Defense and Dissertation Overview
Once a student’s box is checked, the BPH student should set up a one-on-one “Defense Packet Meeting” with the BPH Associate Director to review the Defense and Dissertation Process, which includes reviewing all required materials, logistics, timing, FAS/Harvard Griffin GSAS Form of the Dissertation, sample forms, and to answer student questions related to these processes.
- Defense Committee Chair: One member of the student’s DAC, often the DAC chair, is required to chair the oral defense. This required holdover from the DAC serves the purpose of providing insight to the examiners regarding the path the student has taken in completing the dissertation research. Their primary role is to assess committee satisfaction with the written dissertation, administer the exam, arbitrate any problems that may arise, and make final recommendations for completion of necessary corrections and additions to the dissertation. No other DAC members can serve on the defense committee .
- At least one member must be a BPH faculty member, often from the same academic department.
- One member of the examination committee must be from outside of Harvard University.
- The fourth member may be from either BPH or another Harvard-affiliated program.
- Co-authors and collaborators cannot be members of the Defense committee
DEFENSE TIMING AND FORMAT
- Students should notify the BPH Program as far in advance as possible with the details of the exam.
- The student is required to notify the BPH office no later than 3 weeks in advance of the defense with the final dissertation title.
- At least two weeks before the date of exam, defense members should be sent copies of the dissertation for review. A copy of the dissertation should also be sent to the BPH program.
- If any defense committee member foresees problems with the exam, they should contact the chair of the defense committee in advance of the meeting. If major problems are found with the written document, the Committee can decide to postpone the oral defense until satisfactory changes are made. While rare in our program, these occasions can involve the insufficient or improper use of statistical methods, grossly overstated conclusions, insufficient background or discussion, or evidence of plagiarism.
- More details about the timing and format are provided in the “Defense Packet Meeting” held with each student.
STIPEND GUIDELINES
If a student successfully defends the dissertation before the 15th of the month, the stipend will be terminated at the end of that month. If the student successfully defends on or after the 15th, the next month’s stipend will be the final month the student is paid, at the discretion of their advisor.
Students are encouraged to speak to their advisors directly about how they should be paid as they complete their graduate work. If an advisor wishes to pay the student for one additional month, beyond what has been explained above, the advisor must notify the department’s financial administrator. For administrative reasons, a stipend cannot be issued to a student after their graduation/degree conferral date.
ORAL DEFENSE PROCEDURES
Part 1: Public Seminar As part of the exam, the PhD candidate will present a public seminar followed by a private oral examination. The public presentation lasts no longer than 1 hour, which includes time for the advisor’s introduction, the student’s oral presentation and acknowledgements, and time for audience questions and answers. The Defense Committee is required to attend the public seminar; however, it is customary for members of the defense committee to hold their questions until the private oral exam.
Part 2: Private Oral Examination A private oral examination follows the public seminar. Initially, the student will be asked to leave the room for several minutes, along with the dissertation advisor if the dissertation advisor has decided to remain for the private exam. During this time, the committee will discuss the merits of the dissertation, any issues with the dissertation, and areas they may want to focus on during the oral exam. The student (and advisor if present) is then asked back into the room for the exam.
Each member of the defense committee will direct questions to the candidate based on their review of the dissertation and presentation of the seminar. The Defense Chair will moderate the discussion between the panel and the student. The closed defense takes up to two hours and involves detailed technical questions as well as broader questions on the conclusions, impact, and limitations of the research. Dissertation advisors may be present, but they must not participate in the exam (e.g., answer questions posed by the committee).
At the end of the examination, the student (and advisor if present) is once again asked to step out of the room for several minutes. The Committee will discuss any revisions needed for the thesis and whether these revisions need to be reviewed and by whom. Once the committee determines the outcomes, the student will be asked back into the room and the Committee provides the student with any [minor] changes needed to the dissertation. While it is extremely rare for the student to fail at this stage, the committee will provide recommendations to the student on their research, communication skills, and development as a scientist, as well as delineating the required changes to the dissertation.
PREPARING FOR THE DEFENSE/WRITING THE DISSERTATION
Students preparing to write and defend their dissertation must review University requirements as outlined in “ Dissertations ” with guidelines published at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
Students are also welcome to visit the BPH Student Lounge (Building 2, Room 113) to look at copies of previous BPH bound dissertations.
Writing the Dissertation Each student must write a comprehensive PhD dissertation on their research topic and the original results of their research. There are a variety of ways a dissertation can be composed, but the core elements described below must be included. The dissertation must show original treatment of the subject, contain a scholarly review of the pertinent literature, provide evidence of independent research of publishable quality, and be clearly, logically, and carefully written. In addition to a compendium of the student’s research, including detailed methods and results, the dissertation must contain a thoughtful discussion of the conclusions, impact, and limitations of the research. The completed work should be critically reviewed by the dissertation advisor before being submitted to the Dissertation Defense Committee.
In some cases, the student has done all of the work in the dissertation; more often portions of the dissertation result from collaborative research. In all dissertations containing collaborative results, the dissertation should indicate concisely who contributed to the work and how. For example, a chapter containing multi-authored, published work must include a complete reference of the publication and a brief description of the candidate’s and the colleagues’ contributions. For work that is not published but which resulted from multiple researchers, the contributors must be named and respective attributions made clear. This policy allows stylistic flexibility; depending on the amount of collaborative work in the dissertation and the status of publication(s), the attributions can be, preferably, on or accompanying the cover page for each chapter or within an extended acknowledgements section at the end of each chapter. It is recommended that if figures or figure panels are included that are the work of others that the figure panels be clearly identified and the work properly attributed. It is permissible for more than one student to include work from the same collaboration or publication as long as the required attributions are clear, justified, and complete.
Individual chapters can be that of published articles as long as there are also comprehensive Introduction and Conclusion chapters written by the student. While the text can be the same, use of journal reprints as a chapter is not permissible. A word document of the published article must be used, and the pages in the dissertation must be consecutively numbered. Furthermore, the figures and accompanying figure legends must be integrated into the main body of each chapter, preferably following the first mention of the given figure, not clustered at the end of the chapter. Any dissertation that varies significantly from the Graduate School or FAS guidelines, or is not neat and readable, is subject to required stylistic revision before acceptance by the University. (For further information, please visit https://gsas.harvard.edu/academics/dissertations ).
DEFENSE FORMS AND PAPERWORK
Thesis Acceptance Certificate (TAC) Before the examination, the BPH Program Office will provide the Defense Committee Chair with a copy of the official Thesis Acceptance Certificate. This certificate must be signed by all readers of the dissertation at the end of the examination and returned to the BPH Program Office. This certificate will be scanned and sent to the student so it can be inserted as page one of the dissertation prior to the online submission. The student must submit the one original, official copy to the Registrar’s in Cambridge by the appropriate deadline.
If extensive corrections are to be made, the BPH Program Office will hold the certificate until the Defense Committee Chair, and/or assigned reviewer(s) provide a written notification to the BPH Program to confirm that the corrected work has been reviewed and approved.
Dissertation Defense Exam Report The Dissertation Defense Exam Report is completed by the members of the Dissertation Defense Committee to provide a record of any comments or recommendations they may have. The report must be signed by all members immediately after the private exam. The completed report must be submitted to the BPH Program Office at the same time as the Dissertation Acceptance Certificate.
Sample Dissertation Title Page Please click here to see a sample BPH Dissertation Title Page. Again, please refer to the Dissertation website for guidelines about how to format your dissertation.
News from the School
Nurturing student entrepreneurs
40 years after Bhopal disaster, suffering continues
Meet the Dean
Making health care more affordable
- Dissertation and Final Oral Exam
[Part of the Policies of the CHD, last updated fall 2021]
Dissertation
The dissertation must represent an original and significant contribution to knowledge. The dissertation should be a coherent document conforming with the customary standards of scholarly discourse and addressed to a broad audience in the corresponding subject rather than to a narrow audience of specialists in the field. SEAS does not follow the practice in which a collection of manuscripts published or intended for publication as technical papers constitutes an acceptable dissertation. It should be understood, however, that the student has an obligation to prepare the work for publication in the archival literature in timely fashion. The dissertation must meet the GSAS requirements available at https://gsas.harvard.edu/degree-requirements/dissertations/formatting-your-dissertation .
Final Oral Exam ("Defense")
The last two requirements are the final Ph.D. oral examination and an electronic copy of the dissertation submitted as a PDF file. The student must deliver a complete penultimate draft of the dissertation (except for the acknowledgments) to all members of the research committee at least two weeks prior to the final examination. Once the student has agreed upon a time for the examination with all members of the research committee, the student is responsible for contacting the Office of Academic Programs ( [email protected] ) at least two weeks in advance in order to prepare the exam paperwork, and, if needed, to schedule a room.
The final oral exam (i.e., the defense) is the culmination of a student’s years of effort and formally marks the candidate’s entry into the community of scholars . As such, the candidate and committee should strive to meet together in person for the exam. If after attempting to schedule a time for the full committee to meet together in person it appears that no such time can be found, the candidate should consult with the Office of Academic Programs about alternatives, possibly including that one or more committee members attend remotely.
SEAS encourages candidates to provide a videoconferencing (e.g., Zoom) option for remote attendance by guests, community members and the public who may not be able to attend in person.
The final examination is essentially a presentation and defense of the dissertation, though more general questions relating to the field of the dissertation are in order. At the end of the examination, the research committee may accept the dissertation, possibly subject to agreed-upon revisions, or specify further requirements. If other than minor revisions are involved, the nature of the conditions that need to be met should be reported to the DGS. The research advisor must certify in writing that these conditions have been met before award of the degree can formally be recommended by the Dean.
SEAS facilities are the usual location for the final defense. A student planning a defense to be held outside of SEAS must have the approval of all their committee members before finalizing the location of the defense. Arrangements as to location will be made by the student through the Office of Academic Programs. Public notice will be given. The Office of Academic Programs strongly encourages students to schedule their defense not later than two weeks before the GSAS Ph.D. Dissertation submission deadline.
In Academic Programs
- Non-Resident and Part-Time Study
- CHD Meeting Schedule
- PhD Overview and Timeline
- PhD Course Requirements
- PhD Program Plans
- Teaching: G2 year
- Qualifying Exam: by end of G2 year
- Research Advisors, Committees, and Meetings
- SM and ME Course Requirements
- SM and ME Program Plans
- Masters Thesis and Supervisor
- SM degree en route to the PhD
- Graduate Student Forms
- Teaching Fellows
- External Fellowships List
- COVID-19 Graduate Program Changes (archived)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Overall, students should reserve 3 hours for their defense: 1 hour for the public seminar and up to 2 hours for the private examination. The title, time, date and place of the exam will be posted on the DMS website and will be announced …
DEFENSE TIMING AND FORMAT. Overall, students should reserve 3 hours for their defense: 1 hour for the public seminar and up to 2 hours for the private oral examination.
Every PhD candidate in the Harvard Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences is required to successfully complete and submit a dissertation to qualify for degree conferral. The dissertation …
Every PhD candidate is required to successfully complete and submit a dissertation to qualify for degree conferral. Completion of the PhD requires writing a dissertation, presenting a seminar …
Harvard/MIT MDPhD Program. Tamina Kienka. Thursday, September 26, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Title: Improving CAR T cell persistence in pancreatic cancer using an in vivo CRISPR knockout …
Dissertation & Defense. PiN students are required to write a thesis, present a one-hour thesis seminar, and pass an oral examination (typically scheduled for two hours) in order to graduate. …
All BIG students should carefully follow the DMS procedures and deadlines here. If you have any questions, please contact [email protected].
All Immunology students should carefully follow the DMS procedures and deadlines here. If you have any questions, please contact [email protected].
Students in the Biophysics Program are allowed to carry over two faculty members from their Dissertation Advisory Committee (DAC) to their Dissertation Defense Committee.
The final oral exam (i.e., the defense) is the culmination of a student’s years of effort and formally marks the candidate’s entry into the community of scholars. As such, the candidate and …