Architecture? Models, Strategy, Examples
22.08.2024 | 32min read
What is Voice of the Customer (VoC)? Program, Examples
20.08.2024 | 31min read
What is Employee Experience (EX) and How to Improve It?
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
For coordinate kinds of comparative analysis, a common pitfall is tied to thesis and evidence. Basically, it's a thesis that tells the reader that there are "similarities and differences" between two texts, without telling the reader why it matters that these two texts have or don't have these particular features in common. This kind of thesis is stuck at the level of description or positivism ...
Ph.D. Dissertation ... comparative historical analysis in history, and psychological analysis (Smelser, 1973). Comparative research or analysis is a broad term that includes both quantitative and .
What Is a Comparative Analysis Dissertation? Comparative analysis boils down to studying similarities and differences between two or more things, be it theories, texts, processes, personalities, or time periods. This method is especially useful in conducting social sciences, humanities, history, and business research. Conducting a comparative ...
To write a good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data—the similarities and differences you've observed —and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. Here are the five elements required. Frame of Reference. This is the context within which you place the two things you plan to compare and contrast; it is the umbrella ...
The goal of comparative analysis is to bring multiple positions, including your own, to a discussion of a topic - and to identify the significance of the comparison involved. Reading for and entering the conversation. You can think of all writing as being part of a larger conversation or the context in which a debate or discussion takes place.
Determine the focus of your piece. Determine if you will focus on the similarities, the differences, or both. Be sure you treat each individual the same; each person deserves the same amount of focus-meaning, do not place most of the emphasis on you or the other person. Find a balance.
Organize information. It is important to structure your comments for your readers to want to read your comparative analysis. The idea is to make it easy for your readers to navigate your paper and get them to find the information that interests them quickly. 5. End with a conclusion.
Write your thesis. This will be based on what you have discovered regarding the weight of similarities and differences between the things you are comparing. Write the body of your paper. There are two main approaches to organizing a comparative analysis: Alternating (point-by-point) method: Find similar points between each subject and alternate ...
Comparative analysis is a multidisciplinary method, which spans a wide cross-section of disciplines (Azarian, 2011).It is the process of comparing multiple units of study for the purpose of scientific discovery and for informing policy decisions (Rogers, 2014).Even though there has been a renewed interest in comparative analysis as a research method over the last decade in fields such as ...
A comparative analysis is a paper in which you compare and contrast two items, such as theories, texts, characters, historical figures, and more. A good brainstorming tool is a Venn Diagram. It requires the following elements: ... Thesis. The thesis will indicate the relationship between the two items being compared. As with any argumentative ...
The comparative method of social research is a product of 19 th -century sociology and social anthropology. Sociologists like Emile Durkheim, Herbert Spencer Max Weber used comparative analysis in their works. For example, Max Weber compares the protestant of Europe with Catholics and also compared it with other religions like Islam, Hinduism ...
Step 3. The 3-Step Approach to. Comparative Analysis. or. Comparing and Contrasting. Comparative Analysis Resources. Review of Literature Organizer. Organize articles by using a graphic organizer. Please see the ASC Review of Literature Matrix for instructions on using this organizer.
File the Intent to Graduate (ITG) for the Ph.D. Create an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCiD). Dissertation Defense: Form a Dissertation Defense Commitee and complete the Dissertation Defense Committee form. Confer with the Dissertation Director about procedures for submission of chapters and revisions during the dissertation writing ...
A QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS by William Robert Pruitt ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Criminology and Justice Policy Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, April, 2011
Postcolonial Narrative and The Dialogic Imagination: An Analysis of Early Francophone West African Fiction and Cinema, Seydina Mouhamed Diouf. PDF. The Rising of the Avant-Garde Movement In the 1980s People's Republic of China: A Cultural Practice of the New Enlightenment, Jingsheng Zhang. Theses/Dissertations from 2020 PDF
2.3 The Use of Comparative analysis in political science: relating politics, polity and policy to society 2.4 End matter - Exercises & Questions - Further Reading. fruitful and viable way. In section 2.3 we shall enter into the important topic of the comparative approach, i.e. the comparative method and its implications for a 'proper' ...
Thesis Dissertation ... with an MA in comparative literature. He writes for Scribbr about his specialist topics: grammar, linguistics, citations, and plagiarism. ... An argumentative essay presents a complete argument backed up by evidence and analysis. It is the most common essay type at university. 2315.
Tips on Comparative analysis Be Concise or Accurate in Your Analysis and Dissertation of The Topic. Sometimes the authors believe that the more elaborate the language and the more extensive the writing, the better the writers or essayists. On the contrary, a good essay refers to the exact analysis of a topic, where the reader can dynamically ...
Abstract. Comparative research is essential for making right decisions in business. Decisions are always associated with the comparison and analysis of choices. Each choice, typically, presents multiple features for comparison and analysis depending on the goals, purpose, scope, priorities, resources, capabilities, constraints, available ...
Recent Dissertations in Comparative Literature. Dissertations in Comparative Literature have taken on vast number of topics and ranged across various languages, literatures, historical periods and theoretical perspectives. The department seeks to help each student craft a unique project and find the resources across the university to support ...
A comparative analysis is a side-by-side comparison that systematically compares two or more things to pinpoint their similarities and differences. The focus of the investigation might be conceptual—a particular problem, idea, or theory—or perhaps something more tangible, like two different data sets. For instance, you could use comparative ...
Comparative analysis is a versatile methodology that finds application in various fields and scenarios. Let's explore some of the most common and impactful applications. Business Decision-Making. Comparative analysis is widely employed in business to inform strategic decisions and drive success. Key applications include: