cell culture research paper

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Journal Menu

• Aims & Scope
• Editorial Board
• Reviewer Board
• Topical Advisory Panel
• Instructions for Authors
• Special Issues
• Sections & Collections
• Article Processing Charge
• Indexing & Archiving
• Editor’s Choice Articles
• Most Cited & Viewed
• Journal Statistics
• Journal History
• Journal Awards
• Society Collaborations
• Conferences
• Editorial Office

Journal Browser

• arrow_forward_ios Forthcoming issue arrow_forward_ios Current issue
• Vol. 13 (2024)
• Vol. 12 (2023)
• Vol. 11 (2022)
• Vol. 10 (2021)
• Vol. 9 (2020)
• Vol. 8 (2019)
• Vol. 7 (2018)
• Vol. 6 (2017)
• Vol. 5 (2016)
• Vol. 4 (2015)
• Vol. 3 (2014)
• Vol. 2 (2013)
• Vol. 1 (2012)

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

Importance of Primary Cell Culture in Biomedical Research

• Print Special Issue Flyer
• Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Benefits of publishing in a special issue.

• Published Papers

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section " Cell Methods ".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 August 2023) | Viewed by 19307

Share This Special Issue

Special issue editor.

Dear Colleagues,

Primary cell culture plays an important role in biomedical research. Changes in culturing conditions can regulate the biological behavior and performance of the cells, which can induce the cells into a more suitable state for use. Common methods include adding many kinds of regulating factors to the culture medium, such as cytokines, drugs, and biological cell products (e.g., extracellular vesicle). In this regard, modifying cells by changing the culture conditions is a promising therapeutic approach to improve the therapeutic effect of stem cells. This Special Issue aims at providing novel insights into the importance of primary cell culture in the context of translational research and biomedical application. We welcome original research and review articles in which the topics may include (but are not limited to) the following:

• Methods in in vitro cell culture that can improve cell performance and their related mechanisms;
• Therapeutic strategies aiming to enhance cell function by changing the cell culturing condition in the context of translational medicine, such as cytotherapy, tissue engineering, etc.;
• Reviews that discuss recent advances and future perspectives in understanding the importance and role of primary cell culture in biomedical research.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Yunsong Liu Guest Editor

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website . Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form . Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

• cell culture
• regulating factors
• cell products
• biomedical application
• translational research
• Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
• Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
• Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
• External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
• e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here .

Published Papers (6 papers)

Jump to: Review

Graphical abstract

Jump to: Research

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Published: 23 August 2021

Refresh cell culture

Nature Biomedical Engineering volume  5 ,  pages 783–784 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

5466 Accesses

8 Citations

74 Altmetric

Metrics details

Biomedical research needs upgraded standards for the monitoring, control and reporting of the environmental conditions of cells in culture.

When working with cells, tissues, organs or individuals, biological heterogeneity and variability are commonplace. However, for some types of heterogeneity and variability, their influence can be reduced or controlled for. Participants in trials are selected according to pre-specified criteria approved by scientific review and ethics committees; cell identity and cell phenotypes can be measured, and the cells sorted according to specific biomarkers; and animals for research and donors of biospecimens can be selected to establish genetically homogeneous or environmentally similar backgrounds. And many standard operating procedures for the processing, maintenance and handling of biospecimens and animals are designed to minimize methodological variabilities.

But, even for routine biomedical work, in particular for cell culture and biospecimen preservation, efforts to reduce environmental or methodological variabilities are often insufficient, and whether these variabilities could have any effects on the experiments is commonly discounted or ignored. As reported by Carlos Duarte, Mo Li, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte and colleagues in a Comment in this issue of Nature Biomedical Engineering , the environmental conditions used in mammalian cell culture are routinely underreported in biomedical studies (the research Articles included in this issue are no exception). Specifically, regardless of the cells used (human or non-human cell lines, primary cells or stem cells, for instance), the pH of the media and the level of atmospheric oxygen in the culture chamber are seldom specified in the literature, and only about 40% of biomedical studies report the level of carbon dioxide and the temperature in the culture chamber. Yet it has long been known that the levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the environment of cells alter their physiology — in fact, the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine recognized 1 work that unveiled how cells sense and adapt to the availability of oxygen. Moreover, about 35% of biomedical studies do not describe the type of culture system employed (batch culture is usually assumed). Duarte and colleagues derived these statistics by looking at 1,749 cell-culture experiments reported in 688 randomly selected biomedical studies published in 2014–2019.

Why is it important to thoroughly report the environmental conditions, rather than, for example, to assume that there is no need to do so because commercial media and standard nominal set points for temperature and carbon dioxide levels are used? First, not reporting the actual set points may suggest that it was not verified whether the culture conditions were maintained at the set points. Second, such underreporting may falsely imply that any variabilities in the cell-culture conditions were largely irrelevant to the results of the experiments, which may not be the case. In fact, standard batch cultures can undergo environmental drift 2 (even with daily exchanges of medium), with subsequent alteration of cell growth and cell function; the use of suitable media does not necessarily ensure the stability of the environmental conditions; and, for many types of human cells, physiological function is only retained within the narrow physiological pH range of 7.2–7.4. Moreover, for biospecimens used after cryopreservation, cryoinjuries — that is, damage to the preserved cells caused by the formation of ice and by stresses caused by cold-storage, freezing or vitrification processes, or by the toxicity of the cryoprotectants used — can affect cell viability, proliferation and function, as highlighted in a Review Article in this issue by Haishui Huang, Xiaoming He and Martin Yarmush. Third, underreporting makes replicability and reproducibility 3 attempts unnecessarily harder and, for translational research, this may hamper clinical prospects 4 .

The prevalent underreporting of the environmental conditions of cell culture could be partly addressed if journals were to specifically request that authors declare the environmental parameters, the culture set-up, and culturing conditions and procedures (such as cell density, media-exchange rate, rate of sub-culturing, and passage number), and any monitoring and control processes that they followed. Nature Biomedical Engineering will do so as a matter of course. Yet aiming only at the underreporting problem will be inadequate. The elephant in the room is the fact that the most relevant environmental conditions of cell culture — pH, and the levels of dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide — are rarely tracked let alone controlled, as Duarte and colleagues conclude from their analysis of the literature. Less than 1% of cell-culture experiments in biomedical studies involve bioreactors or chemostats — that is, bioreactors that allow for the continuous addition of fresh medium and the removal of culture liquid — as their acquisition, and maintenance costs are higher than for batch culture. Hence, it is not surprising that periodic measurements of the actual culture conditions (most relevant for cultures that need to be maintained for longer than a few days), which bioreactors more easily allow, are rarely carried out. Setting nominal set points for temperature and the levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and assuming that the pH will be within the physiological range, may be just fine for many studies, particularly with widely used cell lines and for short-term culture, if the cell-culture data are only ancillary to the conclusions, and if the study is well-powered or includes a sufficiently large number of replicates to show the uncertainty levels of the measurements. Yet when using rarer or more delicate biospecimens, particularly primary cells, stem cells, or reproductive cells or tissue (such as sperm cells, oocytes and embryos), verifying — and, when needed, controlling — relevant environmental parameters may be crucial for the interpretation of the findings and for reproducibility.

All in all, monitoring and controlling for the most relevant cell-culture parameters will require awareness of best practices, the development and wide implementation of more stringent yet workable standards, funding for the grunt work needed to better determine the impacts of environmental instabilities on cellular homeostasis, cell function and cell growth, and incentives and penalties 5 conducive to better reporting—in essence, a refresh of the research culture around cell culture.

Nat. Biomed. Eng . 3 , 843–844 (2019).

Eagle, H. Science 174 , 500–503 (1971).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Nat. Biomed. Eng . 2 , 789–790 (2018).

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Kim, B. Y. S. & Trounson, A. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2 , 797–809 (2018).

Nat. Biomed. Eng . 4 , 845–846 (2020).

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Refresh cell culture. Nat Biomed Eng 5 , 783–784 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00790-1

Download citation

Published : 23 August 2021

Issue Date : August 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00790-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Cardiovascular imaging databases: building machine learning algorithms for regenerative medicine.

• Chirag Mehta
• Partho P. Sengupta

Current Stem Cell Reports (2022)

Applying the Cytocentric Principles to Regenerative Medicine for Reproducibility

• Alicia D. Henn
• Kunal Mitra
• Randy Yerden

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Advertisement

Paper as a scaffold for cell cultures: Teaching an old material new tricks

• Prospective Article
• Published: 01 March 2018
• Volume 8 , pages 1–14, ( 2018 )

Cite this article

• Xinchen Wu 1 ,
• Sanika Suvarnapathaki 1 ,
• Kierra Walsh 2 &
• Gulden Camci-Unal 3  

254 Accesses

32 Citations

4 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Paper-based cell culture platforms have emerged as a promising approach for a myriad of biomedical applications, such as tissue engineering, disease models, cancer research, biotechnology, high-throughput testing, biosensing, and diagnostics. Paper enables the generation of highly flexible, biocompatible, inexpensive, porous, and three-dimensional (3D) constructs and devices. These systems have been used to culture mammalian cells, bacteria, algae, and fungi. Studies have shown that paper is an exceptional material for applications in life sciences, materials sciences, engineering, and medicine. Paper has been employed for creating biomimetic cell culture environments by folding or stacking it into the desired 3D shapes and structures. This review discusses the use of paper-based platforms for cellular applications and provides a diverse range of examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Fabrication of paper-based devices for in vitro tissue modeling

Quantifying oxygen in paper-based cell cultures with luminescent thin film sensors.

Paper-based in vitro tissue chip for delivering programmed mechanical stimuli of local compression and shear flow

Explore related subjects.

M. Jamal, S.S. Kadam, R. Xiao, F. Jivan, T.M. Onn, R. Fernandes, T.D. Nguyen, and D.H. Gracias: Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2 , 1142–1150 (2013).

CAS   Google Scholar  

E.A. Peraza-Hernandez, D.J. Hartl, R.J. Malak Jr., and D.C. Lagoudas: Origami-inspired active structures: a synthesis and review. Smart Mater. Struct. 23 , 094001 (2014).

Google Scholar  

J.E. Moreau, K. Anderson, J.R. Mauney, T. Nguyen, D.L. Kaplan, and M. Rosenblatt: Tissue-engineered bone serves as a target for metastasis of human breast cancer in a mouse model. Cancer Res. 67 , 10304–10308 (2007).

R. Derda, S.K. Tang, A. Laromaine, B. Mosadegh, E. Hong, M. Mwangi, A. Mammoto, D.E. Ingber, and G.M. Whitesides: Multizone paper platform for 3D cell cultures. PLoS ONE 6 , e18940 (2011).

G. Camci-Unal, D. Newsome, B.K. Eustace, and G.M. Whitesides: Fibroblasts enhance migration of human lung cancer cells in a paperbased coculture system. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 , 641–647 (2016).

G. Camci-Unal, A. Laromaine, E. Hong, R. Derda, and G.M. Whitesides: Biomineralization guided by paper templates. Sci. Rep. 6 , 27693 (2016).

F. Piraino, G. Camci-Unal, M.J. Hancock, M. Rasponi, and A. Khademhosseini: Multi-gradient hydrogels produced layer by layer flow and crosslinking in open microchannels. Lab. Chip 12 , 659–661 (2012).

M.J. Hancock, F. Piraino, G. Camci-Unal, M. Rasponi, and A. Khademhosseini: Anisotropic material synthesis by capillary flow in a fluid stripe. Biomaterials 32 , 6493–6504 (2011).

J. Hjortnaes, G. Camci-Unal, J.D. Hutcheson, S.M. Jung, F.J. Schoen, J. Kluin, E. Aikawa, and A. Khademhosseini: Directing valvular interstitial cell myofibroblast-like differentiation in a hybrid hydrogel platform. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4 , 121–130 (2015).

H.-Y. Hsieh, G. Camci-Unal, T.-W. Huang, R. Liao, T.-J. Chen, A. Paul, F.-G. Tseng, and A. Khademhosseini: Gradient static-strain stimulation in a microfluidic chip for 3D cellular alignment. Lab. Chip 14 , 482–493 (2014).

D. Lantigua, Y.N. Kelly, B. Unal, and G. Camci-Unal: Engineered paperbased cell culture platforms. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6 , 22 (2017).

M.C. Sapp, H.J. Fares, A.C. Estrada, and K.J. Grande-Allen: Multilayer three-dimensional filter paper constructs for the culture and analysis of aortic valvular interstitial cells. Acta Biomater. 13 , 199–206 (2015).

K. Ng, B. Gao, K.W. Yong, Y. Li, M. Shi, X. Zhao, Z. Li, X. Zhang, B. Pingguan-Murphy, H. Yang, and F. Xu: Paper-based cell culture platform and its emerging biomedical applications. Mater. Today 20 , 32–44 (2017).

L.E. Freed, G. Vunjak-Novakovic, R.J. Biron, D.B. Eagles, D.C. Lesnoy, S. K. Barlow, and R. Langer: Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 12 , 689–693 (1994).

C.Y. Chan, P.-H. Huang, F. Guo, X. Ding, V. Kapur, J.D. Mai, P.K. Yuen, and T.J. Huang: Accelerating drug discovery via organs-on-chips. Lab. Chip 13 , 4697–4710 (2013).

H.-J. Park, S.J. Yu, K. Yang, Y. Jin, A.-N. Cho, J. Kim, B. Lee, H.S. Yang, S.G. Im, and S.-W. Cho: based bioactive scaffolds for stem cell-mediated bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 35 , 9811–9823 (2014).

Y. Wang, T. Uemura, J. Dong, H. Kojima, J. Tanaka, and T. Tateishi: Application of perfusion culture system improves in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis of bone marrow-derived osteoblastic cells in porous ceramic materials. Tissue Eng. 9 , 1205–1214 (2003).

R. Agarwal and A.J. García: Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 94 , 53–62 (2015).

R. Derda, A. Laromaine, A. Mammoto, S.K. Tang, T. Mammoto, D.E. Ingber, and G.M. Whitesides: Supported 3D cell culture for tissuebased bioassays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 , 18457–18462 (2009).

B. Mosadegh, B.E. Dabiri, M.R. Lockett, R. Derda, P. Campbell, K.K. Parker, and G.M. Whitesides: Three-dimensional paper-based model for cardiac ischemia. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3 , 1036–1043 (2014).

L. Wang, C. Xu, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, N. Sun, X. Zhang, K. Feng, and J. Qin: Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beating cardiac tissues on paper. Lab. Chip 15 , 4283–4290 (2015).

GE Lifesciences: https://www.gelifesciences.com/ (accessed 12/2/2017).

B. Mosadegh, M.R. Lockett, K.T. Minn, K.A. Simon, K. Gilbert, S. Hillier, D. Newsome, H. Li, A.B. Hall, and D.M. Boucher: A paper-based invasion assay: Assessing chemotaxis of cancer cells in gradients of oxygen. Biomaterials 52 , 262–271 (2015).

G. Choi, D.J. Hassett, and S. Choi: A paper-based microbial fuel cell array for rapid and high-throughput screening of electricity-producing bacteria. Analyst 140 , 4277–4283 (2015).

A. Fraiwan, S. Mukherjee, S. Sundermier, H.-S. Lee, and S. Choi: A paperbased microbial fuel cell: Instant battery for disposable diagnostic devices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 49 , 410–414 (2013).

N.C. Martins, C.S. Freire, C.P. Neto, A.J. Silvestre, J. Causio, G. Baldi, P. Sadocco, and T. Trindade: Antibacterial paper based on composite coatings of nanofibrillated cellulose and ZnO. Colloids Surf. A 417 , 111–119 (2013).

M. Funes-Huacca, A. Wu, E. Szepesvari, P. Rajendran, N. Kwan-Wong, A. Razgulin, Y. Shen, J. Kagira, R. Campbell, and R. Derda: Portable selfcontained cultures for phage and bacteria made of paper and tape. Lab Chip 12 , 4269–4278 (2012).

F. Deiss, M.E. Funes-Huacca, J. Bal, K.F. Tjhung, and R. Derda: Antimicrobial susceptibility assays in paper-based portable culture devices. Lab Chip 14 , 167–171 (2014).

J.B. Stielow, L.A. Vaas, M. Göker, P. Hoffmann, and H.-P. Klenk: Charcoal filter paper improves the viability of cryopreserved filamentous ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic Basidiomycota and Ascomycota. Mycologia 104 , 324–330 (2012).

C.-C. Chen, Y.-J. Liu, and D.-J. Yao: Paper-based device for separation and cultivation of single microalga. Talanta 145 , 60–65 (2015).

I. Bhattacharya, C. Ghayor, and F.E. Weber: The use of adipose tissuederived progenitors in bone tissue engineering-a review. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 43 , 336–343 (2016).

G.F. Petersen, B.J. Hilbert, G.D. Trope, W.H. Kalle, and P.M. Strappe: A paper-based scaffold for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of equine adipose-derived stem cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 37 , 2321–2331 (2015).

J.L. Patnaik, T. Byers, C. DiGuiseppi, D. Dabelea, and T.D. Denberg: Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 13 , R64 (2011).

J. Petsche Connell, G. Camci-Unal, A. Khademhosseini, and J.G. Jacot: Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells for cardiovascular tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 19 , 368–379 (2013).

G. Camci-Unal, N. Alemdar, N. Annabi, and A. Khademhosseini: Oxygenreleasing biomaterials for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 62 , 843–848 (2013).

N. Alemdar, J. Leijten, G. Camci-Unal, Hjortnaes, J. Ribas, A. Paul, P. Mostafalu, A.K. Gaharwar, Y. Qiu, and S. Sonkusale: Oxygen-generating photo-cross-linkable hydrogels support cardiac progenitor cell survival by reducing hypoxia-induced necrosis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3 , 9 (2016).

H.T. Lynch, T.C. Smyrk, P. Watson, S.J. Lanspa, J.F. Lynch, P.M. Lynch, R.J. Cavalieri, and C.R. Boland: Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review. Gastroenterology 104 , 1535–1549 (1993).

H. Karlsson, M. Fryknäs, R. Larsson, and P. Nygren: Loss of cancer drug activity in colon cancer HCT-116 cells during spheroid formation in a new 3-D spheroid cell culture system. Exp. Cell Res. 318 , 1577–1585 (2012).

A.C. Luca, S. Mersch, R. Deenen, S. Schmidt, I. Messner, K.-L. Schäfer, S.E. Baldus, W. Huckenbeck, R.P. Piekorz, and W. T. Knoefel: Impact of the 3D microenvironment on phenotype, gene expression, and EGFR inhibition of colorectal cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE 8 , e59689 (2013).

B. Hong, P. Xue, Y. Wu, J. Bao, Y.J. Chuah, and Y. Kang: A concentration gradient generator on a paper-based microfluidic chip coupled with cell culture microarray for high-throughput drug screening. Biomed. Microdevices 18 , 21 (2016).

S. Wang, L. Ge, X. Song, J. Yu, S. Ge, J. Huang, and F. Zeng: based chemiluminescence ELISA: lab-on-paper based on chitosan modified paper device and wax-screen-printing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 31 , 212–218 (2012).

K. Erickson, R.D. Braun, D. Yu, J. Lanzen, D. Wilson, D.M. Brizel, T.W. Secomb, J.E. Biaglow, and M.W. Dewhirst: Effect of longitudinal oxygen gradients on effectiveness of manipulation of tumor oxygenation. Cancer Res. 63 , 4705–4712 (2003).

T. Han, D. Kang, D. Ji, X. Wang, W. Zhan, M. Fu, H.-B. Xin, and J.-B. Wang: How does cancer cell metabolism affect tumor migration and invasion? Cell Adh. Migr. 7 , 395–403 (2013).

V. Cristini, H.B. Frieboes, R. Gatenby, S. Caserta, M. Ferrari, and J. Sinek: Morphologic instability and cancer invasion. Clin. Cancer Res. 11 , 6772–6779 (2005).

C. Carmona-Fontaine, V. Bucci, L. Akkari, M. Deforet, J.A. Joyce, and J.B. Xavier: Emergence of spatial structure in the tumor microenvironment due to the Warburg effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 , 19402–19407 (2013).

M.W. Boyce, G.J. LaBonia, A.B. Hummon, and M.R. Lockett: Assessing chemotherapeutic effectiveness using a paper-based tumor model. Analyst 142 , 2819–2827 (2017).

M.W. Boyce, R.M. Kenney, A.S. Truong, and M.R. Lockett: Quantifying oxygen in paper-based cell cultures with luminescent thin film sensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408 , 2985–2992 (2016).

K. Chwalek, L.J. Bray, and C. Werner: Tissue-engineered 3D tumor angiogenesis models: potential technologies for anti-cancer drug discovery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 79 , 30–39 (2014). Prospective Article

K.F. Lei, and C.-H. Huang: Based microreactor integrating cell culture and subsequent immunoassay for the investigation of cellular phosphorylation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 , 22423–22429 (2014).

A.S. Truong, C.A. Lochbaum, M.W. Boyce, and M.R. Lockett: Tracking the invasion of small numbers of cells in paper-based assays with quantitative PCR. Anal. Chem. 87 , 11263–11270 (2015).

J. Zhang and J. Liu: Tumor stroma as targets for cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 137 , 200–215 (2013).

R.M. Bremnes, T. Dønnem, S. Al-Saad, K. Al-Shibli, S. Andersen, R. Sirera, C. Camps, I. Marinez, and L.-T. Busund: The role of tumor stroma in cancer progression and prognosis: emphasis on carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and non-small cell lung cancer. J.Thorac. Oncol. 6 , 209–217 (2011).

F. Deiss, A. Mazzeo, E. Hong, D.E. Ingber, R. Derda, and G.M. Whitesides: Platform for high-throughput testing of the effect of soluble compounds on 3D cell cultures. Anal. Chem. 85 , 8085–8094 (2013).

F. Deiss, W.L. Matochko, N. Govindasamy, E.Y. Lin, and R. Derda: Flowthrough synthesis on teflon-patterned paper to produce peptide arrays for cell-based assays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 , 6374–6377 (2014).

S.P. Jackson, and J. Bartek: The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461 , 1071 (2009).

A.C. Begg, F.A. Stewart, and C. Vens: Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11 , 239 (2011).

G.C. Barnett, C.M. West, A.M. Dunning, R.M. Elliott, C.E. Coles, P.D. Pharoah, and N.G. Burnet: Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9 , 134 (2009).

K.A. Simon, B. Mosadegh, K.T. Minn, M.R. Lockett, M.R. Mohammady, D.M. Boucher, A.B. Hall, S.M. Hillier, T. Udagawa, B.K. Eustace, and G.M. Whitesides: Metabolic response of lung cancer cells to radiation in a paper-based 3D cell culture system. Biomaterials 95 , 47–59 (2016).

R.M. Kenney, M.W. Boyce, A.S. Truong, C.R. Bagnell, and M.R. Lockett: Real-time imaging of cancer cell chemotaxis in paper-based scaffolds. Analyst 141 , 661–668 (2016).

F.F. Tao, X. Xiao, K.F. Lei, and I.-C. Lee: Based cell culture microfluidic system. Biochip J. 2 , 97–104 (2015).

K.F. Lei, C.-H. Huang, and N.-M. Tsang: Impedimetric quantification of cells encapsulated in hydrogel cultured in a paper-based microchamber. Talanta 147 , 628–633 (2016).

G. Choi and S. Choi: Bacterial cell transportation in paper-based microfluidics. In Transducers (IEEE:Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2015), pp. 1921–1924.

A.K. Yetisen, M.S. Akram, and C.R. Lowe: Based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab. Chip 13 , 2210–2251 (2013).

R. Veerubhotla, A. Bandopadhyay, D. Das, and S. Chakraborty: Instant power generation from an air-breathing paper and pencil based bacterial bio-fuel cell. Lab. Chip 15 , 2580–2583 (2015).

L. Zhang, M. Zhou, D. Wen, L. Bai, B. Lou, and S. Dong: Small-size biofuel cell on paper. Biosens. Bioelectron. 35 , 155–159 (2012).

I. Shitanda, S. Kato, Y. Hoshi, M. Itagaki, and S. Tsujimura: Flexible and high-performance paper-based biofuel cells using printed porous carbon electrodes. Chem. Commun. 49 , 11110–11112 (2013).

U. Desselberger: Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. J. Infect. 40 , 3–15 (2000).

X. Cui and T. Boland: Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials 30 , 6221–6227 (2009).

A.W. Martinez, S.T. Phillips, E. Carrilho, S.W. Thomas III, H. Sindi, and G.M. Whitesides: Simple telemedicine for developing regions: camera phones and paper-based microfluidic devices for real-time, off-site diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 80 , 3699–3717 (2008).

T. Srimongkon, T. Ishida, K. Igarashi, and T. Enomae: Development of a bacterial culture system using a paper platform to accommodate media and an ink-jet printing to dispense bacteria. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 10 , 81–87 (2014).

F. Marciano, D. Lima-Oliveira, N. Da-Silva, A. Diniz, E. Corat, and V. Trava-Airoldi: Antibacterial activity of DLC films containing TiO 2 nanoparticles. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 340 , 87–92 (2009).

L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Ding, N. Daskalakis, L. Jeuken, M. Povey, A. J. O’Neill, and D.W. York: Mechanistic investigation into antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli. J.Nanopart. Res. 12 , 1625–1636 (2010).

R. Tankhiwale and S. Bajpai: Preparation, characterization and antibacterial applications of ZnO-nanoparticles coated polyethylene films for food packaging. Colloids Surf. B 90 , 16–20 (2012).

J.T. Seil and T.J. Webster: Reduced Staphylococcus aureus proliferation and biofilm formation on zinc oxide nanoparticle PVC composite surfaces. Acta Biomater. 7 , 2579–2584 (2011).

R. Brayner, R. Ferrari-Iliou, N. Brivois, S. Djediat, M.F. Benedetti, and F. Fiévet: Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 6 , 866–870 (2006).

G. Choi and S. Choi: Monitoring electron and proton diffusion flux through three-dimensional, paper-based, variable biofilm and liquid media layers. Analyst 140 , 5901–5907 (2015).

A. Azam, A.S. Ahmed, M. Oves, M.S. Khan, S.S. Habib, and A. Memic: Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int. J. Nanomed. 7 , 6003 (2012).

S. Pal, Y.K. Tak, and J.M. Song: Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 , 1712–1720 (2007).

I. Sondi and B. Salopek-Sondi: Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for gram-negative bacteria. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 275 , 177–182 (2004).

I. Díez, P. Eronen, M. Österberg, M.B. Linder, O. Ikkala, and R.H. Ras: Functionalization of nanofibrillated cellulose with silver nanoclusters: fluorescence and antibacterial activity. Macromol. Biosci. 11 , 1185–1191 (2011).

S. Baruah, M. Jaisai, R. Imani, M.M. Nazhad, and J. Dutta: Photocatalytic paper using zinc oxide nanorods. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 11 , 055002 (2010).

K. Ghule, A.V. Ghule, B.-J. Chen, and Y.-C. Ling: Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem. 8 , 1034–1041 (2006).

R.J. Pinto, P.A. Marques, C.P. Neto, T. Trindade, S. Daina, and P. Sadocco: Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of silver and bacterial or vegetable cellulosic fibers. Acta Biomater. 5 , 2279–2289 (2009).

N.C. Martins, C.S. Freire, R.J. Pinto, S.C. Fernandes, C.P. Neto, A. J. Silvestre, J. Causio, G. Baldi, P. Sadocco, and T. Trindade: Electrostatic assembly of Ag nanoparticles onto nanofibrillated cellulose for antibacterial paper products. Cellulose 19 , 1425–1436 (2012).

R. Gottesman, S. Shukla, N. Perkas, L.A. Solovyov, Y. Nitzan, and A. Gedanken: Sonochemical coating of paper by microbiocidal silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 27 , 720–726 (2011).

M.J. Ryan and D. Smith: Cryopreservation and freeze-drying of fungi employing centrifugal and shelf freeze-drying. Methods Mol. Biol. 368 , 127–140 (2007).

A. Michaelsen, F. Pinzari, K. Ripka, W. Lubitz, and G. Piñar: Application of molecular techniques for identification of fungal communities colonising paper material. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 58 , 133–141 (2006).

A. Ben-Amotz, R. Fishler, and A. Schneller: Chemical composition of dietary species of marine unicellular algae and rotifers with emphasis on fatty acids. Mar. Biol. 95 , 31–36 (1987).

H.W. Yen, I.C. Hu, C.Y. Chen, S.H. Ho, D.J. Lee, and J.S. Chang: Microalgae-based biorefinery—from biofuels to natural products. Bioresour. Technol. 135 , 166–174 (2013).

W. Liu, N. Dechev, I.G. Foulds, R. Burke, A. Parameswaran, and E.J. Park: A novel permalloy based magnetic single cell micro array. Lab. Chip 9 , 2381–2390 (2009).

S. Lindstrom and H. Andersson-Svahn: Miniaturization of biological assays—overview on microwell devices for single-cell analyses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1810 , 308–316 (2011).

S. Khanna: Microbiota replacement therapies: innovation in gastrointestinal care. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 103 , 102–111 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University of Massachusetts Lowell start-up funds.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

Xinchen Wu & Sanika Suvarnapathaki

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

Kierra Walsh

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

Gulden Camci-Unal

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulden Camci-Unal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Wu, X., Suvarnapathaki, S., Walsh, K. et al. Paper as a scaffold for cell cultures: Teaching an old material new tricks. MRS Communications 8 , 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2018.8

Download citation

Received : 02 December 2017

Accepted : 05 January 2018

Published : 01 March 2018

Issue Date : March 2018

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2018.8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Traditional and emerging methods for analyzing cell activity in cell culture

Affiliation.

• 1 Muscle Biology Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
• PMID: 10650337
• DOI: 10.1023/a:1009839501174

The selection of appropriate techniques to assay for markers of cell activity is important for obtaining optimal results in cell culture-based research. This paper is intended as a guide to many of the assays currently available and new techniques that have been recently introduced in the literature. This paper addresses both manual assay techniques, including the use of hemocytometers, phase contrast microscopy, cell staining, and the immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA), and automated assays for cell activity, including stained optical density, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, creatine kinase assay, DNA quantification, electronic cell counting, flow cytometry, magnetic cell sorting, image analysis, chemiluminescence, radioisotope labeling, precursor incorporation, in-situ hybridization/ligand binding, and enzyme-linked immuno-culture assay (ELICA). Advantages/disadvantages and applicability of these assays to different areas of cell culture research are discussed, and guidelines for selecting an appropriate assay are suggested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• An automatic image analysis approach to quantify stained cell cultures. Glory E, Derocle G, Ollivier N, Meas-Yedid V, Stamon G, Pinset C, Olivo-Marin JC. Glory E, et al. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007 Apr 27;53(2):44-50. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007. PMID: 17531139
• Semi-automated relative quantification of cell culture contamination with mycoplasma by Photoshop-based image analysis on immunofluorescence preparations. Kumar A, Yerneni LK. Kumar A, et al. Biologicals. 2009 Jan;37(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Dec 9. Biologicals. 2009. PMID: 19081267
• Nuclear-labeling index analysis (NLIA), a software package used to perform accurate automation of cell nuclear-labeling index analysis on immunohistochemically stained rat liver samples. Xu YH, Sattler GL, Edwards H, Pitot HC. Xu YH, et al. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2000 Aug;63(1):55-70. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2607(00)00075-4. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2000. PMID: 10927155
• Chemiluminescence: a sensitive detection system in in situ hybridization. Musiani M, Pasini P, Zerbini M, Roda A, Gentilomi G, Gallinella G, Venturoli S, Manaresi E. Musiani M, et al. Histol Histopathol. 1998 Jan;13(1):243-8. doi: 10.14670/HH-13.243. Histol Histopathol. 1998. PMID: 9476653 Review.
• The selection of high-producing cell lines using flow cytometry and cell sorting. Carroll S, Al-Rubeai M. Carroll S, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004 Nov;4(11):1821-9. doi: 10.1517/14712598.4.11.1821. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004. PMID: 15500410 Review.
• Novel Cell Culture Paradigm Prolongs Mouse Corneal Epithelial Cell Proliferative Activity in vitro and in vivo . An X, Wang G, Jin M, Zhou X, Gao S, Chen J, Reinach PS, Liu Z, Xue Y, Li C. An X, et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jun 30;9:675998. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.675998. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34277619 Free PMC article.
• Recent Advances in Monitoring Cell Behavior Using Cell-Based Impedance Spectroscopy. Hassan Q, Ahmadi S, Kerman K. Hassan Q, et al. Micromachines (Basel). 2020 Jun 13;11(6):590. doi: 10.3390/mi11060590. Micromachines (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32545753 Free PMC article. Review.
• Utilizing multiplex fluor LAMPs to illuminate multiple gene expressions in situ. Podushkina D, West NW, Golenberg EM. Podushkina D, et al. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0223333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223333. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31584968 Free PMC article.
• Transfection of insect cell lines using polyethylenimine. Ogay ID, Lihoradova OA, Azimova ShS, Abdukarimov AA, Slack JM, Lynn DE. Ogay ID, et al. Cytotechnology. 2006 Jun;51(2):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10616-006-9022-7. Epub 2006 Nov 2. Cytotechnology. 2006. PMID: 19002899 Free PMC article.
• The evaluation of a semiautomated computer method to determine the effects of DMSO on Giardia lamblia-intestinal cell interaction. Gadelha AP, Travassos R, Monteiro-Leal LH. Gadelha AP, et al. Parasitol Res. 2007 Oct;101(5):1401-6. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0661-1. Epub 2007 Jul 22. Parasitol Res. 2007. PMID: 17659385

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

Related information

• PubChem Compound (MeSH Keyword)

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

In vitro plant tissue culture: means for production of biological active compounds

Claudia a. espinosa-leal.

Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849 Monterrey, NL México

César A. Puente-Garza

Silverio garcía-lara, main conclusion.

Plant tissue culture as an important tool for the continuous production of active compounds including secondary metabolites and engineered molecules. Novel methods (gene editing, abiotic stress) can improve the technique.

Humans have a long history of reliance on plants for a supply of food, shelter and, most importantly, medicine. Current-day pharmaceuticals are typically based on plant-derived metabolites, with new products being discovered constantly. Nevertheless, the consistent and uniform supply of plant pharmaceuticals has often been compromised. One alternative for the production of important plant active compounds is in vitro plant tissue culture, as it assures independence from geographical conditions by eliminating the need to rely on wild plants. Plant transformation also allows the further use of plants for the production of engineered compounds, such as vaccines and multiple pharmaceuticals. This review summarizes the important bioactive compounds currently produced by plant tissue culture and the fundamental methods and plants employed for their production.

Introduction

Plant cell and tissue culture uses nutritive culture media and controlled aseptic conditions for the growth of plant cells, tissues and organs. Since its first establishment by Haberlandt in the early twentieth century, this type of culture has evolved into an essential tool for plant research at both the basic and applied levels (Haberlandt 1902 ). In vitro culture techniques are now indispensable for the production of disease-free plants, rapid multiplication of rare plant genotypes, plant genome transformation, and production of plant-derived metabolites of important commercial value (see Fig.  1 ) (Debnarh et al. 2006 ; Altpeter et al. 2016 ).

Diagram of current methods employed for the large-scale production of bioactive compounds using plant in vitro tissue culture

Due to the diversity of the methods and applications of available culture techniques, the subject of plant cell/tissue culture is extensively covered in the existing literature. Some works have even focused on the use of in vitro tissue culture for the production of secondary metabolites (Verpoorte et al. 2000 , 2002 ; Smetanska 2008 ; Karuppusamy 2009 ). This work aims to provide an updated overview on the use of in vitro culture for the production of medicinally or commercially important plant metabolites and bioengineered products, nevertheless because of the ample range of information available not all works within the scope of the article could be included, we apologize to those authors. The objective of this review is, therefore, to summarize the main molecules currently being produced using plant cell/tissue culture, their applications in areas such as medicine and food technology, and the plant material cultured for their production. The review also covers new trends in in vitro cell/tissue culture and plant transformation.

Production of biologically active compounds

Secondary metabolites.

The term secondary metabolite refers to a compound produced by plants, microorganisms or animals that is not required for their growth (Pickens et al. 2011 ). Humans have long used the products of plant secondary metabolism to satisfy a multitude of different needs (Borchardt 2002 ; Patwardhan 2005 ; Cragg and Newman 2013 ). The primary use of these compounds has been as medicinal agents, first in an empirical way and subsequently, starting in the 19th century, in a more rational way following the advent of molecule isolation (Corson and Crews 2007 ; Zenk and Juenger 2007 ; Cragg and Newman 2013 ). Despite the extensive research into secondary metabolites over such a long period of time, current estimates indicate that only about 6% of higher plants (between 300,000 and 500,000 species) have been systematically studied for their pharmacological potential, and only 15% have been evaluated for phytochemicals in general (Fabricant and Farnsworth 2001 ; Cragg and Newman 2013 ). Therefore, enormous opportunities exist for continued studies in this field.

The identification and isolation of a useful bioactive compound immediately generates a need for a method for its continuous production. A secondary metabolite is typically characterized by its diverse and complex chemical structure, usually encompassing multiple chiral centers and labile bonds, and this makes its chemical synthesis challenging (Pickens et al. 2011 ). Therefore, biologically active molecules are more commonly extracted from their natural sources. However, since most of the source plants are wild rather than domesticated species, harvesting from their natural habitats presents a risk of overexploitation, as well as creating a bottleneck in the production of the compounds. Further complications include the slow growth rates of many source plants, the low concentrations of the active compounds of interest and, frequently, the need for biotic or abiotic stress to induce biosynthesis. All these factors make the extraction of secondary metabolites from source species highly inefficient (Atanasov et al. 2015 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ) and emphasize the need for novel approaches for secondary metabolite production.

The in vitro culture of plant cells and tissues under controlled conditions offers a well-founded technology platform for the production of plant natural products. The in vitro propagation (micropropagation) of plants or the in vitro culture of plant organs (usually roots) or callus can typically provide plant material capable of producing secondary metabolites (Atanasov et al. 2015 ; Morales-Rubio et al. 2016 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ; Espinosa-Leal et al. 2017 ). Micropropagation has, therefore, become a commercially lucrative enterprise and provides marked advantages over conventional horticultural propagation practices by facilitating the production of large numbers of homogenous plants year-round, the generation of disease-free propagules and a substantial enhancement of multiplication rates (Debnarh et al. 2006 ). Currently, a large number of protocols are available for the micropropagation of medicinal plants (Debnarh et al. 2006 ; Rizvi and Kukreja 2010 ; Sarasan et al. 2011 ; Kaul et al. 2013 ; Kun-Hua et al. 2013 ; Bhattecheryya et al. 2014 ; Chen et al. 2014a ; Atanasov et al. 2015 ), as well as some commercially important plants, such as Agave salmiana (Puente-Garza et al. 2017a ), artichoke (Pandino et al. 2017 ), Stevia rebaudiana (Ramírez-Mosqueda et al. 2016 ) and Moringa oleifera (drumstick tree) (Juan-jie et al. 2017 ). However, the high costs of micropropagation compared with its traditional counterpart (i.e., collection from the wild) and the unpredictability of the needs of the market have limited the use of micropropagation at a commercial level (Debnarh et al. 2006 ; Methora et al. 2007 ; Lubbe and Verpoorte 2011 ; Pence 2011 ; Sahu and Sahu 2013 ). Notably, however, recent micropropagation efforts have been aimed at the conservation of overexploited medicinal plants, with special emphasis in plants used for traditional medicines in China and India (Rizvi and Kukreja 2010 ; Verma et al. 2012 ; Bhattecheryya et al. 2014 ; Chen et al. 2016a ).

Recent advances in plant cell culture, brought about by the established experience with microbial and animal cell culture, has resulted in effective scale-up from the experimental stage to an industrial scale. Plant cell culture now represents an efficient way to produce several valuable natural products (Fischer et al. 2015 ). As shown in Table  1 , the range of commercially important products includes pigments (e.g., anthocyanins and betacyanins), anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., berberine and rosmarinic acid), and anti-cancer molecules (e.g., paclitaxel and podophyllotoxin).

Table 1

List of some secondary metabolites industrially produced by plant tissue culture (with information of Wilson and Roberts 2012 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 )

Plant-made pharmaceuticals and other bioengineered products

In the early 1990s, transgenic plants were endorsed as an alternative means of production of pharmaceutically important proteins. A transgenic system offers several advantages, including decreased costs, increased ease of delivery and scale-up, decreased risk of contamination with animal and human pathogens, and eukaryotic protein processing. Despite the potential of the method, the past 20 years since its introduction have seen transgenic biomolecules (mostly orally delivered, plant-made vaccines) continue to languish in Phase I of human clinical trials. Only in this current decade has a breakthrough been made, and plant-based products are now geared to proceed to Phase II trials and beyond (Pogue et al. 2010 ; Thomas et al. 2011 ).

Table  2 lists the first plant-made human recombinant therapeutic protein approved by regulatory agencies for commercial sale in 2014. Developed by Pfizer, Inc. and Protalix Biotherapeutics, the enzyme taliglucerase alfa (commercially known as ELELYSO-™) is a treatment for Type 1 Gaucher disease (Pfizer 2014 ; Pastores et al. 2016 ). More plant-based products are awaiting approval in one of the phases of clinical trials, and some companies, including Icon Genetics, Ventria Bioscience and Greenovation Biotech, now have the technologies available for the production of several pharmaceuticals derived from plants (see Table  2 ). This seemingly show growth of the field can be attributed to some of the challenges presented by the method, such as low yields, unwanted glycosylation of products, purification and downstream processing hurdles, and the challenges inherent in the creation of a new manufacturing industry (Tusé et al. 2014 ; Yao et al. 2015 ).

Table 2

List of some pharmaceuticals produced in plants

With information of Wilson and Roberts ( 2012 ) and Yao et al. ( 2015 )

Some of these problems can be resolved by judicious selection of the plant material. For instance, the use of maize or lettuce, which are both edible and free of harmful substances, can reduce the need for the intensive purification required for the preparation of parenteral pharmaceuticals, thereby reducing the downstream costs (Hayden et al. 2012 , 2014 ; Lakshmi et al. 2013 ; Czyz et al. 2014 , 2016 ; Sue et al. 2015). In addition, the appropriate selection of the desired transgenic phenotypes and the use of breeding methods such as backcrossing or inbreeding can lead to the preservation of valuable traits, including high expression of the desired pharmaceutical by the plant material (Pniewski et al. 2017 ). Other advances have been made in glyco-engineering of host plants, which allows the engineered plants to produce human and mammalian-analogous molecules that exhibit comparable activity to their equivalents produced by mammalian cells in culture (Castilho et al. 2011 ; Zeitlin et al. 2011 ; Gleba et al. 2014 ).

Other plant metabolites of interest, which can be bioengineered, are plant growth regulators. These are typically produced in miniscule quantities in plants, but are essential for the regulation of plant cellular processes (Wani et al. 2016 ). Growth regulators also have critical roles in controlling plant responses to the abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity and extreme temperatures, factors that limit crop productivity worldwide (Wani and Sah 2014 ). Due to these characteristics engineered plant growth regulators can be used for the improvement of crops from both nutritional and stress-resistance perspectives (Wani et al. 2016 ).

Plants employed for the production of biologically active compounds

An abundance of options, ranging from model plants and crops to wild-type plants, is available when selecting an appropriate plant material for the production of biomolecules. The selection of which plant to use will depend on a number of factors, with the chief considerations being the purpose of the study and the availability of the plant.

Most plants employed for the production of secondary metabolites are non-crop wild types, since these are the plants that already contain the metabolic tools for synthesis of many metabolites of interest (see Table  1 ). Some examples include Agave salmiana for saponins (Puente-Garza et al. 2017a ), Rhaponticoide mykalea for chlorogenic acids (Hayta et al. 2017 ) and phenolic compounds (Karalija et al. 2017 ), Leucophyllum frutescens for phenolic compounds (Espinosa-Leal et al. 2015 ) and Poliomintha glabrescens for luteolin (García-Pérez et al. 2012 ). All of these compounds are useful in the food, pharmaceutical or cosmetic industries (Perassolo et al. 2017 ). Other crop plants are used for the production of metabolites such as betalains, which are natural colorants as well as good antioxidants. The main sources of betalain metabolites are the cactus pear ( Opuntia ficus - indica ) and red beet ( Beta vulgaris ), and these metabolites are typically produced using hairy roots in bioreactors or by callus culture (Georgiev et al. 2008 ).

Other crop plants, or their parts, that are used for the production of bioengineered compounds, include carrot cells (enzyme replacement), rice (albumin serum) (both presented in Table  2 ), maize (vaccines, such as anti-HBV) and lettuce (vaccines and antibodies) (Hayden et al. 2012 , 2014 ; Lakshmi et al. 2013 ; Czyz et al. 2014 , 2016 ; Su et al. 2015 ; Yao et al. 2015 ). Model plants, such as Nicotiana benthamiana, are also transformed for the production of plant pharmaceuticals (Yao et al. 2015 ), as summarized in Table  2 .

Methods of plant tissue culture

Several methods are available for plant tissue culture; two of the most commonly used are presented in Fig.  1 . Organogenesis, which refers to the production of plant organs (roots or shoots), can be accomplished directly from meristems or indirectly from dedifferentiated cells (callus). The resulting cultures can later be used for the massive production of plants (micropropagation) or for the growth of particular organs (i.e., roots in hairy root culture). Callogenesis produces an amorphous mass of cells in response to exposure of explants to different growth regulators. The callus can then be used to regenerate whole plants, or it can be scaled up for the production of important metabolites in cell suspension cultures (Morales-Rubio et al. 2016 ).

All plant tissue culture methods follow a series of steps, as mentioned in Table  3 . First, the plant of interest needs to be selected; this is generally dependent on the aim of the study, but disease- and insect-free plants are preferred; if the plant requires it, some pre-treatments (fungicides and pesticides) can be applied. The next step is the initiation of the in vitro culture. The process requires the excision of small plant pieces (explants) or the use of seeds and their surface sterilization with chemicals. The explants are then placed in appropriate culture media and incubated for a short period of time; contaminated explants are discarded while the surviving ones continue to the next step. The following steps vary depending on the type of culture desired. In organogenesis, this is the propagation phase when explants are cultured on appropriate culture media for shoot or root multiplication, similarly in callogenesis the callus is multiplied. In the next step, callus and root cultures are scaled up for their culture using bioreactors, while the propagated shoots are transferred to root-promoting culture media, in the case of micropropagation. Finally, the micropropagated plants are hardened to grow individual plants capable of photosynthesis. The hardening is done gradually allowing the plants to acclimate to ex vitro conditions. Typically the plants are taken from high to low humidity and from low to high light intensity (Ahloowalia et al. 2003 ; Espinosa-Leal et al. 2017 ).

Table 3

List of in vitro tissue culture steps

With information from Ahloowalia et al. ( 2003 ) and Espinosa-Leal et al. ( 2017 )

The following sections cover novel developments in plant tissue culture that allow a more efficient production of bioactive compounds.

Improvements in traditional culturing techniques

Micropropagation has been the technique of choice for the production of whole plants for medicinal, conservation, reforestation and commercial purposes (Afolayan and Adebola 2004 ; Debnarh et al. 2006 ; Sarasan et al. 2011 ). Tissue culture of plants capable of producing important biomolecules offers a number of advantages over traditional field culture, including independence from geographical, seasonal, and environmental variations; uninterrupted production in uniform quality and yield; no need for pesticide and herbicide application; and comparatively short growth cycles (Rao and Ravishankar 2002 ; Debnarh et al. 2006 ). Production of secondary metabolites by plant tissue culture depends on a number of factors, chief among them are the nutrients provided for plant growth. The optimum nutrient concentration is a critical determinant in the growth of the explants and the accumulation of secondary metabolites (Rao and Ravishankar, 2002 ; Nagella and Murthy 2010 ; Murthy et al. 2014 ; Fargoso Monfort et al. 2018 ). The type of culture media used, the salt strength of the medium employed and the growth regulators, type and concentration used, are key factors that most be established for every culture (Rao and Ravishankar, 2002 ; Fargoso Monfort et al. 2018 ). The concentration of salts present in the culture media needed by a specific plant varies depending on the particular culture needs. The selection of a suitable medium is essential to establish cell and organ cultures (Nagella and Murthy 2010 ; Fargoso Monfort et al. 2018 ). Three of the most popular culture media employed are MS, B5 and WPM, as listed in Table  4 . MS basal media contains the highest total salts and nitrogen content. Nitrogen is an essential element that promotes explant growth, since it directly affects amino acid and nucleic acid production in the cells. MS basal media (1962) is the most commonly used plant culture media. As presented in Table  4 , it has a very high salt content, nevertheless, it is the preferred medium for the growth of several species (Alvarenga et al. 2015 ; Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al. 2015 ; Rahman et al. 2015 ). It has been demonstrated that different MS salt concentrations influence growth in several species (Assis et al. 2012 ; Martins et al. 2015 ; Shekhawat et al. 2015 ; Singh et al. 2015 ). Generally, lower salt concentrations stimulate rooting (Sorace et al. 2008 ; Golle et al. 2012 ; Shekhawat et al. 2015 ). Fargoso Monfort et al. ( 2018 ) found that in Ocimum basilicum volatile constituents diminished with higher salt concentrations. Plant growth regulators can affect the production of secondary metabolites, a recent review by Jamwal et al. ( 2018 ) presents a summary of the production of natural products by using different plant growth regulators.

Table 4

List of commonly used culture media used for in vitro plant tissue culture

With information from Fargoso Monfort et al. ( 2018 )

Nevertheless, one of the principal disadvantages of in vitro tissue culture is the high cost involved with the technique, particularly the expenses associated with culture media (mainly the carbon source, gelling agent and growth regulators), electricity and labor. Some studies have attempted to remedy the cost of culture media using alternative materials, such as household sugar or other sugars, as carbon sources and various types of starches and plant gums instead of agar. Other alternatives have included the use of liquid media and cell-suspension cultures, temporal immersion systems, and reusable glass beads as substitute support matrices (Etienne and Berthouly 2002 ; Goel et al. 2007 ; Thorpe 2007 ; Sahu and Sahu 2013 ). The cost of electricity can amount up to 60% of tissue culture production costs. The electrical energy is mostly employed for autoclaving, lighting of the growth room and air filtration in laminar-flow cabinets and air conditioning (Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ; George and Manuel 2013 ). The use of artificial lighting in growth rooms is the most expensive and inefficient method on tissue culture technology. It generates heat that needs to be dissipated using air conditioning and it does not match natural light. Additionally, even though plants are capable of adapting to an ample range of conditions, once the adaptation occurs, re-adaptation to new conditions is slow and difficult (Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ; George and Manuel 2013 ). The use of natural light is a low-cost option for tissue culture, it reduces electricity and capital costs as well as improves plant quality. There are several ways to achieve this, a simple option is to diffuse natural light under plastic or glass, this works best in temperate climates; some laboratories can be modified to adapt the use of ‘solatube’ which redirects daylight from rooftops through reflecting tubing (Kodym and Zapata-Arias 1999 , 2001 ; Kodym et al. 2001 ; Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ) some laboratories can incorporate southwest facing windows in the growth rooms that allow for indirect diffused natural daylight, as is the case of bio-factories in Cuba (Baezas-Lopez 1995 ; Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ) and finally some cultures have been successfully propagated using plastic bags as culture containers and hanging them in greenhouses thus eliminating the need of air-conditioned growth rooms (Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ). Temperature regulation, another high electricity demanding feature of plant in vitro culture, can be mostly avoided since many plants can tolerate wide fluctuations in temperature (Kodym et al. 2001 ). Labor is another source of high in vitro tissue culture costs. Once the efficiency of labor in transferring number of propagules per hour has been achieved to the maximum possible, there is little room for improvement unless an automated or semi-automated system is implemented. For example, the use of bioreactors and mechanized handling of propagules, such systems have shown to reduce the cost of production by 50% (Ahloowalia and Savangikar 2003 ; George and Manuel 2013 ).

Another problem found in plant tissue culture involves the genetic stability of the plants. Different cases of micropropagation of in vitro-regenerated plants have shown that they are not always clonal copies of the mother plant (Devi et al. 2014 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2017a ). In vitro culture conditions, especially some growth regulators and elicitors, act as stress factors that induce alterations in sensitive regions of plant genome, and therefore, generate instability in cultured cells, tissues and organs, an occurrence known as somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981 ; Gyulai et al. 2003 ; Bairu et al. 2011 ; Stanišic et al. 2015 ; Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016 ). The genetic changes experienced by the culture include: alternative DNA methylation, amplification, activation of transposable elements, polyploidy, changes in chromosome number or DNA sequence (Bairu et al. 2011 ; Stanišic et al. 2015 ; Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016 ). Typically regeneration protocols involving a callus phase are considered the least reliable for clonal propagation, while plantlets regenerated by branching of the axillary buds or direct somatic embryos are considered to be, genetically, the most uniform (Rani and Raina 2000 ; Varshney et al. 2001 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2017b ). The occurrence of somaclonal variations during in vitro propagation, industrial production of phytochemicals, or genetically engineered plants can lead to massive economic consequences and represents a serious obstacle in the practical utilization of plant tissue culture techniques for the production of active metabolites (Rahman and Rajora 2001 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2016 ). Therefore, to screen somaclonal variability within a cell culture, it is necessary to monitor and assess the genetic constitution and stability of the in vitro-regenerated plants. The methodologies involved in that process include the use of several techniques to assess possible alterations at different levels (Devarumath et al. 2002 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2015 , 2017a ; Bose et al. 2016 ; Bhattacharyya and Van Staden 2016 ). Flow cytometry and chromosome counting are widely used to assess changes in ploidy and chromosome number; PCR-based DNA markers, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), random fragmented length polymorphism (RFLP), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), microsatellite markers, and start codon targeted (ScoT) polymorphism have been successfully used to evaluate genomic stability of regenerated plants (Hu et al. 2008 ; Collard and Mackill 2009 ; Bairu et al. 2011 ; Singh et al. 2013 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2014 , 2015 ; Rathore et al. 2014 ; Stanišic et al. 2015 ; Bose et al. 2016 ; Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016 ). An appropriate combination of two or more markers guarantees reliable and efficient testing of genetic fidelity in plants (Palombi and Damiano 2002 ; Bhattacharyya et al. 2016 ).

Cell suspension culture remains the best method for the production of active metabolites, especially natural products, with paclitaxel from Taxus spp. being the most prominent example (Atanasov et al. 2015 ) (Table  1 ). For the production of cell suspension cultures, the calli are first induced in solid media, the cells are then transferred to liquid media. In small laboratories, the cells are first grown in shaking flasks and later transferred to large-scale liquid-phase bioreactors. There are many different types of reactors including tank reactors, bubble beds and rotary rectors (Furusaki and Takeda 2017 ). Comprehensive reviews on industrial bioreactors have been published previously and can be consulted for more information on the subject (Su and Lee 2007 ; Huang and McDonald 2012 ).

A number of limitations are associated with these methods, when compared with microbial cultures, such as the slow growth rates and low and variable yields of metabolites, and these limitations still restrict the industrial use of plant cell suspension cultures (Kolewe et al. 2008 ; Kirakosyan et al. 2009 ). However, the production of important metabolites can be enhanced with modifications to the culture media, such as the addition of elicitors or precursors, or the environmental conditions.

Elicitors stimulate the production of plant natural products that serve as plant defense compounds. Several types of elicitors can increase the secondary metabolite production, including pectin and cellulose (plant cell wall constituents), chitin and glucan (from microorganisms) and salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate (plant immune signaling molecules) (Namdeo 2007 ; Shilpa et al. 2010 ; Sharma et al. 2011 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). Srivastava and Srivastava ( 2014 ) used different fungal culture filtrates as biotic elicitors in root cultures of Azadirachta indica to promote the production of Azadirachtin. Filtrates of Curvularia lunata yielded the highest production of the target compound compared to control. Saranya Krishnan and Siril ( 2018 ) used yeast extracts, pectin and xylan to elicit the production of anthraquinones in Oldenlandia umbellate cultures, with the addition of pectin resulting in the highest elicitation. The selection of the adequate elicitor will depend on the metabolite being produced and the plant culture employed.

Another strategy is to supplement with precursors that are intermediary compounds of the metabolic pathway of the desired natural product. Supplementing the culture media with precursors of secondary metabolites can enhance the yield of the final product (Rao and Ravishankar 2002 ; Hussain et al. 2012 ), and has been used successfully in several cases, including the production of phenolic compounds (Palacio et al. 2011 ), triterpenoids (Chen et al. 2016b ) and withanolides (Sivanandhan et al. 2014 ). Cultures of Antrodia cinnamomea were fed exogenous sterols including squalene, cholesterol, and stigmasterol to enhance their triterpenoid content, the feeding of high doses of stigmasterol resulted in an increased amount of terpens (Chen et al. 2016b ). When searching for appropriate precursors it is important to look at the entire biosynthetic pathway and include several molecules involved in different steps of the process, incorporating some examples that affect the production of the target compound in indirect ways. Srivastava and Srivastava ( 2014 ) studied the use of precursors to enhance production of azadirachtin including sodium acetate, cholesterol, squalene, isopentenyl pyrophosphate, and others. They found the best results using cholesterol as an indirect precursor. Parra et al. ( 2017 ), evaluated the effect of different biochemical precursors in fatty acids production in cacao cell cultures including biotin, pyruvate, acetate and bicarbonate, they also utilized glycerol because it is involved in triglycerides assembly. The later was found to induce a higher fat production compared to the other precursors and control. It is also important to remember that the precursor must be easier and cheaper to acquire the compound of interest.

An alternative way of increasing natural product production is by manipulation of environmental factors. Plants are heavily influenced by environmental factors to regulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, through stress response mechanisms (Zhi-lin et al. 2007 ; Verma and Shukla 2015 ). Abiotic stresses related to environmental factors include light intensity, water availability, temperature (high or low), radiation (UV), gaseous toxins (ozone), pesticides and metals (Ni, Cd, Co, Fe, Zn) (Ramakrishna and Ravishankar 2011 ; Raduisene et al. 2012 ). Water stress is produced when the plant has limited water availability, either because there is no water (drought) or because the water is dissolving a solute (salinity). Drought stress can be induced in vitro by the addition of high-molecular-weight solutes, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), to the culture media (Verslues et al. 2006 ). It has been proven to enhance the production of saponins in A. salmiana (Puente-Garza et al. 2017b ), phenolics in Poliomintha glabrescens (García-Pérez et al. 2012 ) and rosmarinic acid in Salvia miltiorrhiza (Liu et al. 2011 ). For the induction of salinity stress different concentrations of salts, such as NaCl and Na 2 CO 3 , can be added to the culture media. This type of stress has resulted in increased production of steviol glycoside content in Stevia rebaudiana (Gupta et al. 2016 ); Sorbito in Lycopersicon esculentum (Tari et al. 2010 ) and flavonoids in Hordeum vulgare (Ali and Abbas 2003 ). Light is an essential abiotic environmental component for plants, since it permits photosynthesis; however, high levels of UV radiation can be harmful (Verma and Shukla 2015 ). To protect itself form oxidative damage the plant produces several antioxidant metabolites such as polyphenols and tocopherols (Kaur and Kapoor 2001 ; Argolo et al. 2004 ). UV radiation can, therefore, be used to enhance the production of secondary metabolites, typically by exposing the cultures to UV light using a special lamp for a set period of time. The technique has been used in Vitis vinifera calli to produce flavonols (Cetin 2014 ). Different chemicals, including heavy metals, can cause chemical stress. Metal ions influence the production of secondary metabolites, and depending on the plant species and heavy metal type and concentration can even enhance their production (Ramakrishna and Ravishankar 2011 ; Verma and Shukla 2015 ; Maleki et al. 2017 ). As an example is the case of Thalictrum rugosum cell suspension culture that used CuSO 4 to stimulate the production of berberine (Kim et al. 1991 ).

These improvements, however, are not sufficient to sustain an adequate large-scale production of bioactive compounds, so other methods are still needed.

Alternatives to in vitro plant culture

The low yield of secondary metabolites in cell cultures can be explained as a consequence of a lack of cell differentiation. An alternative strategy to cell culture is the organized culture of roots or shoots (Verporte et al. 2002; Kolewe et al. 2008 ). Hairy root culture is a perfect example; it is induced by infection of roots with Agrobacterium rhizogenes and the subsequent transfer of the Ri plasmid, which induces abundant growth of neoplastic roots that can be maintained in vitro (Ron et al. 2014 ). Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al. ( 2018 ) obtained hairy root culture of Salvia viridis by wounding shoot explants with needles dipped in Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4 culture. Some of the advantages provided by hairy root cultures include high growth rates without the need for plant growth regulators, genetically and biochemically stable cultures, and a similar capacity for production of secondary metabolites than cell suspension cultures (Guillon et al. 2006 ; Georgiev et al. 2012 ; Mora-Pale et al. 2014 ). A wide range of natural products has been produced using this system, including lignans, steroids, anthraquinones and alkaloids (Doma et al. 2012 ; Huang et al. 2014 ; Pandey et al. 2014 ; Wawrosch et al. 2014 ). However, metabolite production requires that the compound of interest be one that is normally synthesized within the roots of the source plant, so this limits the versatility of the hairy root system (Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ).

Nevertheless, the greatest limiting factor in the industrial use of hairy rots for the production of secondary metabolites is their scale-up, since it requires the development of appropriate culture vessels that permit mixing without causing shear damage to the interconnected root mat. Binoy et al. ( 2016 ) designed a novel culture vessel by customizing a reaction kettle (2 L) for the culture of Plumbago rosea and production of plumbagin an anticancer molecule. Srivastava and Srivastava ( 2007 ) described the different configurations and parameters of bioreactors for hairy roots culture, which include liquid phase, gas phase and hybrid systems. ROOT Bioactives AG, a Swiss company, has successfully developed and optimized a bioreactor system for large-scale cultivation of hairy roots capable of producing many kinds of bioactive compounds, including secondary metabolites and recombinant glycosylated proteins with pharmaceutical properties (Atanasov et al. 2015 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). However, many factors influence the scale-up process, such as culture medium properties, hormonal balance, gaseous composition, growth kinetics, inoculum density, culture period, and the species (Ho et al. 2017 ). In the scale-up process, Ho et al. ( 2017 ) recently obtained a 4.01-kg dry root biomass with a yield of 287.12 mg/L of total phenolic productivity for Polygonum multiflorum in a 500 L pilot-scale reactor. Hybrid systems, which include a liquid- and a gas phase, are reactors that attend the disadvantage of the null distribution uniformity of cells in gas-phase reactors, and the limitations of the mass transfer in liquid-phase reactors; these systems offer the best compromise between the two systems, used in alternate way (Srivastava and Srivastava 2007 ). Biomass measurement is one of the major challenges during scale-up of hairy roots culture, however, it is also important to determine the harvest capacity of secondary metabolites and their bioactivity, some examples are phenolic compounds (Ho et al. 2017 ; Thiruvengadam et al. 2014 ), xanthones (Vinterhalter et al. 2015 ), glucosinolates (Chung et al. 2016 ), tetraterpenoids (Thakore and Srivastava 2017 ), among others.

Transformed hairy roots have shown a higher biological activity, compared with non-transformed roots (Chung et al. 2016 ; Jeong et al. 2005 ; Vinterhalter et al. 2015 ). However, it is important to determine the optimal number of subcultures to avoid somaclonal variations that can affect the yield and behavior of plant cell cultures (Martínez-Estrada et al. 2017 ). Additionally, hairy root culture is susceptible to the use of biotic and abiotic elicitors to enhance the production of the desired metabolites, like the examples presented above from Srivastava and Strivastava (Srivastava and Srivastava 2014 ). Furthermore, a combined approach using both types of elicitors can be employed. For instance Wang et al. ( 2016 ) used ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation and methyl jasmonate applied alone or in combination in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures and found that the combined treatment exhibited synergistic effects on the expression levels of genes in the tanshinone biosynthetic pathway.

Another way to avoid some of the major difficulties encountered when using cell cultures, such as variability in product biosynthesis, large cell aggregates and shear stress (Yun et al. 2012 ), is to use cultures of undifferentiated cambial meristematic cells. These cultures are not only free of the problems stated above, but the cells are physiologically stable and show high growth rates (Lee et al. 2010 ; Jang et al. 2012 ). Cambial meristematic cells are undifferentiated cells that grow indefinitely, behaving like plant stem cells (Lee et al. 2010 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). They eliminate the need for dedifferentiating plant cells for the establishment of plant cell cultures, and they offer greater stability in product accumulation over long periods (Lee et al. 2010 ). This type of culture has been established for the production of nutritional, cosmetic and medicinal products and is currently considered a key platform for the large-scale production of natural products (Roberts and Kolewe 2010 ; Yun et al. 2012 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ).

Plant cell cultures rarely present uniform physiological characteristics, most especially callus cultures. Their heterogeneous nature results in the need to select highly productive cell lines to establish profitable production platforms for natural products (Mulabagal and Tsay 2004 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). A novel cell line can be obtained by employing cell-cloning methods. First, since accumulation of active metabolites is genotype specific, an appropriate selection of suitable species and later organs for callus production is needed (Murthy et al. 2014 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). The selection process depends on the type of compound intended to produce, if the product of interest is a pigment a spectrophotometric method can be employed, however, if it is not other chemical-based approaches are needed (Fujita et al. 1984 ; Mulabagal and Tsay 2004 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). A popular method involves the identification of cell lines that exhibit a high level of metabolic flux through the targeted pathway by the exogenous application of an intermediate (Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). For example, high producing shoots of Mentha arvensis were screened by adding menthol to the culture media. The surviving clones exhibited high menthol tolerance, thus presenting genotypes capable of elevated menthol production (Dhawan et al. 2003 ). Nevertheless, the prolonged use of selected natural product producing cell lines is limited, since they often loose their ability to produce the desired metabolites (Georgiev et al. 2009 ; Wilson and Roberts 2012 ; Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ). The cell lines decrease or loss of active compound biosynthesis is due, in most cases, to genetic instability resulting from somaclonal variations (Ochoa-Villarreal et al. 2016 ).

Despite the problems presented above, there are some commercially available plant cell lines currently in the market. The most popular is Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 cells (BY-2), they are attractive because of their fast growth rate and their ease of Agrobacterium -mediated transformation and cell cycle synchronization (Su and Lee 2007 ). Additionally, the Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures have an ample catalog of plant cell lines. They offer 41-plant cell lines, 18 of which are delivered as actively growing cultures and 23 are maintained as cryopreserved cultures. Among the plants offered are some model plants like Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana and some medicinal plants like Echinacea angustifolia, Arnica montana and Valeriana officinalis (Leibniz Gemeinschaft 2018 ). Acquisition of the cell lines would facilitate the establishment of the culture and allow for a more streamline process of plant transformation and metabolite production.

Strategies for the expression of plant biologically active compounds

Low expression levels of plant active metabolites and expression of new important compounds not typically expressed in plants, such as vaccines, create a need for tools that allow the modification of plant genetic material. Plant genetic engineering has been practiced since the 1980s, first with Agrobacterium and later with transformation mediated by particle bombardment. Both techniques have been effective for an array of plants, allowing over-expression of secondary metabolites or the production of plant-made pharmaceuticals. Nevertheless, despite this success, these methods present several challenges that limit their use in many crops (Altpeter et al. 2016 ).

Agrobacterium -mediated transformation can be performed in most dicotyledonous (dicot) plants (however, it is mostly limited to some genotypes within a species) and in a small number of monocotyledonous (monocot) plants (Klee et al. 1987 ; Nam et al. 1997 ). Problems arising from the use of A. tumefaciens for plant transformation include difficulties obtaining licensing (Chi-Ham et al. 2012 ), high costs of securing regulatory approval, and plant innate responses to bacterial infection, such as the activation of some proteins that cause tissue browning and necrosis that, in turn, reduce transformation frequencies (Altpeter et al. 2016 ). Some of these difficulties can be easily avoided with small modifications to the technique, like downregulating infection-responsive genes in the host plants or adding antioxidants to the infection medium (Altpeter et al. 2016 ).

To eliminate the rest of the problems, researchers continue to seek out a novel gene delivery system based on a non-pathogenic organism that will provide high rates of transformation for both dicot and monocot species. Advances have been made with several species of Rhizobium ( Sinorhizobium meliloti, Mesorhizobium loti and NGR 234) known as Transbacter (Zuniga-Soto et al. 2015 ). Another gram-negative bacterial member of the Rhizobiaceae family, Ensifer adhaerens strain OV14, unlike A. tumefaciens, also seems to be beneficial to plants and has been used successfully for the transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum tuberosum and Oryza sativa L. (Martin 2002 ; Wendt et al. 2012 ; Zhou et al. 2013 ).

Bioballistics can be used on a wider range of plant genotypes than are amenable to Agrobacterium transformation. This technique lacks the pathogenic characteristic of the bacteria and simplifies the cloning process since it does not require a specific vector (Chen et al. 2014b ; Altpeter et al. 2016 ). However, plant tissues subjected to this technique often show difficulties in regeneration after bombardment and in the transgene performance. The effectiveness seems to depend on particle characteristics, such as type, size, quantity and acceleration; on the DNA amount and structure; and on the tissue type and pretreatment (Zuniga-Soto et al. 2015 ). Advancements in these techniques could potentially enhance the regeneration and transformation responses of a wide range of plants of economic interest (Zuniga-Soto et al. 2015 ).

Genome editing mediated by CRISPR/Cas9, a new development in plant genome transformation, may be a promising solution to most of the problems of the currently available techniques. This new technology allows modification of specific areas of the genome with an increased precision of the insertion, while preventing cell toxicity and offering perfect reproducibility (Voytas 2013 ; Voytas and Gao 2014 ). Genome editing is currently applied in one of three forms: (1) Alteration of a small number of nucleotides, (2) replacement of an allele with a pre-existing one, and (3) insertion of new genes in predetermined regions of the genome (Abdallah et al. 2015 ). Since genome editing techniques create only small traces of DNA alterations, most regulatory procedures associated with transgenic plants are avoided and the technique can be employed for the rapid creation of new crops with pest resistance, enhanced nutritional value and drought tolerance (Voytas 2013 ; Abdallah et al. 2015 ; Li et al. 2015 ). Some successful examples include transformations of solanaceous crop plants like potato and tomato (Van Eck 2018 ), soybean (Li et al. 2015 ) and some cereals, such as barley, maize, rice, wheat and sorghum (Zhu et al. 2017 ).

Perspectives for plant production of bioactive molecules

In vitro tissue culture is a vital tool that can be employed for the rapid production of important metabolites. Once a commercially important compound has been identified and isolated, measures can be taken for its scale-up production, as shown in Fig.  1 . Currently, several systems, such as suspension cultures and hairy roots, allow for the large-scale manufacture of plant compounds (Fig.  1 ) (Xu et al. 2012 ). Nevertheless, as mentioned earlier, the high costs associated with this technology makes it uncompetitive when compared to less expensive but environmentally unsustainable processes such as collection of wild plants or when compared to chemical synthesis. These culture methods also still require the use of sterilizable bioreactors, so their scale-up is limited (Nogueira et al. 2018 ; Buyel et al. 2017 ).

The advent of novel molecular tools now presents new possibilities for the production of important metabolites using plant systems. Chief among these is the use of targeted genome engineering, particularly the previously mentioned genome editing mediated by CRISPR/Cas9. The use of this technological approach creates the possibility of producing new plant varieties without the introduction of foreign genes (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 ; Baltes and Voytas 2015 ; Nogueira et al. 2018 ). Gene editing could potentially be used for the introduction of new alleles, promoter replacement or the introduction of new pathways, all of which could result in the creation of plant-based systems capable of novel expression of useful bioactive molecules (Nogueira et al. 2018 ).

Once the plant has been engineered (either by gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 or by traditional methods), and has passed through in vitro culture, the genetic material can be stored using master and working seed banks (Sack et al. 2015 ). The plants can then be used for the large-scale production of the desired metabolites, including plant-made pharmaceuticals. Three options are available for the cultivation of the engineered plants: under open-field conditions, if legal, in conventional greenhouses or in vertical farming units, as modeled in Fig.  1 , with the latter two offering ease of scale-up and appropriate containment of the plants (Buyel et al. 2017 ).

Some plants, like medicinal plants, benefit from in vitro conditions (faster growth rates) and should, therefore, be sustained in those settings (Rao and Ravishankar 2002 ). With this in mind, several actions can increase the production of secondary metabolites by plant cells (Fig.  1 ); some of these, like the use of precursors and elicitors, have already been mentioned. The manipulation of environmental factors, including high/low temperature, drought, UV, alkalinity, salinity, exposure to heavy metals, and others, is now emphasized. These conditions, which are potentially damaging to the plants, often increase the capacity for production or even induce de novo synthesis of secondary metabolites in plant in vitro cultures (Korkina et al. 2017 ; Lajayer et al. 2017 ; Moon et al. 2017 ; Puente-Garza et al. 2017b ).

Conclusions

The use of in vitro tissue culture remains a feasible strategy for the production of structurally complex and high-value natural products, especially if the plant source material is an overexploited, slow-growing or low-yielding plant. However, due to the higher costs, a cost–benefit analysis of in vitro culture is wise before implementation of the technique. Similarly, the production of pharmaceuticals using plant culture systems can offer significant advantages, including reduction in costs, rapid production, low burden of human pathogens and scalability; all these advantages are plant product specific and depend on the production efficiencies compared to those offered by alternative sources. In the next decade, tissue culture should reach its full potential with the use of novel technologies such as gene editing and environmental factor manipulation.

Author contribution statement

All authors contributed equally to this work in terms of writing and conception. All authors wrote and reviewed the latest version of this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The Research Nutriomics Chair Funds and CAT-005 from Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, as well as Postdoctoral fellowships presented to Dr. Claudia Espinosa-Leal by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Mexico and Tecnologico de Monterrey supported this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

• Abdallah NA, Prakash CS, McHughen AG. Genome editing for crop improvement: challenges and opportunities. GM Crops Food. 2015; 6 :183–205. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Afolayan AJ, Adebola PO. In vitro propagation: a biotechnological tool capable of solving the problem of medicinal plants decimation in South Africa. Afr J Biotechnol. 2004; 3 :683–687. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ahloowalia BS, Savangikar VA (2003) Low cost options for energy and labour. Low cost options for tissue culture technology in developing countries. In: Proceedings of a technical meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Vienna, 26–30 August 2002 (pp. 41–46). Viennam Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. ISBN 92–0–115903–X
• Ahloowalia BS, Prakash J, Savangikar VA, Savangikar C (2003) Plant tissue culture. Low cost options for tissue culture technology in developing countries. In: Proceedings of a technical meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Vienna, 26–30 August 2002 (pp. 3–10). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. ISBN 92–0–115903–X
• Ali RM, Abbas HM. Response of salt stressed barley seedlings to phenylurea. Plant Soil Environ. 2003; 49 :158–162. doi: 10.17221/4107-PSE. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Altpeter F, Springer NM, Bartley LE, Blechl AE, Brutnell TP, Citovsky V, Conrad L, Gelvin SB, Jackson D, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG, Medford JI, Orozco-Cardenas M, Tricoli D, VanEck J, Voytas DF, Walbot V, Wang K, Zhang ZJ, Stewart CN. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell. 2016; 28 :1510–1520. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00196. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Alvarenga IA, Pacheco FV, Silva ST, Bertolucci SV, Pinto JB. In vitro culture of Achillea millefolium L.: quality and intensity of light on growth and production of volatiles. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015; 122 :299–308. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0766-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Argolo AC, Sant’Ana AE, Pletsch M, Coelho LC. Antioxidant activity of leaf extracts from Bauhinia monandra . Bioresour Technol. 2004; 95 :229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.12.014. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Assis KC, Pereira FD, Cabral JS, Silva FG, Silva JW, Santos SC. In vitro cultivation of Anacardium othonianum Rizz.: effects of salt concentration and culture medium volume. Acta Sci Agron. 2012; 34 :77–83. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i1.10984. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Atanasov AG, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig AM, Linder T, Wawrosch C, Uhrin P, Temml V, Wang L, Schwaiger S, Heiss EH, Rollinger JM, Schuster D, Breuss JM, Bochkov V, Mihovilovic MD, Kopp B, Bauer R, Dirsch VM, Stuppner H. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015; 33 :1582–1614. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baezas-Lopez P. Cubans enlist the sun in virus-free propagation. Ceres. 1995; 156 :15–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Van Staden J. Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 2011; 63 :147–173. doi: 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baltes NJ, Voytas DF. Enabling plants synthetic biology through genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2015; 33 :120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.11.008. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharyya P, Van Staden J. Ansellia africana (Leopard orchid): a medicinal or- chid species with untapped reserves of important biomolecules—a mini review. S Afr J Bot. 2016; 106 :181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.06.010. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharyya P, Kumaria S, Job N, Tandon P. Phyto-molecular profiling and assessment of antioxidant activity within micropropagated plants of Dendrobium thyrsiflorum : a threatened, medicinal orchid. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015; 122 :535–550. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0818-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharyya P, Kumaria S, Job N, Tandon P. En-masse production of elite clones of Dendrobium crepidatum : a threatened, medicinal orchid used in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2016; 3 :168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.04.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharyya P, Kumar V, Van Staden J. Assessment of genetic stability amongst micropropagated Ansellia africana , a vulnerable medicinal orchid species of Africa using SCoT markers. S Afr J Bot. 2017; 108 :294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.007. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattacharyya P, Kumaria S, Bose B, Paul P, Tandon P. Evaluation of genetic stability and analysis of phytomedicinal potential in micropropagated plants of Rumex nepalensis —a medicinally important source of pharmaceutical biomolecules. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2017; 6 :80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.02.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bhattecheryya P, Kumaria S, Diengdoh R, Tandon P. Genetic stability and phytochemical analysis of the in vitro regenerated plants of Dendrobium nobile Lindl., an endangered medicinal orchid. Meta Gene. 2014; 2 :489–504. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.06.003. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Binoy J, Silja PK, Dhanya B, Pillai B, Satheeshkumar K. In vitro cultivation of hairy roots of Plumbago rosea L. in a customized reaction kettle for the production of plumbagin—an anticancer compound. Ind Crops Prod. 2016; 87 :89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.023. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Borchardt JK. The beginnings of drug therapy: ancient Mesopotamian medicine. Drug News Prespect. 2002; 15 :187–192. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2002.15.3.840015. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bose B, Kumaria S, Choudhury H, Tandon P. Assessment of genetic homogeneity and analysis of phytomedicinal potential in micropropagated plants of Nardostachys jatamansi a critically endangered, medicinal plant of alpine Himalayas. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016; 2 :331–349. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0897-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Buyel JF, Twyman RM, Fischer R. Very-large-scale production of antibodies in plants: the biologization of manufacturing. Biotechnol Adv. 2017; 35 :458–465. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.03.011. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Castilho A, Gattinger P, Grass J, Jez J, Pabst M, Altmann F, et al. N-Glycosylation engineering of plants for the biosynthesis of glycoproteins with bisected and branched complex N-glycans. Glycobiology. 2011; 21 :813–823. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr009. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cetin ES. Induction of secondary metabolite production by UV-C radiation in Vitis vinifera L. Öküzgözü callus cultures. Biol Res. 2014; 47 :37. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-37. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen C-C, Chang C-L, Agrawal DC, Wu C-R, Tsay H-S. In vitro propagation and analysis of secondary metabolites in Glossogyne tenuifolia (Hsiang-Ju)—a medicinal plant native to Taiwan. Bot Stud. 2014; 55 :45. doi: 10.1186/s40529-014-0045-7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen Q, Lai H, Hurtado J, Stahnke J, Leuzinger K, Dent M. Agroinfiltration as an effective and scalable strategy of gene delivery for production of pharmaceutical proteins. Adv Tech Biol Med. 2014; 1 :1–21. doi: 10.4172/atbm.1000103. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen S-L, Yu H, Luo H-M, Wu Q, Li C-F, Steinmetz A. Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress and prospects. Chin Med. 2016; 11 :1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen Y-T, Shen Y-C, Chang M-C, Lu M-K. Precursor-feeding strategy on the triterpenoid production and anti-inflammatory activity of Antrodia cinnamomea . Process Biochem. 2016; 51 :941–949. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.05.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chi-Ham CL, Boettiger S, Figueroa-Balderas R, Bird S, Geoola JN, Zamora P, Alandete-Saez M, Bennett AB. An intellectual property charing initiative in agricultural biotechnology: development of broadly accessible technologies for plant transformation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012; 10 :501–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00674.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chung IM, Rekha K, Rajakumar G, Thiruvengadam M. Production of glucosinolates, phenolic compounds and associated gene expression profiles of hairy root cultures in turnip ( Brassica rapa ssp. rapa ) 3 Biotech. 2016; 6 :175. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0492-9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Collard BC, Mackill DJ. Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2009; 27 :86–93. doi: 10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Corson TW, Crews CM. Molecular understanding and modern application of traditional medicines: triumphs and trials. Cell. 2007; 130 :769–774. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.021. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013; 1830 :3670–3695. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Czyz M, Dembczynski R, Marecik R, Wojas-Turek J, Milczarek M, Pajtasz-Piasecka E, Wietrzyk J, Pniewski T. Freeze-drying of plant tissue containing HBV surface antigen for the oral vaccine againts hepatitis B. Biomed Res Int. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/485689. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Czyz M, Dembczynski R, Marecik R, Pniewski T. Stability of S-HBsAg in long-term stored lyophilised plant tissue. Biologicals. 2016; 44 :69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2015.12.001. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Debnarh M, Malik CP, Baisen PS. Micropropagation:a tool for the production of high quality plant based medicines. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2006; 7 :33–49. doi: 10.2174/138920106775789638. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Devarumath R, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina S. RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of micropropagated plants of three diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam-India type) Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 21 :166–173. doi: 10.1007/s00299-002-0496-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Devi SP, Kumaria S, Rao SR, Tandon P. Single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods reveal subsequent increase in genetic variations in micropropagated plants of Nepenthes khasiana Hook. f . maintained for three consecutive regenerations. Gene. 2014; 538 :23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.028. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dhawan S, Shasany AK, Naqvi AA, Kumar S, Suman PS. Menthol tolerant clones of Mentha arvensis : approach for in vitro selection of menthol rich genotypes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003; 75 :87–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1024684605967. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Doma M, Abhayankar G, Reddy VD, Kavi Kishor PB. Carbohydrate and elicitor enhanced withanolide (withatefin A and withanolide A) accumulation in hairy root cultures of Withania smnifera (L.) Indian J Exp Biol. 2012; 50 :484–490. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Scinece 1077. 10.1126/science.1258096 [ PubMed ]
• Espinosa-Leal C, Treviño-Neávez JF, Garza-Padrón RA, Verde-Star MJ, Rivas-Morales C, Morales-Rubio ME. Total phenols and anti-radical activity of methanolic extracts from wild and in vitro conditions of Leucophyllum frutescens . Rev Mex Cienc Farm. 2015; 46 :52–56. [ Google Scholar ]
• Espinosa-Leal CA, Garza-Padrón RA, Morales-Rubio ME. Cultivo in vitro como alternativa para la producción de metabolitos. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española; 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Etienne H, Berthouly M. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002; 69 :215–231. doi: 10.1023/A:1015668610465. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fabricant DS, Farnsworth NR. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 109 (supplement):69–75. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fargoso Monfort LE, Vilela Bertolucci SK, Fabri Lima A, Alves de Carvalho A, Mohammed A, Fitzgerard Blank A, Pereira Pinto JEB. Effects of plant growth regulators, different culture media and strength MS on production of volatile fraction composition in shoot cultures of Ocimum basilicum . Ind Crops Prod. 2018; 116 :231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.075. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fischer R, Vasilev N, Twyman RM, Schillberg S. High-value products from plants: the challenges of process optimization. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015; 32 :156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.018. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fujita Y, Takahashi S, Yamada Y. Selection of cell lines with high productivity of shikonin derivatives through protoplasts of Lithospermum erithrorhizon. Proc Eur Congr Biotechnol. 1984; 1 :161–166. doi: 10.1271/bbb1961.49.1755. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Furusaki S, Takeda T. Bioreactors for plant cell culture, reference module in life sciences. Dordrecht: Elsevier; 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• García-Pérez E, Gutiérrez-Uribe AJ, García-Lara S. Luteolin content and antioxidant activity in micropropagated plants of Poliomintha glabrescens (Gray) Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2012; 108 :521–527. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0055-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• George P, Manuel J. Low cost tissue culture technology for the regeneration of some economically important plants for developing countries. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2013; 6 :703–711. [ Google Scholar ]
• Georgiev V, Ilieva M, Bley T, Pavlov A. Betalain production in plant in vitro systems. Acta Physiol Plant. 2008; 30 :581–593. doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0170-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Georgiev M, Weber J, Maciuk A. Bioprocessing of plant cell cultures for mass production of targeted compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 83 :809–823. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2049-x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Georgiev MI, Agostini E, Ludwig-Muller J, Xu J. Genetically transformed roots: from plant disease to biotechnological resource. Trends Biotechnol. 2012; 30 :528–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.001. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Giri A, Narasu ML. Production of podophyllotoxin from Podophyllum hexandrum : a potential natural product for clinically useful anticancer drugs. Cytotechnology. 2000; 3 :17–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1008138230896. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gleba YY, Tusé D, Giritch A. Plant viral vectors for delivery by agrobacterium. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014; 375 :155–192. doi: 10.1007/82_2013_352. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Goel MK, Kukreja AK, Khanuja SP. Cost-effective approaches fon in vitro mass propagation of Rauwolfia serpentina Benth. Ex Kurz. Asian J Plant Sci. 2007; 6 :957–961. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2007.957.961. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Golle DP, Reiniger LR, Curti AR, León EA. Estabelecimento e desenvolvimento in vitro de Eugenia involucrata DC.: influência do tipo de explante e do meio nutritivo. Ciência Florestal. 2012; 22 :207–214. doi: 10.5902/198050985092. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Govindaraju S, Arulselvi PI. Effect of cytokinin combined elicitors ( l -phenylalanine, salicylic acid and chitosan) on in vitro propagation, secondary metabolites and molecular characterization of medicinal herb— Coleus aromaticus Benth (L) J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.11.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grzegorczyk-Karolak I, Kuźma Ł, Wysokińska H. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant potential in shoot cultures of Scutellaria alpina . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015; 122 :699–708. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0804-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grzegorczyk-Karolak I, Kuźma Ł, Skała E, Kiss A. Hairy root cultures of Salvia viridis L. for production of polyphenolic compounds. Ind Crops Prod. 2018; 117 :235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guillon S, Tremouillaux-Guiller J, Pati PK, Rideau M, Ganetet P. Harnessing the potential of hairy roots: dawn of a new era. Trends Biotechnol. 2006; 24 :403–409. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.07.002. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gupta P, Sharma S, Saxena S. Effect of abiotic stress on growth parameters and steviol glycoside content in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) raised in vitro. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2016; 3 :160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.03.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gyulai G, Mester Z, Kiss J, Szemán L, Heszky L, Idnurm A. Somaclone breeding of reed canarygrass ( Phalaris arundinacea L ) Grass Forage Sci. 2003; 58 :210–215. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2003.00372.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Haberlandt G. Culturversuche mit isolierten PFlanzellen. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss Wien Math Nat. 1902; 111 :69–91. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hayden CA, Streatfield SJ, Lamphear BJ, Fake GM, Keener TK, Walker JH, Clements JD, Turner DD, Tizard IR, Howard JA. Bioencapsulation of the hepatitis B surface antigen and its use as an effective oral immunogen. Vaccine. 2012; 30 :2937–2942. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.072. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hayden CA, Smith EM, Turner DD, Keener TK, Wong JC, Walker JH, Tizard IR, Jimenez-Flores R, Howard JA. Supercritical fluid extraction provides an enhancement to the immune response for orally-delivered hepatitis B surface antigen. Vaccine. 2014; 32 :1240–1246. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.037. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hayta S, Bayraktar M, Baykan erel S, Gurel A. Direct plant regeneration from different explants through micropropagation and determination of secondary metabolites in the critically endangered endemic Rhaponticoides mykalea . Plant Biosyst Int J Deal Asp Plant Biol. 2017; 151 :20–28. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2015.1057267. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ho TT, Lee KJ, Lee JD, Bhushan S, Paek KY, Park SY. Adventitious root culture of Polygonum multiflorum for phenolic compounds and its pilot-scale production in 500 L-tank. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017; 130 :167–181. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1212-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hu J, Gao X, Liu J, Xie C, Li J. Plant regeneration from petiole callus of Amorphophallus albus and analysis of somaclonal variation of regenerated plants by RAPD and ISSR markers. Bot Stud. 2008; 49 :189–197. [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang TK, McDonald KA. Bioreactor systems for in vitro production of foreign proteins using plant cell cultures. Biotechnol Adv. 2012; 30 :398–409. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.016. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang B, Lin H, Yan C, Qiu H, Qiu L, Yu R. Optimal inductive and cultural conditions of Polygonum multiflorum transgenic hairy roots mediated with Agrobacterium rhizogenes R1601 and an analysis of their anthraquinone constituents. Pharmacogn Mag. 2014; 10 :77–82. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.126671. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hussain S, Fareed S, Ansari S, Rahman A, Ahmad IZ, Saeed M. Current approaches toward production of secondary plant metabolites. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012; 4 :10–20. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.92725. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jamwal K, Bhattacharya S, Puri S. Plant growth regulator mediated consequences of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.12.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jang S-H, Yu J-Y, Lee EK, Lim MJ, Hong NJ, Oh IS, T-h Kang, E-m So, Jin YW, Jin Y-S, Jeong Y-S, Jeong H-S, Lee J-C, Jang Y-S. In vitro anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of cambial meristematic cells established from Ginko biloba L. J Med Plant Res. 2012; 6 :3048–3058. doi: 10.5897/JMPR11.1784. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jeong QT, Park DH, Ryu HW, Hwang B, Woo JC, Kim D, Kim SW. Production of antioxidant compounds by culture of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer hairy roots. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005; 121 (1):1147–1157. doi: 10.1385/ABAB:124:1-3:1147. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Juan-jie Z, Yue-sheng Y, Meng-fei L, Shu-qi L, Yi T, Han-bin C, Xiao-yang C. An efficient micropropagation protocol for direct organogenesis from leaf explants of an economically valuable plant, drumstick ( Moringa oleifera Lam.) Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 103 :59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.028. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Karalija E, Ćavar Zeljković S, Tarkowski P, Muratović E, Parić A. The effect of cytokinins on growth, phenolics, antioxidant and antimicrobial potential in liquid agitated shoot cultures of Knautia sarajevensis . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017; 131 :347–357. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1288-2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Karuppusamy S. A review on trends in production of secondary metabolites from higher plants by in vitro tissue, organ and cell cultures. J Med Plants Res. 2009; 3 :1222–1239. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kaul S, Das S, Srivastava PS. Micropropagation of Ajuga bracteosa , a medicinal herb. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013; 19 :289–296. doi: 10.1007/s12298-012-0161-3. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kaur C, Kapoor HC. Antioxidants in fruits and vegetables—the millennium’s health. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2001; 36 :703–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.00513.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim DI, Pedersen H, Chin CK. Stimulation of berberine production in Thalictrum rugosum suspension cultures in response to addition of cupric sulfate. Biotechnol Lett. 1991; 13 :213–216. doi: 10.1007/BF01025820. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kirakosyan A, Cseke LJ, Kaufman PB. The use of plant cell biotechnology for the production of phytochemicals. In: Kirakosyan A, Kaufman PB, editors. Recent advances in plant biotechnology. 1. New York: Springer; 2009. pp. 15–33. [ Google Scholar ]
• Klee H, Horsch R, Rogers S. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and its further applications to plant biology. Annu rev Plant Physiol. 1987; 38 :467–486. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.1.16-37.2003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kobayashi Y, Fukui H, Tabata M. An immobilized cell culture system for berberine production by Thalictrum minus cells. Plant Cell Rep. 1987; 6 :185–186. doi: 10.1007/BF00268474. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kodym A, Zapata-Arias FJ. Natural light as an alternative light source for the in vitro culture of banana ( Musa acuminata cv. ‘Grande Naine’) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999; 55 :141–145. doi: 10.1023/A:1006119114107. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kodym A, Zapata-Arias FJ. Low-cost alternatives for the micropropagation of banana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2001; 66 :67–71. doi: 10.1023/A:1010661521438. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kodym A, Hollenthoner S, Zapata-Arias FJ. Cost reduction in the micropropagation of banana by using tubular skylights as source for natural lighting. In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2001; 37 :237–242. doi: 10.1007/s11627-001-0042-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kolewe ME, Gaurav V, Roberts SC. Pharmaceutically active natural product synthesis and supply via plnat cell culture technology. Mol Pharm. 2008; 5 :243–256. doi: 10.1021/mp7001494. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Korkina LG, Mayer W, de Luca C. Meristem plant cells as a sustainable source of redox actives for skin rejuvenation. Biomolecules. 2017; 7 :1–22. doi: 10.3390/biom7020040. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kun-Hua W, Lin-Xuan L, Young-Cai W, Mei-Ying W, Cui L, Jian-Hua M. Tissue culture of Sophora tonkinenss Gapnep. and its quality evaluation. Pharmacogn Mag. 2013; 9 :323–330. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.117828. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lajayer BA, Ghorbanpour M, Nikabadi S. Heavy metals in contaminated enviroment: destiny of secondary metabolite biosynthesis, oxidative status and phytoextraction in medicinal plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017; 145 :377–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.035. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lakshmi PS, Verma D, Yang X, Lloyd B, Daniell H. Low cost tuberculosis vaccine antigens in capsules: expression in chloroplasts, bio-encapsulation, stability amd functional evaluation in vitro. PLoS One. 2013; 8 :e54708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054708. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR. Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 1981; 60 :197–214. doi: 10.1007/BF02342540. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee EK, Jin YW, Park JH, Yoo YM, Hong SM, Amir R, Yan Z, Kwon E, Elfick A, Thomilinson S, Halbritter F, Waibel T, Yun BW, Loake GJ. Culture cambial meristematic cells as a source of plant natural products. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28 :1213–1217. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1693. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leibniz Gemeinschaft (2018) Catalogue of plant cell lines. Retrieved April 2, 2018, from Leibniz-Institut DSMZ—Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH: https://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-plant-cell-lines.html
• Li Z, Liu Z-B, Xing A, Moon BP, Koellhoffer JP, Huang L, Ward RT, Clifton E, Falco SC, Cigan AM. Cas9-Guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2015; 169 :960–970. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00783. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu H, Wang X, Wang D, Zou Z, Liang Z. Effect of drought stress on growth and accumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Ind Crops Prod. 2011; 33 :146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lubbe A, Verpoorte R. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants for specialty industrial materials. Ind Crop Prod. 2011; 34 :785–801. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.019. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Maleki M, Ghorbanpour M, Kariman K. Physiological and antioxidative responses of medicinal plants exposed to heavy metals stress. Plant Gene. 2017; 11 :247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2017.04.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin M. Predatory prokaryotes: an emerging research opportunity. J Mol Miobiol Biotechnol. 2002; 4 :467–477. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martínez-Estrada E, Caamal-Velázquez JH, Salina Ruíz J, Bello-Bello JJ. Assessment of somaclonal variation during sugarcane micropropagation in temporary inmersion bioreactors by intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. In vitro cell Dev Biol Plant. 2017; 53 :553–560. doi: 10.1007/s11627-017-9852-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martins JP, Pasqual M, Martins AD, Ribeira SF. Effects of salts and sucrose concentrations on in vitro propagation of Billbergia zebrina (Herbert) Lindley (Bromeliaceae) Aust J Crop Sci. 2015; 9 :85. [ Google Scholar ]
• Methora S, Goel MK, Kukreja AK, Mishra BN. Efficiency of liquid culture systems over conventional micropropagation: a progress towards commercialization. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007; 6 :1484–1492. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moon SH, Mistry B, Kim HD, Pandurangan M. Antioxidant and anticancer potential of bioactive compounds following UV-C light-induced plant cambium meristematic cell cultures. Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 109 :762–772. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.024. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Morales-Rubio ME, Espinosa-Leal C, Garza-Padrón RA. Cultivo de tejidos vegetales y su aplicación en productos naturales. In: Rivas-Morales C, Oranday-Cardenas MA, Verde-Star MJ, editors. Investigación en plantas de importancia médica. 1. Barcelona: OmniaScience; 2016. pp. 351–410. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mora-Pale M, Sanchez-Rodriguez SP, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS, Koffas MA. Biochemical strategies for enhancing the in vitro production of natural poducts with pharmaceutical potential. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014; 25 :86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.009. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mulabagal V, Tsay H-S. Plant cell cultures—an alternative and efficient source for the production of biologically important secondary metabolites. Int J Appl Sci Eng. 2004; 2 :29–48. [ Google Scholar ]
• Muranaka T, Ohkawa H, Yamada Y. Continuous production of scopolamine by a culture of Duboisia leichhardtii hairy root clone in a bioreactor system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993; 40 :219–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00170370. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Murthy HN, Lee EJ, Paek KY. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: strategies and approaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014; 118 :1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0467-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nagella P, Murthy HN. Establishment of cell suspension cultures of Withania somnifera for the production of withanolide A. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101 :6735–6739. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.078. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nam J, Matthysse AG, Gelvin SB. Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration. Plant Cell. 1997; 9 :317–333. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.3.317. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Namdeo AG. Plant cell elicitation for production of secondary metabolites: a review. Pharmacog Rev. 2007; 1 :69–79. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nogueira M, Enfissi EM, Almeida J, Fraser PD. Creating plant molecular factories for industrial and nutritional isoprenoid production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018; 40 :80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.08.002. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ochoa-Villarreal M, Howat S, Hong S, Jang MO, Jin YW, Lee EK, Loake GJ. Plant cell culture strategies for the production of natural products. BMB Rep. 2016; 49 :149–158. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.3.264. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Palacio L, Cantero JJ, Cusidó R, Goleniowski M. Phenolic compound production by Larrea divaricata Cav. plant cell cultures and effect of precursor feeding. Process Biochem. 2011; 46 :418–422. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.08.029. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Palombi M, Damiano C. Comparison between RAPD and SSR molecular markers in detecting genetic variation in kiwifruit ( Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev) Plant Cell Rep. 2002; 20 :1061–1066. doi: 10.1007/s00299-001-0430-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pandey R, Krishnasamy V, Kumaravadivel N, Rajamani K. Establishment of hairy root culture and production of secondary metabolites in Coleus ( Coleus forskohlii ) J Med Plant Res. 2014; 8 :58–62. doi: 10.5897/JMPR12.1182. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pandino G, Lombardo S, Antonino LM, Ruta C, Mauromicale G. In vitro micropropagation and mycorrhizal treatment influences the polyphenols content profile of globe artichoke under field conditions. Food Res Int. 2017; 99 :385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.037. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Parra O, Gallego AM, Urrea A, Rojas LF, Correa C, Atehortúa L. Biochemical precursor effects on the fatty acid production in cell suspension cultures of Theobroma cacao L . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017; 111 :59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.11.013. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pastores GM, Shankar SP, Petakov M, Giraldo P, Rosenbaum H, Amato DJ, Szer J, Chertkoff R, Brill-Almon E, Zimran A. AJH 36-month safety and efficacy results in adult patients with Enzyme replacement therapy with taliglucerase alfa: Gaucher disease previously treated with imiglucerase. Am J Hematol. 2016; 91 :661–665. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24399. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patwardhan B. Ethnopharmacology and drug discovery. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 100 :50–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.006. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pence VC. Evaluating costs for in vitro propagation and preservation of endangered plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2011; 47 :176–187. doi: 10.1007/s11627-010-9323-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Perassolo M, Cardillo AB, Mugas ML, Núñez Montoya SC, Giulietti AM, Rodríguez Talou J. Enhancement of anthraquinone production and release by combination of culture medium selection and methyl jasmonate elicitation in hairy root cultures of Rubia tinctorum . Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 105 :124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.010. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pfizer (2014) Pfizer. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from Pfizer and Protalix Biotherapeutics announce FDA approval of pediatric indication for ELELYSO™ (taliglucerase alfa) for injection, for intravenous use for the treatment of type 1 Gaucher disease: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_and_protalix_biotherapeutics_announce_fda_approval_of_pediatric_indication_for_elelyso_taliglucerase_alfa_for_injection_for_intravenous_use_for_the_treatment_of_type_1_gaucher_disease
• Pickens LB, Tang Y, Chooi Y-H. Metabolic engineering for the production of natural products. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011; 2 :211–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114209. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pniewski T, Czyz M, Wyrwa K, Bociag P, Krajewski P, Kapusta J. Micropropagation of transgenic lettuce containing HBsAg as a method of mass-scale production of standardised plant material for biofarming purposes. Plant Cell Rep. 2017; 36 :49–60. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2056-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pogue GP, Vojdani F, Palmer KE, Hiatt E, Hume S, Phelps J, Long L, Bohorova N, Kim D, Pauly M, Velasco J, Whaley K, Zeitlin L, Granger SJ, White E, Bai Y, Haydon H, Bratcher B. Production of pharmaceutical-grade recombinant aprotinin and monoclonal antibody product using plant-based transient expression systems. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010; 8 :638–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00495.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Puente-Garza CA, García-Lara S, Gutiérrez-Uribe JA. Enhancement of saponins and flavonols by micropropagation of Agave salmiana . Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 105 :225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Puente-Garza CA, Meza-Miranda C, Ochoa-Martínez D, García-Lara S. Effect of in vitro drought stress on phenolic acids, flavonols, saponins and antioxidant activity in Agave salmiana . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017; 115 :400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.04.012. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raduisene J, Karpaviciene B, Stanius Z. Effect of external and internal factors on secondary metabolites accumulation in St. John’s wort. Bot Lith. 2012; 18 :101–108. doi: 10.2478/v10279-012-0012-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rahman M, Rajora O. Microsatellite DNA somaclonal variation in micropropagated trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides ) Plant Cell Rep. 2001; 20 :531–536. doi: 10.1007/s002990100365. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rahman ZA, Noor ES, Ali MS, Mirad R, Othman AN. In vitro micropropagation of a valuable medicinal plant Plectranthus amboinicus . Am J Plant Sci. 2015; 6 :1091. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.68113. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ramakrishna A, Ravishankar GA. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011; 6 :1720–1731. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.11.17613. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG, Ramírez-Madero G, Hernández-Rincón EU. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. in temporary immersion systems and evaluation of genetic fidelity. S Afr J Bot. 2016; 106 :238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.07.015. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rani V, Raina SN. Genetic fidelity of organized meristem-derived micropropagated plants: a critical reappraisal. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2000; 36 :319–330. doi: 10.1007/s11627-000-0059-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rao SR, Ravishankar GA. Plant cell cultures: chemical factories of secundary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv. 2002; 20 :101–153. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00007-1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rathore NS, Rai MK, Phulwaria M, Rathore N, Shekhawat NS. Genetic stability in micropropagated Cleome gynandra revealed by SCoT analysis. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014; 36 :555–559. doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1429-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rizvi MZ, Kukreja AK. In vitro propagation of an endangered medicinal herb Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand. through somatic embryogenesis. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2010; 16 :249–257. doi: 10.1007/s12298-010-0026-6. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Roberts S, Kolewe M. Plant natural products from cultured multipotent cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28 :1175–1176. doi: 10.1038/nbt1110-1175. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ron M, Kajala K, Pauluzzi G, Wang D, Reynoso MA, Zumstein K, Garcha J, Winte S, Masson H, Inagaki S, Federici F, Sinha N, Deal RB, Bailey-Serres J, Brady SM. Hary root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166 :455–469. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.239392. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sack M, Rademacher T, Spiegel H, Boes A, Hellwig S, Drossard J, Stoger E, Fischer R. From gene to harvest: insights into upstream process development for the GMP production of a monoclonal antibody in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 13 :1094–1105. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12438. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sahu J, Sahu RK. A review on low cost methods for in vitro micropropagation of plant through tissue culture technique. UK J Pharm Biosci. 2013; 1 :38–41. doi: 10.20510/ukjpb/1/i1/91115. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saito K, Kanehira T, Horimoto M, Moritome N, Komamine A. Biosynthesis of carthamin in florets and cultured cells of Carthamus tinctorius . Biol Plant. 1993; 35 :537. doi: 10.1007/BF02928029. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sakamoto K, Kumiko I, Sawamura K, Hajiro K, Asada Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Anthocyanin production in cultured cells of Aralia cordata Thunb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1994; 36 :21–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00048311. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Saranya Krishnan SR, Siril EA. Elicitor mediated adventitious root culture for the large-scale production of anthraquinones from Oldenlandia umbellata L. Ind Crops Prod. 2018; 114 :173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.069. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarasan V, Kite GC, Sileshi GW, Stevenson PC. Applications of phytochemical and in vitro techniques for reducing over-harvesting of medicinal and pesticidal plants and generating income for the rural poor. Plant Cell Rep. 2011; 30 :1163–1172. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1047-5. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sharma M, Sharma A, Kumar A, Basu SK. Enhancement of secondary metabolites in cultured plant cells through stress stimulus. Am J Plant Physiol. 2011; 6 :50–71. doi: 10.3923/ajpp.2011.50.71. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shekhawat MS, Kannan N, Manokari M. In vitro propagation of traditional medicinal and dye yielding plant Morinda coreia Buch.–Ham. S Afr J Bot. 2015; 100 :43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.05.018. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shilpa K, Varun K, Lakshmi BS. An alternate method of natural drug production: eliciting secondary metabolite production using plant cell culture. J Plant Sci. 2010; 5 :222–247. doi: 10.3923/jps.2010.222.247. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Singh SR, Dalal S, Singh R, Dhawan AK, Kalia K. Evaluation of genetic fidelity of in vitro raised plants of Dendrocalamus asper (Schult. & Schult. F.) Backer ex K. Heyne using DNA-based markers. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013; 35 :419–430. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1084-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Singh A, Jani K, Kumari P, Agarwal PK. Effect of MgCl 2 and double con- centration of Murashige and Skoog medium on in vitro plantlet and root cultures generation in halophytic grasswort Salicornia brachiata . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015; 129 :501–510. doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0622-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sivanandhan G, Selvaraj N, Ganapathi A, Manickavasagam M. Enhanced biosynthesis of withanolides by elicitation and precursor feeding in cell suspension culture of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal in Shake-Flask culture and bioreactor. PLoS One. 2014; 9 :e104005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104005. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smetanska I. Production of secondary metabolites using plant cell cultures. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2008; 111 :187–228. doi: 10.1007/10_2008_10. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sorace M, de Faria RT, Júnior CV, Gomes GP, Barbosa CM, Vieira FG, Lopes da Silva G, Assari Takahashi LS, Aparecida Schnitzer J. In vitro growth of Oncidium baueri (Orchidaceae) at different macronutrients and sucrose concentrations. Semin Cienc Agrar. 2008; 29 :775–782. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n4p775. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Srivastava S, Srivastava AK. Hairy root culture for mass-production of high-value secondary metabolites. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2007; 27 :29–43. doi: 10.1080/07388550601173918. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Srivastava S, Srivastava AK. Effect of elicitors and precursors on Azadirachtin production in hairy root culture of Azadirachta indica . Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014; 172 :2286–2297. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0664-6. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stanišić M, Raspor M, Ninković S, Milošević S, Ćalić D, Bohanec B, Trifunovića M, Petrića M, Subotića A, Jevremovića S. Clonal fidelity of Iris sibirica plants regenerated by somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in leaf-base culture—RAPD and flow cytometer analyses. S Afr J Bot. 2015; 96 :42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2014.10.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Su WW, Lee K-T. Plant cell and hairy root cultures—process characteristics, products, and applications. In: Yang S-T, editor. Bioprocessing for value-added products from renewable resources. Boston: Elsevier B.V; 2007. pp. 263–292. [ Google Scholar ]
• Su J, Zhu L, Sherman A, Wang X, Kamesh A, Norikane JH, Streatfield SJ, Herzog RW, Daniell H. Low cost industrial production of coagulation factor IX bioencapsulated in lettuce cells for oral tolerance induction in hemophilia B. Biomaterials. 2015; 70 :84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.004. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tari I, Kiss G, Deer AK, Csiszar J, Erdei L, Galle A, Gémes K, Horváth F, Poór P, Szepesi Á, Simon LM. Salicylic acid increased aldose reductase activity and sorbitol accumulation in tomato plants under salt stress. Biol Plant. 2010; 54 :677–683. doi: 10.1007/s10535-010-0120-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thakore D, Srivastava AK. Production of biopesticide azadirachtin using plant cell and hairy root cultures. Eng Life Sci. 2017; 17 :997–1005. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201700012. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thiruvengadam M, Praveen N, Kim EH, Kim SH, Chung IM. Production of anthraquinones, phenolic compounds and biological activities from hairy roots cultures of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. Protoplasma. 2014; 251 :555–566. doi: 10.1007/s00709-013-0554-3. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thomas DR, Penney CA, Majumder A, Walmsley AM. Evolution of plant-made pharmaceuticals. Int J Mol Sci. 2011; 12 :3220–3236. doi: 10.3390/ijms12053220. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Thorpe T. History of plant tissue culture. J Mol Microb Biotechnol. 2007; 37 :169–180. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tusé D, Tu T, McDonald KA. Manufacturing economics of plant-made biologics: case studies in therapeutic and industrial enzymes. BioMol Res Int. 2014; 2014 :1–16. doi: 10.1155/2014/256135. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Eck J. Genome editing and plant transformation of solanaceous food crops. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018; 49 :35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.012. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Varshney A, Lakshmikumaran M, Srivastava PS, Dhawan V. Establishment of genetic fidelity of in vitro-raised Lilium bulblets through RAPD markers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2001; 37 :227–231. doi: 10.1007/s11627-001-0040-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Verma N, Shukla S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2015; 2 :105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2015.09.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Verma P, Mathur AK, Jain SP, Mathur A. In vitro conservation of twenty-three overexploited medicinal plants belonging to the Indian Sub Continent. Sci World J. 2012; 2012 :1–10. doi: 10.1100/2012/929650. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Verpoorte R, van der Heijden R, Memelink J. Engineering the plant cell factory for secondary metabolite production. Transgen Res. 2000; 9 :323–343. doi: 10.1023/A:1008966404981. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Verpoorte R, Contin A, Memelink J. Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochem Rev. 2002; 1 :13–25. doi: 10.1023/A:1015871916833. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J. 2006; 45 :523–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vinterhalter B, Krstić-Milošević D, Janković T, Pljevljakušić D, Ninković S, Smigocki A, Vinterhalter D. Gentiana dinarica Beck. Hairy root cultures and evaluation of factors affecting growth and xanthone production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015; 121 :667–679. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0737-z. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Voytas DF. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specificnucleases. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 64 :327–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105552. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Voytas DF, Gao C. Precision genome engineering and agriculture: oportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol. 2014; 12 :1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001877. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wagner H, Stuppner H, Schåfer W, Zenk M. Immunologically active polysaccharides of Echinacea purpurea cell cultures. Phytochemistry. 1988; 119 :126. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang CH, Zheng LP, Tian H, Wang JW. Synergistic effects of ultraviolet-B and methyl jasmonate on tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016; 159 :93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.01.012. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wani SH, Sah SK. Biotechnology and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. J Rice Res. 2014; 2 :e105. doi: 10.4172/jrr.1000e105. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wani SH, Kumar V, Shriram V, Sah SK. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop J. 2016; 4 :162–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.01.010. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wawrosch C, Schwaiger S, Stuppner H, Kopp B. Lignan formation in hairy root cultures of Edelweiss ( Leontopodium nivale spp. alpinum (Cass.) Greuter) Fitoterapia. 2014; 97 :219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.06.008. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wendt T, Doohan F, Mullins E. Production of Phytophtora infestance resistance potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) utilizing Ensifer adhearence OV 14. Trans Res. 2012; 21 :567–578. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9553-3. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson SA, Roberts SC. Recent advances towards development and commercialization of plant cell culture processes for synthesis of biomolecules. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012; 10 :249–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00664. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Xu JF, Dolan MC, Medrano G, Cramer CL, Weathers PJ. Green factory: plants as bioproduction platforms for recombinant proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2012; 30 :1171–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.020. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yamamoto Y. Tissue cultures of Euphorbia species. In: Hanover JW, Keathley DE, Wilson CM, Kuny G, editors. Genetic manipulation of woody plants. New York: Springer; 1988. pp. 365–376. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yao J, Weng Y, Dickey A, Wang KY. Plants as factories for human pharmaceuticals applications and challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16 :28549–28565. doi: 10.3390/ijms161226122. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yun UW, Yan Z, Amir R, Hong S, Jin YW, Lee EK, Loake GJ. Plant natural products: history, limitations and the potential of cambial meristematic cells. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2012; 28 :47–59. doi: 10.5661/bger-28-47. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zeitlin L, Prettitt J, Scully C, Bohorova N, Kim D, Pauly M, Hiatt A, Ngo L, Steinkellner H, Whaley KJ, Olinger GG. Enhanced potency of a fucose-free monoclonal antibody being developed as an Ebola virus immunoprotectant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108 :20690–20694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108360108. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zenk MH, Juenger M. Evolution and current status of the phytochemistry of nitrogenous compounds. Phytochemistry. 2007; 68 :2757–2772. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.07.009. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhi-lin Y, Chuan-chao D, Lian-qing C. Regulation and accumulation of secondary metabolites in plant-fungus symbiotic system. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007; 6 :1266–1271. doi: 10.4314/ajb.v6i11.57436. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhou G, Wang Y, Zhai S, Ge F, Liu Z, Dai Y, Yuan S, Hou JY. Biodegradation of the neonocotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam by nitrogen-fixin and plany-growth-promoting rizobacterium Ensifer adhaerens strain TMX-23. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 97 :4065–4074. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4638-3. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu C, Bortesi L, Baysal C, Twyman RM, Fischer R, Capell T, Schillberg S, Christou P. Characteristics of genome editing mutations in cereal crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22 :38–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.009. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zuniga-Soto E, Mullins E, Didicova B. Ensifer-mediated transformation: an efficient non-Agrobacterium protocol for the genetic modification of rice. Springerplus. 2015; 4 :1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1369-9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]