Following analysis, making interpersonal connections was identified as an overarching theme central to helping participants meet their health and wellbeing needs and/or those of others. Figure 2 presents five main themes representing the different contexts in which these connections were made, from understanding self, to linking with individuals, communities, services or wider systems. A summary of key factors that enhanced and hindered participants’ connections and experiences of HSC across these contexts is included in Figure 3 .
Overview of themes.
Factors that enhanced and hindered connections and experiences of HSC.
Participants across all groups discussed their experiences of understanding and coping with changing health and wellbeing needs or supporting others to do so.
Service user [n = 6] and informal carer [n = 7] participants’ understanding of their changing health and wellbeing needs, were shaped by their connections with others. They felt their experiences of accessing HSC could be challenging. Some HSC staff had focussed on service users’ medical conditions that were sometimes unrelated to their presenting complaint, suggesting some staff may not be adopting a person-centred approach to care:
[Caitlin, quoting her Gastric Surgeon’s referral letter, gestures air-quotes] ‘Met with Caitlin, slim lady with Multiple Sclerosis, and I recommend that you give her a stoma’ [Catlin pauses, furrows brow and rolls eyes] …that’s when I was an [gestures air-quotes again] ‘MS person’ and nothing else.” Caitlin, service user, HSCP 1 .
All informal carer participants [n = 5] highlighted the impact their caring role had on their health and wellbeing, and their own need for person-centred support in their caring role. However, informal carer Anisha described an encounter with a Social Worker who exhibited a judgemental attitude, questioning her commitment as a wife and her role as an informal carer, when she raised the prospect of becoming unwell herself and the potential that she might not be able to care for Arthur:
“The quote I got thrown back at me was, ‘a good wife would do that for her husband’, and I thought, yeah, if a good wife’s here type of thing but, I didn’t say it, I should’ve said it really or, maybe I should’ve just turned round and said, ‘well, I’m nae a good wife then!’, you know [crosses arms, frowns].” Anisha, informal carer, HSCP 1 .
Informal carers [n = 5] also highlighted the negative impact that increased stress, as a result of their caring responsibilities, had upon their wellbeing. They reported low mood, depression, emotional strain and physical exhaustion. Staff member participants [n = 7] acknowledged their role in supporting service users and informal carers whilst their health and wellbeing needs were changing.
Service user and informal carer participants emphasised a need for support from HSC staff with their changing health and wellbeing needs. They wanted reassurance and support from staff to feel empowered to make decisions about their care, and to access information to help them cope:
“We get an appointment with them, just to go through things… they [HSC staff] don’t make up your mind for you but, they give the necessary information to allow you to come to a sensible decision… you canna make a decision on anything, if you don’t have the facts, you know.” Arthur, service user, HSCP 1 .
For service users and informal carers, coping with changing health and wellbeing needs was also linked to being able to attend to practical tasks, such as managing finances, personal care, eating and drinking, managing continence, housework and shopping tasks. For some, getting ‘out and about’ to meet others [n = 3 informal carers] and contact with HSC staff [n = 4 service users], promoted engagement with communities and social contacts. However, all service user participants [n = 6] reported feeling lonely and isolated, and this was a source of concern for their informal carers [n = 3] and staff members [n = 2].
Participants’ shared their experiences of fostering connections to build supportive relationships, which enhanced their health and wellbeing.
For all participant groups, connecting with others across HSC services, organisations and sectors to build a supportive relationship was facilitated through face-to-face interactions. Staff member [n = 4] and service user [n = 2] participants highlighted co-location of services as a means of promoting this. An interpersonal or ‘friendly’ connection was perceived by all participant groups as a necessary foundation for building supportive relationships. Commonalities between individuals was a key quality of these connections. Service user Donna, who had carers supporting her for a number of years, offers an example of this when she described her experiences of her need to connect with her HSC carer:
“She’s [Donna’s Carer] chatting to me when I’m showering and I, I find out about her family and things, chat about her family and, you know, that sort of thing… … I considered them as friends [her carers] and, I mean, I have a carer now, who’s been coming for over four years, in this company, and, I mean, she’s really efficient and, you know, I’m made to feel really comfortable and all that but, I mean, I said to her one day, do you think of me as a friend, or just another client [hesitates, looks down]… she [the carer] said, ‘well, just another client ’. Donna, service user, HSCP 2 .
During the interview, Donna’s non-verbal body language suggested she was disappointed with the disparity between the meaning her HSC carer had placed on the relationship and her own perceptions of it. For all participant groups, supportive relationships were fostered over a period of time, from a place of trust between two individuals, services or sectors. The opportunity to build up a trusting bond was afforded through continuity of contact between these groups, leading to a perception of more collaborative supportive relationships and HSC practices.
Key characteristics required for fostering a supportive relationship, as perceived by all participant groups, included personal attributes of empathy, trust, discernment and reliability:
“I think Beverley works well because I can, I can count on her… I know that she’ll be there and that, that she won’t, you know, she won’t turn up sometimes and not others, that’s really quite important to me.” Barney, service user, HSCP 1 .
Furthermore, when service user and informal carer participants were looking to foster a supportive relationship with HSC staff, they also wanted those staff to be knowledgeable about their condition and circumstances. All participant groups looked to share information, offer support and reassurance when communicating within supportive relationships. However, communication was perceived as challenging across HSC organisations and sectors. All participants [n = 14] attributed this to inefficient methods of communicating across organisational boundaries, with some staff members [n = 5] reporting system-wide data protection issues when trying to share information about those whom they were supporting.
Service user and informal carer participants’ experiences of connecting with communities helped them with practical tasks and to maintain social contacts, which were perceived to improve their health and wellbeing. Communities were defined by service user and informal carer participants as local geographical areas, meaning people who lived nearby. They also described communities, where people had a common interest or role such as a religious church group or a group of informal carers.
Service users and informal carers reported that members of their communities provided valued reassurance and support. Some informal carers [n = 2] asked members of their communities to ‘check-in’ with their service user, and service users asked them to help with local grocery shopping and putting their rubbish bins out for collection [n = 2]. Connections that service users and informal carers had with people in their communities were often perceived as more cohesive than those they had with people from statutory HSC services. They attributed this to community members’ in-depth knowledge and understanding of their needs:
“People that support me, are often people who are integrated into the local community so, people know them, erm, and they kind of know me so, that’s quite important to me, like… they know what I need and they, they know that I can’t walk too far so if, for example… I’d went and got some very heavy shopping; they would pick it up and put it in the car for me.” Barney, service user, HSCP 1 .
However, for service user Grant, connecting with people in his community had become more challenging as local populations increased and neighbourly knowledge diluted:
“The village is expanded so much, everybody before knew who I was and knew who the kids were but, no… you don’t know all the people now, you see, and there isn’t that contact, village contact, if you like… I don’t think it’s that open, er, neighbourly kind of care that used to be. The people probably are more dependent on, er, trained professional people.” Grant, service user, HSCP 1.
People in his community no longer had knowledge of his circumstances, leading to reduced informal support and to Grant feeling disconnected from his community.
Social contact with others had a positive influence on mental health and wellbeing. Previous knowledge of a service users’ circumstances helped community members to connect with them socially. All informal carers [n = 5] felt their service users’ social contact with others should be encouraged to promote mental wellbeing. Although service users wanted to maintain and make new social contacts [n = 4], when informal carer Esther encouraged service user Eddie to have social contact with others, he reminded her that he also needed time to himself:
“He’ll [Eddie] sort of remind us, ‘I’m in my 70s! I actually quite like just sitting on my own sometimes and, like just having, having a wee [small] rest and taking it easy’.” Esther, informal carer (talking about her father, service user Eddie), HSCP 2.
This highlighted disparity between the expectations of some informal carers and service users, with relation to service users’ desire and need for social contact with others.
Communities played a vital role in supporting service users, promoting connections and supportive relationships with people who knew and understood their circumstances. Maintaining and making connections with other service user and informal carers offered an opportunity for participants to share their experiences and access information about their condition or caring role, whilst offering peer support and social contact. However, not all service users and informal carers wanted to connect with communities of people who had similar circumstances or conditions [n = 2]. They reported anxieties around their future, and a risk of mis-matched expectations between treatment and progression of their condition:
“My dad [Eddie] was sort of freshly diagnosed, he was sort of advised [by another person who also had Multiple Sclerosis] not to go along [to the support group], that he might find it a bit upsetting because there would be people there further along in the disease, in wheelchairs and really unwell. So, I think he sort of put off going” . Esther, informal carer, HSCP 2.
Service user participants who did attend these groups [n = 3], felt supported because they were able to exchange accounts of treatment options, discuss symptoms and disease progression, and connect with people who knew and understood their circumstances. However, it also presented challenges in other areas as highlighted through an anecdotal account from staff member Catherine:
“I suppose it’s a great charity that patients, erm, get a lot out of [the support group], I’m sure. Sometimes their [the third sector organisation] opinions can be quite forceful, and we have to look at treatment options from an evidence-based practice [point of view] as opposed to perhaps what’s purported by the – [third sector organisation].” Catherine, staff member, HSCP 1.
Participants’ experiences of connecting with HSC services helped them maintain and promote their health and wellbeing, with availability, access, coordination and utility of HSC relevant to their needs.
Service user [n = 4], informal carer [n = 4] and staff member [n = 6] participants described their experiences of accessing HSC services, reporting fragmentation and reduced availability. It was important to all participants that service users and informal carers had timely access to services, such as physiotherapy and General Practitioners (GP). Service users [n = 6], informal carers [n = 5] and staff members [n = 7] reported reduced access to respite services, a need for greater flexibility in the way services were delivered, and reduced access to HSC services because of perceived obstructive ‘gatekeepers’:
“But there’s a woman in [location] who, you have to convince that you’re in need of the services.” Barney, service user, HSCP 1.
Some service users [n = 3] and informal carers [n = 3] attributed reduced access and availability of services to financial constraints, and inflexible ways of working across HSC systems. Service user Barney perceived HSC as a ‘post-code lottery’, where services were available in some areas but not others and where the nature of individual HSC staff members influenced care. However, when participants could gain access to services at a time when they thought they needed them, they felt supported and that their health and wellbeing needs were being met.
“She [GP] gives us [Barney and his wife] such good support. It seems to me to be a bit of a lottery [access to a supportive GP], it depends very much on the nature of the, of the particular GP.” Barney, service user, HSCP 1.
All participant groups were looking for further clarity on the way HSC was set up and organised across their services. Service users [n = 4] and informal carers [n = 5] perceived that having a named point-of-contact helped them achieve this:
“Having a Care Manager [as a named point-of-contact] that, you know, coordinated things, that would refer you if you needed physio or OT or anything like that, that worked very well.” Donna, service user, HSCP 2.
However, not all service users had a point-of-contact. For some, this led to a perception of reduced levels of access to care and coordination. Service users and informal carers were not always involved in planning their own care, leading to them feeling disempowered. When they were involved in planning their care, they felt it was more efficient and timelier. They sought the support of HSC staff to plan for the future in order to ensure their changing health and wellbeing needs would be met. However, service user Arthur and his informal carer Anisha felt their Social Worker had demonstrated a short-term view and lack of pre-emptive planning of their care. Anisha explained that this made her feel as though she had fraudulently requested potentially unreasonable support; her non-verbal communication during the interview portrayed a sense of anger and distaste:
[crosses arms, purses lips, raises eyebrows and clicks tongue on the roof of her mouth] “It made me feel, almost fraudulent, as though I was asking for something that I shouldn’t have been asking for at that stage, or at this stage.” Anisha, informal carer, HSCP 1.
Participants’ use of HSC services to meet their health and wellbeing needs were varied. Some service users and informal carers were able to meet their needs through regular contact with a GP, specialist or wheelchair service. For some service users and informal carers, use of HSC was more challenging. They encountered lengthy waiting times and thought their care was not always appropriate, resulting in them using similar private sector services at their own expense.
“The waiting list is 15 weeks [for physiotherapy input], which isn’t handy if you can’t walk down the stairs! I couldn’t get away from it being sore… I think 15 weeks of that I would just be round the bend.” Caitlin, service user, HSCP 1 .
In addition, time constraints of support visits exerted negative pressure on service users and staff members relationships. For some staff members [n = 3], the relationships they formed with more experienced colleagues were instrumental in helping them to feel supported and boosting their confidence in their role.
Participants’ experiences of working together across HSC services and systems to promote and maintain health and wellbeing needs highlighted their understanding of ‘integration’. They acknowledged the positive effect that integration could have on HSC services, with pooled information and resources to promote better outcomes for service users and informal carers. However, ‘integration’ appeared to be an abstract concept to many participants (across all groups). Abigail reported a lack of clarity about structural changes, and a lack of communication and preparation for progressing them:
“Integrated HSC started up here maybe a couple of years ago, we were never really given a lot of information about it, naebody [nobody] ever came to speak to us about it and, to be quite honest, we’re nae [not] really sure how it’s supposed to work ‘cause naebody’s ever discussed it with us… I think a lot of our Locality Managers now are HSCP, as opposed to being health board.” Abigail, staff member, HSCP 1.
Services were reported as disjointed, adopting unsafe communication and information sharing practices when bureaucratic processes did not meet the needs of HSC staff, the services or their HSC system. Some staff member participants [n = 6] suggested they needed further information about other HSC services working with people they were supporting. For staff member Debra, personal safety was compromised. She felt she had been placed at risk because of a communication breakdown that left her feeling vulnerable and uncomfortable:
“I had a patient who was very sexually inappropriate towards me, erm, I was just on my own in his house, so I called the Community Nursing staff to let them know [that the person had been inappropriate] but, they’d known about this for a long time and they had already made him double-visits [where two members of staff attend at the same time]. So, I’d been going in for months without knowing this, that was communication breakdown, it wasn’t nice what happened, and that could’ve been prevented had communication been that little bit better or, had we all been on the same system [electronic information system] and that would’ve flagged up for me. That would’ve saved a lot of uncomfortable feeling for myself [looks towards the floor, laughs uncomfortably, hesitates] … so.” Debra, staff member, HSCP 2.
She felt that, had communication in the HSC system been better (through a joined-up electronic information system) this situation could have been avoided, mitigating risk for staff. Promoting trust between people within HSC systems helped to strengthen their supportive relationships and communication, and collaboration was achieved when people were experienced, knowledgeable and flexible in their approach to working with others.
Findings of this study support the need for significant investment in facilitating and protecting the allocation of HSC staff time to help them develop supportive relationships with service users, informal carers and other staff across HSC systems. This is based on the understanding those in the relationship maintain contact or interaction over a period of time through continuity [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Participants highlighted several key characteristics that they perceived as important in interpersonal connections and supportive relationships, which are represented in a typology below ( Figure 4 ).
Typology of interpersonal connection and supportive relationships in HSC.
In addition to the key characteristics of interpersonal connections and supportive relationships, participants across all groups outlined what they perceived as their health and wellbeing needs ( Table 4 ).
Health and wellbeing needs in HSC.
Findings of this study suggest models of HSC should promote the principles of interpersonal connection outlined above, and encourage supportive relationships between service users, informal carers and HSC staff members as a foundational principle of HSC. The concept of connection, through continuity of contact with someone who offers support, has long been acknowledged in relevant models and frameworks as a fundamental principle of PCC for people who access HSC services. Continuity has been advocated across a variety of contexts for many years, to help reduce admissions to hospital, lower HSC costs, and promote Service User and staff satisfaction [ 22 , 23 ]. Findings of this study support a significant investment in facilitating and protecting the allocation of HSC staff time; it can help them to develop supportive relationships with service users, informal carers and other staff across HSC systems.
Many existing frameworks, theories and concepts identify key principles for integrating, improving and delivering HSC and PCC [ 5 , 24 ]. Some key theories were considered when interpreting participants experiences in this study. It is suggested that the findings outlined add to these. When interpreting participants’ experiences of fostering connections and relationships in a care provider-receiver context, behaviours linked to applications of Bowlby’s Attachment theory across the lifespan, were instrumental [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. To further acknowledge the influence of connection in an HSC environment, a ‘blended’ theoretical lens was adopted. Caring Theory [ 28 ], Person-centred Care [ 29 ], Relationship-Based Care theories [ 30 ] and evidence informed propositions about experiences of people who access HSC [ 5 ] were combined. Figure 5 , blends these key theoretical constructs and contextual influences that were important to study participants.
Theoretical and contextual influences: People-centred Relationship-based Care.
These theories and propositions intersect as People-centred Relationship-based Care, reflecting the key concepts of ‘integrating HSC’, as identified by the study participants: people, services and systems being ‘connected’ through supportive relationships; encouraging knowledge and understanding between people who access and provide HSC; being involved in making decisions about their own care or role, and working together to meet a shared desire for truly individualised care.
In an online engagement event, members of the public, HSC service users, and informal carers, offered their insights on how this study’s findings might be applied to HSC practice in their local areas [n = 12] (July 2021). They were clear that they wanted their services to provide streamlined and holistic HSC, regardless of organisational or sectorial boundaries. The concepts of People-centred Relationship-based Care have been framed from the viewpoint of participants and entitled ‘My People-centred Relationship-based Health and Social Care’ (PRHSC) ( Figure 6 ).
My People-centred Relationship-based Health and Social Care (PRHSC).
The PRHSC model and its underpinning theories add an original perspective to key concepts of integrating HSC, as perceived explicitly by the people who are at the very centre of accessing and providing it (service users, informal carers and staff members). Furthermore, it could be argued that it could complement existing models of IHSC, for example, the International Foundation for Integrated Care’s nine key conceptual ‘Pillars of Integrated Care’ [ 31 , 32 ]. The PRHSC model’s underpinning blended theories ( Figure 5 ) align closely with fundamental human rights, contributing to social justice by promoting equality and inclusion [ 33 ]. They highlight key insight into participants’ perceptions of integrated care in HSC practice. The application of the PRHSC model should be tested across different groups of people who access HSC in a variety of settings, to establish reliability and the viability of its use. Further exploration of the potential transferability of findings beyond HSC would be warranted across wider communities. For example, industries or public service sectors where elements of caring are incorporated, such as policing or education. It could be argued that these communities may also benefit from a deeper understanding of interpersonal connections and supportive relationships to inform the caring elements of their work.
The active part that members of the public and key stakeholders played in developing ideas, study design and refining interpretations, is key to the credibility of these findings. A further strength is its multi-case embedded design, which allowed multiple perspectives of participants’ reality to be represented in the data within each case. Reflexivity incorporating reflection, curiosity and consultation with key stakeholders and the research team, underpinned the entire research process thereby increasing the trustworthiness and transferability potential of these findings.
A potential limitation to the transferability of these findings is the contextual nature of HSC with the study population being from two HSCPs in one region in Scotland. In line with the ethics panel recommendations (Section 2.2.4), people who have learning disabilities or profound mental health issues were excluded from this study. This is recognised as a limitation and including these communities could have added depth of understanding and promoted relevance to wider practice areas [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].
The overarching purpose of this study was to explore and better understand the health and wellbeing needs, experiences and relationships of people who accessed HSC and the individuals who supported them at home. Interpersonal connections that developed into supportive relationships were perceived by participants in all groups as instrumental in helping them feel able to cope with their changing HSC needs and roles. Supportive relationships promoted reassurance, information sharing and reduced anxiety; when they were lacking, it negatively impacted upon their experiences of HSC. This study highlights that connections, relationships and cross-sectoral working are important and entirely necessary for integrating HSC services. It is important that policy makers and HSC providers recognise the contribution communities can make to HSC; those communities come in many forms, and one model of integrating HSC does not fit all. No one person or service can provide the whole care-package, and all those who access and provide HSC need to have an equal voice. If the integration of HSC is to be improved, we as a society, must be clear on what is expected of HSC services and systems, and how we prioritise the limited resource across all contexts of HSC to meet health and wellbeing needs.
Prof Anne Hendry, Senior Associate, International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC), Director, IFIC Scotland , Honorary Secretary, British Geriatrics Society, Honorary Professor, University of the West of Scotland, UK.
One anonymous reviewer.
This paper has been produced to summarise and further disseminate findings of the lead authors PhD study; co-authors were part of the supervisory team. The full thesis is available here: https://doi.org/10.48526/rgu-wt-1677988 . PhD studentship was co-funded by Robert Gordon University and NHS Grampian. Funding for the publication of this paper was provided via the same studentship fund.
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.
For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft
Affiliation Center for Climate Action and Social Transformations (4CAST), Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland
Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliations Center for Climate Action and Social Transformations (4CAST), Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland, Department of Psychological Sciences, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America
Research on the extent to which people believe that people can change (incremental beliefs) suggests that incrementalist beliefs are positively related to well-being, whereas entity beliefs (people cannot change) are not. One explanation for this relationship is that incremental beliefs are associated with a mastery orientation, whereas entity beliefs are not. If this is the case, then autonomous and competence motives should mediate relationships between incrementalism and well-being because these motives reflect different aspects of mastery. The present study examined the possibility that autonomous and competence motives mediate relationships between self-theories and well-being. Participants were adult community members ( n = 428) who completed the Life Engagement Test (eudaimonic well-being), the Satisfaction with life Scale (hedonic well-being), the Mental Health Continuum Scale (eudaimonic, subjective, and psychological well-being), the Basic Needs Satisfaction scale (autonomy, competence, relatedness), and a measure of implicit theories of the self (incremental and entity beliefs). Regression analyses found that incremental beliefs were significantly related (positively) to all three measures of well-being, whereas entity beliefs were not significantly related to well-being. Regression analyses also found that incremental beliefs were positively related to satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs but were not related to satisfaction of relatedness needs. Entity beliefs were not related to the satisfaction of any of the three basic needs. A series of mediational analyses found that competence and autonomy motives mediated relationships between incremental beliefs and all three measures of well-being. In all but one case, satisfaction with life, the direct effects of incremental beliefs on well-being were rendered non-significant when satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs were included as mediators. The present results confirm and extend to the general domain the supposition that a mastery orientation is responsible for relationships between well-being and incremental theories of the self. They also conform the importance of the tenants of Self-Determination Theory in understanding self-theories.
Citation: Cypryańska M, Nezlek JB (2024) Satisfaction of basic needs mediates relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0309079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079
Editor: Henri Tilga, University of Tartu, ESTONIA
Received: February 26, 2024; Accepted: August 6, 2024; Published: August 16, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Cypryańska, Nezlek. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data are freely and immediately available via the Open Science framework. The site for this study includes a fully annotated SPSS file and an accompanying codebook, and a csv data file. The url is: https://osf.io/ajkh4/?view_only=13dbb2a2f98648499cbbe3cbbe8a439d .
Funding: The research described in this paper was supported by grant NSC 2013/11/B/HS6/01135) from the Polish National Science Centre (Narodowe Centrum Nauki) to MC. URL: https://www.ncn.gov.pl/ The funder had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
As shown by a considerable body of research, individuals vary in the extent to which they believe that the self can change [ 1 ], and Dweck introduced the terms incremental and entity theories to refer respectively to people’s beliefs that the self can change and that it cannot. Research on mindsets, a term that is now commonly used to refer to the distinction between incremental and entity beliefs, has consistently found that incremental beliefs are more adaptive than entity beliefs. For example, performance in school has been found to be positively related to the strength with which students advocate incremental theories of the self, or alternatively, is negatively related to the strength with which students advocate entity theories of the self [e.g., 2]. Moreover, although much of the research on mindsets has concerned achievement (e.g., school performance) mindsets can play roles in various domains [ 1 ].
Although numerous underlying mechanisms and processes have been proposed for these relationships [ 2 ], few studies, particularly outside of the domain of academic achievement, have examined the essence of Dweck’s contention that “mastery” and “helpless” orientations are responsible (at least in part) for relationships between mindsets and positive outcomes. Regardless, there seems to be broad agreement that relationships between mindsets and various outcomes reflects the fact that incremental beliefs are associated with a mastery orientation, whereas entity beliefs are associated with a helpless orientation.
An unresolved issue in the study of mindsets is the extent to which mindsets should be conceptualized as a uni-dimensional construct anchored at one end by incrementalist beliefs and anchored at the other end by entity beliefs, or as two separate constructs. Dweck and colleagues write as if mindsets consist of two components, referring frequently to incrementalist and entitative beliefs as they were distinct rather than opposite ends of a single continuum, but their research consistently represents mindsets with a single score reflecting the extent to which people advocate an incremental mindset.
Nevertheless, as long ago as 1995, Dweck and colleagues acknowledged the possibility that incremental and entity beliefs were distinct constructs [ 3 ]. Consistent with this possibility, a meta-analysis of young people’s mindsets regarding intelligence found clear support for two correlated factors [ 4 ]. Along the same lines, in a series of studies Karwoski has found that mindsets regarding creativity are best conceptualized as two factors corresponding to incremental and entity beliefs rather than a single factor [e.g., 5 ]. With this research and the content of the items of the scale in mind, we conceptualized mindsets in terms of two correlated constructs, and we examined how well our data fit this conceptualization before examining relationships among mindsets, well-being, basic need satisfaction, the primary focus of the present study.
The present study examined relationships between mindsets and well-being. Typically, the construct of mindsets has been applied to performance of some kind, to success at a task, or to the achievement of a goal. Nevertheless, examination of the items on some measures of mindsets suggests that mindsets can refer to more than achievement or performance [ 6 ]. For example, in the mindset questionnaire titled “Kind of person” entity beliefs are measured by items such as “People can do things differently, but the important parts of who they are can’t really be changed.” In contrast, incremental beliefs are measured by items such as “Everyone, no matter who they are, can significantly change their basic characteristics.” Such items refer to life in general, not to a specific domain such as academic achievement or work. As such, we expected that mindsets would be related to well-being defined in general terms.
Contemporary research on well-being suggests that well-being can be defined in terms of hedonic and eudemonic well-being. As noted by Ryan and Deci [ 7 ]: “Current research on well-being has been derived from two general perspectives: the hedonic approach, which focuses on happiness and defines well-being in terms of pleasure attainment and pain avoidance; and the eudaimonic approach, which focuses on meaning and self-realization and defines well-being in terms of the degree to which a person is fully functioning.” Although Deci and Ryan discuss how hedonic and eudemonic approaches differ and how they overlap, in terms of mindsets, we believe that possessing an incremental mindset should be associated with greater well-being whether well-being is conceptualized in hedonic or eudemonic terms. The sense of mastery inherent in an incremental mindset should facilitate both types of well-being, a supposition consistent with self-determination theory [SDT; 8 ] and with research about well-being that has been conducted within the context of SDT.
Self-determination theory is a major theoretical framework that concerns human motivation broadly defined [ 9 , 10 ]. We choose SDT as our explanatory framework because of its breadth and its emphasis on constructs that we believed corresponded to the mastery orientation discussed by Dweck and colleagues. SDT. SDT discusses human motivation in terms of three needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Within the context of SDT, we assumed that competence and autonomy corresponded to mastery as discussed by Dweck and colleagues.
The extent to which the basic needs proposed by SDT are satisfied has been found to be positively related to well-being across various domains and cultures [ 11 ]. This suggested to us that need satisfaction might mediate relationships between mindsets and well-being. Dweck and colleagues have proposed that a sense of mastery is responsible for relationships between mindsets and well-being. We collected data that allowed us to determine if the extent to which the satisfaction of the basic needs of competence and autonomy mediated relationships between mindsets and well-being. We chose the satisfaction of the basic needs for competence and for autonomy because we thought that people’s beliefs about their competence in terms of life activities and their beliefs about the extent to which they were free to choose what they did (autonomy) were aspects of mastery.
Although the construct of “need satisfaction” may not immediately lead to an association with feeling autonomous or competent for some, inspection of the items on the Basic Needs Satisfaction Scale [BNS; 12 ] scale suggests that need satisfaction overlaps considerably with people’s beliefs about how competent or autonomous they are. For example, two items on the competence subscale of Gagne’s measure are: “Most days I feel a sense of accomplishment from what I do,” and “Often, I do not feel very competent” (reverse-coded). Two items on the autonomy scale are: “I generally feel free to express my ideas and opinions,” and “There is not much opportunity for me to decide for myself how to do things in my daily life” (reverse-coded). The scales measure how competent and autonomous a person feels, which is a measure of how well these needs are satisfied.
We understood mediation as described by Agler and De Boeck [ 13 ]: ‘…mediation processes are framed in terms of intermediate variables between an independent variable and a dependent variable, with a minimum of three variables required in total: X, M, and Y, where X is the independent variable (IV), Y is the dependent variable (DV), and M is the (hypothesized) mediator variable that is supposed to transmit the causal effect of X to Y. The total effect of X on Y is referred to as the total effect (TE), and that effect is then partitioned into a combination of a direct effect (DE) of X on Y, and an indirect effect (IE) of X on Y that is transmitted through M. In other words, the relationship between X and Y is decomposed into a direct link and an indirect link.”
In their classic description of mediation Baron and Kenny [ 14 ] described three criteria for mediation. (1) The predictor needs to be related to the outcome, or there is nothing to mediate, although there may be exceptions to this rule such as suppression [ 13 , 15 ]. (2) The predictor needs to be related to the mediator; otherwise, the mediator cannot mediate the relationship between the predictor and the outcome. (3) Including the mediator should lead to a reduction in the strength of the relationship between the predictor and the outcome. This is a simplified description of mediation. See Hayes [ 16 ] for a more thorough discussion of mediation.
Within the present context and in terms of the mediational model to be tested, well-being is the outcome, mindsets are the predictors, and the satisfaction of basic needs are the mediators. We proposed this model assuming that mindsets lead to (or precede) the satisfaction of basic needs, and that in turn, the satisfaction of basic needs leads to (or precedes) well-being. One of the tenets of mindset theory is that incremental mindsets are associated with a sense of mastery over one’s environment (or some specific domain of life). In terms of SDT and BNS, mastery is represented by autonomy, a belief that one is acting on his/her own volition, and competence, a belief that one can achieve goals and accomplish tasks.
Therefore, we expected that the satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs (i.e., how autonomous and competent a person feels) would mediate relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being. Given that we distinguished incremental and entity mindsets, we assumed that this mediation would exist only for incremental mindsets, not for entity mindsets. Finally, mediation, particularly within the context of a cross-sectional design with only one measurement occasion, does not provide a strong basis for drawing causal inferences, and we discuss the issue of causal precedence in the discussion section.
Participants were 428 adults ( M age = 33.0 years, SD = 7.84, range 18–59 years; 211 women) who were recruited via calls on the internet to participate in a study on running and well-being. Data were collected from two samples, which were combined for the present analyses. The first sample was obtained between 21 March and 26 May 2015, and the second between 23 April and 22 August 2016. For both samples, participants were told that their names would be entered into a lottery for prizes ranging from running shoes and other running paraphernalia to an all-expense paid trip to a run held in Europe, and these prizes were awarded at the conclusion of each study.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki regarding the rights of research participants. Participants consented electronically by clicking on a link indicating their agreement to participate after being told that their names would not be associated with their answers and that they could terminate participation at any time without penalty. Consistent with these instructions, responses were de-identified prior to analysis. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Scientific Research Involving Humans as subjects, School of Social Psychology, Campus in Poznań, protocol 5/2015/WZ, entitled "Personality traits, specific patterns of adaptation and well-being and related activity with preparation for long-distance runs (National study runners’ motivation),” approved on 18 March 2015.
Mindsets were measured with the eight-item “Kind of person” scale discussed by Dweck [ 6 ]. The scale has four items that measure incrementalist beliefs, e.g., “People can always substantially change the kind of person they are,” and four items that measure entity beliefs, e.g., “Everyone is a certain kind of person, and there is not much that can be done to really change that.” We used a Polish language version of the scale developed by Lachowicz-Tabaczek [ 17 ]. Responses were made using a six-point scale with endpoints labeled: 1 = definitely disagree and 6 = definitely agree.
Satisfaction of basic needs was measured with the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale [BNS; 8, 12 ]. The BNS consists of 21 items, seven items for each of the three subscales: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. To create a Polish language version of the scale, the items on the scale were translated and back-translated by a team consisting of members fluent in both languages, some of whom had 25+ years of experience. Participants responded using seven-point scales with endpoints labeled: 1 = not at all true and 7 = completely true.
Well-being was measured with three scales: the Mental Health Continuum Short Form [MHC; 18 ], the Life Engagement Test [LET; 19 ], and the Satisfaction with Life Scale [SWLS; 20 ]. We used a Polish language version of the MHC created by Karaś et al. [ 21 ]. The MHC has three subscales: Eudaimonic, Social, and Psychological. Satisfaction with life was measured using a Polish language version of the SWLS created by Jankowski [ 22 ], and Life Engagement was measured using a Polish language version of the LET created by Bąk et al. [Unpublished]. Due to a programming error, item three of the MHC was not administered.
Responses to the MHC were made using six-point scales with endpoint labeled: 0 = ‘never’ and 5 = ‘every day.’ Responses to the LET were made using five-point scales with endpoint labeled: 1 = definitely disagree and 5 = definitely agree. Responses to the SWLS were made using seven-point scales with endpoints labeled: 1 = definitely disagree and 7 = definitely agree.
Before conducting the primary analyses of the study, we examined the factor structure of the measure of mindsets. Based upon an inspection of the items and previous research [ 23 , e.g., 24 ], we used Mplus to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis that examined the fit between the data and a two factor model. We modeled items 1, 4, 7, and 8 as observed measures of a latent construct of incrementalist beliefs, and items 2, 3, 5, and 6 as observed measures of a latent construct of entity beliefs. The covariance between the factors was left to vary freely.
This analysis found that the proposed two-factor model fit the data well (CFI = .978; TFI = .978, SRMR = .029, RMSEA = .074, 95% CI = .055/.094), and the standardized coefficients are presented in Table 1 . The estimated standardized covariance between the two factors was -.776. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 1 .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t001
We also fit a single factor model, but this model did not appear to fit the data as well as the two-factor model. Although it was not possible to compare statistically the fits of these two models because they had the same df , for all fit indices, the fit of the two-factor model was better. For example, e.g., the sample-size adjusted BIC was 8575.4 for the two-factor model, and it was 8660.2 for the single factor model. The χ2 difference between the models was 84.8, and for the one factor model the TFI was .90 and the RMESA was .13.
Based on these analyses, we computed separate scores representing incremental and entity beliefs. These were defined as the mean of the four items that measured incremental beliefs (items 1, 4, 7, and 8) and the mean of the four items that measured entity beliefs (items 2, 3, 5, and 6).
Before conducting the primary analyses of the study, we examined the means, standard deviations, reliabilities, and correlations between our measures. These summary statistics are presented in Table 2 . According to guidelines provided by Shrout [ 25 ], all measures had at least moderate reliability (.61 to .80), and most had substantial reliability (.81 and above).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t002
The first requirement for mediation is that a predictor is related to an outcome; otherwise, there is nothing to mediate. To determine if our data met this requirement, we examined relationships between the measures of the two mindsets (predictors) and well-being (outcomes) with a set of regression analyses in which incrementalist beliefs and entity beliefs were regressed onto each measure of well-being. The results of these analyses were quite clear, and the results are summarized in Table 3 . When incremental and entity beliefs were considered simultaneously, incremental beliefs were significantly and positively related to all measures of well-being, whereas entity beliefs were not significantly related to any measure of well-being.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t003
Relationships between mindsets and satisfaction of basic needs. The second requirement for mediation is that predictors are related to potential mediators. To determine if our data met this requirement, we examined relationships between the measures of the two mindsets and satisfaction of basic needs in regression analyses in which incremental beliefs and entity beliefs were regressed onto each measure of satisfaction of basic needs. The results of these analyses were also quite clear, and the results are summarized in Table 4 . When incremental and entity beliefs were considered simultaneously, incremental beliefs were significantly and positively related to all three measures of satisfaction of basic needs, whereas entity beliefs were not significantly related to any measure of the satisfaction of basic needs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t004
Although relationships between mediators (satisfaction of basic needs) and outcomes (well-being) do not figure prominently in discussions of mediation, we examined these relationships nevertheless. This reflected in part our desire to have a complete understanding of the relationships among the variables we measured. This is consistent with what Agler and De Boeck [ 13 ] described as an “indirectness perspective” (p. 4). In addition, the results of these analyses contribute to our understanding of relationships between well-being and the satisfaction of basic needs.
Relationships between satisfaction of basic needs and well-being were examined in a series of regression analyses in which the three measures of satisfaction of basic needs were regressed onto each measure of well-being. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 5 . As can be seen from these results, with only one exception, the satisfaction of all three basic needs was significantly and positively related to all measures of well-being. The exception was the relationship between the satisfaction of relatedness needs and MHC Eudemonia, which was significant at p = .07. Such relationships are consistent with the contention of SDT that the satisfaction of basic needs provides a foundation for well-being.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t005
The preceding analyses were conducted in anticipation of the mediational analyses, which are the primary focus of this paper. After controlling for the relationship between incremental and entity mindsets, entity mindsets were not related to any measure of well-being, and entity mindsets were not related to any measure of satisfaction of basic needs. In other words, the measure of entity mindsets did not meet either criterion for mediation.
Given this, the mediational analyses were limited to how the satisfaction of basic needs mediated relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being. The present hypotheses concern how mastery mediates relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being, and only two of the three basic needs, autonomy and competence, concern mastery. Therefore, the mediational analyses focused on satisfaction of competence and autonomy needs as mediators.
The mediational analyses were done using the PROCESS macro [ 16 ], Model 4. In these analyses, a measure of well-being was the outcome, a score representing incremental beliefs was the predictor, and the satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs were the mediators. Both mediators were included simultaneously. To obtain 95% confidence intervals (CI), 5,000 bootstrap iterations were made. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6 . We present unstandardized coefficients to provide a basis to understand how total effects were partitioned into direct and indirect effects. To interpret the statistical significance of effects, we treated effects for which the CIs did not include 0 as different from 0.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309079.t006
The results of these analyses were quite clear. The satisfaction of both autonomy and competence needs mediated the relationship between incremental beliefs and well-being for all five measures of well-being. Moreover, for the three MHC measures and the LET, the CI for the direct effect included 0, i.e., the direct effects were not different from 0. Also, tests of the differences of the indirect effects for autonomy and competence did not find any significant differences between them.
Although there is a robust debate about how to assess the strength of indirect effects in mediation, the indirect effects in the present analyses represented two-thirds or more (some close to 90%) of the total effects. This, combined with the lack of significant direct effects, provides strong support for the central hypothesis of the study that individual differences in mastery are responsible for relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being.
The results clearly supported our hypothesis that a sense of mastery mediates relationships between incremental mindsets and well-being. We found that the satisfaction of the basic needs of Autonomy and Competence mediated relationships between incremental beliefs and well-being for all measures of well-being. Moreover, this mediation was strong. For all but one measure of well-being, the direct effect between incremental beliefs and well-being was not significant after Autonomy and Competence were included as mediators. Some refer to this as “full mediation.” These results support our logic that the sense of mastery that has been discussed as one of the important reasons incrementalist beliefs are associated with success also applies to relationships between incrementalist beliefs and well-being.
The present results meaningfully extend the domain in which mindsets operate. Much of the work on mindsets has concerned performance in achievement domains such as school and work. The present results suggest that people’s beliefs about how they can changeare related to their well-being, generally defined. Such a possibility complements the extensive body of research demonstrating that perceived control over one’s environment is positively related to well-being
Although mindsets were initially conceptualized as an “either/or” single continuum that reflects a single construct, the present results suggest that it may be useful to conceptualize mindsets in terms of two, albeit related constructs: incremental mindsets and entity mindsets. Support for this contention comes from two sources: the results of confirmatory factor analyses and the results of analyses of relationships between mindsets and well-being. The CFA found solid support for the existence of two separate constructs, constructs that made conceptual sense.
The validity of conceptualizing mindsets as two constructs was demonstrated by the differences in the relationships between these two constructs and well-being. At the zero-order, incremental beliefs were positively correlated with well-being, whereas entity beliefs were negatively correlated with well-being. Moreover, when the two measures of mindsets were simultaneously regressed onto measures of well-being, entity beliefs were not significantly related to any measure of well-being, whereas incremental beliefs were positively related to all measures of well-being. This indicates that relationships between well-being and entity beliefs reflect the relationship between entity and incremental beliefs.
Moreover, the possibility that mindsets can be conceptualized in terms of two separate (albeit correlated) dimensions was discussed by Dweck et al. [ 3 ]. In responding to numerous commentators in an issue of Psychological Inquiry , Dweck et al. (pp. 323–324) noted:
“For simplicity’s sake, we have tended to portray the two implicit theories as mutually exclusive alternatives…Nonetheless, students of the human mind know that the fact that two beliefs are opposites does not prevent people from holding them both…This possibility-that many people actually hold both theories, albeit to differing degrees- raises many other intriguing possibilities and suggests that research into the circumstances that might elicit the different theories may well be in a fruitful direction.”
Despite this response about intriguing possibilities and fruitful directions, nearly 30 years later, the issue of the dimensionality of mindsets has not been explored very vigorously.
Regardless, conceptualizing mindsets as being comprised of two separate, but related dimensions is similar to distinctions that have been made in other domains. For example, in their seminal article, Cacioppo and Berntson [ 26 ] discussed how negative and positive evaluations are best conceptualized as a two-dimensional evaluative space, not single, bi-polar dimension. Along the same lines, Elliot and Thrash [ 27 ] demonstrated that approach and avoidance motives are best conceptualized as two separate motives, not opposite ends of a single continuum. Earlier, Diener and Emmons [ 28 ] found that reports of positive and negative affect were uncorrelated over longer periods of times (e.g., a year), and even though they were negatively correlated over shorter periods of time, these correlations were not strong enough to support a uni-dimensional or bi-polar model.
Although individual differences in entity mindsets were not related to well-being or to the satisfaction of basic needs when entity mindsets were analyzed with incremental mindsets, they were significantly (negatively) related to both well-being and to the satisfaction of basic needs at the zero-order (simple correlations). These correlations suggest that entity mindsets are not adaptive. Such correlations may represent the existence of what is sometimes referred to as a “pessimistic explanatory style” that has been found to interfere with people’s ability to cope with stress, and more generally, to thrive [ 29 ]. It is possible that entity mindsets are, at least in part, a manifestation of the same beliefs, cognitions, and emotions that characterize a pessimistic explanatory style and related constructs.
Nevertheless, the present results are somewhat ambiguous about such possibilities. That is, entity mindset did not play a role, even a minor role, in relationships among mindsets, the satisfaction of basic needs, and well-being when incremental mindsets were included in the analyses. The present results suggest that whatever relationships exist between entity mindsets and well-being or the satisfaction of basic needs are subsumed by relationships between incremental mindsets and these other constructs. Given the lack of attention to the possibility the mindsets may be best conceptualized as two factors rather than one, there is little research or theory that can be used to provide a context for the present results. This will require future research that focuses on this possibility.
Within the context of a cross-sectional, single-occasion design such as that used in the present study, demonstrating that a variable (M) mediates a relationship between an outcome (Y) and a predictor (X) cannot serve as a basis for claims about causal relationships among the constructs being measured. Nevertheless, the fact that M mediates a relationship between X and Y can be interpreted as being consistent with, or supportive of, the existence of a causal sequence from X to M to Y. Such support can be meaningful when a mediational model is theory-driven, and when the components of the model represent relationships that have been supported by past research.
We think the present results provide credible support for the existence of a causal sequence from incremental beliefs through the satisfaction of autonomy and competence basic needs to well-being. The direct relationship between incremental beliefs and well-being is a straightforward extension of research on relationships between incremental beliefs and success in other domains. Dweck and colleagues have repeatedly discussed how incremental beliefs are associated with a mastery orientation, and it is this mastery orientation that is responsible for the relationship between incremental beliefs and success. The satisfaction of the basic needs of autonomy and competence are clearly components of a mastery orientation, and so the fact that they mediate relationships between incremental beliefs and well-being is fully consistent with Dweck’s model and the considerable body of research that has been conducted to examine it.
Nonetheless, as just described, the existence of mediation can be used to support, but not prove causality. Causality is best examined using experimental methods, although attempts to manipulate mindsets have produced mixed results [e.g., 30 ]. Other ways of examining causality include longitudinal models in which changes in mindsets and well-being are measured across time.
The present results suggest that: (1) mindsets can be conceptualized in terms of two independent sets of beliefs, incremental and entity, (2) incremental beliefs are positively related to well-being defined broadly, and (3) relationships between incremental beliefs and well-being reflect underlying relationship between incremental beliefs and mastery orientation and between a mastery orientation and well-being. Each of these findings is new, and collectively, they provide a basis for new directions in research on mindsets.
UCL Grand Challenges
Working across sectors to foster a community focused on connected policies and collaborative practices to improve mental health and wellbeing in the construction industry
1 March 2024
Grant: Grand Challenges Mental Health and Wellbeing Network Building Year awarded: 2023-24 Amount awarded: £2,482.00
The construction industry is a major employer in the UK, supporting 2.1 million workers and contributing 6% to the GDP. Yet, it faces a significant mental health crisis, with suicide rates 3.7x the national average. Addressing this issue is crucial for sustainable development, as workers endure pressures like tight schedules and financial instability, often leading to a reluctance to discuss mental health.
In a collaboration between the Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction (BSSC) and UCL Division of Psychiatry, a half-day roundtable event was held on 2 July 2024. The event brought together 25 professionals from different sectors of construction and 11 researchers from numerous disciplines and different universities. There was a mix of research presentations, panel discussions and roundtable workshops on various topics of mental health and wellbeing in construction. The panel consisted of 6 experts:
The conversation explored several questions, and further detail can be found in the event summary report:
The project aimed to foster a community focused on connected policies and collaborative practices by engaging UCL researchers and industry leaders, culminating in a cross-disciplinary symposium to identify challenges and co-create solutions for systemic change.
We’ve put some small files called cookies on your device to make our site work.
We’d also like to use analytics cookies. These send information about how our site is used to a service called Google Analytics. We use this information to improve our site.
Let us know if this is OK. We’ll use a cookie to save your choice. You can read more about our cookies before you choose.
Change my preferences I'm OK with analytics cookies
Improving personal health and wellbeing.
Download a PDF of the above NHS health and wellbeing model (2021): creating a health and wellbeing culture infographic
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
Introduction: Workplace health and wellbeing is a major public health issue for employers. Wellbeing health initiatives are known to be cost-effective, especially when the programs are targeted and matched to the health problems of the specific population. The aim of this paper is to gather information about the health and wellbeing needs and resources of employees at one British organization.
Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out to explore the health and wellbeing needs and resources of employees at one British organization. All employees were invited to participate in the survey, and, therefore, sampling was not necessary.
Results: 838 questionnaires were viable and included in the analysis. Employees reported "feeling happier at work" was the most important factor promoting their health and wellbeing. Physical tasks, such as "moving and handling" were reported to affect employee health and wellbeing the most. The "provision of physiotherapy" was the most useful resource at work. In all, 75% felt that maintaining a healthy lifestyle in the workplace is achievable.
Conclusions: More needs to be done by organizations and occupational health to improve the working conditions and organizational culture so that employees feel that they can function at their optimal and not perceive the workplace as a contributor to ill-health.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Thirza Tooes
View articles
The workforce at Arconic’s Kitts Green site weren’t engaged with health interventions, so HR created a strategy around their specific wellbeing needs
The organisation
Arconic is a global business that develops and manufactures products for the aerospace, commercial transportation and oil and gas markets. It has approximately 150 sites, around 40,000 employees, and in 2017 generated a turnover of $13 billion (£10.1 billion). Its history goes back a long way; the firm has been manufacturing in the UK since the 1830s, and supplied turbine blades for the first aircraft to be powered by a jet engine. Its 16 British manufacturing sites contributed around 6% to Arconic’s global 2017 revenue.
The problem
Arconic’s Kitts Green site in Birmingham manufactures and processes aluminium in a factory that runs 24/7. The shop floor employees work in a shift pattern of two 12-hour day shifts and two 12-hour night shifts followed by four days off. The workforce is largely male and ageing; 68% are over 40 and 20% are 55 or older. As such they’re vulnerable to health conditions associated with shift work (such as poor sleep), and older people (such as cardiovascular problems).
Prevailing attitudes among staff around seeking help at work to make changes were also a barrier. There was something of a stigma around using the wellness centre, for example, and engagement with healthy lifestyle messages was weak.
Although the site was running health campaigns there was no data on their uptake or success rate, and – chosen from an NHS list – they weren’t personalised to the workforce.
To identify the health and wellbeing status of the workforce and create a tailored two-year strategy, HR and health and safety joined forces. In 2016 the on-site wellness team (comprised of an occupational health nurse, an occupational health adviser and a healthy lifestyle adviser) planned a health-check roadshow in conjunction with HR.
These 10-minute checkups screened for 15 different health markers. Individual results were available to employees immediately along with personalised recommendations. There was also the opportunity to make a further appointment to see the nurse or healthy lifestyle adviser to discuss any concerns.
Although Arconic was already offering these checks in the wellness centre, key was getting out onto the shop floor to conduct them in canteens so that employees missed less time away from work.
“It was really important to get on the floor and start talking to the guys face to face. We feel that broke down a lot of barriers and made the wellness centre that much more accessible. They became comfortable, they put faces to the names, and I think that really opened the door,” explains Ines Balasa-Balint, Kitts Green’s HR business partner.
The easier-to-attend sessions proved much more popular than health checks previously had been; 175 employees took part in the roadshow checks.
The data gathered demonstrated that areas of particular concern were high body fat percentage, hydration and cholesterol. From this the team was able to establish a holistic health and wellbeing strategy focused around four key areas: environmental, occupational, social and health. Various interventions were launched under each area – for example more classes at the on-site gym, various health promotion campaigns on site, and health vending machines (environmental), free counselling, physio and chiropody services, and financial support through HR (occupational), and health screenings and subsided stop smoking programmes (health) to name a few. Particularly key was creating and developing a wellness committee (social).
“Ten different employees from different areas of the plant make up the wellness committee and they help with getting communication out to the shop floor. They’ll help us organise sporting events, external work for charity and family fun days,” says Claire Green, health and safety manager for Kitts Green.
Getting staff across the site engaged at the frontline was again vital to the interventions being a success. Posters were put up in each area displaying different shift patterns’ aggregate results from the health checks, which not only kept employees informed but also sparked conversations.
“It was like a bit of a competition actually between the areas. It became a good talking point between the work crews as well,” explains Green.
Generalised results were also published in the staff newsletter, which every employee gets a copy of.
To particularly target the three problem areas highlighted by the health checks (body fat, hydration and cholesterol), the business ran weight loss programmes, physical activity initiatives such as cycling clubs, a hydration campaign that included distributing informative water bottles, and took part in national awareness initiatives like National Heart Month and Know Your Numbers (which focuses on blood pressure awareness and testing).
Although not highlighted as an issue in the health-check roadshow, which tested mainly physical health markers, mental health has also been a focus. “We’ve sat down and said ‘look we’ve done really well with the physical side of things but now it’s time to step it up and include mental health’, because it is so important,” says Balasa-Balint.
It was decided some form of benchmark was needed, and that a mental health roadshow wouldn’t really work as it’s harder to ‘test’ for mental wellbeing issues. So a Mind Your Health survey was created and distributed earlier this year.
“We had an online survey sent out to all those who had computer access, but for the shop floor we decided that once again going out in person was key. So myself, Claire and Nadia [Fedotova, former environmental health and safety manager] spent a few weeks going to every single team briefing, and gave a 10-minute talk at the end about why it was important and what we wanted to do,” explains Balasa-Balint. “We actually gave people the option to fill in the survey then and there and had a whopping 320 people respond, which we were really excited about.”
Not only has Arconic enjoyed incredible internal success, it has also received external industry recognition in the form of HR magazine’s 2018 HR Excellence Awards Health and Wellbeing award.
Since the health checks and subsequent tailored health and wellbeing strategy there have been various broad improvements. Sickness absence dropped by 0.57% between 2016 and 2017, the lowest result seen since 2014. The latest employee engagement survey in late-2017 demonstrated that environment, health and safety areas are up by 3% and employee engagement is up 5% compared with other UK sites.
Kitts Green has collectively lost 138 kilograms, 30% of people identified with critical hypertension stage 2 blood pressure have been reduced to a less critical rating, and 61.5% of people screened in 2017 have hit the cholesterol target of a reading of 5mmol/L or below.
The stigma around seeking help also appears to have lessened; appointments to see the occupational health nurse increased by 139.9% from 2016 to 2017, and the on-site gym now has 288 members (42.4% of all employees). The team plans to repeat the health-check roadshow in 2019 so that it can compare data and establish whether there are additional areas requiring intervention.
“We expect a better uptake. We were chuffed with 175 at the time considering before then not much had been recorded or followed up really. But we hope to get numbers like we did for our mental health survey because that was just fantastic,” says Balasa-Balint.
She adds: “To have the success we’ve had so far is encouraging because I think we are making an impact on our employees. At the end of the day that’s what we want; we want happy, healthy people working for us who are happy to work for us”.
We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services.
We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.
You have accepted additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
You have rejected additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
A group-wide project was launched last year to help everyone feel more able to talk openly about mental health in the workplace and ensure that our people understand how to access help if they need it.
Some of our mental health campaigns and initiatives
The health and safety of our people and communities is at the heart of everything we do, with mental wellbeing regarded as being as important as physical safety. A group-wide project was launched last year to help everyone feel more able to talk openly about mental health in the workplace and ensure that our people understand how to access help if they need it.
In 2019, the importance of mental health and wellbeing was firmly placed at the top of the NDA group employee agenda and given special project status and group-wide focus. With the ambition of embedding a strong mental health culture, a delivery group was formed to set strategic direction and share good practice and resources. The project group has since committed to standardising our Employee Assistance Programme, collaborated on national awareness campaigns and developed a consistent way to measure success in this area. Each business has also committed to meet the standards set out in the Thriving at Work report (ref 51) and progress is reported at quarterly performance reviews.
Strong leadership is a key factor in ensuring that mental health is embedded in our culture and executive leadership is represented in each of our businesses. Mental health first aiders have been put in place by most businesses in the group, with 14 trained individuals in the NDA. Their role is to signpost people to support and encourage them to speak up about mental health and seek help if they need it. We have also enlisted the guidance and support of charities like Mind and Samaritans, with people across the group fundraising to support their important work.
Early signs are showing that the focus on mental health is starting to pay off. A recent survey carried out across the NDA group showed a 30% increase in people who responded and agreed that mental health is openly discussed in the workplace, compared to 2 years ago. The survey also showed that 91% of respondents know how to access support if they need it. Marking the success of the project so far was a major highlight of our first ever NDA group Safety and Wellbeing Awards in 2019.
Related content, is this page useful.
Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.
To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. Please fill in this survey (opens in a new tab) .
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Ascending to well-being through mediated spaces: an alternative to informal learning and physical activity environments in vertical schools.
2. learning and pedagogy, 2.1. what is learning, 2.2. children’s developmental aspects, 2.3. from traditional to innovative pedagogy.
3.1. children’s problems in today’s learning environment, 3.2. background of integrating education, nature, and community, 3.3. vertical school as a learning environment type, 3.4. biophilic design, 4. definition of mediated spaces.
Author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Spaces | Definitions |
---|---|
Classrooms | A traditional closed learning space of about 40–60 sqm for 20–30 students. If learning spaces are fully closable with flexible walls, then they are classified as classrooms. |
Commons | A learning space greater than about 40 sqm that cannot be fully closed into 25 student classrooms (or smaller) and is not the major access route to any other commons or classroom, hence protecting it from major through traffic. |
Streetspace | An open learning space about 3 m in width (allowing activity + circulation) that cannot be closed into classrooms and is exposed to major through traffic as the primary access space to other learning spaces. |
Meeting area | A small learning area of less than 40 sqm accommodating groups of 5 to 20. While such spaces may house seminars, the key criterion is that they cannot house a traditional class size. |
Fixed function | Any learning space fitted for specialised use such as “Arts”, “Science”, “IT”, “Computers”, “Wet Area”, “Music”, “Drama”, and “Resources”. |
Outdoor learning | Any outdoor area defined on the plan as an integral part of the learning cluster, generally labelled “outdoor learning”, “outdoor room”, or “learning court”. Simple access to the outdoors does not qualify. |
Scales | Biophilic Design Elements |
---|---|
Building | Green rooftops Sky gardens and green atria Rooftop garden Green walls Daylit interior spaces |
Block | Green courtyards Clustered housing around green areas Native species yards and spaces |
Street | Green streets Urban trees Low impact development (LID) Vegetated swales and skinny streets Edible landscaping High degree of permeability |
Neighbourhood | Stream daylighting, stream restoration Urban forests Ecology parks Community gardens Neighbourhood parks/pocket parks Greening grey fields and brownfields |
Community | Urban creeks and riparian areas Urban ecological networks Green schools City tree canopy Community forest/community orchards Greening utility corridors |
Region | River systems/floodplains Riparian systems Regional greenspace systems Greening major transport corridors |
School Name | Convex Map | Graph of Space Syntax | Mediated Space Relationship Diagram |
---|---|---|---|
Antonio Sant’Elia Kindergarten Italy—Giuseppe Terragni: 1937 | |||
Emerson Junior High School USA—Richard Neutra: 1938 | |||
UCLA Lab School USA—Neutra and Alexander: 1959 | |||
Montessori Primary School Netherlands—Herman Hertzberger: 1960 | |||
Boarding School Spain—Carme Pinós and Enric Miralles: 1994 | |||
Hellerup School Denmark—Arkitema: 2002 |
Case Studies | Criteria | Elements and Spaces |
---|---|---|
Antonio Sant’ Elia Kindergarten Como, Italy—1937 Giuseppe Terragni | Community/social interaction | Lobby Corridor Internal courtyard Outdoor courtyard Garden Veranda with canopy Transparent façade |
Natural exposure | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning | ||
Emerson Junior High School Los Angeles, USA—1938 Richard Neutra | Community/social interaction | Garden Courtyard Corridor Lobby Auditorium Sliding glass doors/walls Transparent façade Trees Outdoor classroom |
Physical education activity | ||
Natural exposure | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning | ||
UCLA Lab School Los Angeles, USA—1959 Richard Neutra and Robert Alexander | Community/social interaction | Children’s garden Common learning space Terrace Porch Stairs/bridge Corridor Outdoor courtyard Trees Lawn Transparent façade Sliding window walls In-between spaces like porch and patio |
Physical education activity | ||
Natural exposure | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning | ||
Montessori Primary School Delft, Netherlands—1960 Herman Hertzberger | Community/social interaction | Terrace Corridor library with chimney Communal kitchen Non-enclosed outdoor courtyard/street space Children’s garden Direct access to outside from the classroom terrace Transparent large façade Window seating area |
Physical education activity | ||
Natural exposure | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning | ||
Boarding School Morella, Spain—1994 Enric Miralles and Carme Pinós | Community/social interaction | Stairs Hall/lobby Terrace Corridor Patio Openable apertures/pivot doors Outdoor courtyard Game court Transparent façade/window walls |
Physical education activity | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning | ||
Hellerup School Copenhagen, Denmark—2002 Arkitema Architects | Community/social interaction | Atrium Hellerup stairs Outdoor courtyard Gymnasium Nook spaces like balconies and bridges |
Physical education activity | ||
Outdoor/indoor informal learning |
Design Guidelines/ Criteria | 1 Flexible Seating | 2 Vibrant Space | 3 Visual Interaction | 4 Greening Strategies | 5 Extendable Spaces | 6 Personal Spaces | 7 Shading Solutions | 8 Natural Interaction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mediated Spaces | |||||||||
Lobby | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Atrium | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Corridor | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Sky bridges | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Library | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Plaza | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Multi-purpose hall | NA | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Auditorium | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Communal kitchen | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Canteen | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Lunchroom | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Staircases with void | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Hellerup stairs | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Multi-purpose hall | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Sheltered amphitheatre | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Window seat/nook area | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
Wildflower garden | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Edible/food garden | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Science/pollinator garden | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Roof/sky garden | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Pond | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Sandpit | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Nature Trail | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Walkway path | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Natural terrain | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Grassy berm | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Lawn | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Outdoor classroom | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Common learning space | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Internal courtyard | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Internal play area | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Terrace | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Balcony | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Veranda with canopy | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Pool | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | |
Gym | ✓ | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Climbing wall | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Incline mound space | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Outdoor courtyard | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
External play space | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Rooftop play ground | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Grass sport pitches | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Hard game court | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | |
Running tracks | NA | NA | NA | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Ebrahimi Salari, E.; Westbrook, N. Ascending to Well-Being through Mediated Spaces: An Alternative to Informal Learning and Physical Activity Environments in Vertical Schools. Architecture 2024 , 4 , 613-638. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030032
Ebrahimi Salari E, Westbrook N. Ascending to Well-Being through Mediated Spaces: An Alternative to Informal Learning and Physical Activity Environments in Vertical Schools. Architecture . 2024; 4(3):613-638. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030032
Ebrahimi Salari, Elia, and Nigel Westbrook. 2024. "Ascending to Well-Being through Mediated Spaces: An Alternative to Informal Learning and Physical Activity Environments in Vertical Schools" Architecture 4, no. 3: 613-638. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030032
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
13th August 2024 Global Welfare and equalities
Please login to bookmark.
Username or Email Address
Remember Me
Top view of raked sand with stones
Curated case studies of ways governments can adopt and promote local wellbeing economies. Examples this week come from Spain, Canada, New Zealand and the U.S.
Have your own example to share, get in touch !
SPAIN: Using technology for wellbeing economy policy design Developed in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the City of Barcelona’s digital participation and democratic platform Decidim provides residents with a voice to decide on the future of their surroundings. The platform allows Barcelona’s citizens a chance to consult in an open participatory process, submit and track policy proposals, and take part in debates. When reviewing changes made on the platform, the city council considers not only the popularity of a proposal, but the number of neighbourhoods involved in the consultation process. By 2016, the platform had seen over 220,000 interactions, and the city had implemented wide ranging policy reforms aiming at re-municipalisation and localisation of resources and assets. The tool itself is open-source, ensuring it can be reused and improved upon by other governments should they wish. Decidim / Wellbeing Economy Alliance
CANADA: City incorporates social wellbeing into design guidelines With multi-unit housing developments increasingly common across British Columbia, Canada, the City of Port Moody sought to ensure any of this new housing supports residents’ health, happiness, and inclusion. The city partnered with Happy Cities to develop Social Wellbeing Design Guidelines for new multi-unit housing developments. These guidelines incentivise housing developers to include social features and shared spaces, to boost amenity and connection. The guidelines are free to download online, and were adopted by the council in June 2024. Happy Cities
USA: Californian city uses ‘science of wellbeing’ to better understand residents’ quality of life Santa Monica, California is renowned for its seemingly aspirational lifestyle, an affluent and cultural area with beaches, sun, mountains and top-rated schools. Yet the City of Santa Monica sought to understand whether its citizens really have a high quality of life, both objectively and subjectively. The city launched the Wellbeing Project, which saw the council develop personalised ways to measure local wellbeing factors before going out in person to collect data from 2,200 local residents. The project created a Wellbeing Index, measuring residents’ quality of life across place, health, opportunity, community, learning and life outlook. It found that while general wellbeing was high, Santa Monicans did not feel enough day-to-day connection in their neighbourhoods. To build on the project, the citylaunched the Office of Civic Wellbeing to embed wellbeing measurement and action in its agencies and departments, leading efforts on community partnerships and racial equality. Wellbeing Economy Alliance
NEW ZEALAND: Award winning employment scheme designed to improve socio-economic wellbeing outcomes Many of New Zealand’s poorest people live in South Auckland, a region with a large proportion of Māori and Pasifika. As part of its 30-year city plan and place-based regeneration programme, Auckland Council has committed to improve Māori wellbeing, strengthen employment outcomes and help communities in greatest need. One example of this is the council’s Kia Puāwai programme, which sees unemployed local graduates in the city’s south work towards employment in the council’s contact centre workforce. The council consolidated six of its contact centres for the scheme to help its underprivileged graduates find a career and permanent employment. The idea behind the scheme is that widespread youth employment would have a ripple effect on families and communities, improving their finances and long-term outlook overall. The scheme has been successful, with 90% of graduate entrants finding permanent employment and reporting “a new sense of purpose” and has won industry awards for its local leadership. Taituarā / Our Auckland
Report: Wellbeing economy ideas for cities: Lessons for implementation In this report, the concept of the wellbeing economy is broken down for those working at the city level. It outlines why this concept is increasingly necessary, and outlines six ways of working (vision, measurement, collaboration, citizen participation, prevention, and creative experimentation) related to successfully applying it at city level.
Report: Creating an impactful and sustainable: Wellbeing Economy for better public health The key concepts and associated approaches supporting a wellbeing economy are set out in this report, alongside how we can measure its benefits and impact. In addition, this report highlights how a wellbeing economy ties into health policy and how health actors can lead the concept.
Report: The wellbeing economy in brief: understanding the growing agenda and its implications This publication contains a collection of mini briefing papers that look at the idea of a wellbeing economy, how it relates to other ideas for economic change, and what some of the core elements of a wellbeing economy are.
Report: How to measure progress towards a wellbeing economy: distinguishing genuine advances from ‘window dressing’ Wellbeing economies seek to achieve social justice within the boundaries of our planet, acting as an alternative approach to economic design. This paper sets out a series of criteria to judge how successfully a local area is making progress towards a wellbeing economy.
Looking for even more? Make sure you subscribe to LGIU to never miss out on this essential service for the local government sector everywhere.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
If your council/organisation is not a member of LGIU then please contact us to discuss a free trial so that you and all your colleagues can discover the value of LGIU membership. Email us on [email protected] or call on 020 7554 2800.
This chapter examines an often-neglected outcome of organisational-change programmes: the effects they have on employee health and wellbeing. It presents a case study of the organisational restructuring of Reproductive Medicine in a UK National Health Service Trust. Based on in-depth interviews with four maternity-services teams incorporating midwives, clinical support workers and administrators, the chapter examines the various inter-relations between organisational change and health. Interviews were conducted at three points over two years, allowing a detailed investigation of the trajectory of health outcomes during the change process. The ways in which staff reacted to change and also acted to influence change were seen to have powerful impacts on their health.
Sign in with a library card.
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2022 | 1 |
January 2023 | 1 |
May 2024 | 1 |
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
© 2024 Universities and Colleges Employers Association A Company limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales, Company No. 2914327 Registered office: Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HU
IMAGES
COMMENTS
with Simplyhealth, examines the practices organisations have to support people's health at work. It provides people professionals and employers with benchmarking data on important areas such as absence management, wellbeing benefits provision and mental health. The survey for this 2022 edition was conducted online and sent to people ...
Case Study 1: TechCo's Holistic Wellness Approach TechCo, a leading technology company, recognized the importance of addressing the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of their employees. They implemented a holistic wellness program that encompassed various aspects of well-being.
sis yielded six workplace mental health and well-being best practices described below. In each section that follows, we highligh. case-study examples of employers who have used the specific practice being discussed. Note, however, that many of the employers have used multiple practices, suggesting that a broad, comprehensive approach to menta.
Wellbeing. Employee experience. Now in its 23rd year, the CIPD's Health and wellbeing at work survey, supported by Simplyhealth, provides readers with benchmarking data, information and analysis on current and emerging health and wellbeing practices. While these findings are based on UK data, the broader trends and implications should be of ...
Read more insights from our Organization Practice. To truly build a more resilient workforce and rebuild the economy in 2021 and beyond, employers should prioritize well-being, which is the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy. Businesses should treat well-being as a tangible skill, a critical business input, and a measurable outcome.
Well-being is the ability of individuals to address normal stresses, work productively, and realize one's highest potential. 1 Research shows that employees in good health are more likely to deliver optimal performance in the workplace. 1,2,3 Healthy employees not only have better quality of life, they also benefit from having a lower risk of disease, illness, and injury, as well as ...
1. Introduction. 1. The topic of well-being at work has become one of the key issues during the Covid-19. 2. pandemic in many organisations. The sudden situation of isolation, long-term remote ...
The case study described having health inequalities 'at the heart of its health and wellbeing strategy' which was echoed across the documents from multiple sectors across the system. Evidence of a values driven partnership with whole systems working was centred on the importance of place and involving people, with links to a 'strong third ...
The Southern Health and Social Care Trust (the Trust) is based in Northern Ireland. The Trust employs around 14,887 people across the four council areas of Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon; parts of Newry, Mourne and Downe; and the Mid-Ulster. Their Workplace Health and Wellbeing Framework 2022-2025 is part of their new People Framework ...
This study provides a comprehensive examination of university students' mental health and well-being in three Southern European countries, addressing the major mental health challenges among ...
Case studies. The Center's research identifies and explores best practices, which in turn are the foundation for policies, programs, and practices that are implemented by organizations seeking to improve worker health, safety, and well-being. Our case studies provide concise summaries of organizational change implemented using a Total Worker ...
The true impact of workplace wellbeing: two case studies. Embedded Expertise, Published: January 29, 2020 - Updated: August 22, 2022 Mental health concerns are a leading cause of workplace absence, and as we see increasing incidents of mental health-related sick days, workplace wellbeing is paramount for both organisational and individual success. ...
This qualitative multi-case [n = 7] study was co-designed with key stakeholders and aimed to explore experiences and needs of people who access and provide HSC at home. Data were collected in a regional area of Scotland (UK) via single [n = 10] or dyad [n = 4] semi-structured interviews with service users [n = 6], informal carers [n = 5] and ...
Case studies . Below are the top five Nesta Level case studies identified by the report: 1. Sleepio. Intervention area: Sleep Nesta level: 4 Reach: 25,000+ Availability: Internationally to English-speaking countries Sleepio is a digital training programme that aims to improve participants' sleep and in turn their wider mental health, using cognitive behavioural therapy.
Three UK's award-winning wellbeing strategy is based around three pillars to ensure initiatives cover every aspect of employee health. The organisation. Since its launch in 2003 Three UK has celebrated a number of firsts, including being the first mobile network to offer unlimited data. In July 2019 it launched the world's first 5G-ready ...
A series of mediational analyses found that competence and autonomy motives mediated relationships between incremental beliefs and all three measures of well-being. In all but one case, satisfaction with life, the direct effects of incremental beliefs on well-being were rendered non-significant when satisfaction of autonomy and competence needs ...
Introduction: International policies and legislation set a precedence of person-centred sustainable integrated Health and Social Care (HSC) that meets the health and wellbeing needs of service users through improved experiences. However, current research focuses on service models, with fewer studies investigating experiences and needs. ...
There was a mix of research presentations, panel discussions and roundtable workshops on various topics of mental health and wellbeing in construction. The panel consisted of 6 experts: Ruth Pott, Head of Workplace Wellbeing, BAM UK and Ireland; Jim Senior, CMIOSH, Health, Safety and Environmental Consultant
NHS health and wellbeing framework; Case studies; Case studies Improving personal health and wellbeing. Helping our people manage stress and anxiety - West Midlands Ambulance Service; How to establish a model of psychological support for employees during COVID-19 and beyond - Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust ...
An evaluation of the health and wellbeing needs of employees: An organizational case study J Occup Health. 2017 Jan 24;59(1):88-90. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0197-BR. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Author ... Workplace health and wellbeing is a major public health issue for employers. Wellbeing health initiatives are known to be cost-effective, especially when ...
Since the health checks and subsequent tailored health and wellbeing strategy there have been various broad improvements. Sickness absence dropped by 0.57% between 2016 and 2017, the lowest result seen since 2014. The latest employee engagement survey in late-2017 demonstrated that environment, health and safety areas are up by 3% and employee ...
Published. 18 March 2021. Some of our mental health campaigns and initiatives. The health and safety of our people and communities is at the heart of everything we do, with mental wellbeing ...
Mobile health technologies and commercial wearable devices might prove to be a useful resource for tracking recovery from COVID-19 and the prevalence of its long-term sequelae, as well as representing an abundant source of historical data. Mental wellbeing can be impacted negatively for an extended period following COVID-19.
At TCS, talent management and employee well-being go hand-in-hand. Focusing on wellness in the workplace improves employee health and happiness and makes for more vibrant, energetic, engaged, and creatively attuned employees. Well-being at TCS focuses not only on employees being productive within the organization, but also on their contribution ...
Additionally, case study analyses of exemplary schools are conducted to identify mediated spaces that enhance well-being and adapt these findings to vertical school designs. The correlation between health and well-being, outdoor activity, and the natural environment in learning environments has been recognised by pioneers like Samuel Wilderspin ...
The city launched the Wellbeing Project, which saw the council develop personalised ways to measure local wellbeing factors before going out in person to collect data from 2,200 local residents. The project created a Wellbeing Index, measuring residents' quality of life across place, health, opportunity, community, learning and life outlook.
It presents a case study of the organisational restructuring of Reproductive Medicine in a UK National Health Service Trust. Based on in-depth interviews with four maternity-services teams incorporating midwives, clinical support workers and administrators, the chapter examines the various inter-relations between organisational change and health.
The case study is divided into three main sections: Mental Wellbeing Policy; Embedding a supportive wellbeing culture; and Maintaining high standards into the future. From operating a Health and Wellbeing Steering Group to providing staff with access to on-line pilates and yoga, the study shares a wide variety of good practice initiatives.
Banner Health Case Study Highlight Reel When the behavioral health crisis assessment and referral team at Banner Health's Northern Colorado campus in Greeley heard about H.O.P.E. Certification, a program that is helping build resilience and wellbeing in industries facing acute suicide and other mental health crises, they were intrigued.
The respondents (n=251) ranged from 18 to 83 years old and were 85.66% (n=215) female. and 13.94% (n=35) male, with one undeclared (0.40%). The survey engaged with an ethnically, religiously and ...