Fish IP Law logo leads back to homepage on click

A license is a grant (assignment) to the licensee of various licensed rights.  The situation can be further obscured by the fact that one can assign the licensed rights from one entity to another.  Thus, the first recordation of a license may be recorded as a “license,” while the assignment of those same licensed rights to another entity may be recorded as an “assignment.”  The only way to really understand the situation is to review the actual documents, which are all readily available from the recordation branch of the patent office.

Note that the patent office sometimes refers to licenses as a species of assignment.  That is correct, because one is assigning license rights.

Not necessarily.  Assignments are only needed if you are contractually obligated, by employment or otherwise, to make the assignment.

An important corollary is that an inventor can merely license his patent rights to a company that is exploiting the invention, and keep title to those rights in his own name.  Investors are usually unhappy with that arrangement, but there can be significant advantages.  One major advantage is that the patent holder is a “necessary and indispensable” to any litigation over patent validity.  Any competitor trying to invalidate the patent must file the action in the district where the inventor resides.

Assignments of provisionals have substantially the same pros and cons as assigning formal utility and design applications.  See the previous FAQ.

Since there are costs attending the handling and recording of assignments, many inventors and companies prefer to hold off on assigning provisional applications until filing of the corresponding formal (utility or PCT) applications.  That is a dangerous strategy.  In the interim between filing the provisional and the formal applications, there are all sorts of unfortunate events that can make later assignments difficult or impossible, including death or disability of an inventor, reluctance of an inventor to file an assignment due to a separation from a company, or divorce.

It is not technically necessary to re-file assignments for divisional or straight continuation applications.  A properly worded prior assignment recorded against the original application is automatically effective because the assignment recorded against the parent application gives the assignee rights to the subject matter common to both applications.

In the case of a substitute or continuation-in-part application, a prior assignment of the original application is not applied to the substitute or continuation-in-part application because the assignment recorded against the original application gives the assignee rights to only the subject matter common to both applications.  Substitute or continuation-in-part applications require the recordation of a new assignment if they are to be issued to an assignee.

Absolutely.  Indeed, it is a very common occurrence that an inventor will assign his invention to a company, and then the company will re-assign the rights after the patent issues.

Assignment is technically free, but it costs about $100 ($40 in filing costs and about $60 in paralegal time) to record the assignment at the U.S. patent office.

Note that the office charges US$ 40 for each patent or patent application listed on the recorda­tion form.  Thus, if an assignment references a family of 5 patent applications, the recorda­tion fee is US$ 200.  Of course paralegal charges would also apply, and possibly attorney time.

Under U.S. law, assignments must be recorded to be effective as against third parties who do not have actual knowledge of the assignment.  The statute is similar to recording statutes used for recording real property.  Thus, although there is no requirement to record an assignment, it is foolish not to do so.

Note that absent some unusual circumstance, patent assignments do not have to be notarized for use within the United States.

Preparing assignments is usually a simple matter of filling in the blanks of a form.  Assignment forms (inventor to company and company to company) and guidelines for preparing such forms can be found in  Strategic Patenting .

Note also that it is important to clearly identify whether the document being recorded is an assignment, license, or other document.  The recording branch does not generally read the documents to verify the content.

The Patent office will proceed as if the signature had been procured from the inventor, but only after establishing that the entity pursuing the application has colorable rights, and only after establishing that the inventor cannot be reached.  Thus, the patent office will need a copy of the employee agreement, assignment, or other documentary evidence establishing those rights.

In the case of a deceased inventor, the patent office will insist upon a statement from the executor of the estate, or an heir if probate is finished.  Where the inventor refuses to sign, or cannot be found, the patent office will insist upon seeing the letters, emails and faxes sent to the inventor, and will need a declaration from the person trying to make contact.

One simply records a certificate of name change or other formal document with the USPTO, using the assignment recordation form.

In foreign countries, name changes can be a real problem, and can cost anywhere from several hundred to a thousand dollars (mostly in attorneys fees).

It depends on the wording of the assignment and the recordation laws of the foreign countries.  Most assignments transfer all rights, title, and interest to U.S. patents and applications, and to corresponding foreign patents and applications.  Even so, the assignments might not be legally effective in a given country until the assignment is recorded in that country.

Some countries insist on a specific assignment that expressly lists that country. Canada, for example, typically requires its own assignments.

Patent infringement damages accrue in some countries only from the date the assignment was actually recorded at the relevant patent office.  Thus, delay in registering can cost a patent holder dearly in reduced patent infringement damages.

The main disadvantage to recording assignments is that many countries (including most or all of Europe) consider assignment of a patent or application to be a taxable transfer, and charge VAT (Value Added Tax) on the estimated value of the application or patent.  Since the value is often low in the early days, and can rise considerably during the life of the patent, the disadvantage of recordation can be mitigated by registering early.

Assignments records at the USPTO are available for  public inspection , but only for patents and published applications.  One can search by reel/frame number, patent or publication number, and assignor or assignee name.

The underlying documents are not available for download, but can be ordered from the assignment branch.  Paper mail requests can take months, but faxed requests are usually filled within a day or two.

No.  One should never rely upon the designation of “assignee” as set forth on the face of a patent.  First, the patent office obtains the “assignment” information directly from the issue fee transmittal form, and there is no verification whatsoever that such information is, or even ever was, correct.  The entry could well have been an error on the part of an attorney, paralegal, or secretary, and the issue fee transmittal form even warns that designation of an assignee of that form does not, in and of itself, affect an assignment.  Second, the patent is never altered after it is published.  Information that was correct at one point in time may well be superseded down the road.  Third, even if the “assignee” information is correct, one cannot know from the face of the patent what rights were assigned.  It might well be that only licensed rights were assigned, or that such rights are subject to a reversion.

Yes. But there can be real problems with multiple owners of a patent. Unless there is some other agreement restricting what an entity can do with its ownership interest, a co-owner of any portion of a patent, (whether 99% or 1% or .0001%), can make use of the patent however they want.  For example, a .0001% owner of a patent could license out its rights, and keep 100% of the license fee.  Absent an agreement to the contrary, there is no duty of a co-owner of the patent to share license fees with any of the other co-owners.

One of the big problems with two entities owning portions of a given patent is that the two entities can compete with each other with respect to license fees. For example, if co-owner A offers to license the patent rights for 7%, co-owner B might choose to undercut the previous offer by offering to license the same rights for 5%.  But then co-owner A comes back and offers to license the rights for 2%. Pretty soon the value of the license rights goes to zero.  Also, if co-owner A gets upset with co-owner B, co-owner A could unilaterally abandon the patent, which would make it worthless to everyone.

Even if co-owners agree to share license fees 50-50, there can be problems.  For example, co-owner A could decide to license out its patent rights for one dollar a year to a licensee that co-owner A owns, has an interest in, or perhaps has a relative with an interest in.  Of course co-owner A would be happy to share $0.50 of its annual license fee with co-owner B, but co-owner B would be pretty upset.

Still further, if there is a chain of patents, for example with a parent and a child patent in the same family, the ownership of both patents has to remain to the same at all times.  If, for example, both a parent patent and a child patent are 100% owned by A, assignment of some or all of the child patent to B will immediately invalidate the child patent.  Even if such an assignment is made, and the parties realize the mistake, reassigning the child patent back A would not cure the mistake. The child patent would remain abandoned.

Bottom line, co-ownership of a patent is really problematic.

Ph: (949) 943-8300 Fx: (949) 943-8358 [email protected]

Orange County 19900 MacArthur Blvd. Suite 810 Irvine, CA 92612

Silicon Valley 99 S. Almaden Blvd. Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95113

PRIVACY POLICY

Patent Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

A patent assignment is an irrevocable agreement for a patent owner to sell, give away, or transfer interest to an assignee, who can enforce the patent. 6 min read updated on November 05, 2020

Patent Assignment: What Is It?

A patent assignment is a part of how to patent an idea and is an irrevocable agreement for a patent owner to sell, give away, or transfer his or her interest to an assignee, who can benefit from and enforce the patent. The assignee receives the original owner's interest and gains exclusive rights to intellectual property. He or she can sue others for making or selling the invention or design.

There are four types of patent assignments:

Assignment of Rights - Patent Issued: This is for patents that have already been issued.

Assignment of Rights - Patent Application : This is for patents still in the application process. After filing this form, the assignee can be listed as the patent applicant.

Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights - No Patent Issued or Application Filed: This is for unregistered inventions with no patent.

Exclusive Rights

Advantages of a Patent Assignment

Assignees don't create a unique invention or design. They also don't go through the lengthy patent process. They simply assume exclusive rights to intellectual property.

Profit Potential

Many patents cover intellectual property that can earn the owner money. A patent owner can charge a lump sum sale price for a patent assignment. After the transfer, the assignee can start to earn profits from the patent. Both original owners and assignees can benefit from this business arrangement.

Disadvantages of a Patent Assignment

Too Many or Not Enough Inventors

Patents can have multiple owners who invented the product or design. Sometimes patents list too many or not enough inventors. When this happens, owners can argue about an incorrect filing. This kind of dispute can make a patent assignment impossible.

Limited Recourse

Older patents may already have many infringements. Not all patent assignments include the right to sue for past infringements. This is known as the right to causes of action. This can cost the assignee a lot of potential profit.

Examples of What Happens When You File a Patent Assignment vs. When You File a Patent License

When You File a Patent Assignment

The patent owner changes permanently. You file the paperwork with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Information about the new owner is available to the public.

Many owners charge a one-time fee for a patent assignment. The original owner doesn't receive additional payments or profits in the future. The new owner receives future profits.

When You File a Patent License

The patent owner doesn't change permanently. Most licenses have a time limit. At the end of the period, the original owner takes control again. Licensing information isn't always available through an online USPTO search. Contact the recordation office directly to get information about patent licenses.

The licensee can assign rights to another person or company. This adds another layer of ownership over the intellectual property.

Many owners charge royalties for a patent license. The licensee pays royalty fees throughout the license period. If the royalty fees are high and the license period is long, a patent assignment may be a better choice for earning the new owner more money.

Common Mistakes

Not Filing an Assignment Document

A verbal agreement is not official. File a patent assignment to change patent ownership.

Taking Action Before Filing

The assignee shouldn't make or sell the invention before the patent assignment is official. If an error or another problem happens, this could be patent infringement .

Making a Filing Error

Patent assignments are official documents. The assignee's name must be legal and correct. Before filing, check the spelling of the assignee name. If the assignee is a business, confirm the legal name. Many patents have more than one owner. List all names on the assignment.

Misidentifying the Patent

Include as much information about the patent as you can. List the patent number and title. Describe the intellectual property completely.

Not Searching for Security Interests

Patents can be collateral. A bank or another party can file a security interest in a patent, and this can limit how much an assignee can earn from a patent. Check for security interests before filing a patent assignment.

Not Filing a Proprietary Information Agreement

Many businesses file patents, as this is part of a business plan , and it's especially common for startup businesses. Inventorship problems can happen if employees file patents instead of the business.

Often, employees have an obligation to assign inventions to a company. This is true if they developed the invention on the job.

To avoid confusion, require employees to sign a proprietary information agreement. This automatically assigns inventions and designs to the business. Other options include signing an automatic assignment or an explicit assignment. These all clarify patent ownership.

Not Being Notarized

Make sure all official documents concerning your patent are notarized. There is a huge legal advantage to being notarized. It makes it so that your documents will be accepted as correct until it is proven otherwise. If you can't get your documents notarized, gather two witnesses. Have them attest to the signatures.

You have to file a patent assignment within three months of signing the form. If you don't, the assignee could lose ownership rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where Do I Record a Patent Assignment?

If you have a U.S. patent, record your patent assignment with the USPTO. If you have a foreign patent, file with the correct national patent offices.

I Can't Get a Signature from the Inventor. What Happens Now?

First, it needs to be officially established that:

  • Whoever is pursuing the application has the right to do so.
  • The inventor cannot be reached.

In order to establish this, the patent office will need a copy of the following:

  • the employee agreement
  • the assignment
  • other evidence of the rights

After that, the patent office will continue as if the signature has been obtained, even though it hasn't.

If the inventor has died, the patent office will try to contact the person in charge of managing the deceased's estate or the heir. If the invented refuses to sign or is missing, the patent office will ask for a declaration from the person who is trying to contact them. They will also look at the following items that have been sent to the inventor:

  • Do I Have to File a Patent Assignment if the Owner's Name Changed?

No, you don't need a patent assignment if only the person's or company's name changed. If the company merged with another, you may need a patent assignment.

What if I Make a Mistake on My Patent Assignment?

You can't correct a patent assignment. You have to assign it back to the original owner. Then you have to reassign with the correct information.

How Much Does a Patent Assignment Cost?

The patent assignment fee is $25. Filing electronically doesn't cost extra. You do have to pay an additional $40 fee if you file on paper.

Should I Hire a Lawyer?

Yes, you should get a lawyer to help with a patent assignment. A lawyer will make sure there are no filing errors. A lawyer knows how to describe the patent correctly. Errors and bad descriptions can limit the power of a patent assignment. This could cost the assignee a lot of money in future profits and legal fees.

Steps to File a Patent Assignment

1. Fill Out a Recordation Form Cover Shee t

The Recordation Form Cover Sheet is an official USPTO document. This includes the names of the assignor(s) and the assignee(s). It also includes the patent title and number.

2. Complete a Patent Assignment Agreement

The patent assignment agreement should list the assignor(s) and the assignee(s). It should state that the assignor has the right to assign the patent. It should also describe the intellectual property clearly and completely. It should also explain any financial or other transactions that have to take place. This includes a description of the lump sum payment.

3. Sign the Patent Assignment Agreement

All patent owners and assignees must sign the patent assignment agreement.

4. Submit the Patent Assignment

Finally, submit the patent assignment with the USPTO. You have to pay the assignment fee at this time.

If you need help with patent assignments, you can post your question or concern on UpCounsel's marketplace . UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

  • Brookfield Patent Lawyers
  • Jackson Patent Lawyers
  • Katy Patent Lawyers
  • Kokomo Patent Lawyers
  • Providence Patent Lawyers
  • Reno Patent Lawyers
  • Southaven Patent Lawyers
  • How to Sell a Patent
  • Patent Assignment Database
  • Patent Companies
  • Patent Pending Infringement
  • Patent Rights
  • Patent Attorney
  • What Does a Patent Do
  • How to File a Patent
  • When Can You Say Patent Pending? Everything You Need to Know
  • Atlanta Patent Lawyers
  • Austin Patent Lawyers
  • Boston Patent Lawyers
  • Chicago Patent Lawyers
  • Dallas Patent Lawyers
  • Houston Patent Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Patent Lawyers
  • New York Patent Lawyers
  • Philadelphia Patent Lawyers
  • San Francisco Patent Lawyers
  • Seattle Patent Lawyers
  • Charlotte Patent Lawyers
  • Denver Patent Lawyers
  • Jacksonville Patent Lawyers
  • Las Vegas Patent Lawyers
  • Phoenix Patent Lawyers
  • Portland Patent Lawyers
  • San Antonio Patent Lawyers
  • San Diego Patent Lawyers
  • San Jose Patent Lawyers
  • View All Patent Lawyers

The following table lists the patent fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. USPTO  Trademark Fees  are listed separately. A complete copy of the USPTO's fee schedule is available from  their website . 

Quick Jump:  Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB)  | PCT:   International Stage  -  National Stage  -  WIPO  |  Hague Convention 

USPTO Fee changes : Fees increased effective January 16, 2018 PCT Fee  Changes: Some International Stage and National Stage fees changed January 16, 2018 PCT Fee for search by EPO and Rospatent changed as of December, 2017 PCT Fee for search by IPO Singapore changed as of November 1, 2017 PCT Fee for sarch by ILPO changes as of July 1, 2017 PCT Fees for search by JPO and KIPO changed as of March 1, 2017 WIPO fees  and  International Fees  changed January 1, 2017 The "Large Entity Fee", "Small Entity Fee" and "Micro Entity Fee" columns on this page incorporate changes to USPTO fees which became effective through the last update of this page - changes which have been announced, but are not yet effective, are listed in the "pending fees" columns. Upcoming changes will be incorporated as they are announced.  See  this page on our website  for instructions on how to decide if you are entitled to small entity or micro-entity fees.    DESCRIPTION Large Entity Fee Small Entity Fee Micro Entity Fee Utility Application Basic Filing Fee 320 128 64 Utility Application Basic Filing Fee (Small Entity) if filed electronically n/a 64 n/a Excess Claims: more than three  Independent Claims  (per indep. claim over 3) 480 192 96 Excess Claims: more than 20 total claims (per claim over 20) 100 40 20 Excess Claims: surcharge if there are any  multiple dependent claims 860 344 172 Utility Application Search Fee 700 280 140 Utility Application Examination Fee 800 320 160 Surcharge - Late Filing Fee, search fee, examination fee or oath/declaration 160 64 32 Surcharge - Late Provisional Filing Fee or Cover Sheet 60 24 12 Design Filing Fee or  Continuing Prosecution Application (CPA) 220 88 44 Design Search Fee 160 64 32 Design Examination Fee 640 256 128 Reissue Filing Fee 320 128 64 Reissue Search Fee 700 280 140 Reissue Examination Fee 2,320 928 464 Plant Filing Fee 220 88 44 Plant Search Fee 440 176 88 Plant Examination Fee 660 264 132 Provisional Application Filing Fee 300 120 60 Excess pages (all applications) - if more than 100 pages, per add'l 50 pages  (note: each page in an electronically filed application counts as 3/4 of a page for the purpose of calculating this fee, so that for electronically filed applications this fee becomes, in effect, $420/168/84 for each additional 66 pages if there are more than 133 electronically filed pages)  420 168 84 Extension - First Month 220 88 44 Extension - Second Month 640 256 128 Extension - Third Month 1,480 592 296 Extension - Fourth Month 2,320 928 464 Extension - Fifth Month 3,160 1,264 632 Request for Continued Examination (RCE) (first request) 1,360 544 272 Request for Continued Examination (RCE) (second or more request) 2,000 800 400 Correcting inventorship after first action on the merits (FAOM) Note: does not apply if inventor(s) are deleted, and statement is filed that correction is solely due to cancelation of claims in the application. 640 256 128 "Request for Prioritized Examination" (a/ka/ "Track I" or "Fast Track") of Utility Application 4,200 1,680 840 Request for Expedited Examination of Design Application 1,600 640 320 Petitions under the following 37 CFR sections (group I): § 1.36(a) - for revocation of a power of attorney by fewer than all applicants § 1.53(e) - to accord a filing date. § 1.57(a) - to accord a filing date. § 1.182 - for decision on a question not specifically provided for. § 1.183 - to suspend the rules. § 1.378(e) - for reconsideration of decision on petition refusing to accept delayed payment of maintenance fee in an expired patent. § 1.741(b) - to accord a filing date to an application under § 1.740 for extension of a patent term. 420 168 84 Petitions under the following 37 CFR sections (group II) § 1.12 -for access to an assignment record. § 1.14 -for access to an application. § 1.47 -for filing by other than all the inventors or a person not the inventor. § 1.59 -for expungement of information. § 1.103(a) - to suspend action in an application. § 1.136(b) - for review of a request for extension of time when the provisions of section 1.136(a) are not available. § 1.295 - for review of refusal to publish a statutory invention registration. § 1.296 - to withdraw a request for publication of a statutory invention registration filed on or after the date the notice of intent to publish issued. § 1.377 - for review of decision refusing to accept and record payment of a maintenance fee filed prior to expiration of a patent. § 1.550(c) - for patent owner requests for extension of time in ex parte reexamination proceedings. § 1.956 - for patent owner requests for extension of time in inter partes reexamination proceedings. § 5.12 -for expedited handling of a foreign filing license. § 5.15 - for changing the scope of a license. § 5.25 - for retroactive license. 220 88 44 Petitions under the following 37 CFR sections (Group III) § 1.19(g) -to request documents in a form other than that provided in this part. § 1.84 -for accepting color drawings or photographs. § 1.91 - for entry of a model or exhibit. § 1.102(d) - to make an application special. § 1.138(c) - to expressly abandon an application to avoid publication. § 1.313 - to withdraw an application from issue. § 1.314 - to defer issuance of a patent. 140 56 28 Processing fees under the following 37 CFR sections § 1.28(c)(3) - for processing a non-itemized fee deficiency based on an error in small entity status.  § 1.41 - for supplying the name or names of the inventor or inventors after the filing date without an oath or declaration as prescribed by § 1.63, except in provisional applications.  § 1.48 - for correcting inventorship, except in provisional applications.    -  but see new fee for filing change in inventorship after first office action §1.17(d), above § 1.53(b)(3) - to convert a provisional application filed under § 1.53(c) into a nonprovisional application under § 1.53(b).  § 1.55 - for entry of late priority papers.  § 1.71(g)(2) – to enter an amendment to the specification for purposes of 35 U.S.C. 103(c)(2) if not filed within the cited time periods  § 1.99(e) - for processing a belated submission under § 1.99.  § 1.103(b) - for requesting limited suspension of action, continued prosecution application (§ 1.53(d)).  § 1.103(c) - for requesting limited suspension of action, request for continued examination (§ 1.114).  § 1.103(d) - for requesting deferred examination of an application.  § 1.217 - for processing a redacted copy of a paper submitted in the file of an application in which a redacted copy was submitted for the patent application publication.  § 1.291(c)(5) - for processing a second or subsequent protest by the same real party in interest.  § 1.497(d) - for filing an oath or declaration pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 371(c)(4) naming an inventive entity different from the inventive entity set forth in the international stage.  § 3.81 - for a patent to issue to assignee, assignment submitted after payment of the issue fee. 140 56 28 §1.52(d) Non-English Specification 140 56 28 §1.221—for requesting voluntary publication or republication of an application. 140 140 140 Petition for Revival of an Abandoned Application for a Patent, for the Delayed Payment of the Fee for Issuing Each Patent, or for the Delayed Response by the Patent Owner in any 1453/2453/3453 1.17(m) Reexamination Proceeding 2,100 840 420 Submission of an Information Disclosure Statement (1.97) or third party submission (1.290(f)) 260 104 52 Processing fee for various actions on Provisional Applications (correcting inventorship, convert nonprovisional to provisional, etc)  50 50 50 Filing a submission after final rejection (1.129(a)) 880 352 176 Per add'l invention to be examined (1.129(b)) 880 352 176 Acceptance of Unintentionally delayed claim for priority 2,100 840 420 Utility or Reissue Issue Fee  1,200 480 240 Design Issue Fee 740 296 148 Plant Issue Fee 840 336 168 Publication fee - early, voluntary or normal 0 0 0 Publication fee - republication 320 320 320 Filing Application for patent term adjustment 210 210 210 Request for reinstatement of term reduced 420 420 420 Copy of Patent or Published Patent Application 3 3 3 Plant Patent Copy in color 15 15 15 Copy of Utility Patent or SIR in Color 25 25 25 Paper Copy of Patent Application as Filed 35 35 35 Paper Copy of File Wrapper (no page limit) 290 290 290 Paper copies of documents in file, other than application, per document 25 25 25 Electronic copy of File Wrapper 60 60 60 Certified or uncertified copy of document, not otherwise provided 25 25 25 For Assignment Records, Abstract of Title and Certification 35 35 35 Library Service 50 50 50 Copy of Non-U.S. Patent Document 25 25 25 Certificate of Correction 160 160 160 Processing fee for correcting inventorship in a patent 160 160 160 Request for ex parte Reexamination - streamlined * Micro-entity not available for third-party requestors 6,300 2,520 1,260* Request for ex parte Reexamination - non streamlined 12,600 5,040 2,520 Reexamination - excess independent claims 480 192 96 Reexamination - excess total claims 100 40 20 Petitions in a reexamination proceeding, except for those specifically enumerated in 37 CFR 1.550(i) and 1.937(d) 2,040 816 408 Statutory Disclaimer  note: no small or micro entity discount available 170 170 170 Maintenance Fee - 3.5 Years 2,000 800 400 Maintenance Fee - 7.5 Years 3,760 1,504 752 Maintenance Fee - 11.5 Years 7,700 3,080 1,540 Surcharge - Maintenance Fee - 6 Months 500 200 100 Extension of Term of Patent Under 1.740  note: no small or micro entity discount available 1,180 1,180 1,180 Initial Application for Interim Extension Under 1.790     note: no small or micro entity discount available 440 440 440 Subsequent Application for Interim Extension Under 1.790     note: no small or micro entity discount available 230 230 230 Request for Supplemental Examination 4,620 1,848 924 Reexamination ordered as a result of Supplemental Examination 12,700 5,080 2,540 Supplemental Examination document size - nonpatent reference 21-50 sheets 180 72 36 Supplemental Examination document size - nonpatent reference >50 sheets (per 50 sheets or part thereof) 300 120 60 International Type Search Report 40 40 40 Recording Patent Assignment, Agreement or other document - submitted electronically  0 0 0 Recording Patent Assignment, Agreement or other document -  not  submitted electronically 50 50 50 Publication in the OG 25 25 25 Handling Fee - Incomplete Application 140 140 140 Submission of Sequence Listing of 300 MB to 800 MB 1,060 424 212 Submission of Sequence Listing of more than 800 MB 10,500 4,200 2,100 Additional Fee for Overnight Delivery 40 40 40 Additional Fee for Expedited Service 170 170 170 PCT Fees - International Stage Large Entity Fee Small Entity  Fee* Micro Entity Fee* Transmittal Fee 260 104 52 PCT Search Fee for USPTO search  (note: Discount for prior US search has been eliminated) 2,180 872 436 Supplemental Search (per additional invention) 2,180 872 436 PCT Search Fee for European Patent Office (EPO) search  2,107 2,107 2,107 PCT Search Fee for IP Australia (IPAU) search  (Note: IP Australia may only be used for a limited number of technologies - be sure to check our  PCT News Page  for the latest list before choosing ISA/AU) 1,587 1,587 1,587 PCT Search Fee for Korean Patent Office (KIPO) search  (Note: IP Korea has a list of technologies they will not search - see our  PCT News Page  for the list)  1,003 1,003 1,003 PCT Search Fee for Israel Patent Office (ILPO) search  1,036 1,036 1,036 PCT Search Fee for Japanese Patent Office (JPO) search  (note: only for "green technology") 1,457 1,457 1,457 PCT Search Fee for Russian Patent Office (Rospatent) search 537 537 537 PCT Search Fee for IP Office of Singapore (IPOS) search  ( 1,622 1,622 1,622 Preliminary Exam Fee (if US was International Searching Agency) 640 256 128 Preliminary Exam Fee (if US was not ISA) 800 320 160 Supplemental Examination (per additional invention) 640 256 128 Non-electronic filing fee (additional fee for applications filed on paper) 400 200 200 Late Furnishing Fee for Providing a Sequence Listing in Response to an Invitation Under PCT Rule 13 ter 320 128 64 For information on which fees need to be paid to file an International Stage application, see  the note  below.  PCT Fees - National Stage Large Entity Fee Small Entity Fee*   Micro Entity Fee* Basic Filing Fee       Basic National Stage Fee 320 128 64 Fees in addition to Basic Fee       National Stage Search Fee (other - i.e. if none of the exceptions below apply) 700 280 140 - Search fee if USPTO issued IPER saying novelty, inventive step (nonobviousness) and industrial applicability have been satisfied for all claims entering the National Stage  0 0 0  - Search fee if USPTO was ISA and Int'l Search fee paid 140  56 28  - Search fee if USPTO not ISA, but Int'l Search Report is provided to USPTO no later than time at which search fee is paid 540 216 108 National Stage Examination Fee 800 320 160  - Exam fee if USPTO issued IPER saying novelty, inventive step (nonobviousness) and industrial applicability have been satisfied for all claims entering the National Stage  0 0 0 Claims - Extra Independent (Over 3) 480 192 96 Claims - Extra Total (Over 20) 100 40 20 Claims - if application has any multiple dependent claim (also affects total fee calculation) 860 344 172 Surcharge - Oath or Declaration filed after 30 months from priority date 160 64 32 English Translation filed after 30 Months from priority date (large or small entity) 140 56 28 Extra pages - for each 50 sheets over 100 420 168 84 Non-electronic filing fee (additional fee for applications filed on paper) 400 200 200 Fee for filing a petition to revive an international application abandoned unintentionally under 37 CFR 1.137(b) 2,100 840 420 Submission of Sequence Listing of 300 MB to 800 MB 1,060 424 212 Submission of Sequence Listing of more than 800 MB 10,500 4,200 2,100 For information on which fees need to be paid to file an International Stage application, see  the note  below.  PCT Fees - to WIPO or EPO Large Entity Fee Small Entity Fee*   Micro Entity Fee* Basic application fee (up to 30 pages)# 1,367 n/a n/a Basic application fee (up to 30 pages) filed on paper with PCT-EASY zip file# 1,264 n/a n/a Basic application fee if application is filed electronically with PCT-EASY zip file# 1,161 n/a n/a Basic supplemental fee (each page over 30)#       Handling Fee (Chapter II)# 206 n/a n/a International CD Application# 5,200 n/a n/a Fee for requesting restoration of the right of priority (unintentional only)  (No Micro Entity discount as of Dec. 18, 2013) 1,700 850 n/a # -  Note : These fees are actually paid by the USPTO to WIPO or EPO in Swiss Francs, and therefore they will change from time to time based on the fluctuations in the exchange rate. Treat these dollar amounts as estimates only, and check when paying fees as to what they actually are at that time. No small entity or micro entity discounts are applicable to WIPO or EPO fees.  * - Small Entity and Micro Entity discounts are only available for some (not all) fees charged by USPTO. Other authorities do not offer these discounts. If the fee in the "Small Entity Fee" or "Micro Entity Fee" column is "n/a", this means that the discount is not available, and the next-larger fee must be paid.   Note on Fees for Filing PCT Applications Not all of the fees listed in the various PCT sections will actually be paid in any given application. When filing an International Stage PCT application in the USPTO as receiving office, at least the following fees are required: Basic Application Fee (from this WIPO section) Transmittal Fee (from  PCT Fees - International Stage ) Search Fee - depends on which search authority is chosen (US, EP, KR, AU or RU) see  PCT Fees - International Stage When entering a PCT application into the National Stage in the USPTO, at least the following fees are required (from the  PCT Fees - National Stage  list, above): Basic National Stage Fee National Stage Examination Fee National Stage Search Fee Other application fees may apply, depending on the application, but these are the only ones which  every  PCT application filed in the USPTO will pay. Of course, the fees on this table are only the government fees. Attorney fees and expenses are in addition to these fees - for a more complete explanation, see our  Patent Budget Estimator Patent Trials and Appeals Board Fees Large Entity Fees Small Entity Fees Micro Entity Fee Petitions to the Chief Judge under 37 CFR 41.3 420 420 420 Notice of Appeal 840 336 168 Filing a Brief - appeal of application or Ex Parte Reexamination 0 0 0 Filing a Brief - appeal of Inter Partes Reexamination 2,100 840 420 Request for Oral Hearing 1,360 544 272 Forwarding an appeal in an application or Ex Parte Reexamination * Third-Party Filers Are Not Eligible for the Micro Entity Fee. 2,360 944 472* Inter partes review (IPR) - request fee, up to 20 claims 19,000 19,000 19,000 IPR - Post-institution fee, up to 20 claims 22,500 22,500 22,500 IPR - claims in excess of 20 for inter partes review - in addition to request fee  (per claim) 375 375 375 IPR - claims in excess of 20 for inter partes review - in addition to post-institution fee  (per claim) 750 750 750 Post-grant Review (PGR) or a covered business method (CBM) review - request fee, up to 20 claims 20,000 20,000 20,000 PGR or CBM - post-institution fee, up to 20 claims 27,500 27,500 27,500 PGR or CBM - claims in excess of 20, in addition to request fee (per claim) 475 475 475 PGR or CBM - claims in excess of 20, in addition to post-institution fee (per claim) 1,050 1,050 1,050 Derivation Petition 420 420 420 Request to make a settlement agreement and other requests filed in a patent trial proceeding  420 420 420 Hague Convention Fees Transmittal Fee 120 48 24 International design application fees payable to WIPO - see  WIPO Fee Calculator var var var Notes:  For further information regarding fee amounts or to request a copy of the PTO fee schedule, please contact the USPTO General Information Services Division by phone at (800) 786-9199 [PTO-9199] or (703) 308-4357 [308-HELP], or by fax at (703) 305-7786. PTO fees are subject to change. Usually, new fees take effect in the Fall, typically October-December. Be sure to check for the latest fees before filing anything.  PCT fees change more or less quarterly, as exchange rates change. See note above in " PCT Fees to WIPO or EPO "  The preceding table was taken from information supplied by the  USPTO web site . Additional legal and handling fees may apply for preparing and processing paperwork for payment of these fees. Back  to Patents Page Back to  Patent Budget Estimator

IP Overview

  • Information on Patents
  • Patents FAQ
  • Information on Trademarks
  • Trademarks FAQ
  • Information on Copyrights
  • Copyrights FAQ

You are using an unsupported browser ×

You are using an unsupported browser. This web site is designed for the current versions of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Safari.

Site Feedback

The Office of the Federal Register publishes documents on behalf of Federal agencies but does not have any authority over their programs. We recommend you directly contact the agency associated with the content in question.

If you have comments or suggestions on how to improve the www.ecfr.gov website or have questions about using www.ecfr.gov, please choose the 'Website Feedback' button below.

If you would like to comment on the current content, please use the 'Content Feedback' button below for instructions on contacting the issuing agency

Website Feedback

  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Recent Updates
  • Recent Changes
  • Corrections
  • Reader Aids Home
  • Using the eCFR Point-in-Time System
  • Understanding the eCFR
  • Government Policy and OFR Procedures
  • Developer Resources
  • My Subscriptions
  • Sign In / Sign Up

Hi, Sign Out

The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

Enhanced content :: cross reference.

Enhanced content is provided to the user to provide additional context.

Navigate by entering citations or phrases (eg: suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">1 CFR 1.1 suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">49 CFR 172.101 suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">Organization and Purpose suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">1/1.1 suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">Regulation Y suggestions#fillExample" class="example badge badge-info">FAR ).

Choosing an item from citations and headings will bring you directly to the content. Choosing an item from full text search results will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box will also bring you to search results.

Background and more details are available in the Search & Navigation guide.

  • Title 37 —Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights
  • Chapter I —United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce
  • Subchapter A —General

Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

Part 3
§ 3.1
§ 3.11
§ 3.16
§ 3.21
§ 3.24
§ 3.25
§ 3.26
§ 3.27
§ 3.28
§ 3.31
§ 3.34
§ 3.41
§ 3.51
§ 3.54
§ 3.56
§ 3.58
§ 3.61
§ 3.71
§ 3.73
§ 3.81
§ 3.85

Enhanced Content - Details

15 U.S.C. 1123 ; 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2) .

57 FR 29642 , July 6, 1992, unless otherwise noted.

Enhanced Content - Print

(approximately 10+ pages) " href="#">Generate PDF (approximately 10+ pages)

This content is from the eCFR and may include recent changes applied to the CFR. The official, published CFR, is updated annually and available below under "Published Edition". You can learn more about the process here .

Enhanced Content - Display Options

The eCFR is displayed with paragraphs split and indented to follow the hierarchy of the document. This is an automated process for user convenience only and is not intended to alter agency intent or existing codification.

A separate drafting site is available with paragraph structure matching the official CFR formatting. If you work for a Federal agency, use this drafting site when drafting amendatory language for Federal regulations: switch to eCFR drafting site .

Enhanced Content - Subscribe

Subscribe to: 37 CFR Part 3

Enhanced Content - Timeline

No changes found for this content after 1/03/2017.

Enhanced Content - Go to Date

Enhanced content - compare dates, enhanced content - published edition.

View the most recent official publication:

  • View Title 37 on govinfo.gov
  • View the PDF for 37 CFR Part 3

These links go to the official, published CFR, which is updated annually. As a result, it may not include the most recent changes applied to the CFR. Learn more .

Enhanced Content - Developer Tools

This document is available in the following developer friendly formats:

  • Hierarchy JSON - Title 37
  • Content HTML - Part 3
  • Content XML - Part 3

Information and documentation can be found in our developer resources .

eCFR Content

The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the official legal print publication containing the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) is a continuously updated online version of the CFR. It is not an official legal edition of the CFR.

Enhanced Content

Editorial note on subchapter a of chapter i, editorial note:.

Part 2 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

PART 3—ASSIGNMENT, RECORDING AND RIGHTS OF ASSIGNEE

Editorial note.

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 68 FR 14337 , Mar. 25, 2003.

§ 3.1 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following definitions shall apply:

Application means a national application for patent, an international patent application that designates the United States of America, an international design application that designates the United States of America, or an application to register a trademark under section 1 or 44 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 , or 15 U.S.C. 1126 , unless otherwise indicated.

Assignment means a transfer by a party of all or part of its right, title and interest in a patent, patent application, registered mark or a mark for which an application to register has been filed.

Document means a document which a party requests to be recorded in the Office pursuant to § 3.11 and which affects some interest in an application, patent, or registration.

Office means the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Recorded document means a document which has been recorded in the Office pursuant to § 3.11 .

Registration means a trademark registration issued by the Office.

[ 69 FR 29878 , May 26, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 17969 , Apr. 2, 2015]

Documents Eligible for Recording

§ 3.11 documents which will be recorded..

( a ) Assignments of applications, patents, and registrations, and other documents relating to interests in patent applications and patents, accompanied by completed cover sheets as specified in § 3.28 and § 3.31 , will be recorded in the Office. Other documents, accompanied by completed cover sheets as specified in § 3.28 and § 3.31 , affecting title to applications, patents, or registrations, will be recorded as provided in this part or at the discretion of the Director.

( b ) Executive Order 9424 of February 18, 1944 ( 9 FR 1959 , 3 CFR 1943-1948 Comp., p. 303) requires the several departments and other executive agencies of the Government, including Government-owned or Government-controlled corporations, to forward promptly to the Director for recording all licenses, assignments, or other interests of the Government in or under patents or patent applications. Assignments and other documents affecting title to patents or patent applications and documents not affecting title to patents or patent applications required by Executive Order 9424 to be filed will be recorded as provided in this part.

( c ) A joint research agreement or an excerpt of a joint research agreement will also be recorded as provided in this part.

[ 62 FR 53202 , Oct. 10, 1997, as amended at 70 FR 1824 , Jan. 11, 2005; 70 FR 54267 , Sept. 14, 2005; 78 FR 62408 , Oct. 21, 2013]

§ 3.16 Assignability of trademarks prior to filing of an allegation of use.

Before an allegation of use under either 15 U.S.C. 1051(c) or 15 U.S.C. 1051(d) is filed, an applicant may only assign an application to register a mark under 15 U.S.C. 1051(b) to a successor to the applicant's business, or portion of the business to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing.

[ 64 FR 48926 , Sept. 8, 1999]

Requirements for Recording

§ 3.21 identification of patents and patent applications..

An assignment relating to a patent must identify the patent by the patent number. An assignment relating to a national patent application must identify the national patent application by the application number (consisting of the series code and the serial number; e.g., 07/123,456). An assignment relating to an international patent application which designates the United States of America must identify the international application by the international application number; e.g., PCT/US2012/012345. An assignment relating to an international design application which designates the United States of America must identify the international design application by the international registration number or by the U.S. application number assigned to the international design application. If an assignment of a patent application filed under § 1.53(b) of this chapter is executed concurrently with, or subsequent to, the execution of the patent application, but before the patent application is filed, it must identify the patent application by the name of each inventor and the title of the invention so that there can be no mistake as to the patent application intended. If an assignment of a provisional application under § 1.53(c) of this chapter is executed before the provisional application is filed, it must identify the provisional application by the name of each inventor and the title of the invention so that there can be no mistake as to the provisional application intended.

[ 80 FR 17969 , Apr. 2, 2015]

§ 3.24 Requirements for documents and cover sheets relating to patents and patent applications.

( a ) For electronic submissions: Either a copy of the original document or an extract of the original document may be submitted for recording. All documents must be submitted as digitized images in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) or another form as prescribed by the Director. When printed to a paper size of either 21.6 by 27.9 cm (8 1 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches) or 21.0 by 29.7 cm (DIN size A4), the document must be legible and a 2.5 cm (one-inch) margin must be present on all sides.

( b ) For paper or facsimile submissions: Either a copy of the original document or an extract of the original document must be submitted for recording. Only one side of each page may be used. The paper size must be either 21.6 by 27.9 cm (8 1 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches) or 21.0 by 29.7 cm (DIN size A4), and in either case, a 2.5 cm (one-inch) margin must be present on all sides. For paper submissions, the paper used should be flexible, strong white, non-shiny, and durable. The Office will not return recorded documents, so original documents must not be submitted for recording.

[ 69 FR 29879 , May 26, 2004]

§ 3.25 Recording requirements for trademark applications and registrations.

( a ) Documents affecting title. To record documents affecting title to a trademark application or registration, a legible cover sheet ( see § 3.31 ) and one of the following must be submitted:

( 1 ) A copy of the original document;

( 2 ) A copy of an extract from the document evidencing the effect on title; or

( 3 ) A statement signed by both the party conveying the interest and the party receiving the interest explaining how the conveyance affects title.

( b ) Name changes. Only a legible cover sheet is required ( See § 3.31 ).

( c ) All documents.

( 1 ) For electronic submissions: All documents must be submitted as digitized images in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) or another form as prescribed by the Director. When printed to a paper size of either 21.6 by 27.9 cm (8 1 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches) or 21.0 by 29.7 cm (DIN size A4), a 2.5 cm (one-inch) margin must be present on all sides.

( 2 ) For paper or facsimile submissions: All documents should be submitted on white and non-shiny paper that is either 8 1 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches (21.6 by 27.9 cm) or DIN size A4 (21.0 by 29.7 cm) with a one-inch (2.5 cm) margin on all sides in either case. Only one side of each page may be used. The Office will not return recorded documents, so original documents should not be submitted for recording.

§ 3.26 English language requirement.

The Office will accept and record non-English language documents only if accompanied by an English translation signed by the individual making the translation.

[ 62 FR 53202 , Oct. 10, 1997]

§ 3.27 Mailing address for submitting documents to be recorded.

Documents and cover sheets submitted by mail for recordation should be addressed to Mail Stop Assignment Recordation Services, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, unless they are filed together with new applications.

§ 3.28 Requests for recording.

Each document submitted to the Office for recording must include a single cover sheet (as specified in § 3.31 ) referring either to those patent applications and patents, or to those trademark applications and registrations, against which the document is to be recorded. If a document to be recorded includes interests in, or transactions involving, both patents and trademarks, then separate patent and trademark cover sheets, each accompanied by a copy of the document to be recorded, must be submitted. If a document to be recorded is not accompanied by a completed cover sheet, the document and the incomplete cover sheet will be returned pursuant to § 3.51 for proper completion, in which case the document and a completed cover sheet should be resubmitted.

[ 70 FR 56128 , Sept. 26, 2005]

Cover Sheet Requirements

§ 3.31 cover sheet content..

( a ) Each patent or trademark cover sheet required by § 3.28 must contain:

( 1 ) The name of the party conveying the interest;

( 2 ) The name and address of the party receiving the interest;

( 3 ) A description of the interest conveyed or transaction to be recorded;

( 4 ) Identification of the interests involved:

( i ) For trademark assignments and trademark name changes: Each trademark registration number and each trademark application number, if known, against which the Office is to record the document. If the trademark application number is not known, a copy of the application or a reproduction of the trademark must be submitted, along with an estimate of the date that the Office received the application; or

( ii ) For any other document affecting title to a trademark or patent application, registration or patent: Each trademark or patent application number or each trademark registration number or patent against which the document is to be recorded, or an indication that the document is filed together with a patent application;

( 5 ) The name and address of the party to whom correspondence concerning the request to record the document should be mailed;

( 6 ) The date the document was executed;

( 7 ) The signature of the party submitting the document. For an assignment document or name change filed electronically, the person who signs the cover sheet must either:

( i ) Place a symbol comprised of letters, numbers, and/or punctuation marks between forward slash marks (e.g., /Thomas O'Malley III/) in the signature block on the electronic submission; or

( ii ) Sign the cover sheet using some other form of electronic signature specified by the Director.

( 8 ) For trademark assignments, the entity and citizenship of the party receiving the interest. In addition, if the party receiving the interest is a domestic partnership or domestic joint venture, the cover sheet must set forth the names, legal entities, and national citizenship (or the state or country of organization) of all general partners or active members that compose the partnership or joint venture.

( b ) A cover sheet should not refer to both patents and trademarks, since any information, including information about pending patent applications, submitted with a request for recordation of a document against a trademark application or trademark registration will become public record upon recordation.

( c ) Each patent cover sheet required by § 3.28 seeking to record a governmental interest as provided by § 3.11(b) must:

( 1 ) Indicate that the document relates to a Government interest; and

( 2 ) Indicate, if applicable, that the document to be recorded is not a document affecting title (see § 3.41(b) ).

( d ) Each trademark cover sheet required by § 3.28 seeking to record a document against a trademark application or registration should include, in addition to the serial number or registration number of the trademark, identification of the trademark or a description of the trademark, against which the Office is to record the document.

( e ) Each patent or trademark cover sheet required by § 3.28 should contain the number of applications, patents or registrations identified in the cover sheet and the total fee.

( f ) Each trademark cover sheet should include the citizenship of the party conveying the interest.

( g ) The cover sheet required by § 3.28 seeking to record a joint research agreement or an excerpt of a joint research agreement as provided by § 3.11(c) must:

( 1 ) Identify the document as a “joint research agreement” (in the space provided for the description of the interest conveyed or transaction to be recorded if using an Office-provided form);

( 2 ) Indicate the name of the owner of the application or patent (in the space provided for the name and address of the party receiving the interest if using an Office-provided form);

( 3 ) Indicate the name of each other party to the joint research agreement party (in the space provided for the name of the party conveying the interest if using an Office-provided form); and

( 4 ) Indicate the date the joint research agreement was executed.

( h ) The assignment cover sheet required by § 3.28 for a patent application or patent will be satisfied by the Patent Law Treaty Model International Request for Recordation of Change in Applicant or Owner Form, Patent Law Treaty Model International Request for Recordation of a License/Cancellation of the Recordation of a License Form, Patent Law Treaty Model Certificate of Transfer Form or Patent Law Treaty Model International Request for Recordation of a Security Interest/Cancellation of the Recordation of a Security Interest Form, as applicable, except where the assignment is also an oath or declaration under § 1.63 of this chapter . An assignment cover sheet required by § 3.28 must contain a conspicuous indication of an intent to utilize the assignment as an oath or declaration under § 1.63 of this chapter .

[ 57 FR 29642 , July 6, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 53202 , Oct. 10, 1997; 64 FR 48927 , Sept. 8, 1999; 67 FR 79523 , Dec. 30, 2002; 69 FR 29879 , May 26, 2004; 70 FR 1824 , Jan. 11, 2005; 70 FR 56128 , Sept. 26, 2005; 73 FR 67775 , Nov. 17, 2008; 77 FR 48825 , Aug. 14, 2012; 78 FR 62408 , Oct. 21, 2013]

§ 3.34 Correction of cover sheet errors.

( a ) An error in a cover sheet recorded pursuant to § 3.11 will be corrected only if:

( 1 ) The error is apparent when the cover sheet is compared with the recorded document to which it pertains, and

( 2 ) A corrected cover sheet is filed for recordation.

( b ) The corrected cover sheet must be accompanied by a copy of the document originally submitted for recording and by the recording fee as set forth in § 3.41 .

§ 3.41 Recording fees.

( a ) All requests to record documents must be accompanied by the appropriate fee. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a fee is required for each application, patent and registration against which the document is recorded as identified in the cover sheet. The recording fee is set in § 1.21(h) of this chapter for patents and in § 2.6(b)(6) of this chapter for trademarks.

( b ) No fee is required for each patent application and patent against which a document required by Executive Order 9424 is to be filed if:

( 1 ) The document does not affect title and is so identified in the cover sheet (see § 3.31(c)(2) ); and

( 2 ) The document and cover sheet are either: Faxed or electronically submitted as prescribed by the Director, or mailed to the Office in compliance with § 3.27 .

[ 63 FR 52159 , Sept. 30, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 29879 , May 26, 2004]

Date and Effect of Recording

§ 3.51 recording date..

The date of recording of a document is the date the document meeting the requirements for recording set forth in this part is filed in the Office. A document which does not comply with the identification requirements of § 3.21 will not be recorded. Documents not meeting the other requirements for recording, for example, a document submitted without a completed cover sheet or without the required fee, will be returned for correction to the sender where a correspondence address is available. The returned papers, stamped with the original date of receipt by the Office, will be accompanied by a letter which will indicate that if the returned papers are corrected and resubmitted to the Office within the time specified in the letter, the Office will consider the original date of filing of the papers as the date of recording of the document. The procedure set forth in § 1.8 or § 1.10 of this chapter may be used for resubmissions of returned papers to have the benefit of the date of deposit in the United States Postal Service. If the returned papers are not corrected and resubmitted within the specified period, the date of filing of the corrected papers will be considered to be the date of recording of the document. The specified period to resubmit the returned papers will not be extended.

[ 62 FR 53203 , Oct. 10, 1997]

§ 3.54 Effect of recording.

The recording of a document pursuant to § 3.11 is not a determination by the Office of the validity of the document or the effect that document has on the title to an application, a patent, or a registration. When necessary, the Office will determine what effect a document has, including whether a party has the authority to take an action in a matter pending before the Office.

§ 3.56 Conditional assignments.

Assignments which are made conditional on the performance of certain acts or events, such as the payment of money or other condition subsequent, if recorded in the Office, are regarded as absolute assignments for Office purposes until cancelled with the written consent of all parties or by the decree of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Office does not determine whether such conditions have been fulfilled.

§ 3.58 Governmental registers.

( a ) The Office will maintain a Departmental Register to record governmental interests required to be recorded by Executive Order 9424. This Departmental Register will not be open to public inspection but will be available for examination and inspection by duly authorized representatives of the Government. Governmental interests recorded on the Departmental Register will be available for public inspection as provided in § 1.12 .

( b ) The Office will maintain a Secret Register to record governmental interests required to be recorded by Executive Order 9424. Any instrument to be recorded will be placed on this Secret Register at the request of the department or agency submitting the same. No information will be given concerning any instrument in such record or register, and no examination or inspection thereof or of the index thereto will be permitted, except on the written authority of the head of the department or agency which submitted the instrument and requested secrecy, and the approval of such authority by the Director. No instrument or record other than the one specified may be examined, and the examination must take place in the presence of a designated official of the Patent and Trademark Office. When the department or agency which submitted an instrument no longer requires secrecy with respect to that instrument, it must be recorded anew in the Departmental Register.

Domestic Representative

§ 3.61 domestic representative..

If the assignee of a patent, patent application, trademark application or trademark registration is not domiciled in the United States, the assignee may designate a domestic representative in a document filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The designation should state the name and address of a person residing within the United States on whom may be served process or notice of proceedings affecting the application, patent or registration or rights thereunder.

[ 67 FR 79522 , Dec. 30, 2002]

Action Taken by Assignee

§ 3.71 prosecution by assignee..

( a ) Patents—conducting of prosecution. One or more assignees as defined in paragraph (b) of this section may conduct prosecution of a national patent application as the applicant under § 1.46 of this title , or conduct prosecution of a supplemental examination or reexamination proceeding, to the exclusion of the inventor or previous applicant or patent owner. Conflicts between purported assignees are handled in accordance with § 3.73(c)(3) .

( b ) Patents—assignee(s) who can prosecute. The assignee(s) who may conduct either the prosecution of a national application for patent as the applicant under § 1.46 of this title or a supplemental examination or reexamination proceeding are:

( 1 ) A single assignee. An assignee of the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent, or

( 2 ) Partial assignee(s) together or with inventor(s). All partial assignees, or all partial assignees and inventors who have not assigned their right, title and interest in the application or patent, who together own the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent. A partial assignee is any assignee having less than the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent. The word “assignee” as used in this chapter means with respect to patent matters the single assignee of the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent if there is such a single assignee, or all of the partial assignees, or all of the partial assignee and inventors who have not assigned their interest in the application or patent, who together own the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent.

( c ) Patents—Becoming of record. An assignee becomes of record as the applicant in a national patent application under § 1.46 of this title , and in a supplemental examination or reexamination proceeding, by filing a statement in compliance with § 3.73(c) that is signed by a party who is authorized to act on behalf of the assignee.

( d ) Trademarks. The assignee of a trademark application or registration may prosecute a trademark application, submit documents to maintain a trademark registration, or file papers against a third party in reliance on the assignee's trademark application or registration, to the exclusion of the original applicant or previous assignee. The assignee must establish ownership in compliance with § 3.73(b) .

[ 65 FR 54682 , Sept. 8, 2000, as amended at 77 FR 48825 , Aug. 14, 2012]

§ 3.73 Establishing right of assignee to take action.

( a ) The original applicant is presumed to be the owner of an application for an original patent, and any patent that may issue therefrom, unless there is an assignment. The original applicant is presumed to be the owner of a trademark application or registration, unless there is an assignment.

( b ) In order to request or take action in a trademark matter, the assignee must establish its ownership of the trademark property of paragraph (a) of this section to the satisfaction of the Director. The establishment of ownership by the assignee may be combined with the paper that requests or takes the action. Ownership is established by submitting to the Office a signed statement identifying the assignee, accompanied by either:

( 1 ) Documentary evidence of a chain of title from the original owner to the assignee ( e.g., copy of an executed assignment). The documents submitted to establish ownership may be required to be recorded pursuant to § 3.11 in the assignment records of the Office as a condition to permitting the assignee to take action in a matter pending before the Office; or

( 2 ) A statement specifying where documentary evidence of a chain of title from the original owner to the assignee is recorded in the assignment records of the Office ( e.g., reel and frame number).

( 1 ) In order to request or take action in a patent matter, an assignee who is not the original applicant must establish its ownership of the patent property of paragraph (a) of this section to the satisfaction of the Director. The establishment of ownership by the assignee may be combined with the paper that requests or takes the action. Ownership is established by submitting to the Office a signed statement identifying the assignee, accompanied by either:

( i ) Documentary evidence of a chain of title from the original owner to the assignee ( e.g., copy of an executed assignment). The submission of the documentary evidence must be accompanied by a statement affirming that the documentary evidence of the chain of title from the original owner to the assignee was or concurrently is being submitted for recordation pursuant to § 3.11 ; or

( ii ) A statement specifying where documentary evidence of a chain of title from the original owner to the assignee is recorded in the assignment records of the Office ( e.g., reel and frame number).

( 2 ) If the submission is by an assignee of less than the entire right, title and interest ( e.g., more than one assignee exists) the Office may refuse to accept the submission as an establishment of ownership unless:

( i ) Each assignee establishes the extent (by percentage) of its ownership interest, so as to account for the entire right, title and interest in the application or patent by all parties including inventors; or

( ii ) Each assignee submits a statement identifying the parties including inventors who together own the entire right, title and interest and stating that all the identified parties own the entire right, title and interest.

( 3 ) If two or more purported assignees file conflicting statements under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Director will determine which, if any, purported assignee will be permitted to control prosecution of the application.

( d ) The submission establishing ownership under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section must show that the person signing the submission is a person authorized to act on behalf of the assignee by:

( 1 ) Including a statement that the person signing the submission is authorized to act on behalf of the assignee;

( 2 ) Being signed by a person having apparent authority to sign on behalf of the assignee; or

( 3 ) For patent matters only, being signed by a practitioner of record.

[ 77 FR 48825 , Aug. 14, 2012]

Issuance to Assignee

§ 3.81 issue of patent to assignee..

( a ) With payment of the issue fee: An application may issue in the name of the assignee consistent with the application's assignment where a request for such issuance is submitted with payment of the issue fee, provided the assignment has been previously recorded in the Office. If the assignment has not been previously recorded, the request must state that the document has been filed for recordation as set forth in § 3.11 .

( b ) After payment of the issue fee: Any request for issuance of an application in the name of the assignee submitted after the date of payment of the issue fee, and any request for a patent to be corrected to state the name of the assignee, must state that the assignment was submitted for recordation as set forth in § 3.11 before issuance of the patent, and must include a request for a certificate of correction under § 1.323 of this chapter (accompanied by the fee set forth in § 1.20(a) ) and the processing fee set forth in § 1.17(i) of this chapter .

( c ) Partial assignees.

( 1 ) If one or more assignee, together with one or more inventor, holds the entire right, title, and interest in the application, the patent may issue in the names of the assignee and the inventor.

( 2 ) If multiple assignees hold the entire right, title, and interest to the exclusion of all the inventors, the patent may issue in the names of the multiple assignees.

§ 3.85 Issue of registration to assignee.

The certificate of registration may be issued to the assignee of the applicant, or in a new name of the applicant, provided that the party files a written request in the trademark application by the time the application is being prepared for issuance of the certificate of registration, and the appropriate document is recorded in the Office. If the assignment or name change document has not been recorded in the Office, then the written request must state that the document has been filed for recordation. The address of the assignee must be made of record in the application file.

Part 6 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Part 7 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to trademarks regulations.

Part 1 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Part 3 pertaining to both patents and trademarks is placed in the grouping pertaining to patents regulations.

Part 4 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Part 5 is placed in the separate grouping of parts pertaining to patents regulations.

Reader Aids

Information.

  • About This Site
  • Legal Status
  • Accessibility
  • No Fear Act
  • Continuity Information

The basics of patent assignments

What is a patent assignment, what are the requirements to make it valid, and why would a business enter into a patent assignment agreement? Read on to find answers to these questions and more.

Find out more about Patents

us patent assignment fee

by   Cindy DeRuyter, Esq.

Cindy DeRuyter, Esq., has been writing for LegalZoom since 2018. She earned a Juris Doctor from Mitchell Hamline Scho...

Read more...

Updated on: December 4, 2023 · 2 min read

Defining Patent Assignment

Requirements to assign a patent, searching for patent assignments.

Assigning patents can be a great way for companies to generate revenue and reduce risks associated with intellectual property ownership. If you are considering entering into a patent assignment agreement, understand that it is irrevocable. Because of that, evaluate proposed terms and provisions carefully before moving forward.

Young coworkers looking at laptops and paperwork on a desk

Here's a high-level overview of how patent assignments work: when a patent's owner or applicant assigns it to another individual or company, the assignor agrees to relinquish their rights to enforce or benefit from it in the future.

You can assign rights for applications still pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). When the USPTO approves the application, the assignee benefits from and may use and enforce the patent, not the assignor. Companies also assign rights for issued patents, which relieves the assignor of the burden of enforcing their intellectual property and provides a source of revenue.

Patent assignments can be lucrative for both parties. While assignors make money right away, assignees can create revenue streams by earning money from royalty payments. After an assignment is complete, the assignee has exclusive rights to such income.

A patent assignment agreement documents the transfer and arrangement between the parties. If you are considering entering into one, know that you need it to be written—a verbal agreement alone is insufficient.

Don't underestimate the importance of this, either. Without a valid agreement on file with the USPTO, an intended assignor remains legally responsible for the patent and an intended assignee gains none of the rights or benefits.

Here are the requirements for a valid written assignment:

  • Confirm that the assignor has the full, legal right to make the assignment and that the assignee can legally assume the rights and obligations.
  • Clearly identify both the assignor and assignee using legal names. If more than one company owns the patent, identify all owners.
  • Identify the underlying patent by title and number and include a complete and accurate description of it.
  • Describe the terms of the agreement, including financial arrangements.
  • All parties must sign the agreement, with limited exceptions in situations where the assignor cannot be reached but where enough evidence exists that documents their intentions and rights.
  • File the patent assignment with the USPTO within three months after the agreement is signed, paying the then-current fee.

Though the agreement is a legal document, it does not need to be notarized. However, obtaining notarization for the signatures provides added protection, limiting the risk of a party later claiming a signature was not valid.

The USPTO maintains a patent assignment database that includes all the assignments recorded since August 1980. Using the database, you can search with the assignor's or assignee's name, the patent number, application number, publication number, or other identifying information.

Properly assigning patents protects both assignors and assignees. If you want to assign a patent, downloading a patent assignment form can help. Alternatively, you can consult an intellectual property attorney .

You may also like

us patent assignment fee

What Is a Power of Attorney (POA)? A Comprehensive Guide

A power of attorney can give trusted individuals the power to make decisions on your behalf—but only in certain situations.

August 29, 2024 · 20min read

us patent assignment fee

How to Start an LLC in 7 Easy Steps (2024 Guide)

2024 is one of the best years ever to start an LLC, and you can create yours in only a few steps.

July 29, 2024 · 22min read

What is a patent assignment?

What is a Patent Assignment?

Whether you’re curious about assigning a patent to someone else or having a patent assigned to you, you might be wondering what a patent assignment is? Patent law allows patent holders to assign patents to other parties. Patent assignments often take place between an employee and his company, however, it’s not uncommon for a person to assign his interest to a patent to a third party. So, what exactly is a patent assignment? We will cover this below.

What is a Patent Assignment ?

A patent assignment is an agreement by the patent holder (assignor) to transfer his interest and ownership of a patent to another party known as the assignee (party receiving patent rights). Once a patent holder executes an assignment agreement assigning his interest in a patent to another party, the assignor loses his rights under the patent. The assignor (transferor) will no longer be able to stop others from using, making, and selling the patent invention. Instead, the assignee gains these rights.

In the United States, patent assignments are very common between an employee and his company because a company or business cannot apply for a patent. An inventor has to apply for a patent and then the inventor then assigns his interest under a patent to the company for which he is working.

If you’re an inventor and you want to assign your patent to another party, just remember that patent assignments are final. Once an inventor assigns (transfers) his interest in a patent to another party, the assignment (transfer of rights) cannot be undone, it’s final.

What is a Patent Assignor?

What is a patent assignee, requirements to execute a patent assignment agreement.

Once the assignment agreement is executed, it must be filed with the USPTO for the agreement to take effect. Please remember that the agreement needs to be in writing, oral agreements are not sufficient to transfer the rights from the patent holder to the assignee.

Who Owns the Patent After a Patent Assignment?

Assigning a patent vs licensing a patent.

Assigning a patent is much different than licensing a patent. When a patent holder assigns his interest in a patent to another party, he is usually transferring ownership of the patent to the other party. Patent licensing is different in that a license is merely a transfer of the right to use the patent in the manner specified in the licensing agreement. Assignments transfer ownership while a license transfers the right to use the patented invention. That said, if a patent is assigned, the information of the assignor and assignee will become part of the public record. Whereas if an inventor licenses his patent, that information is not typically published to the public.

Does a Patent Assignment Need to be Notarized?

Can multiple people own a patent.

Yes, multiple people can own a patent. For example, if three inventors make a single invention, all three are considered joint inventors and their names should appear on the patent application, as well as the issued patent.

Patent Assignment Tips

1) hire an attorney to assist you with your patent assignment, 2) don’t forget to record a patent assignment.

If you have been assigned a patent, don’t forget to record your assignment with the USPTO. We say this because patent assignments don’t go into effect unless the assignment is recorded with the patent office. Recording a patent assignment tells the patent office that you are the new owner of the patent.

3) Notarize Your Assignment Agreement

4) how much does it cost to record an assignment with the uspto, patent assignment.

Let’s do a quick recap. A patent assignment is the transfer of ownership of a patent from one party to another. The party transferring its right is known as the assignor and the party receiving the patent rights is known as the assignee.

Similar Posts

What are the parts of a patent application, why do people get patents, what percentage of patents are approved, how many patents has steve jobs been awarded since he died, how long is a utility patent good for, what is a provisional patent, leave a reply cancel reply.

29 Jan 2024

Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

By Michael K. Henry, Ph.D.

Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Prosecution

This is the second in a two-part blog series on owning and transferring the rights to a patent. ( Read part one here. )

As we discussed in the first post in this series, patent owners enjoy important legal and commercial benefits: They have the right to exclude others from making, selling, using or importing the claimed invention, and to claim damages from anyone who infringes their patent.

However, a business entity can own a patent only if the inventors have assigned the patent rights to the business entity. So if your employees are creating valuable IP on behalf of your company, it’s important to get the patent assignment right, to ensure that your business is the patent owner.

In this post, we’ll take a closer look at what a patent assignment even is — and the best practices for approaching the process. But remember, assignment (or transfer of ownership) is a function of state law, so there might be some variation by state in how all this gets treated.

What Is a Patent Assignment and Why Does it Matter?

A patent assignment is an agreement where one entity (the “assignor”) transfers all or part of their right, title and interest in a patent or application to another entity (the “assignee”). 

In simpler terms, the assignee receives the original owner’s interest and gains the exclusive rights to pursue patent protection (through filing and prosecuting patent applications), and also to license and enforce the patent. 

Ideally, your business should own its patents if it wants to enjoy the benefits of the patent rights. But  under U.S. law , only an inventor or an assignee can own a patent — and businesses cannot be listed as an inventor. Accordingly, patent assignment is the legal mechanism that transfers ownership from the inventor to your business.

Patent Assignment vs. Licensing

Keep in mind that an assignment is different from a license. The difference is analogous to selling versus renting a house.

In a license agreement, the patent owner (the “licensor”) gives another entity (the “licensee”) permission to use the patented technology, while the patent owner retains ownership. Like a property rental, a patent license contemplates an ongoing relationship between the licensor and licensee.

In a patent assignment, the original owner permanently transfers its ownership to another entity. Like a property sale, a patent assignment is a permanent transfer of legal rights.

U sing Employment Agreements to Transfer Patent Ownership

Before your employees begin developing IP,  implement strong hiring policies  that ensure your IP rights will be legally enforceable in future.

If you’re bringing on a new employee, have them sign an  employment agreement  that establishes up front what IP the company owns — typically, anything the employee invents while under your employment. This part of an employment agreement is often presented as a self-contained document, and referred to as a “Pre-Invention Assignment Agreement” (PIAA).

The employment agreement should include the following provisions:

  • Advance assignment of any IP created while employed by your company, or using your company’s resources
  • An obligation to disclose any IP created while employed by your company, or using your company’s resources
  • An ongoing obligation to provide necessary information and execute documents related to the IP they created while employed, even after their employment ends
  • An obligation not to disclose confidential information to third parties, including when the employee moves on to a new employer

To track the IP your employees create, encourage your employees to document their contributions by completing  invention disclosure records .

But the paperwork can be quite involved, which is why your employment policies should also include  incentives to create and disclose valuable IP .

Drafting Agreements for Non-Employees

Some of the innovators working for your business might not have a formal employer-employee relationship with the business. If you don’t make the appropriate arrangements beforehand, this could complicate patent assignments. Keep an eye out for the following staffing arrangements:

  • Independent contractors:  Some inventors may be self-employed, or they may be employed by one of your service providers.
  • Joint collaborators:  Some inventors may be employed by, say, a subsidiary or service company instead of your company.
  • Anyone who did work through an educational institution : For example, Ph.D. candidates may not be employees of either their sponsoring institution or your company.

In these cases, you can still draft contractor or collaborator agreements using the same terms outlined above. Make sure the individual innovator signs it before beginning any work on behalf of your company.

us patent assignment fee

O btaining Written Assignments for New Patent Applications

In addition to getting signed employment agreements, you should  also  get a written assignments for each new patent application when it’s filed, in order to memorialize ownership of the specific patent property.

Don’t rely exclusively on the employment agreement to prove ownership:

  • The employment agreement might contain confidential terms, so you don’t want to record them with the patent office
  • Because employment agreements are executed before beginning the process of developing the invention, they won’t clearly establish what specific patent applications are being assigned

While you  can  execute the formal assignment for each patent application after the application has been filed, an inventor or co-inventor who no longer works for the company might refuse to execute the assignment.

As such, we recommend executing the assignment before filing, to show ownership as of the filing date and avoid complications (like getting signatures from estranged inventors).

How to Execute a Written Patent Agreement

Well-executed invention assignments should:

  • Be in writing:  Oral agreements to assign patent rights are typically not enforceable in the United States
  • Clearly identify all parties:  Include the names, addresses, and relationship of the assignor(s) and assignee
  • Clearly identify the patent being assigned:  State the patent or patent application number, title, inventors, and filing date
  • Be signed by the assignors
  • Be notarized : If notarization isn’t possible, have one or two witnesses attest to the signatures

Recording a Patent Assignment With the USPTO

Without a recorded assignment with the U.S. patent office, someone else could claim ownership of the issued patent, and you could even lose your rights in the issued patent in some cases. 

So the patent owner (the Assignee) should should record the assignment through the  USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch . They can use the  Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS)  to file a  Recordation Cover Sheet  along with a copy of the actual patent assignment agreement.

They should submit this paperwork  within three months  of the assignment’s date. If it’s recorded electronically, the USPTO  won’t charge a recordation fee .

Need to check who owns a patent?  The USPTO website  publicly lists all information about a patent’s current and previous assignments.

When Would I Need to Execute a New Assignment for a Related Application?

You’ll need only one patent assignment per patent application, unless new matter is introduced in a new filing (e.g., in a  continuation-in-part , or in a non-provisional application that adds new matter to a  provisional application ). In that case, you’ll need an additional assignment to cover the new matter — even if it was developed by the same inventors.

What If an Investor Won’t Sign the Written Assignment?

If you can’t get an inventor to sign an invention assignment, you can still move forward with a patent application — but you’ll need to document your ownership. To document ownership, you can often rely on an   employee agreement ,  company policy ,  invention disclosure , or other employment-related documentation.

D o I Need to Record My Assignments in Foreign Countries?

Most assignments transfer all rights, title, and interest in all patent rights throughout the world.

But in some countries, the assignment might not be legally effective until the assignment has been recorded in that country — meaning that the assignee can’t enforce the patent rights, or claim damages for any infringement that takes place before the recordation. 

And there might be additional formal requirements that aren’t typically required in the United States. For example, some countries might require a transfer between companies to be signed by both parties, and must contain one or both parties’ addresses.

If you’re assigning patents issued by a foreign country, consult a patent attorney in that country to find out what’s required to properly document the transfer of ownership.

N eed Help With Your Patent Assignments?

Crafting robust assignment agreements is essential to ensuring the proper transfer of patent ownership. An  experienced patent professional  can help you to prepare legally enforceable documentation.

Henry Patent Law Firm has worked with tech businesses of all sizes to execute patent assignments —  contact us now  to learn more.

GOT A QUESTION? Whether you want to know more about the patent process or think we might be a good fit for your needs – we’d love to hear from you!

us patent assignment fee

Michael K. Henry, Ph.D.

Michael K. Henry, Ph.D., is a principal and the firm’s founding member. He specializes in creating comprehensive, growth-oriented IP strategies for early-stage tech companies.

10 Jan 2024

Geothermal Energy: An Overview of the Patent Landscape

By Michael Henry

Don't miss a new article. Henry Patent Law's Patent Law News + Insights blog is designed to help people like you build smart, scalable patent strategies that protect your intellectual property as your business grows. Subscribe to receive email updates every time we publish a new article — don't miss out on key tips to help your business be more successful.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Find the right content for you

writing 1149962 640

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?  

One country which requires the inventor to submit signed forms is the USA.  Each inventor named on the application must submit a signed declaration and assignment with the US Patent and Trademark Office before payment of the Issue Fee.

What are US Declarations and Assignments?

An inventor declaration confirms the inventor’s belief that they are the original (or joint original) inventor of the claimed invention.  If an inventor declaration is not submitted by each inventor before payment of the Issue Fee, the application will be abandoned.

An assignment provides documentary evidence that the rights in the invention have been transferred from the inventor to the applicant, and that the applicant is the rightful owner of any patent granted for the claimed invention.  If a signed assignment is not submitted by each inventor before payment of the Issue Fee, the application could grant in the name of the inventor(s) instead of the applicant, although this can usually be rectified post-grant.

What if the inventor cannot or will not sign these forms?

In cases where the US application is filed later in the patent process, such as at the 12 month convention deadline, or even the 30 month national phase deadline, it is possible that the inventor(s) may no longer be available to sign the required forms (for example, they have left the company).  What happens then?

A substitute statement can be submitted in lieu of a declaration if an inventor is deceased, is under legal incapacity, has refused to sign the declaration, or cannot be found or reached after a diligent effort.  To demonstrate a “ diligent effort ”, it is usually sufficient to send a copy of the forms to the inventor’s last known address, along with an explanation of what is required and specifying a reasonable time-period for returning the signed forms (for example, 28 days).  If the forms are not returned by the end of this period, then it can be assumed that the inventor is no longer reachable.

If an inventor cannot or will not sign the required assignment to transfer their rights in the invention to the applicant, then one possible option where the inventor is an employee of the applicant is to submit their employment agreement in lieu of the assignment.  However, for the purposes of the USA, the employment agreement must address the employee’s obligation to assign any Intellectual Property (IP) rights created during their employment to their employer.  Ideally the document should contain language which indicates a present and active intent to assign any IP rights (for example, “ I hereby assign… ”), rather than language which merely indicates an intent to assign any IP rights in the future (for example, “ I agree to assign… ”).

If the employment agreement does not contain suitable language, one option is to rely on any local IP laws which legally require the employee to assign any IP rights to their employer.  For example, in the UK, section 39 of the Patents Act 1977 states that an invention made by an employee will automatically belong to the employer if:

“ (a) it was made in the course of the normal duties of the employee or in the course of duties falling outside his normal duties, but specifically assigned to him, and the circumstances in either case were such that an invention might reasonably be expected to result from the carrying out of his duties; or

(b) the invention was made in the course of the duties of the employee and, at the time of making the invention, because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising from the nature of his duties he had a special obligation to further the interests of the employer’s undertaking. ”

Therefore, if the employee and the employer are based in the UK and the invention falls into category (a) or (b) above, then the invention will automatically belong to the employer under UK law.

As such, in addition to filing a copy of the employment contract, a copy of the relevant local laws and a memorandum explaining why, under local law, the invention belongs to the employer can also be filed to prove full ownership of the application by the applicant.

What can the applicant do to avoid the above complications?

1/ Make use of PCT declarations if filing an International application, particularly:

  • (i) the declaration as to the identity of the inventor;
  • (ii) the declaration as to the applicant’s entitlement, as at the international filing date, to apply for and be granted a patent; and,
  • (iv) the declaration of inventorship (for the purposes of the designation of the USA).

For example, declaration (ii) satisfies the proof of right requirements in the Indian national phase, and (iv) satisfies the declaration requirements in the US national phase.  Declarations (i) and (ii) can be signed off by the acting attorney; declaration (iv) however must be signed by each inventor.

2/ Make sure any employment agreements, particularly for research & development staff, clearly address the employee’s obligation to assign any IP rights created, and include language which actively and presently assigns those rights to the employer.

If existing employment agreements do not contain such clauses, a separate agreement can be drawn up for the employee to sign and then appended to their contract. 

3/ Include a clause in the employment agreement requiring the employee to sign any necessary forms both during and after their employment.  This contractual agreement can be referred to should the employee actively refuse to sign any required forms later in the patent process.

Taking the above actions now can help to avoid any problems later in the patenting process which will likely incur unnecessary costs to rectify.  Should you require any assistance or advice, please contact me at christina .schiavone@ wynne-jones .com .

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

Non-fungible tokens are the latest fashion in the cyber world. Building on blockchain technology, NFTs may be a new way to exploit intellectual property rights.

Artificial Intelligence Patents at the EPO and UKIPO

Artificial Intelligence Patents at the EPO and UKIPO

The number of patent applications for inventions relating to Artificial Intelligence  “AI” is  growing fast!  But, can artificial intelligence be patented at the European Patent Office? The answer is both yes... and no.

Related News

Happy National Dog Day!

Happy National Dog Day!

National Dog Day is a time to celebrate the loyal companions who bring joy, love, and the occasional muddy paw print into our lives. From guiding the blind to detecting drugs, dogs have proven themselves invaluable to humanity in countless ways. But did you know that our four-legged friends have also found themselves at the centre of some fascinating intellectual property (IP) battles? Today, as we honour man's best friend, let's explore a few cases where dogs have trotted into the courtroom, wagging their tails and leaving paw prints on the law.

We, too, want people to find moments for movement in their daily routines.

We, too, want people to find moments for movement in their daily routines.

Recognising the detrimental effects of sedentary work, Wynne-Jones are striving to reshape office culture and safeguard the health—both physical and mental—of their most invaluable asset: their people.

Intellectual property experts from across Europe come together in Faro, Portugal for the annual AIPEX Cross-Country meeting

Intellectual property experts from across Europe come together in Faro, Portugal for the annual AIPEX Cross-Country meeting

Intellectual property professionals from across the continent came together in Faro, Portugal last week to share knowledge, know-how and best practice at the annual AIPEX CC meeting. 

Good luck to the finalists of the Game Designer of the Year Award (Licensed/IP-Driven Product) Award!

Good luck to the finalists of the Game Designer of the Year Award (Licensed/IP-Driven Product) Award!

The finalists for this years’ Play Creator Awards have been announced by Mojo Nation.

EPO Fee Increases 1 April 2024

EPO Fee Increases 1 April 2024

 The European Patent Office (EPO) has again announced a set of fee increases  on procedural fees, to be effective from  1 April 2024 .

The Future is Coming, Faster Than Ever

The Future is Coming, Faster Than Ever

Throughout history, we have witnessed periods of significant technological advancements that have revolutionised society.  We are now in the age of information, biotechnology, and the renewable energy revolution. We are witnessing, and will continue to witness, massive leaps forward in technology bringing with them significant social and cultural changes. This is all happening at a speed never seen before.

Support for Cheltenham Open Door During 2023

Support for Cheltenham Open Door During 2023

Throughout 2023, Wynne-Jones IP supported local charity, Cheltenham Open Door.  Over the course of the year our active Charity & Social Team organised fundraising events and donation rallies to enable the small, independent charity to provide much needed support in the community.

Wynne-Jones IP Partners with CyNam to Foster Cyber Technology Innovation in Gloucestershire

Wynne-Jones IP Partners with CyNam to Foster Cyber Technology Innovation in Gloucestershire

We are delighted to announce a strategic partnership with CyNam to support and sponsor their mission to nurture cyber technology innovation in Gloucestershire.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

Trending News

Mintz Law Firm

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

  • Administrative Regulatory
  • Corporate Business Organizations
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation Trial Practice
  • All Federal

info_icon_img

Increased employee mobility, health challenges, and the economic downturn due to the COVID-19 pandemic may result in more inventors than usual being unavailable to assign patent rights.  Fortunately, applicants may procure a U.S. patent even if an assignment document cannot be obtained for the application to be filed.  This article summarizes the requirements for filing and prosecuting a U.S. patent application filed post-America Invents Act (AIA) without a patent assignment and identifies pitfalls when establishing ownership of patent rights for patent prosecution.  Inventors being unavailable may also complicate obtaining the declarations required for U.S. patent prosecution, but solutions are available as we previously discussed  here .

Need for an Assignment

For a patent to issue to an assignee, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) must be made formally aware of the assignment so that the assignee is recognized as the patent applicant.  Filing an Application Data Sheet (ADS) for a patent application identifying the assignee as the applicant provides informal notice to the USPTO.   MPEP § 301  discusses ownership/assignability of patents and applications, including formal assignment recordation at the USPTO.  Recording an assignment may be necessary to permit the assignee to “take action” in the patent application during prosecution and for the patent to issue in the name of the assignee.   37 CFR 1.46 ; MPEP §§  301 ,  302 ,  605 .  In other words, assignees may face obstacles prosecuting a patent without an executed assignment.  The assignment(s) must transfer the entirety of patent rights from each of the inventors to the assignee, e.g., corporation, partnership, university, government entity, etc.  There can be multiple assignees if different inventors assign their rights to different assignees, a situation that results in two or more partial assignees that must each be identified to the USPTO as an applicant.   MPEP § 301 .

As only one patent assignment is required per inventor per patent application, subsequent applications claiming priority may often rely on an earlier assignment (depending on the assignment’s particular language).  If new subject matter is introduced in the application being filed, such as in a continuation-in-part application, another assignment may be required.

Persons who may file a Patent Application without an Assignment

Fortunately, applicants may procure a patent even if an inventor is not available to sign an assignment before application filing or during prosecution before payment of the issue fee. 

A person to whom the inventor is under the obligation to assign the invention may file a patent application and be identified as the applicant.  An assignment can then be subsequently executed and the USPTO notified as discussed above.  Alternatively, other documentary evidence of ownership, such as an employment agreement, invention disclosure form, or other documentation, can be recorded with the USPTO in lieu of a signed assignment document.   37 CFR 1.46 .  Employment agreements may contain language stating that the inventor assigns all rights, title, and interests in any invention developed while employed by the employer.  In some instances, the employment agreement may affirmatively state that the employee is under an obligation to assign the invention to the employer.  An invention disclosure form may contain language stating that the inventor’s signature on the form acknowledges the inventor’s assignment of and/or obligation to assign any rights, title, and interest in the invention disclosure to the employer.  If the invention disclosure form includes the inventor’s signature, this may be sufficient evidence that the employer is an obligated assignee.   37 C.F.R. 1.46(b)(1) .  It is important to examine any documentary evidence of ownership before recordation to identify any information (e.g., industry trend language, discussion of prior art, personal information of an employee, etc.) that may require redaction before recordation and/or may make public recording of the documentary evidence an undesirable option for the applicant.

Also, a person who shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter may file a patent application and be identified as the applicant upon showing that such an action is appropriate, with the resulting patent being issuable in the applicant’s name.   37 CFR 1.46 .  If filing a national stage application, the applicant must have been identified in the international stage of the international application or as the applicant in the publication of the international registration. 

Showing Sufficient Proprietary Interest or Obligation to Assign

As provided in  37 CFR 1.46(b)(2) , “[i]f the applicant is a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter, such applicant must submit a petition including: (i) The fee set forth in § 1.17(g); (ii) A showing that such person has sufficient proprietary interest in the matter; and (iii) A statement that making the application for patent by a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter on behalf of and as agent for the inventor is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties.”  Additionally, as stated in  MPEP § 409.05 , “[t]he ability for a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter to make an application for patent is not limited to situations in which all of the inventors refuse to execute the application, or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort.”

Showing sufficient proprietary interest requires “proof of the pertinent facts and a showing that such action is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties.”   37 CFR 1.46(a) ;  37 CFR 1.424 .  Showing sufficient proprietary interest is discussed in  MPEP § 409.05  and may be established in various ways depending on the circumstances.  MPEP § 409.05 states that

A proprietary interest obtained other than by assignment or agreement to assign may be demonstrated by an appropriate legal memorandum to the effect that a court of competent jurisdiction (federal, state, or foreign) would by the weight of authority in that jurisdiction award title of the invention to the 37 CFR 1.46 applicant.  The facts in support of any conclusion that a court would award title to the 37 CFR 1.46 applicant should be made of record by way of an affidavit or declaration of the person having firsthand knowledge of same.  The legal memorandum should be prepared and signed by an attorney at law familiar with the law of the jurisdiction involved.  A copy (in the English language) of a statute (if other than the United States statute) or a court decision (if other than a reported decision of a federal court or a decision reported in the United States Patents Quarterly) relied on to demonstrate a proprietary interest should be made of record.

Remember that an applicant as a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter must submit the required petition, fee, and information prior to paying the issue fee as set forth in  37 CFR 1.46 .

Final Considerations

Patent applicants can gain control over patent prosecution and assert patent rights even without execution of a signed assignment by an inventor.  Before doing so, however, applicants should coordinate with patent counsel regarding their particular circumstances and should consult current USPTO rules.

Current Public Notices

Current legal analysis, more from mintz, upcoming legal education events.

Practising Law Institute New York

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know keyboard_arrow_down

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Jump to main content

United States Patent and Trademark Office - An Agency of the Department of Commerce

Assignment Center has replaced the Electronic Patent Application System (EPAS) and Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS). Assignment Center makes it easier to transfer ownership or change the name on your patent or trademark registration. 

See our how-to guides on using Assignment Center for   patents  and  trademarks . If you have questions, email  [email protected]  or call customer service at 800-972-6382.

Online patent tools

We offer online tools to help you conduct business with the USPTO. Review them here:

You appreciate getting things done with efficiency and convenience. This set of tools will help you do so when paying fees, filing forms and applications, exchange documents, and more.

Receive convenient access to tools and information related to payment of fees.

Self-Service Fees Portal

Manage financial accounts for transactions with the USPTO, manage permissions for users, receive notifications, and generate reports.

Financial Manager

Pay maintenance fees for one or more patents.

Patent Maintenance Fees Storefront

Check a Sequence Listing in Computer Readable Form (CRF) for compliance with WIPO standards before submission to the USPTO.

Biotechnology Sequence Checker

Receive single-point access to up-to-date citation data on applications submitted to any IP5 Office (a cooperative effort of the leading IP [intellectual property] agencies worldwide). It consolidates the prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application. This enables search results produced by several offices for the same invention to be seen on a single page.

Common Citation Document (CCD)

Order a certified priority document for each office of subsequent filing, while avoiding the costs of ordering and transmitting those documents to foreign associates or IP offices.

Electronic Priority Document Exchange (PDX)

This program will email you about downloading and viewing new office communications in Patent Center. Opt into the program to receive a daily email, replacing postal mailings.

e-Office Action Program

Create a single personalized place to actively manage your IP portfolio. Track patent applications and grants, check trademark registration and status, and access our services.

Registered and guest users may file and manage applications, access information, and submit applications and follow-on documents through the approval process.

Patent Center

Download forms in PDF format. Open them using Adobe Acrobat Reader, and fill out and submit them electronically via the appropriate filing system Patent Center, or use alternate filing methods (fax, postal mail, USPTO walk-up window).

Patent Forms

Prepare a sequence listing in Computer Readable Form (CRF) containing nucleic acid and amino acid sequences complying with all WIPO standard format requirements.

PatentIn Software

Other Resources

Allows users to update assignment data for patent ownership (sale of a patent, change of company name, etc.).

Assignment Center

Estimate how long before a first office action is issued on an application by its serial number.

First Office Action Estimator

Request an interview with an examiner for your pending patent application.

See the latest on operating status, availability of online business systems, and planned outages.

USPTO Systems Status and Availability

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Search the electronic warehouse for the USPTO Patent Board (Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences — BPAI) and PTAB. Search for trial, appeal, and interference decisions and public documents issued after July 1997.

PTAB Decision Search

Browse public, final decisions of the PTAB, including those designated precedential or informative.

PTAB Decisions

Anonymously nominate a routine PTAB decision for designation as precedential or informative.

PTAB decision nomination form

Use this instructional video, template, and guidance to help prepare an ex parte appeal brief.

PTAB ex parte appeal brief tool

Use this form to submit amicus support or opposition to a pending request for Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) review.

PTAB POP Request: Amicus Form

View and download PTAB statistics and special reports.

PTAB Statistics

Patent Information

An informed patent applicant is more likely to succeed. These tools will help you learn about important aspects of applying for a patent.  

Download bulk data for these products: Patent Grant, Patent Application, Patent Assignments, Cooperative Patent Classification Text, and Maintenance Fee Events.

Bulk Data Storage System (BDSS)

View and download data on key performance indicators, such as patent term adjustment (PTA), inventory, quality, pendency petitions, etc.

Data Visualization Center

View and download statistical information on your patent.

General Patent Statistics Reports

Access IP data products such as patent visualization, community collaborative, API tool, data query builder, bulk data download, and more.

PatentsView

Download datasets, learn about available APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), and access information about patent data

USPTO Open Data Portal

Additional resources

Search for contact information for USPTO employees.

Employee Locator

Find definitions for IP terms.

Read and search the manual as needed.

MPEP (Manual of Patent Examining Procedure)

Order frequently requested USPTO publications.

USPTO Publications

Find a patent agent or attorney, view information about publicly disciplined practitioners, and apply for registration to practice in patent matters before the USPTO.

Patent Practitioner Homepage

Estimate the expiration dates of utility, plant, and design patents.

Patent Term Calculator

Search for listed patented technologies and identify people for discussing licensing availability.

Patents 4 Partnerships

Subscribe and unsubscribe to USPTO newsletters or alerts, which include:

  • USPTO News and Updates  
  • USPTO Director’s Forum Blog
  • USPTO Monthly Review

USPTO Events

  • Patent Alerts
  • Patent Trial and Appeal Board
  •  Intellectual Property for K-12 Educators
  • Journeys of Innovation
  • Intellectual Property for Colleges and Universities
  • USPTO Awards
  • Northeast Regional Outreach Office
  • Midwest Elijah J. McCoy Regional Outreach Office
  • Rocky Mountain Regional Outreach Office
  • Southwest Regional Outreach Office
  • Western Regional Outreach Office

USPTO Subscription Center

Patent Searches

Searching for information affecting your patent application is a necessary task. These tools will help you perform a patent search.

Purchase certified patent and trademark documents.

Certified Copy Center

The Global Dossier looks at dossiers/file wrappers for applications from EPO, JPO, KIPO, SIPO, USPTO, and WIPO, and allows you to view prosecution details, relevant reference citations, and identify areas to begin or supplement searches.

Global Dossier

Search for owner information on patent documents since August 1980.

Patent Assignment Search

Classification resources are available for CPC, IPC, Locarno, and USPC — learn about and search for the patent classification scheme (schedule) and definitions.

Patent Classification System

Securely search, view, and download data for all publicly available applications. Search and download in bulk, and manage the volume of data downloaded in any time period.

Patent Examination Data System (PEDS)

Browse through issued patents for the current week by classification or type of patent (for example, utility, design, and plant).

Patent Official Gazette

Search for and access prior art for patents (replacing PubEast, PubWest, PatFT, and AppFT).

Patent Public Search Tool

Sequence listings, tables, and other items for granted patents or published applications (all sequences and tables available to view without downloading — access the proper document detail page and then submit a SEQ ID NO or a mega table ID number).

PSIPS (Publication Site for Issued and Published Sequences)

Search for old patent classes, subclasses, and Art Units.

Search for Class/Subclass and Art Units

Proper training equips professionals for success, and that includes patent applicants. These tools will help you access training resources, including materials and events.

Computer-based training (CBT) modules — practice and procedure for patent examiners

Examiner Training Materials

Learn how to identify which of your creative ideas might be intellectual property assets and how to protect them.

IP Identifier

IP eLearning modules

Calendar of training and public events

Courses led by USPTO trainers cover selected topics based on recent updates to current examination practice and procedure. View additional training programs about patents .

Stakeholder Offerings and Resources (SOaR)

Additional information about this page

IMAGES

  1. Patent Docs: Proposed USPTO Fee Increases and New Annual Patent

    us patent assignment fee

  2. Free Patent Assignment Template & FAQs

    us patent assignment fee

  3. FREE 9+ Patent Assignment Samples and Templates in PDF

    us patent assignment fee

  4. Patent Assignment Form printable pdf download

    us patent assignment fee

  5. Patent Docs: Proposed USPTO Fee Increases and New Annual Patent

    us patent assignment fee

  6. Patent Assignment Agreement Template

    us patent assignment fee

VIDEO

  1. Design Patent : Grant Certificate Received only :3 to 4 months: Fee:7,950 only

  2. Assignment 3: Patent Drafting for Beginners NPTEL

  3. FAQs on Live classes: Patent Agent Exam

  4. Patent Search For Engineers And Lawyers Week 6 Quiz Assignment Solution

  5. NPTEL

  6. Assignment 1: Patent Drafting for Beginners NPTEL

COMMENTS

  1. USPTO fee schedule

    Effective December 29, 2022 (Last revised July 1, 2024) The fee schedule provides information and fee rates for USPTO's products and services. All payments must be paid in U.S. dollars for the full amount of the fee required. View the Accepted payment methods page or call the USPTO Contact Center at 571-272-1000 or 800-786-9199 for assistance.

  2. Fees and payment

    571-273-8300. Maintenance Fee Branch. Patent maintenance fees. 571-273-6500. The mailing address depends on the type of payment you wish to make. We accept check or money order, credit and debit card, or deposit account when paying by mail. For credit and debit card payments, include the Credit Card Payment Form.

  3. Patents Assignments: Change & search ownership

    Assignment Center makes it easier to transfer ownership or change the name on your patent or trademark registration. See our how-to guides on using Assignment Center for patents and trademarks. If you have questions, email [email protected] or call customer service at 800-972-6382.

  4. Assignment Center

    An official website of the United States government. Here's how you know keyboard_arrow_down. ... The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is streamlining the process for recording assignments and other documents relating to interests in patents and trademarks. ... Trademark Assignment Fees (Fee codes: 8521 and 8522) Manual of Patent ...

  5. Assignment Center

    Sample of a Patent Assignment (PDF) Sample of a Trademark Assignment (PDF) Resources. Upload a Document (PDF) Trademark Assignment Fees (Fee codes: 8521 and 8522) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Trademark Manual of Examining Procedures (TMEP) Assignment Search ; Tutorial. Assignment Center Patent Training Guide (PDF)

  6. Assignment Center

    Assignment Center is the USPTO's online system for filing and managing patent and trademark assignments. Learn how to use it with our tutorial videos and FAQs.

  7. Assignment Center

    You may contact the Assignment Recordation Branch Customer Service Desk at 571-272-3350 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET. You may email questions about electronic assignment filing to [email protected].

  8. Frequently Asked Questions about Patent Assignment

    How much does it cost to assign a patent application. Assignment is technically free, but it costs about $100 ($40 in filing costs and about $60 in paralegal time) to record the assignment at the U.S. patent office. Note that the office charges US$ 40 for each patent or patent application listed on the recorda­tion form.

  9. Patent Assignment

    You file the paperwork with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Information about the new owner is available to the public. ... How Much Does a Patent Assignment Cost? The patent assignment fee is $25. Filing electronically doesn't cost extra. You do have to pay an additional $40 fee if you file on paper.

  10. PDF USPTO Fee Schedule

    Effective December 29, 2022 (Last revised on July 1, 2024) The fee schedule provides information and fee rates for USPTO's products and services. All payments must be paid in U.S. dollars for the full amount of the fee required. View the Accepted payment methods page or call the USPTO Contact Center at 571-272-1000 or 800-786-9199 for assistance.

  11. USPTO Patent Fees

    The following table lists the patent fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. ... Recording Patent Assignment, Agreement or other document - not submitted electronically. 50: 50: 50: Publication in the OG. 25: 25: 25: Handling Fee - Incomplete Application. 140: 140: 140:

  12. 37 CFR Part 3 -- Assignment, Recording and Rights of Assignee

    An assignment relating to a national patent application must identify the national patent application by the application number (consisting of the series code and the serial number; e.g., 07/123,456). An assignment relating to an international patent application which designates the United States of America must identify the international ...

  13. The basics of patent assignments

    Here's a high-level overview of how patent assignments work: when a patent's owner or applicant assigns it to another individual or company, the assignor agrees to relinquish their rights to enforce or benefit from it in the future. You can assign rights for applications still pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  14. What is a Patent Assignment? (Detailed Answer)

    In the United States, patent assignments are very common between an employee and his company because a company or business cannot apply for a patent. ... there is a $50 fee for the service. So, record your assignment online if you want to avoid paying anything. That said, you may need to publish your assignment in an official gazette, such ...

  15. PDF What you Need to Know…..

    signment will be recorded. Customers who desire to have an assignment application stopped, prior to recordation, should submit a Stop/Hold Request, immediately. upon recognizing the need. A stop/hold request must be submitted via email to. [email protected]. If the subject matter of your conveyance type; is not indicated on the list of ...

  16. PDF USPTO Fee Schedule

    The fee schedule provides information and fee rates for USPTO's products and services. All payments must be paid in U.S. dollars for the full amount of the fee required. View the. Accepted payment methodspage or call the USPTO Contact Center at 571-272- 1000 or 800-786-9199 for assistance. SCAM ALERT - Warning about non-USPTO ...

  17. Patent Assignment: How to Transfer Ownership of a Patent

    Be in writing: Oral agreements to assign patent rights are typically not enforceable in the United States. Clearly identify all parties: Include the names, addresses, and relationship of the assignor (s) and assignee. Clearly identify the patent being assigned: State the patent or patent application number, title, inventors, and filing date.

  18. United States Patent and Trademark Office

    United States Patent and Trademark Office. Select one. Enter assignment information in any field or combination of fields. The number assigned when a patent application is filed at USPTO. The person, group of persons, or organization that recieved ownership rights of the patent application or patent. The nature of the transfer of ownership of ...

  19. 301-Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications

    A patent or patent application is assignable by an instrument in writing, and the assignment of the patent, or patent application, transfers to the assignee (s) an alienable (transferable) ownership interest in the patent or application. 35 U.S.C. 261. II. ASSIGNMENT. "Assignment," in general, is the act of transferring to another the ...

  20. US Inventor Declarations & Assignments

    An assignment provides documentary evidence that the rights in the invention have been transferred from the inventor to the applicant, and that the applicant is the rightful owner of any patent granted for the claimed invention. If a signed assignment is not submitted by each inventor before payment of the Issue Fee, the application could grant ...

  21. US Patents Without a Signed Assignment of Patent Rights

    Recording an assignment may be necessary to permit the assignee to "take action" in the patent application during prosecution and for the patent to issue in the name of the assignee. 37 CFR 1. ...

  22. Online patent tools

    Assignment Center makes it easier to transfer ownership or change the name on your patent or trademark registration. See our how-to guides on using Assignment Center for patents and trademarks. If you have questions, email [email protected] or call customer service at 800-972-6382.