how to critique a video presentation

Speech Writing
Delivery Techniques
PowerPoint & Visuals
Speaker Habits
Speaker Resources

Speech Critiques

Book Reviews
Browse Articles
ALL Articles
Learn About Us
About Six Minutes
Meet Our Authors
Write for Us
Advertise With Us

Why study other speakers?

How to Study and Critique a Speech
The Art of Delivering Evaluations
Modified Sandwich Technique for Evaluations
Evaluation Forms, Tools, and Resources
Toastmasters Evaluation Contests

Studying and evaluating the techniques of other speakers is an excellent way to become a better public speaker.

When a speaker impresses, ask “ Why was that impressive? “
When a speaker bombs, ask “ Why didn’t that hit the mark? “

Analyzing other speakers provides an abundant supply of ideas that can be incorporated into our own presentations.

Why use video critiques?

With a growing supply of speech videos readily accessible, video critiques can be especially useful teaching and learning aids.

Without video , you can say: “ Remember that keynote speaker last week? Weren’t her gestures powerful? “
With video , you can refer directly to precise moments: “ The keynote speaker last week was fantastic. Her gestures at 1:27 and 2:38 of her speech were powerful. “

Speech Critique Examples on Six Minutes

Please share this....

This is one of many public speaking articles featured on Six Minutes . Subscribe to Six Minutes for free to receive future articles.

Subscribe - It's Free!

Find More Articles Tagged:

Recent tweets.

Speech Critique Examples http://ht.ly/1KPec of famous #speakers — presensation May 14th, 2010

Speech Critique Examples http://ht.ly/1KPed of famous #speakers — Michael Moesslang May 14th, 2010

Speech Critique Examples http://ht.ly/1KPed of famous #speakers — top1speaker May 14th, 2010

Why study other speakers? http://tinyurl.com/cfnph8 from @6minutes thanks @mikesansone for pointing me to Andrew's wk! — bigwags Jun 6th, 2010

@MatthewAGilbert Matthew, many university instructors/students like this http://t.co/P5yRCQm7 and these http://t.co/0Sc4PzEY — Matthew A. Gilbert Nov 20th, 2011

@Janaclarke @twopdhart @edbierman @rebranded @cguenard @clwitte Thanks for RT of my Lincoln critique. More critiques: http://t.co/0Sc4PzEY — Andrew Dlugan Nov 26th, 2011

want to know how to give a good speech? http://t.co/rMaLIoWV – excellent material — madi Jan 15th, 2012

http://t.co/v2rJkSeO interesting stuff on how to deliver a speech! — Ashutosh Tamhankar Jan 26th, 2012

#ExamPrep #SpeechCritiques http://t.co/pNt6Seqd via @6minutes — Ayoola S. Efunkoya Aug 23rd, 2012

US thought:Learn from Obama and Steve Jobs! See & adopt things you like about their talks-video speech critiques here http://t.co/kIRnqfEi — Dee Clayton Nov 7th, 2012

11 Blog Links

salegro Vertriebs-Blog » Archiv » Speech critiques — Mar 29th, 2010

Giving a Talk About Your Book » Holly Brady — Apr 14th, 2011

Giving a Talk About Your Book « Holly Brady — Apr 20th, 2011

Critiquing Speeches – ELC Learning Place — May 11th, 2011

Reading Response for Class 11/22 | Visual Design – Com 364 — Nov 22nd, 2011

Honors English III: 10.2.12 — Ms. Ward — Oct 2nd, 2012

English III: 10.4 — Ms. Ward — Oct 7th, 2012

6 of the world’s best blogs for presenters | Remote Possibilities — Dec 1st, 2012

Final Presentation Assignment | WPC Main Blog — Mar 16th, 2013

Speech Critique | angiehakopian — Apr 22nd, 2013

Speech Critique: Averting the Climate Crisis, Al Gore | mcalpinmba — Apr 28th, 2013

Books We Recommend

Read our permissions policy , privacy policy , or disclosure policy .

Comments? Questions? Contact us .

How to Give Effective Presentation Feedback

A conversation with sam j. lubner, md, facp.

Giving an effective scientific presentation, like all public speaking, is an acquired skill that takes practice to perfect. When delivered successfully, an oral presentation can be an invaluable opportunity to showcase your latest research results among your colleagues and peers. It can also promote attendee engagement and help audience members retain the information being presented, enhancing the educational benefit of your talk, according to Sam J. Lubner, MD, FACP , Associate Professor of Medicine and Program Director, Hematology-Oncology Fellowship, at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, and a member of ASCO’s Education Council.

Sam J. Lubner, MD, FACP

In 2019, the Education Council launched a pilot program to provide a group of selected speakers at the ASCO Annual Meeting with feedback on their presentations. Although some of the reviewers, which included members of the Education Council and Education Scholars Program, as well as ASCO’s program directors, conveyed information to the presenters that was goal-referenced, tangible, transparent, actionable, specific, and personalized—the hallmarks of effective feedback—others provided comments that were too vague to improve the speaker’s performance, said Dr. Lubner. For example, they offered comments such as “Great session” or “Your slides were too complicated,” without being specific about what made the session “great” or the slides “too complicated.”

“Giving a presentation at a scientific meeting is different from what we were trained to do. We’re trained to take care of patients, and while we do have some training in presentation, it usually centers around how to deliver clinical information,” said Dr. Lubner. “What we are trying to do with the Education Council’s presentation feedback project is to apply evidence-based methods for giving effective feedback to make presentations at ASCO’s Annual Meeting, international meetings, symposia, and conferences more clinically relevant and educationally beneficial.”

GUEST EDITOR

The ASCO Post talked with Dr. Lubner about how to give effective feedback and how to become a more effective presenter.

Defining Effective Feedback

Feedback is often confused with giving advice, praise, and evaluation, but none of these descriptions are exactly accurate. What constitutes effective feedback?

When I was looking over the literature on feedback to prepare myself on how to give effective feedback to the medical students and residents I oversee, I was amazed to find the information is largely outdated. For example, recommendations in the 1980s and 1990s called for employing the “sandwich” feedback method, which involves saying something positive, then saying what needs to be improved, and then making another positive remark. But that method is time-intensive, and it feels disingenuous to me.

What constitutes helpful feedback to me is information that is goal-referenced, actionable, specific, and has immediate impact. It should be constructive, descriptive, and nonjudgmental. After I give feedback to a student or resident, my next comments often start with a self-reflective question, “How did that go?” and that opens the door to further discussion. The mnemonic I use to provide better feedback and achieve learning goals is SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely, as described here:

Specific: Avoid using ambiguous language, for example, “Your presentation was great.” Be specific about what made the presentation “great,” such as, “Starting your presentation off with a provocative question grabbed my attention.”
Measurable: Suggest quantifiable objectives to meet so there is no uncertainty about what the goals are. For example, “Next time, try a summary slide with one or two take-home points for the audience.”
Achievable: The goal of the presentation should be attainable. For example, “Trim your slides to no more than six lines per slide and no more than six words per line; otherwise, you are just reading your slides.”
Realistic: The feedback you give should relate to the goal the presenter is trying to achieve. For example, “Relating the research results back to an initial case presentation will solidify the take-home point that for cancer x, treatment y is the best choice.”
Timely: Feedback given directly after completion of the presentation is more effective than feedback provided at a later date.

The ultimate goal of effective feedback is to help the presenter become more adept at relaying his or her research in an engaging and concise way, to maintain the audience’s attention and ensure that they retain the information presented.

“Giving a presentation at a scientific meeting is different from what we were trained to do.” — Sam J. Lubner, MD, FACP Tweet this quote

Honing Your Communication Skills

What are some specific tips on how to give effective feedback?

There are five tips that immediately come to mind: (1) focus on description rather than judgment; (2) focus on observation rather than inference; (3) focus on observable behaviors; (4) share both positive and constructive specific points of feedback with the presenter; and (5) focus on the most important points to improve future presentations.

Becoming a Proficient Presenter

How can ASCO faculty become more proficient at delivering their research at the Annual Meeting and at ASCO’s thematic meetings?

ASCO has published faculty guidelines and best practices to help speakers immediately involve an audience in their presentation and hold their attention throughout the talk. They include the following recommendations:

Be engaging. Include content that will grab the audience’s attention early. For example, interesting facts, images, or a short video to hold the audience’s focus.
Be cohesive and concise. When preparing slides, make sure the presentation has a clear and logical flow to it, from the introduction to its conclusion. Establish key points and clearly define their importance and impact in a concise, digestible manner.
Include take-home points. Speakers should briefly summarize key findings from their research and ensure that their conclusion is fully supported by the data in their presentation. If possible, they should provide recommendations or actions to help solidify their message. Thinking about and answering this question—if the audience remembers one thing from my presentation, what do I want it to be?—will help speakers focus their presentation.
When it comes to slide design, remember, less is more. It’s imperative to keep slides simple to make an impact on the audience.

Another method to keep the audience engaged and enhance the educational benefit of the talk is to use the Think-Pair ( ± Share) strategy, by which the speaker asks attendees to think through questions using two to three steps. They include:

Think independently about the question that has been posed, forming ideas.
Pair to discuss thoughts, allowing learners to articulate their ideas and to consider those of others.
Share (as a pair) the ideas with the larger group.

The value of this exercise is that it helps participants retain the information presented, encourages individual participation, and refines ideas and knowledge through collaboration.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SLIDE DESIGN

Have a single point per line.
Use < 6 words per line.
Use < 6 lines per slide.
Use < 30 characters per slide.
Use simple words.
When using tables, maintain a maximum of 6 rows and 6 columns.
Avoid busy graphics or tables. If you find yourself apologizing to the audience because your slide is too busy, it’s a bad slide and should not be included in the presentation.
Use cues, not full thoughts, to make your point.
Keep to one slide per minute as a guide to the length of the presentation.
Include summary/take-home points per concept. We are all physicians who care about our patients and believe in adhering to good science. Highlight the information you want the audience to take away from your presentation and how that information applies to excellent patient care.

Speakers should also avoid using shorthand communication or dehumanizing language when describing research results. For example, do not refer to patients as a disease: “The study included 250 EGFR mutants.” Say instead, “The study included 250 patients with EGFR -mutant tumors.” And do not use language that appears to blame patients when their cancer progresses after treatment, such as, “Six patients failed to respond to [study drug].” Instead say, “Six patients had tumors that did not respond to [study drug].”

We all have respect for our patients, families, and colleagues, but sometimes our language doesn’t reflect that level of respect, and we need to be more careful and precise in the language we use when talking with our patients and our colleagues.

ASCO has developed a document titled “The Language of Respect” to provide guidance on appropriate respectful language to use when talking with patients, family members, or other health-care providers and when giving presentations at the Annual Meeting and other ASCO symposia. Presenters should keep these critical points in mind and put them into practice when delivering research data at these meetings. ■

DISCLOSURE: Dr. Lubner has been employed by Farcast Biosciences and has held a leadership role at Farcast Biosciences.

Treatment Advances, Predictive Biomarkers May Improve Urothelial Carcinoma Care

Are young patients with cancer discussing fertility preservation with physicians, prostatectomy with or without postprostatectomy radiotherapy and long-term hrqol in localized prostate cancer, in case you missed it: roundup from esmo congress 2024, exploring issues in oncofertility.