reproductive health research topics

• Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• Biostatistics
• Environmental Health and Engineering
• Epidemiology
• Health Policy and Management

Health, Behavior and Society

International Health

• Mental Health
• Molecular Microbiology and Immunology

Population, Family and Reproductive Health

• Program Finder
• Admissions Services
• Course Directory
• Academic Calendar
• Hybrid Campus
• Lecture Series
• Convocation
• Strategy and Development
• Implementation and Impact
• Integrity and Oversight
• In the School
• In the Field
• In Baltimore
• Resources for Practitioners
• Articles & News Releases
• In The News
• Statements & Announcements
• At a Glance
• Student Life
• Strategic Priorities
• Inclusion, Diversity, Anti-Racism, and Equity (IDARE)
• What is Public Health?

Reproductive and Sexual Health

The prevention of gender-based violence and trauma, sexually transmitted infections, and maternal and neonatal deaths

Reproductive and Sexual Health Headlines

Explore the latest public health research and insights about reproductive and sexual health.

Student Spotlight: Annaliese Collins

MSPH student Annaliese Collins began volunteering as a Planned Parenthood Peer Educator when they were 15 years old. Learn why they chose the Bloomberg School’s Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health to continue their longstanding commitment to sexual and reproductive health education.

What’s at Stake for Public Health in the 2024 U.S. Election?

Experts share how they expect a Harris or Trump administration would affect abortion access, health care costs, federal agencies, global health, gun violence, and immigration.

Student Spotlight: Shelby Rohlff

As part of her MSPH field placement, Shelby Rohlff is assisting with development of a mobile app for adolescents to inform and educate themselves on sexual and reproductive health needs before clinician visits. 

Student Spotlight: Amy Ozinsky

MSPH student Amy Ozinksy speaks to how her values show up in her educational journey - and what she loves best about Baltimore.

Important Abortion Cases in a Holding Pattern Following SCOTUS Decisions

The court upholds the status quo for now, but reproductive law experts expect mifepristone and EMTALA to be litigated again in the future.

Internship Spotlight: Zoey Hall

Through the Diversity Summer Internship Program for Undergraduates, Zoey Hall is interning in the Department of Biostatistics, working on research related to the Boston Birth Study Cohort.

• View more Headlines

Reproductive and Sexual Health Faculty Experts

Looking for prominent public health experts in the field of reproductive and sexual health? They’re here at the Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Cynthia Schaffer Minkovitz

Cynthia Minkovitz, MD, MPP, focuses on enhancing the quality of preventive services for children and understanding how policies and programs impact child and family well-being.

Michele R. Decker

Michele Decker, ScD, leads research at the cutting edge of gender equity, and gender-based violence prevention and response, in close partnership with practitioners and communities most affected.

Saifuddin Ahmed

Saifuddin Ahmed, MBBS, PhD ‘96, his research includes reproductive epidemiology, particularly maternal mortality estimation; program evaluation for family planning and MCH care.

Departments

Centers & institutes.

Center of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health

Hopkins Population Center

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

William H. Gates Sr. Institute for Population and Reproductive Health

Upcoming Events

Criminalization as a barrier to public health, pfrh wednesday seminar series: the unequal impact of abortion bans on fertility and infant health.

• Frontiers in Physiology
• Clinical and Translational Physiology
• Research Topics

Reproductive Health

Total Downloads

Total Views and Downloads

About this Research Topic

Reproductive health is crucial to successful conception, pregnancy and delivery. It is also a key determinant of wellbeing in adulthood. The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the physiological processes involved in male and female reproduction are poorly understood with rates of infertility, ...

Important Note : All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic Editors

Topic coordinators, recent articles, submission deadlines.

Submission closed.

Participating Journals

Total views.

• Demographics

No records found

total views article views downloads topic views

Top countries

Top referring sites, about frontiers research topics.

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Editorial: Reviews in reproductive epidemiology: 2022

Stefania papatheodorou, vassiliki benetou.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Edited and Reviewed by: Delivette Castor, Columbia University, United States

Correspondence: Stefania Papatheodorou [email protected]

Received 2023 Sep 1; Accepted 2023 Oct 18; Collection date 2023.

Keywords: Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), male infertility, health promotion, personhood, bacterial vaginosis (BV), review

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Editorial on the Research Topic Reviews in reproductive epidemiology: 2022

Under the current landscape of the exponential increase in primary studies of all study designs in reproductive epidemiology on a wide range of reproductive health issues as well as the changing access to reproductive health services, summarizing and interpreting current evidence is of utmost importance for clinicians, policy makers, public health officials and individuals. This special collection of Frontiers in Reproductive Health under the Research Topic Reviews in Reproductive Epidemiology aimed to bring together the most recent evidence synthesis on pressing topics of reproductive epidemiology, to highlight current advances or gaps in knowledge and to propose new associations and/or effective interventions. Summarizing all available evidence in a topic highlights the methodological differences between studies that answer the same question and incorporate quality considerations in the interpretation of the totality of evidence.

This Research Topic consists of four reviews covering topics such as HPV vaccination, attributes of personhood, bacterial vaginosis treatments and male infertility. Krokidi et al. summarized available evidence on an important issue related to the effectiveness of health education interventions about uptake, acceptance and awareness on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination among people 9–29 years old in India, in light of the new indigenous HPV vaccine ( Krokidi et al. ). In their systematic review, after searching three databases up to July 2022, seven studies conducted in India were included. Authors concluded that health education and promotion interventions such as audiovisual presentations and workshops proved to be effective in increasing uptake, awareness, and acceptance of the HPV vaccine, while the barriers included, among others, the cost of the vaccine, the lack of awareness, and cultural issues. Another noteworthy conclusion was that males and marginalized populations were underrepresented whereas the involvement of various stakeholders was proven beneficial, and it is highly recommended.

In a special and very interesting assessment, Hughes and Hughes proposed a framework, based on the biological discrete events and processes spanning pre-fertilization and prenatal development, which implies that personhood should be incrementally attributed, and societal protections should be graduated and applied progressively across the pre-birth timespan ( Hughes and Hughes ). They provide a novel perspective for considering the biological and ethical aspects of attribution of personhood and individualization of potential humans.

In a comprehensive assessment, Abbe and Mitchell systematically appraised ongoing and potential treatment and prevention strategies for bacterial vaginosis (BV) ( Abbe and Mitchell ). BV, which is a common cause of vaginitis worldwide, is associated with serious adverse reproductive outcomes including preterm birth, sexually transmitted infections and pelvic inflammatory disease. Given that antibiotics (such as metronidazole and clindamycin) are the only FDA approved treatment and that 50%–80% of women experience recurrence within a year of completing the antibiotic treatment, implementation of new strategies for treatment and prevention is crucial. Thus, the review presents current options of BV management such as smoking cessation, condom use and hormonal contraception, additional strategies considered by many people such as dietary modifications, non-medical vaginally applied products, and treatments from medical practices outside of allopathic medicine. Also, other less studied but promising treatments are presented including probiotics, vaginal microbiome transplantation, pH modulation, and biofilm disruption.

Finally, Kaltsas et al. tried to answer the question whether varicoceles in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) should be operated or not ( Kaltsas et al. ). The prevalence of this condition in the general population is 1% while it can be as high as 15% in the population of infertile men. Among non-obstructed azoospermic men, 4%–14% have varicocele. Several studies have been performed to assess whether varicocele repair may contribute to the reappearance of spermatozoa in semen. This hypothesis is also contradicted by the small number of spontaneous pregnancies after such interventions. The findings of this review conclude that varicocelectomy in NOA-men may have a beneficial effect on spermatogenesis and the reappearance of motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate. In addition, varicocelectomy increases sperm retrieval rate in men who remain azoospermic after the surgery. However, there is a possibility that NOA-men who are positive for spermatozoa in the semen samples post-varicocele repair will relapse into azoospermia. As a result, NOA-men should be advised to freeze spermatozoa appearing the semen post-varicocelectomy. Finally, this review highlighted that the performance of varicocelectomy in NOA-men and subsequent ICSI procedures using testicular spermatozoa may increase pregnancy and live birth rates in couples without female infertility factors.

Overall, the four contributions published in this Research Topic provide valuable information on the timely topics of HPV vaccination, origins of personhood, sexually transmitted diseases and male infertility. Given the representation of broad reproductive epidemiology research areas, this Research Topic highlights recent advances of the distinct characteristics of each topic, whilst emphasizing important directions and new possibilities for future inquiries. The Research Topic also highlights the limitations that the authors come across when aiming to combine studies with different designs and potential biases and how these considerations were incorporated in the critical appraisal of evidence synthesis.

Funding Statement

SP is supported by NIEHS grant number R01034038.

Author contributions

SP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

• View on publisher site
• PDF (164.2 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

Aims and scope

Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction, including adolescent health, female fertility, contraception, and maternal health and all articles are open access.

Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce  and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.

Reproductive Health  has a particular interest on the impact changes in reproductive health have globally, and therefore encourages submissions from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries.

The challenge of the field is to evaluate current promising interventions rigorously, address emerging issues such as synthesizing ever-increasing research findings, and develop innovative dissemination and communication strategies.

The journal invites submissions on research in reproductive health, including social and gender issues, sexual health, country and population specific issues, assessment of service provision, education and training and also in a broader range of gynaecological and obstetrical topics related to reproductive health.

Reproductive Health provides a platform that helps authors to share their knowledge with a wider audience, and sustains a rapid process for submissions resulting in high quality publications. We further aim to contribute towards reducing the inequity in publications from low- and middle-income countries. Our audience is global and we intend to share research results in reproductive health from all parts of the world.

Why publish your article in Reproductive Health ?

• Our journal publishes and disseminates high quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences .
• We offer a high visibility platform for your work, with over 3 million articles downloaded in 2023. As an open access journal, all our articles are universally accessible online without charge , helping to increase the dissemination of your research.
• We deliver high levels of author satisfaction , with 87% of our published authors reporting that they would  definitely or probably publish with us again .

Open access

All articles published by Reproductive Health are made freely and permanently accessible online immediately upon publication, without subscription charges or registration barriers. Further information about open access can be found here . 

As authors of articles published in Reproductive Health you are the copyright holders of your article and have granted to any third party, in advance and in perpetuity, the right to use, reproduce or disseminate your article according to the licence terms . 

For those of you who are US government employees or are prevented from being copyright holders for similar reasons, BMC can accommodate non-standard copyright lines. Please contact us if further information is needed.

Article processing charges (APC)

Authors who publish open access in Reproductive Health are required to pay an article processing charge (APC). The APC price will be determined from the date on which the article is accepted for publication.

The current APC, subject to VAT or local taxes where applicable, is: £2290.00/$3090.00/€2690.00

Visit our open access support portal and our Journal Pricing FAQs for further information.

Open access funding

Visit Springer Nature’s open access funding & support services for information about research funders and institutions that provide funding for APCs.

Springer Nature offers agreements that enable institutions to cover open access publishing costs. Learn more about our open access agreements to check your eligibility and discover whether this journal is included.

Springer Nature offers APC waivers and discounts for articles published in our fully open access journals whose corresponding authors are based in the world’s lowest income countries (see our APC waivers and discounts policy for further information). Requests for APC waivers and discounts from other authors will be considered on a case-by-case basis, and may be granted in cases of financial need (see our open access policies for journals for more information). All applications for discretionary APC waivers and discounts should be made at the point of manuscript submission; requests made during the review process or after acceptance are unable to be considered.

Indexing services

All articles published in Reproductive Health are included in:

• Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
• Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)

The full text of all articles is deposited in digital archives around the world to guarantee long-term digital preservation. You can also access all articles published by BioMed Central on SpringerLink .

Peer-review policy

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here .

Reproductive Health operates a trasnparent peer-review system, where the reviewers' names are optionally included on the peer review reports for authors. In addition, if the article is published, the reviewer reports are published online alongside the article under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 . Previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are available by contacting [email protected] .

The benefit of transparent peer review is that it increases transparency. In addition, published reports can serve an educational purpose in helping facilitate training and research into peer review.

Editorial policies

All manuscripts submitted to Reproductive Health should adhere to BioMed Central's editorial policies .

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Citing articles in Reproductive Health

Articles in Reproductive Health  should be cited in the same way as articles in a traditional journal. Because articles are not printed, they do not have page numbers; instead, they are given a unique article number.

Article citations follow this format:

Authors: Title. Reprod Health [year], [volume number]:[article number].

e.g. Roberts LD, Hassall DG, Winegar DA, Haselden JN, Nicholls AW, Griffin JL: Increased hepatic oxidative metabolism distinguishes the action of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor delta from Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma in the Ob/Ob mouse.  Reprod Health  2009, 1 :115.

refers to article 115 from Volume 1 of the journal.

Appeals and complaints

Authors who wish to appeal a rejection or make a complaint should follow the procedure outlined in the BMC Editorial Policies .

Benefits of publishing with BMC

High visibility.

Reproductive Health 's open access policy allows maximum visibility of articles published in the journal as they are available to a wide, global audience. 

Speed of publication

Reproductive Health offers a fast publication schedule whilst maintaining rigorous peer review; all articles must be submitted online, and peer review is managed fully electronically (articles are distributed in PDF form, which is automatically generated from the submitted files). Articles will be published with their final citation after acceptance, in both fully browsable web form, and as a formatted PDF.

Flexibility

Online publication in Reproductive Health gives you the opportunity to publish large datasets, large numbers of color illustrations and moving pictures, to display data in a form that can be read directly by other software packages so as to allow readers to manipulate the data for themselves, and to create all relevant links (for example, to PubMed , to sequence and other databases, and to other articles).

Promotion and press coverage

Articles published in Reproductive Health are included in article alerts and regular email updates. Some may be highlighted on Reproductive Health ’s pages and on the BMC homepage.

In addition, articles published in Reproductive Health may be promoted by press releases to the general or scientific press. These activities increase the exposure and number of accesses for articles published in Reproductive Health . A list of articles recently press-released by journals published by BMC is available here .

As an author of an article published in Cancer & Metabolism you retain the copyright of your article and you are free to reproduce and disseminate your work. For further information, see our guide to licensing, copyright and author rights . 

For further information about the advantages of publishing in a journal from BMC, please click here .

• Editorial Board
• Manuscript editing services
• Instructions for Editors
• Contact Support for Editors
• Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal
• Follow us on Twitter
• Follow us on Facebook

Annual Journal Metrics

Citation Impact 2023 Journal Impact Factor: 3.6 5-year Journal Impact Factor: 4.0 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.496 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.083

Speed 2023 Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 9 Submission to acceptance (median days): 166

Usage 2023 Downloads: 3,031,937 Altmetric mentions: 1,524

• More about our metrics

Meet the SDG3 Researcher: Bright Ahinkorah

Meet Editor-in-Chief Bright Ahinkorah as he discusses his research and efforts to achieve the SDGs.

Engaging with African feminist interpretations of the Maternal

Read the blog by Ogochukwu Udenigwe on interpretations of motherhood and its relationship with patriarchal culture among African feminists.

Reaction to the 2024 Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF

Read the blog by Gwendolyn P. Quinn & Laura Kimberly on the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF and what it means for women with cancer.

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755

• General enquiries: [email protected]